IN THE CASE OF:
BOARD DATE: 18 September 2013
CASE NUMBER: AR20130006072
___________________________________________________________________________
Board Determination and Directed Action
After carefully examining the applicant's record of service during the period of enlistment under review, and considering the Discussion and Recommendation which follows, the Board determined the discharge was both proper and equitable and voted to deny relief.
Presiding Officer
I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Department of the Army Discharge Review Board in this case.
THE APPLICANTS REQUEST AND STATEMENT:
1. The applicant requests an upgrade of his uncharacterized discharge to honorable.
2. The applicant states in effect that he wants his characterization of service upgraded.
DISCHARGE UNDER REVIEW INFORMATION:
a. Application Receipt Date: 25 March 2013
b. Discharge Received: Uncharacterized
c. Date of Discharge: 30 November 2005
d. Reason/Authority/SPD/RE: Failed Medical Procurement Standards, Chapter 5 paragraph 5-11, JFW, RE-3
e. Unit of assignment: F Co, 2d Bn, 58th IN ITB, Fort Benning, GA
f. Current Enlistment Date/Term: 5 July 2005, 4 years and 19 weeks
g. Current Enlistment Service: 4 months, 26 days
h. Total Service: 4 months, 26 days
i. Time Lost: None
j. Previous Discharges: None
k. Highest Grade Achieved: E-2
l. Military Occupational Specialty: None
m. GT Score: NIF
n. Education: HS Graduate
o. Overseas Service: None
p. Combat Service: None
q. Decorations/Awards: None
r. Administrative Separation Board: No
s. Performance Ratings: None
t. Counseling Statements: None
u. Prior Board Review: No
SUMMARY OF SERVICE:
The applicant enlisted in the Regular Army on 5 July 2005, for a period of 4 years and 19 weeks. He was 18 years old at the time and a high school graduate. He was attending basic training at Fort Benning, GA when his discharge was initiated. The record does not contain any evidence of acts of valor or meritorious achievements.
SEPARATION FACTS AND CIRCUMSTANCES:
1. The applicants available record is void of the specific facts and circumstances concerning the events which led to the discharge from the Army. However, the record contains a properly constituted DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty), which was authenticated by the applicants signature. He was discharged as a PVT/E-2.
2. The DD Form 214 indicates that on 28 June 2005, the applicant was discharged under the provisions of Chapter 5, paragraph 5-11, AR 635-200, for failure to meet procurement medical fitness standards, with an SPD code of JFW, an RE code of 3, and a characterization of service of uncharacterized.
3. On 30 November 2005, Orders 334-2230, DA, HQ, US Infantry Center, Fort Benning, GA, discharged the applicant from the Regular Army, effective 30 November 2005.
4. The applicants service record does not contain any evidence of unauthorized absences or time lost.
EVIDENCE OBTAINED FROM THE APPLICANT'S RECORD:
There are no counseling statements or UCMJ actions in the record.
EVIDENCE SUBMITTED BY THE APPLICANT:
The applicant provided a DD Form 293 and a DD Form 214.
POST-SERVICE ACTIVITY:
None were provided by the applicant.
REGULATORY AUTHORITY:
1. Army Regulation 635-200 provides the basic authority for the separation of enlisted personnel. Paragraph 5-11 specifically provides that Soldiers who were not medically qualified under procurement medical fitness standards, when accepted for enlistment, or who became medically disqualified under these standards prior to entry on active duty or active duty training or initial entry training will be separated. A medical proceeding, regardless of the date completed, must establish that a medical condition was identified by appropriate medical authority within six months of the Soldiers initial entrance on active duty, that the condition would have permanently or temporarily disqualified the Soldier for entry into the military service had it been detected at that time, and the medical condition does not disqualify the Soldier from retention in the service under the provisions of Army Regulation 40-501, Chapter 3.
2. The characterization of service for Soldiers separated under this provision of the regulation will normally be honorable. However for Soldiers in entry-level status, it will be uncharacterized.
3. Army Regulation 635-200 states that a Soldier is in an entry-level status if the Soldier has not completed more than 180 days of creditable continuous active duty prior to the initiation of separation action.
4. Army Regulation 635-200, paragraph 3-7a, provides that an honorable discharge is a separation with honor and entitles the recipient to benefits provided by law. The honorable characterization is appropriate when the quality of the members service generally has met the standards of acceptable conduct and performance of duty for Army personnel, or is otherwise so meritorious that any other characterization would be clearly inappropriate. Whenever there is doubt, it is to be resolved in favor of the individual.
5. Army Regulation 635-200, paragraph 3-7b, provides that a general discharge is a separation from the Army under honorable conditions. When authorized, it is issued to a Soldier whose military record is satisfactory but not sufficiently meritorious to warrant an honorable discharge. A characterization of under honorable conditions may be issued only when the reason for the Soldiers separation specifically allows such characterization.
DISCUSSION AND RECOMMENDATION:
1. The applicants request for an upgrade of the characterization of his discharge was carefully considered. However, after a careful review of all the applicants available records for the period of enlistment under review and the issue submitted with the application, there are insufficient mitigating factors to merit an upgrade of the applicant's discharge.
2. The applicants available record is void of the specific facts and circumstances concerning the events which led to his discharge from the Army; however, the record contains a properly constituted DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty), which was not authenticated by the applicants signature. This document identifies the reason and characterization of the discharge.
3. The DD Form 214 shows the applicant was discharged under the provisions of Chapter 5, paragraph 5-11, AR 635-200, for failure to meet procurement medical fitness standards with service uncharacterized. In connection with such a discharge, the proceedings of an Entrance Physical Standards Board (EPSB) would have revealed the applicant had a medical condition which was disqualifying for enlistment and that it existed prior to entry on active duty. Subsequently, competent medical authority would have had to approve the findings of the EPSB. The applicant would have had to agree with the findings and the proposed action for administrative separation from the Army.
4. A Soldier is in entry-level status (ELS) for the first 180 days of continuous active duty. The purpose of the entry-level status is to provide the Soldier a probationary period. Army Regulation 635-200 also provides, except in cases of serious misconduct, that a Soldiers service will be uncharacterized when his separation is initiated while the Soldier is in entry level status. A general, under honorable conditions discharge is not authorized under ELS conditions and an honorable discharge may be granted only in cases which are clearly warranted by unusual circumstances involving outstanding personal conduct and/or performance of duty. The applicants service record contains no such unusual circumstances and his service did not warrant an honorable discharge. It appears that all requirements of law and regulation were met and that the rights of the applicant were fully protected throughout the separation process.
5. Furthermore, the burden of proof remains with the former Soldier to provide the appropriate documents such as the discharge packet or other evidence sufficient to explain the facts, circumstances, and reasons underlying the separation action, for the Board's consideration. If the applicant desires a personal appearance hearing, it will be his responsibility to meet the burden of proof since the discharge packet is not available in the official record.
6. Therefore, based on the available evidence and on the presumption of government regularity, it appears the reason for discharge and the characterization of service being both proper and equitable, recommend the Board deny relief.
SUMMARY OF ARMY DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD HEARING:
Type of Hearing: Records Review Date: 18 September 2013 Location: Washington, DC
Did the Applicant Testify? NoA
Counsel: None
Board Vote:
Character Change: 0 No Change: 5
Reason Change: 0 No Change: 5
(Board member names available upon request)
Board Action Directed:
Issue a new DD Form 214: No
Change Characterization to: No Change
Change Reason to: No Change
Change Authority for Separation: No Change
Change RE Code to: No Change
Grade Restoration to: NA
Other: NA
Legend:
AMHRR - Army Military Human Resource Record FG - Field Grade IADT Initial Active Duty Training RE - Reentry
AWOL - Absent Without Leave GD - General Discharge NA - Not applicable SCM- Summary Court Martial
BCD - Bad Conduct Discharge HS - High School NIF - Not in File SPCM - Special Court Martial
CG - Company Grade Article 15 HD - Honorable Discharge OAD - Ordered to Active Duty UNC - Uncharacterized Discharge
CID - Criminal investigation Department MP Military Police OMPF - Official Military Personnel File UOTHC - Under Other Than Honorable Conditions
ADRB Case Report and Directive (cont) AR20130006072
Page 2 of 5 pages
ARMY DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD (ADRB)
CASE REPORT AND DIRECTIVE
1
ARMY | DRB | CY2013 | AR20130007889
Prior Board Review: No SUMMARY OF SERVICE: The applicant enlisted in the Regular Army on 30 March 2004, for a period of 4 years. EVIDENCE SUBMITTED BY THE APPLICANT: The applicant provided a copy of his basic training and medical records, including the front page of DA Form 4707, dated 26 August 2004; DD Form 214 for service under current review; and his discharge orders. The characterization of service for Soldiers separated under this provision of the regulation will normally be honorable.
ARMY | DRB | CY2013 | AR20130007902
Prior Board Review: No SUMMARY OF SERVICE: The applicant enlisted in the Regular Army on 31 March 2005, for a period of 3 years and 16 weeks. A medical proceeding, regardless of the date completed, must establish that a medical condition was identified by appropriate medical authority within six months of the Soldiers initial entrance on active duty, that the condition would have permanently or temporarily disqualified the Soldier for entry into the military service had it been detected at...
ARMY | DRB | CY2013 | AR20130003564
On 26 January 2013, the separation authority directed the applicants discharge with a characterization of service listed as uncharacterized. EVIDENCE OBTAINED FROM THE APPLICANT'S RECORD: Entrance Physical Standards Board (EPSB) Proceedings dated, 18 January 2013. The characterization of service for Soldiers separated under this provision of the regulation will normally be honorable.
ARMY | DRB | CY2013 | AR20130011179
On 27 March 2013, the separation authority directed the applicants discharge with a characterization of service of an uncharacterized discharge. Army Regulation 635-200 states that a Soldier is in an entry-level status if the Soldier has not completed more than 180 days of creditable continuous active duty prior to the initiation of separation action. An RE Code of 3 indicates the applicant requires a waiver prior to being allowed to reenlist.
ARMY | DRB | CY2013 | AR20130006837
IN THE CASE OF: Mr. BOARD DATE: 4 October 2013 CASE NUMBER: AR20130006837 ___________________________________________________________________________ Board Determination and Directed Action After carefully examining the applicant's record of service during the period of enlistment under review, and considering the Discussion and Recommendation which follows, the Board determined the discharge was both proper and equitable and voted to deny relief. Prior Board Review: No SUMMARY OF...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | AR20110016145
Applicant Name: ????? Legal Basis for Separation: Army Regulation 635-200 provides the basic authority for the separation of enlisted personnel. Army Regulation 635-200 states that a Soldier is in an entry-level status if the Soldier has not completed more than 180 days of creditable continuous active duty prior to the initiation of separation action.
ARMY | DRB | CY2013 | AR20130007412
Presiding Officer I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Department of the Army Discharge Review Board in this case. On 11 January 2013, the unit commander recommended separation from the Service under the provisions of Chapter 5, paragraph 5-11, AR 635-200, by reason of failure to meet procurement medical fitness standards with an uncharacterized conditions discharge. The characterization of service for Soldiers separated under this...
ARMY | DRB | CY2013 | AR20130003244
The applicant requests an upgrade of his uncharacterized discharge to honorable and a change to the RE code. The characterization of service for Soldiers separated under this provision of the regulation will normally be honorable. However, Soldiers being processed for separation are assigned reentry codes based on their service records or the reason for discharge.
ARMY | DRB | CY2011 | AR20110018233
Applicant Name: ????? Army Regulation 635-200 states that a Soldier is in an entry-level status if the Soldier has not completed more than 180 days of creditable continuous active duty prior to the initiation of separation action. Yes No Counsel: None Witnesses/Observers: NA Exhibits Submitted: DD Form 293, DD Form 149, Physical Profile, dated 18 November 2005, Entrance Physical Standards Board (BPSBD) Proceedings, dated 18 November 2005, and DD Form 214 for the period of service under review.
ARMY | DRB | CY2013 | AR20130010973
On 25 March 2011, the separation authority directed the applicants discharge with a characterization of service listed as uncharacterized. The characterization of service for Soldiers separated under this provision of the regulation will normally be honorable. However, after a careful review of the entire applicants military records, and the issues and document submitted with the application, there are insufficient mitigating factors to merit an upgrade of the applicant's discharge.