Applicant Name: ?????
Application Receipt Date: 2011/10/20 Prior Review: Prior Review Date: NA
I. Applicant Request: Upgrade Reason Change RE Code Change
Issues: The applicant states, in effect, that the characterization of his discharge would be changed after 6 months. He is also requesting that his date of birth as shown on the DD Form 214 be changed. He made one mistakes and poor choices but has already suffered much as a consequence of his discharge from the Army. He is sorry for what he did but requests a change to his discharge because no one will hire him.
II. Were Proper Discharge and Separation Authority procedures followed?
Tender Offer: NA
See Attachments: Legal Medical Minority Opinion Exhibits
III. Discharge Under Review
Unit CDR Recommended Discharge: Date: 050408
Discharge Received: Date: 050429 Chapter: 14-12c(2) AR: 635-200
Reason: Misconduct RE: SPD: JKK Unit/Location: 62d EN Co, Fort Benning, GA
Time Lost: 25 days, AWOL (040806-040830), mode of return is unknown. Not reflected on the DD Form 214.
Article 15s (Charges/Dates/Punishment): 040915, AWOL (040806-040830), reduction to E-2, forfeiture of $668, 45 days of extra duty and restriction (FG)
Courts-Martial (Charges/Dates/Punishment): 050411, wrongfully used methamphetamines (041011-041018), wrongfully used marijuana (050121-050131), reduction to E-1, forfeiture of $823, and confinement for 30 days (SCM)
Counseling Records Available: Yes No
IV. Soldiers Overall Record
Age at current enlistment: 17
Current ENL Date: 010622 Current ENL Term: 4 Years ?????
Current ENL Service: 03 Yrs, 10 Mos, 08 Days ?????
Total Service: 03 Yrs, 10 Mos, 08 Days ?????
Previous Discharges: None
Highest Grade: E-4 Performance Ratings Available: Yes No
MOS: 21E10/Hvy Constr Opr GT: NIF EDU: HS Grad Overseas: None Combat: TDS in a memorandum states the applicant served in Kuwait/Iraq for 9 months in 2003 (NIF)
Decorations/Awards: GWOTSM, ASR
V. Post-Discharge Activity
City, State: ?????
Post Service Accomplishments: None listed
VI. Facts, Circumstances, and Legal Basis for Separation
a. Facts and Circumstances:
The evidence of record shows that on 6 April 2005, the unit commander notified the applicant of initiation of separation action under the provisions of Chapter 14, paragraph 14-12c(1), AR 635-200, by reason of misconduct - commission of a serious offense, for testing positive por marijuana and methamphetamines with an under other than honorable conditions discharge. The applicant was advised of his rights.
On 28 February 2005, as part of a court-martial plea agreement, the applicant consulted with legal counsel, was advised of the impact of the discharge action, unconditionally waived his right to an administrative separation board, and did not submit a statement in his own behalf. The unit commander subsequently recommended separation from the Army and waiver of further rehabilitative efforts. The intermediate commanders reviewed the proposed action and recommended approval of the separation with an under other than honorable conditions discharge.
On 15 April 2005, the separation authority approved the unconditional waiver request, waived further rehabilitation and directed the applicants discharge with a characterization of service of under other than honorable conditions.
b. Legal Basis for Separation:
Army Regulation 635-200 sets forth the basic authority for the separation of enlisted personnel. Chapter 14 of this regulation establishes policy and prescribes procedures for separating members for misconduct. Specific categories include minor disciplinary infractions, a pattern of misconduct, and commission of a serious offense, to include abuse of illegal drugs, convictions by civil authorities and desertion or absence without leave. Action will be taken to separate a member for misconduct when it is clearly established that rehabilitation is impractical or unlikely to succeed. Army policy states that an under other than honorable conditions discharge is normally considered appropriate; however, a general, under honorable conditions or an honorable discharge may be granted.
c. Response to Issues, Recommendation and Rationale:
After carefully examining the applicants record of service during the period of enlistment under review and the issue and documents submitted with the application, the analyst determined that the discharge was both proper and equitable.
The analyst determined that the applicants discharge was appropriate because the quality of service was not consistent with the Army's standards for acceptable personal conduct and performance of duty by military personnel. The applicant, by violating the Army's policy not to possess or use illegal drugs, compromised the trust and confidence placed in a Soldier. The applicant, as a Soldier, had the duty to support and abide by the Army's drug policies. By abusing illegal drugs, the applicant knowingly risked a military career and diminished the quality of service below that meriting a fully honorable discharge.
The applicant contends that he has already suffered enough, cant find a job and that his date of birth is incorrect. The analyst noted the applicant's issues; however, the Board does not grant relief solely for the purpose of gaining employment or enhancing employment opportunities. Furthermore, the analyst noted the applicants issue about his request for an automatic upgrade. However, the U.S. Army does not have, nor has it ever had, a policy to automatically upgrade discharges. Each case is decided on its own merits when an applicant submits a DD Form 293 requesting a change in discharge. Changes may be warranted if the Board determines that the characterization of service or the reason for discharge or both were improper or inequitable.
Finally, the analyst noted the applicant's issue about his date of birth being incorrect on the DD Form 214; however, the correction the applicant requests to be made to the DD Form 214, does not fall within the purview of this Board. The applicant may apply to the Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR), utilizing the enclosed DD Form 149 regarding this matter. A DD Form 149 may also be obtained from a Veterans' Service Organization.
Therefore, the analyst determined the reason for discharge and the characterization of service were both proper and equitable and recommends to the Board to deny relief.
VII. Summary of Army Discharge Review Board Hearing
Type of Hearing: Date: 27 April 2012 Location: Washington, DC
Did the Applicant Testify? Yes No
Counsel: None
Witnesses/Observers: NA
Exhibits Submitted: DD Form 149, a self-authored statement, birth certificate.
VIII. Board Discussion, Determination, and Recommendation
After carefully examining the applicants record of service during the period of enlistment under review and considering the analysts recommendation and rationale, the Board determined that the discharge was both proper and equitable and voted to deny relief.
IX. Board Decision
Board Vote:
Character - Change 0 No change 5
Reason - Change 0 No change 5
(Board member names available upon request)
X. Board Action Directed
Issue a new DD Form 214
Change Characterization to:
Change Reason to: NA
Other: NA
RE Code:
Grade Restoration: No Yes Grade: NA
XI. Certification Signature
Approval Authority:
EDGAR J. YANGER
Colonel, U.S. Army
President, Army Discharge Review Board
BONITA E. TROTMAN
Lieutenant Colonel, U. S. Army
Secretary Recorder
?????
Legend:
AWOL Absent Without Leave GCM General Court Martial NA Not applicable SCM Summary Court Martial
BCD Bad Conduct Discharge GD General Discharge NIF Not in the file SPCM Special Court Martial
CG Company Grade Article 15 HD Honorable Discharge OAD Ordered to Active Duty UNC Uncharacterized Discharge
DD Dishonorable Discharge HS High School Graduate OMPF Official Military Personnel File UOTH Under Other Than Honorable
FG Field Grade Article 15 IADT Initial Active Duty Training RE Reentry Code Conditions
ARMY DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD - CASE REPORT AND DIRECTIVE
Case Number AR20110021121
______________________________________________________________________________
Page 1 of 3 pages
ARMY | DRB | CY2011 | AR20110021871
On 12 July 2004, the separation authority waived further rehabilitation and directed the applicants discharge with a characterization of service of general, under honorable conditions. The analyst determined that the applicants discharge was appropriate because the quality of his service was not consistent with the Army's standards for acceptable personal conduct and performance of duty by military personnel. The applicable Army regulation states that there are circumstances in which the...
ARMY | DRB | CY2009 | AR20090015690
Applicant Name: ????? Application Receipt Date: 2009/09/08 Prior Review: Prior Review Date: NA I. Applicant Request: Upgrade Reason Change RE Code Change Issues: The applicant states: "According to my commander and first sargeant, when i was enlisted the correct action for failing a urinalysis was immediate discharge.
ARMY | DRB | CY2009 | ar20090011941
Applicant Request: Upgrade Reason Change RE Code Change Issues: The applicant states,"Separtion (sic) code does not match current RED REPORT. The narrative reason specified by Army Regulations for a discharge under this paragraph is "Misconduct (Civil Conviction)," the separation code is "JKB," and the reentry code is "RE 3." Board Action Directed President, Army Discharge Review Board Issue a new DD Form 214 Change Characterization to: Change Reason to: No Change Other: NA RE Code: Grade...
ARMY | DRB | CY2008 | AR20080007224
Applicant Name: ????? Discharge Under Review Unit CDR Recommended Discharge: Date: NIF Discharge Received: Date: 041105 Chapter: 3 AR: 635-200 Reason: Court-Martial, Other RE: SPD: JJD Unit/Location: Battery D, 1st Battalion, 4th Air Defense Artillery, APO AE 09185 Time Lost: Military Confinement for 96 days from (030410-030714), as a result of the special court-martial sentence. After a thorough review of the applicants record and the issue submitted with the application, the analyst...
ARMY | DRB | CY2008 | AR20080003801
Applicant Name: ????? The separation authority waived further rehabilitative efforts and directed that the applicant be discharged with a characterization of service of general, under honorable conditions. Board Action Directed President, Army Discharge Review Board Issue a new DD Form 214 Change Characterization to: Change Reason to: No Change Other: NA RE Code: Grade Restoration: No Yes Grade: None ARMY DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD - CASE REPORT AND DIRECTIVE Case Number...
ARMY | DRB | CY2008 | AR20080020038
Applicant Name: ????? On 20 August 2007, the separation authority waived further rehabilitative efforts and directed that the applicant be discharged with a characterization of service of general, under honorable conditions. Board Action Directed President, Army Discharge Review Board Issue a new DD Form 214 Change Characterization to: Change Reason to: NA Other: NA RE Code: Grade Restoration: No Yes Grade: NA ARMY DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD - CASE REPORT AND DIRECTIVE Case Number...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | AR20110003970
Applicant Name: ????? On 1 November 2006, the applicant consulted with legal counsel, was advised of the impact of the discharge action, unconditionally waived his right to an administrative separation board, and did not submit a statement in his own behalf. The analyst determined that the applicants discharge was appropriate because his quality of service was not consistent with the Army's standards for acceptable personal conduct and performance of duty by military personnel.
ARMY | DRB | CY2012 | AR20120022404
Facts and Circumstances: The evidence of record shows that on 19 February 2008, the unit commander notified the applicant of initiation of separation action under the provisions of Chapter 14, paragraph 14-12c, AR 635-200, by reason of misconduct commission of a serious offense for the use of methamphetamine x 4 (070619, 071116, 071226, and 080117), with an under other than honorable conditions discharge. On 29 February 2008, the separation authority waived further rehabilitation and...
ARMY | DRB | CY2006 | AR20060012917
Current ENL Service: 02 Yrs, 09 Mos, 20 Days ????? The separation authority waived further rehabilitative efforts and directed that the applicant be discharged with a characterization of service of general, under honorable conditions. Board Discussion, Determination, and Recommendation After carefully examining the applicants record of service during the period of enlistment under review and considering the analysts recommendation and rationale, the Board determined that the discharge...
ARMY | DRB | CY2009 | ar20090012536
The narrative reason specified by Army Regulations for a discharge under this paragraph is "Misconduct (Drug Abuse)", and the separation code is "JKK." Yes No Counsel: Wabasha County Veteran Service Office 625 Jefferson Avenue Wabasha MN 55981 Witnesses/Observers: NA Exhibits Submitted: Department of Veterans Affairs Rating Decision dated 5 August 2008 (10 pages). Board Action Directed President, Army Discharge Review Board Issue a new DD Form 214 Change Characterization to: Change Reason...