Applicant Name: ?????
Application Receipt Date: 2011/08/08 Prior Review: Prior Review Date: NA
I. Applicant Request: Upgrade Reason Change RE Code Change
Issues: The applicant states, in effect, that he would like an upgrade of his discharge so that he can reenlist.
II. Were Proper Discharge and Separation Authority procedures followed?
Tender Offer: NA
See Attachments: Legal Medical Minority Opinion Exhibits
III. Discharge Under Review
Unit CDR Recommended Discharge: Date: 050426
Discharge Received: Date: 050510 Chapter: 5-11 AR: 635-200
Reason: Failed Medical/Physical Procurement Standards RE: SPD: JFW Unit/Location: HQ 46th AG HLD Det, Fort Knox, KY
Time Lost: None
Article 15s (Charges/Dates/Punishment): None
Courts-Martial (Charges/Dates/Punishment): None
Counseling Records Available: Yes No
IV. Soldiers Overall Record
Age at current enlistment: 28
Current ENL Date: 050316 Current ENL Term: 03 Years 17 Weeks
Current ENL Service: 00 Yrs, 01 Mos, 25 Days ?????
Total Service: 09 Yrs, 06 Mos, 10 Days ?????
Previous Discharges: ARNG-931118-940803/NA
ADT-940804-950303/HD
ARNG-950304-970708/NA
USARCG-970709-011117/NA
(Break-in-service)
ARNG-031030-050315/HD
Highest Grade: E4 Performance Ratings Available: Yes No
MOS: None GT: NIF EDU: HS Grad Overseas: None Combat: None
Decorations/Awards: NDSM, ASR
V. Post-Discharge Activity
City, State: Philadelphia, PA
Post Service Accomplishments: None Listed
VI. Facts, Circumstances, and Legal Basis for Separation
a. Facts and Circumstances:
The evidence of record indicates that an Entrance Physical Standards Board (EPSB) convened on 14 April 2005, and determined the applicants medical condition of having a psychotic disorder. The applicant reviewed and concurred with the findings of the Entrance Physical Standard Board (EPSB) proceedings, was advised of the impact of the discharge action, and did not submit a statement in his own behalf. The unit commander subsequently recommended separation from the Service.
On 26 April 2005, the unit commander notified the applicant of initiation of involuntary separation action under the provisions of Chapter 5, paragraph 5-11, AR 635-200, by reason of failure to meet procurement medical fitness standards with an uncharacterized discharge.
On 3 May 2005, the separation authority directed the applicants discharge with service as uncharacterized.
b. Legal Basis for Separation:
Army Regulation 635-200 provides the basic authority for the separation of enlisted personnel. Paragraph 5-11 specifically provides that Soldiers who were not medically qualified under procurement medical fitness standards, when accepted for enlistment, or who became medically disqualified under these standards prior to entry on active duty or active duty training or initial entry training will be separated. A medical proceeding, regardless of the date completed, must establish that a medical condition was identified by appropriate medical authority within six months of the Soldiers initial entrance on active duty, that the condition would have permanently or temporarily disqualified the Soldier for entry into the military service had it been detected at that time, and the medical condition does not disqualify the Soldier from retention in the service under the provisions of Army Regulation 40-501, Chapter 3. The characterization of service for Soldiers separated under this provision of the regulation will normally be honorable. However for Soldiers in entry-level status, it will be uncharacterized. Army Regulation 635-200 states that a Soldier is in an entry-level status if the Soldier has not completed more than 180 days of creditable continuous active duty prior to the initiation of separation action.
c. Response to Issues, Recommendation and Rationale:
After a careful review of all the applicants military records during the period of enlistment under review, the issue, and documents submitted with the application, the analyst found no mitigating factors that would merit an upgrade of the applicant's discharge.
The proceedings of the Entrance Physical Standards Board (EPSBD) revealed that the applicant had a medical condition which was disqualifying for enlistment and that it existed prior to entry on active duty. Subsequently, these findings were approved by competent medical authority. The applicant agreed with these findings and the proposed action for administrative separation from the Army. The analyst was satisfied that all requirements of law and regulation were met and the rights of the applicant were fully protected through the separation process.
A Soldier is in entry-level status (ELS) for the first 180 days of continuous active duty. The purpose of the entry-level status is to provide the Soldier a probationary period. Army Regulation 635-200 also provides, except in cases of serious misconduct, that a Soldiers service will be uncharacterized when his separation is initiated while the Soldier is in entry level status.
Further, a fully honorable discharge may be granted only in cases which are clearly warranted by unusual circumstances involving outstanding personal conduct and/or performance of duty. The analyst determined that no such unusual circumstances were present in the applicants record and his service did not warrant an honorable discharge.
The analyst noted the applicant's issue of wanting an upgrade of his discharge so he can reenlist. At the time of discharge the applicant was appropriately assigned a reentry eligibility (RE) code of 3. If reenlistment is desired, the applicant should contact the local recruiter to determine eligibility to reenlist. Those individuals can best advise a former service member as to the needs of the Army at the time, and are required to process waivers of reentry eligibility (RE) codes if appropriate.
In view of the foregoing, the analyst determined the reason for discharge and the characterization of service were both proper and equitable and recommends to the Board deny relief.
VII. Summary of Army Discharge Review Board Hearing
Type of Hearing: Date: 15 February 2012 Location: Washington, DC
Did the Applicant Testify? Yes No
Counsel: None
Witnesses/Observers: NA
Exhibits Submitted: DD Form 293 and DD Form 214 for the period of service under review.
VIII. Board Discussion, Determination, and Recommendation
After carefully examining the former service members record of service during the period of enlistment under review and considering the analysts recommendation and rationale, the Board determined that the discharge was both proper and equitable and voted to deny relief.
IX. Board Decision
Board Vote:
Character - Change 0 No change 5
Reason - Change 0 No change 5
(Board member names available upon request)
X. Board Action Directed
Issue a new DD Form 214
Change Characterization to:
Change Reason to: NA
Other: NA
RE Code:
Grade Restoration: No Yes Grade: NA
XI. Certification Signature
Approval Authority:
EDGAR J. YANGER
Colonel, U.S. Army
President, Army Discharge Review Board
BONITA E. TROTMAN
Lieutenant Colonel, U. S. Army
Secretary Recorder
?????
Legend:
AWOL Absent Without Leave GCM General Court Martial NA Not applicable SCM Summary Court Martial
BCD Bad Conduct Discharge GD General Discharge NIF Not in the file SPCM Special Court Martial
CG Company Grade Article 15 HD Honorable Discharge OAD Ordered to Active Duty UNC Uncharacterized Discharge
DD Dishonorable Discharge HS High School Graduate OMPF Official Military Personnel File UOTH Under Other Than Honorable
FG Field Grade Article 15 IADT Initial Active Duty Training RE Reentry Code Conditions
ARMY DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD - CASE REPORT AND DIRECTIVE
Case Number AR20110016145
______________________________________________________________________________
Page 1 of 3 pages
ARMY | DRB | CY2007 | AR20070018460
Applicant Name: Application Receipt Date: 2007/12/04 Prior Review: Prior Review Date: NA I. Facts and Circumstances: The evidence of record shows that on 29 October 2004, the unit commander notified the applicant of initiation of involuntary separation action under the provisions of Chapter 5-11, AR 635-200, by reason of failure to meet procurement medical fitness standards with an uncharacterized discharge. Army Regulation 635-200 states that a soldier is in an entry-level status if the...
ARMY | DRB | CY2008 | AR20080005107
Applicant Name: ????? Facts and Circumstances: The evidence of record shows that on 8 September 1994, after careful consideration of medical records, laboratory findings, and medical examinations, the Entrance Physical Standards Board (EPSB) found that the applicant was medically unfit for enlistment in accordance with current medical fitness standards, she was diagnosed with an anterior cruciate ligament deficient left knee, and in the opinion of the evaluating physicians the condition...
ARMY | DRB | CY2008 | AR20080020022
Facts and Circumstances: The evidence of record shows that on 27 August 1996, after careful consideration of medical records, laboratory findings, and medical examinations, the Entrance Physical Standards Board (EPSB) found that the applicant was medically unfit for enlistment in accordance with current medical fitness standards. On 17 September 1996, the separation authority directed that the applicant be discharged with an uncharacterized separation of service. A fully honorable...
ARMY | DRB | CY2009 | AR20090007523
Applicant Name: ????? Facts and Circumstances: The evidence of record shows that on 21 August 2008, after careful consideration of medical records, laboratory findings, and medical examinations, the Entrance Physical Standards Board (EPSB) found that the applicant was medically unfit for enlistment in accordance with current medical fitness standards, he was diagnosed with a pre existing left foot hallux. Board Action Directed President, Army Discharge Review Board Issue a new DD Form...
ARMY | DRB | CY2009 | AR20090001852
Applicant Name: ????? Application Receipt Date: 2009/01/05 Prior Review: Prior Review Date: NA I. Facts and Circumstances: The evidence of record shows that on 29 August 2008, after careful consideration of medical records, laboratory findings, and medical examinations, the Entrance Physical Standards Board (EPSB) found that the applicant was medically unfit for enlistment in accordance with current medical fitness standards, he was diagnosed with a left knee meniscal tear, chronic, and in...
ARMY | DRB | CY2008 | AR20080011277
Applicant Name: ????? Facts and Circumstances: The evidence of record shows that on 22 November 1995, after careful consideration of medical records, laboratory findings, and medical examinations, the Entrance Physical Standards Board (EPSB) found that the applicant was medically unfit for enlistment in accordance with current medical fitness standards, he was diagnosed with asthma and in the opinion of the evaluating physicians the condition existed prior to service. Board Action Directed...
ARMY | DRB | CY2007 | AR20070003642aC071031
Facts and Circumstances: The evidence of record shows that on 5 November 1997, after careful consideration of medical records, laboratory findings, and medical examinations, the Physical Evaluation Board (EPSB) found that the applicant was medically unfit for enlistment in accordance with current medical fitness standards and in the opinion of the evaluating physicians the conditions(s) existed prior to service. Legal Basis for Separation: Army Regulation 635-200 provides the basic...
ARMY | DRB | CY2009 | AR20090009108
Applicant Name: ????? On 4 February 2009, the intermediate commander reviewed the proposed discharge action and recommended approval of the separation action with an uncharacterized discharge. Army Regulation 635-200 states that a Soldier is in an entry-level status if the Soldier has not completed more than 180 days of creditable continuous active duty prior to the initiation of separation action.
ARMY | DRB | CY2012 | AR20120006041
Applicant Name: ????? On 19 March 2010, the separation authority reviewed the proposed action and directed the applicants discharge from the Army with service uncharacterized. Army Regulation 635-200 states that a Soldier is in an entry-level status if the Soldier has not completed more than 180 days of creditable continuous active duty prior to the initiation of separation action.
ARMY | DRB | CY2012 | AR20120004215
Applicant Name: ????? On 29 October 2009, the applicant reviewed and concurred with the findings of the Entrance Physical Standard Board (EPSB) proceedings, and requested to be discharged from the Army. Legal Basis for Separation: Army Regulation 635-200 provides the basic authority for the separation of enlisted personnel.