Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | DRB | CY2011 | AR20110019895
Original file (AR20110019895.txt) Auto-classification: Denied
Applicant Name:  ?????

Application Receipt Date: 2011/08/20	Prior Review:     Prior Review Date: NA     

I.  Applicant Request:  Upgrade     Reason Change     RE Code Change    

Issues: The applicant states:  "I realize that this is going to be a long shot but I'll do my very best to explain to you what happened. I joined the Army at 17 out of my junior year wanting to go Infantry and then hopefully to Ranger School. I didn't score substantially well on my ASVAB but for some reason I was not allowed to choose any kind of combat arms as a job. I enjoyed basic training very much and loved the friends I made there and at my duty station; who I'd consider to be better friend's than most of the people from back home.

I was to report to Ft. Hood January 11th 2009 and I did not report until the end of June 2009. This is where I first went wrong; I lost my military mindset and got into a lot of bad habits I partook in before I joined. I returned to Fort Hood and I was so grateful that 1SG thought I was truly a good Soldier and gave me a chance to stay in. I went five months without pay due to an issue that happened when I was AWOL, which is my own fault(basically got dropped from the whole Army's system ie. I did not exist anymore).

During these five months I got in trouble for underage drinking and was referred the ADAPT course and completed the two day class. Afterwords I got in another underage drinking incident and was given another Field Grade Article 15 and it was added onto my AWOL Article.  While doing extra duty I ended up hanging out with the wrong people and fail my drug test. I did receive another Field Grade Article 15 for that. 

I still look up to all of my command and all the NCO's in my platoon. They did what they could to steer me in the right direction and I just couldn't do the right thing when I was off duty. I could give you every one of their contact information and I know they would say the same.

During my time being AWOL I incurred a lot of debt and was very stressed out. I lived in my car  in fear of going to the brig and in fear of showing my face to my parents. I also what put in jail for an ABC law violation and was not taken by MP's do to me not being in the Army's system anymore. I talked to some people and did some research before I finally turned myself in. It was a tremendously stressful time for me and I know things would be different if it had not happened.

Basically what I'm saying is I know that I messed up; I should have been discharged long before I failed that drug test.I just want the chance to prove myself again to the military. I would go through basic and everything else again just to have to chance to show that I can be one of the best Soldiers out there.

Civilian life just isn't for me and the worst thing was to come home to nothing but disappointment from my friend's and family. I've been here in the South for a year and a half and had a few jobs working at automobile dealerships and restaurants. I can't help but think about all the great friends and leaders I had in Texas, even in AIT or basic training. 

What I'm trying to say is, I just want another chance to serve my country and even if this doesn't go through I'm going to do my best to find a way. I owe it to my country and I owe it to the people that supported and believed in me that I selfishly let down when I was younger. I'll do whatever it takes and I will get you whatever references or information you need from me to make this happen."










II.  Were Proper Discharge and Separation Authority procedures followed?	     
Tender Offer:   NA

See Attachments:  Legal     Medical     Minority Opinion     Exhibits 

III.  Discharge Under Review
Unit CDR Recommended Discharge: 	   Date: 100208
Discharge Received: 			   Date: 100310   Chapter: 14-12c (2)       AR: 635-200
Reason: Misconduct (Drug Abuse)	   RE:     SPD: JKK   Unit/Location: 13th Chemical Company, 2nd Chemical Battalion, 48th Chemical Brigade, Fort Hood, TX 

Time Lost: AWOL x 1 (090220-090626) for 127 days; the applicant surrendered to the military authorities at Fort Jackson, SC.

Article 15s (Charges/Dates/Punishment): 090929, wrongfully consumed alcohol while under the legal age of 21 years old (090731), AWOL (090220-090626), reduction to Private (E-1), extra duty and restriction for 45 days (FG)

100129, wrongfully used cocaine between (091017-091116), forfeiture of $723.00 pay per month for two months, extra duty and restriction for 45 days (FG).

Courts-Martial (Charges/Dates/Punishment): None

Counseling Records Available: Yes    No 

IV.  Soldier’s Overall Record
Age at current enlistment:  17
Current ENL Date: 080820    Current ENL Term: 6 Years  25 weeks
Current ENL Service: 	1 Yrs, 2  Mos, 14  Days The net active service this period on the DD Form 214 block 12c is incorrect; should be as annotated above.  The applicant has a period of AWOL that was not shown in block 29.  See Police Desk Blotter dated (090716).
Total Service:  		1 Yrs, 2  Mos, 14  Days ?????
Previous Discharges: 	None
Highest Grade: E-2		Performance Ratings Available: Yes    No 
MOS: 74D10 Chemicl Oper Spec   GT: 114   EDU: HS Grad   Overseas: None   Combat: None
Decorations/Awards: NDSM

V.  Post-Discharge Activity
City, State:  ?????
Post Service Accomplishments: None submitted by the applicant.

VI.  Facts, Circumstances, and Legal Basis for Separation

       a.  Facts and Circumstances:
       The evidence of record shows that on 8 February 2010, the unit commander notified the applicant of initiation of separation action under the provisions of Chapter 14-12c, AR 635-200, by reason of misconduct-commission of a serious offense; in that he went AWOL from (090220-090626) and tested positive for marijuana and cocaine on (091116), with a general, under honorable conditions discharge. 
       
       He was advised of his rights. 10 February 2010, the applicant waived legal counsel, was advised of the impact of the discharge action, and did not submit a statement in his own behalf.  The unit commander subsequently recommended separation from the service and waiver of further rehabilitative efforts.  The intermediate commander reviewed the proposed discharge action and recommended approval of the separation action with a general, under honorable conditions discharge.  On 19 February 2010, the separation authority waived further rehabilitative efforts and directed that the applicant be discharged with a characterization of service of general, under honorable conditions. 

       b.  Legal Basis for Separation:  
       Army Regulation 635-200 sets forth the basic authority for the separation of enlisted personnel.  Chapter 14 of this regulation establishes policy and prescribes procedures for separating members for misconduct.  Specific categories include minor disciplinary infractions, a pattern of misconduct, and commission of a serious offense, to include abuse of illegal drugs, convictions by civil authorities and desertion or absence without leave.  Action will be taken to separate a member for misconduct when it is clearly established that rehabilitation is impractical or unlikely to succeed.  Army policy states that an under other than honorable conditions discharge is normally considered appropriate; however, a general, under honorable conditions or an honorable discharge may be granted.   

       c.  Response to Issues, Recommendation and Rationale:  
       After a careful review of all the applicant’s military records, and the issue submitted with the application, the analyst found no mitigating factors which would merit an upgrade of the applicant's discharge.  
       
       The analyst determined that the applicant’s discharge was appropriate because the quality of his service was not consistent with the Army's standards for acceptable personal conduct and performance of duty by military personnel.  By the misconduct, the applicant diminished the quality of his service below that meriting a fully honorable discharge.  
       
       The applicant provided no independent corroborating evidence demonstrating that either the command's action was erroneous or that the applicant’s service mitigated the misconduct or poor duty performance.  
       
       The analyst noted the applicant's issue that he joined the Army at the age of 17 out of his junior year wanting to go Infantry and then hopefully to Ranger School.  The analyst found that the applicant met entrance qualification standards to include age.  The analyst further found no evidence that the applicant was any less mature than other Soldiers of the same age who successfully completed military service.
       
       Further, the analyst found no evidence of arbitrary or capricious actions by the command.  The analyst was satisfied that all requirements of law and regulation were met and the rights of the applicant were fully protected throughout the separation process.  
       
       The applicant further contends that he just want another chance to serve his country.  At the time of discharge the applicant was appropriately assigned a reentry eligibility (RE) code of “4.”  An RE code of “4” cannot be waived and the applicant is no longer eligible for reenlistment.  
       
       Therefore, the analyst determined the reason for discharge and the characterization of service were both proper and equitable and recommends to the Board to deny relief. 

VII.  Summary of Army Discharge Review Board Hearing

Type of Hearing: 		Date: 4  April 2012         Location: Washington, DC

Did the Applicant Testify?  Yes     No  

Counsel: None

Witnesses/Observers: NA 

Exhibits Submitted: Online application dated 20 August 2011.







VIII.  Board Discussion, Determination, and Recommendation
After carefully examining the applicant’s record of service during the period of enlistment under review and considering the analyst’s recommendation and rationale, the Board determined that the discharge was both proper and equitable and voted to deny relief.  
        
IX.  Board Decision						
Board Vote:
Character - Change 0    No change 5
Reason -     Change 1    No change 4
(Board member names available upon request)

X.  Board Action Directed
Issue a new DD Form 214  
Change Characterization to: 
Change Reason to: No Change
Other: No Change
RE Code: 
Grade Restoration:   No   Yes   Grade: No Change

XI.  Certification Signature
Approval Authority:




EDGAR J. YANGER
Colonel, U.S. Army
President, Army Discharge Review Board




BONITA E. TROTMAN
Lieutenant Colonel, U. S. Army
Secretary Recorder















Legend:
AWOL    	Absent Without Leave		GCM   General Court Martial	NA   Not applicable			SCM	Summary Court Martial
BCD   	Bad Conduct Discharge	GD      General Discharge	NIF   Not in the file			SPCM	Special Court Martial
CG 	Company Grade Article 15	HD      Honorable Discharge	OAD   Ordered to Active Duty		UNC	Uncharacterized Discharge  
DD 	Dishonorable Discharge	HS       High School Graduate	OMPF   Official Military Personnel File	UOTH  	Under Other Than Honorable 
FG	Field Grade Article 15		IADT   Initial Active Duty Training	RE     Reentry Code				Conditions 
ARMY DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD - CASE REPORT AND DIRECTIVE

Case Number AR20110019895
______________________________________________________________________________


Page 1 of 4 pages

Similar Decisions

  • NAVY | DRB | 2000_Navy | ND00-00816

    Original file (ND00-00816.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Decision A documentary discharge review was conducted in Washington, D.C. on 010111. When he told me I can do this request I became very excited as this provides me another chance to achieve my dreams and goals with the U.S. Navy. I hope that you can see my desire in wanting to serve and allow me the chance to correct my mistakes and prove to the navy that I can be an excellent sailor.

  • NAVY | DRB | 2002_Navy | ND02-00884

    Original file (ND02-00884.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    ND02-00884 Applicant’s Request The application for discharge review, received 020605, requested that the characterization of service on the discharge be changed to honorable. I would be in charge of the Bravo working party. When I was discharged, I returned to Tennessee and started my life over as I had intended.

  • USMC | DRB | 1999_Marine | MD99-00606

    Original file (MD99-00606.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    MD99-00606 Applicant’s Request The application for discharge review, received 990326, requested that the characterization of service on the discharge be changed to general/under honorable conditions. After being hesitant about signing for 4 years, he told me I could always get out if it didn't work out for me. He told me I'd just have to leave if I wanted out.

  • ARMY | DRB | CY2009 | AR20090015343

    Original file (AR20090015343.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Applicant Name: ????? Facts and Circumstances: Evidence of record shows that on 27 November 2007, the unit commander notified the applicant of initiation of separation action under the provisions of Chapter 14, paragraph 14-12c(2), AR 635-200, by reason of misconduct—commission of a serious offense (abuse of illegal drugs) for having tested positive for cocaine (071030), with a general, under honorable conditions discharge. Board Action Directed President, Army Discharge Review Board Issue...

  • ARMY | DRB | CY2006 | AR20060008529

    Original file (AR20060008529.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Applicant Request Request: Upgrade Reason Change RE Code Change Issues: The applicant states, in effect, that she did every thing they ask of me I was the lower enlisted personal involved in adultery. Chapter 10 of that regulation provides, in pertinent part, that a member who has committed an offense or offenses for which the authorized punishment includes a punitive discharge may submit a request for a discharge for the good of the service in lieu of trial by court-martial. It is also...

  • NAVY | DRB | 2001_Navy | ND01-00343

    Original file (ND01-00343.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    As I previously mentioned the Carl Vinson was having major drug problems and lot sailors were being busted for drugs it was during this time that several of my roommates close friends were busted for drug abuse and put on restriction. We then called in my roommates in and they were asked about three questions in which they denied any involment and then they were dismissed they then called the two friends of my roommates and they both testified under oath about what my roommates had told...

  • AF | DRB | CY2005 | FD2005-00199

    Original file (FD2005-00199.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The records indicatcd the applicant received a General discharge for not attending drills (weekend duty) in the Air National Guard. In view of the foregoing findings the Board further concludes that therc cxists no legal or equitable basis for upgrade of discharge, thus the applicant's discharge should not be changed. Since she's retired Air Force (20+ years), she suggested it as a good start into adult life for me.

  • USMC | DRB | 2001_Marine | MD01-00122

    Original file (MD01-00122.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    MD01-00122 Applicant’s Request The application for discharge review, received 001102, requested that the characterization of service on the discharge be changed to honorable. He would try to intimidate me in the shop everyday, by forcing respect from me, so the Marine sergeant requested that I be on this operation with him. At this time the applicant has not provided sufficient documentation of good character and conduct.

  • NAVY | DRB | 2002_Navy | ND02-01094

    Original file (ND02-01094.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    ND02-01094 Applicant’s Request The application for discharge review, received 020801, requested that the characterization of service on the discharge be changed to honorable and the reason for the discharge be changed. The Naval Discharge Review Board (NDRB) also advised that the board first conducts a documentary review prior to any personal appearance hearing. My evidence of this situation is Lt. P_ of the USS Truman who went out the way to help me talk to my wife and my wife harassment...

  • ARMY | DRB | CY2010 | AR20100022972

    Original file (AR20100022972.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Applicant Name: ????? The intermediate commander reviewed the proposed discharge action and recommended approval of the separation action with a general, under honorable conditions discharge. The Board determined that the overall length and quality of the applicant’s service, to include his combat service, mitigated the discrediting entries in his service record.