Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | DRB | CY2011 | AR20110020093
Original file (AR20110020093.txt) Auto-classification: Denied
Applicant Name:  ?????

Application Receipt Date: 2011/10/05	Prior Review:     Prior Review Date: NA     

I.  Applicant Request:  Upgrade     Reason Change     RE Code Change    

Issues: The applicant states, "I was pending a medical evaluation board.  I was undergoing a lot of stresses at the time and instead of helping me my chain of command made me drop my MEB and get a general court martial.  This caused extreme anxiety and depression and made me very mentally unstable more than I already am.  They pushed me into failure instead of helping me and my medical conditions and I recieved an undeserved other than honorable discharge."

II.  Were Proper Discharge and Separation Authority procedures followed?	     
Tender Offer:   NA

See Attachments:  Legal     Medical     Minority Opinion     Exhibits 

III.  Discharge Under Review
Unit CDR Recommended Discharge: 	   Date: 101027
Discharge Received: 			   Date: 110105   Chapter: 10      AR: 635-200
Reason: In Lieu Of Trial By Court-Martial	   RE:     SPD: KFS   Unit/Location: 31st Chemical Company, 2nd Chemical Battalion, 48th Chemical Brigade, Fort Hood, Texas 

Time Lost: AWOL x 3 for a total of 19 days (100907 - 100908), (100913 - 100925) and (100926 - 100929); mode of return unknown.  The applicant was also in confinement for a total of 46 days.

Article 15s (Charges/Dates/Punishment): 090709, failed to go at the time prescribed to his appointed place of duty x 3, 0630 Physical Training formation (090420); 0530 APFT Test (090509); 0545 Accountability formation (090615); made a false official statement to SGT S, “I went to Sick Call this morning” (090602); wrongfully appropriated spark plugs valued at $20.00, the property of WalMart (090528); dishonorably failed to pay monthly rent in the sum of $300.00 (090301 – 090601); reduction to the grade of E-3; forfeiture of $409.00 pay per month for one month, both suspended, to be automatically remitted if not vacated before (100104); extra duty and restriction for 14 days; (CG).

090917, vacation of suspension of the punishment of reduction to the grade of E-3 and forfeiture of $409.00 pay per month for one month, imposed (090709); wrongfully appropriated sunglasses, valued at $30.00, the property of the Fort Hood Clear Creek PX (090802). 

091021, stole a pair of sunglasses, of a value of about $100, the property of NAF/AAFES (090802); reduction to E-2; and forfeiture of $784.00 per month for 2 months, both suspended, to be automatically remitted if not vacated before (100420); extra duty for 45 days; and restriction for 45 days to the limits of Fort Hood, Texas and place of residence, suspended, to be automatically remitted if not vacated before (100429); (FG).

091215, vacation of the suspension of the punishments imposed (100921); reduction to E-2; extra duty for 45 days; and restriction for 45 days; without authority failed to go at the time prescribed to his appointed place of duty for extra duty (091127); without authority failed to go at the time prescribed to his appointed place of duty, 0630 accountability formation (091116).

100308, without authority failed to go at the time prescribed to his appointed place of duty x 2, 0900 hours mandatory training at the Palmer Theater (100205) and 0900 hours drivers training at the Soldier Development Center Room (100122); reduction to E-1, forfeiture of $337.00 pay for one month, suspended, to be automatically remitted if not vacated before (100903); extra duty for 14 days and restriction for 14 days to the limits of the Soldier’s residence and Fort Hood; (CG).



Courts-Martial (Charges/Dates/Punishment): None

Counseling Records Available: Yes    No 

IV.  Soldier’s Overall Record
Age at current enlistment:  19
Current ENL Date: 070111    Current ENL Term: 4 Years  24 Weeks
Current ENL Service: 	3  Yrs, 9 Mos, 7 Days ?????
Total Service:  		3  Yrs, 9 Mos, 7 Days ?????
Previous Discharges: 	None
Highest Grade: E-4		Performance Ratings Available: Yes    No 
MOS: 91B10 Wheeled Vehicle Mechanic   GT: 97   EDU: HS Grad   Overseas: None   Combat: None
Decorations/Awards: NDSM, ASR

V.  Post-Discharge Activity
City, State:  ?????

Post Service Accomplishments: None

VI.  Facts, Circumstances, and Legal Basis for Separation

       a.  Facts and Circumstances:
       The evidence of record shows that on 27 October 2010, the applicant was charged with AWOL x 3 (100907 – 100908), (100913 – 100925) and (100926 – 100929); wrongfully used cocaine a schedule II substance (100823 – 100825); wrongfully possessed three tablets of Clonazepam a schedule IV controlled substance (100929); made a false official statement to BTM, “It was my personal property (TA-50)” (100929); stole twelve tablets of Tramadol hydrochloride, of some value, the property of KJ (100929); stole a Military Star credit card and a package of Newport Cigarettes, of some value, the property of EMF (100929); stole an ACU pattern ruck sack, of some value, the property of JM (100929); stole four bottles of vodka and one bottle of tequila, of some value over $100.00, the property of Army Air Force Exchange Service (100929); stole a pair of sunglasses, of a value of about $100.00 the property of AAFES (090802).
       
       On 22 November 2010, the applicant consulted with legal counsel and voluntarily requested, in writing, discharge under the provisions of Chapter 10, AR 635-200 in lieu of trial by court-martial.  In this request, the applicant admitted guilt to the offense, or a lesser-included offense.  Further, the applicant indicated he understood that he could receive an under other than honorable conditions discharge and that the discharge would have a significant effect on eligibility for veteran’s benefits.  The applicant submitted a statement in his own behalf.  The unit commander and intermediate commanders recommended approval of an under other than honorable conditions discharge.  
       
       On 16 December 2010, the separation authority approved the Chapter 10 request and directed the discharge with a characterization of service of under other than honorable conditions.  The applicant was to be reduced to the lowest enlisted rank. 

       b.  Legal Basis for Separation:  
       Army Regulation 635-200 sets forth the basic authority for the separation of enlisted personnel.  Chapter 10   of that regulation provides, in pertinent part, that a member who has committed an offense or offenses for which the authorized punishment includes a punitive discharge may submit a request for a discharge for the good of the Service in lieu of trial by court-martial.  The request may be submitted at any time after charges have been preferred and must include the individual’s admission of guilt.  Army policy states that although an honorable or general, under honorable conditions discharge is authorized, a discharge under other than honorable conditions is normally considered appropriate.  

       c.  Response to Issues, Recommendation and Rationale:  
       After a careful review of the applicant’s available military records, the issue and documents submitted with the application, the analyst found no mitigating factors which would merit an upgrade of the applicant's discharge.  The evidence of record shows the applicant was charged with the commission of an offense punishable under the Uniform Code of Military Justice (UCMJ) with a punitive discharge.  The applicant consulted with defense counsel, and voluntarily in writing, requested separation from the Army in lieu of trial by court-martial.  In doing so, the applicant admitted guilt to the stipulated or lesser-included offenses under the UCMJ. 
        
       The analyst noted that all the requirements of law and regulation were met and the rights of the applicant were fully protected throughout the separation process.  It is also noted that the characterization of service for this type of discharge is normally under other than honorable conditions and the applicant was aware of it prior to requesting discharge. 
       
       The analyst noted the applicant’s contention that he was under stress and received no help from his command; however,  the evidence of record shows that the command attempted to assist the applicant in performing and conducting himself to Army standards by providing counseling and by the imposition of non-judicial punishment.  The applicant failed to respond appropriately to these efforts.  Additionally, the analyst found no evidence of arbitrary or capricious actions by the command.  The analyst was satisfied that all requirements of law and regulation were met and the rights of the applicant were fully protected throughout the separation process.  
       
       The applicant contends he was going through a MEB at the time of discharge; however, the record does not support the applicant’s contention, and no evidence to support it has been submitted by the applicant, that the discharge was the result of any medical condition.
       
       Therefore, the analyst determined the reason for discharge and the characterization of service were both proper and equitable and recommends to the Board to deny relief. 

VII.  Summary of Army Discharge Review Board Hearing

Type of Hearing: 		Date: 6 April 2012         Location: Washington, D. C.

Did the Applicant Testify?  Yes     No  

Counsel: None

Witnesses/Observers: None 

Exhibits Submitted: DD Form 293 with a self-authored statement and a DD Form 214

VIII.  Board Discussion, Determination, and Recommendation
After carefully examining the applicant's record of service during the period of enlistment under review, and considering the analyst's recommendation and rationale, the Board determined that the discharge was both proper and equitable and voted to deny relief.
        















IX.  Board Decision						
Board Vote:
Character - Change 0    No change 5
Reason -     Change 0    No change 5
(Board member names available upon request)

X.  Board Action Directed
Issue a new DD Form 214  
Change Characterization to: 
Change Reason to: No Change
Other: NA
RE Code: 
Grade Restoration:   No   Yes   Grade: NA

XI.  Certification Signature
Approval Authority:




EDGAR J. YANGER
Colonel, U.S. Army
President, Army Discharge Review Board




BONITA E. TROTMAN
Lieutenant Colonel, U. S. Army
Secretary Recorder



















Legend:
AWOL    	Absent Without Leave		GCM   General Court Martial	NA   Not applicable			SCM	Summary Court Martial
BCD   	Bad Conduct Discharge	GD      General Discharge	NIF   Not in the file			SPCM	Special Court Martial
CG 	Company Grade Article 15	HD      Honorable Discharge	OAD   Ordered to Active Duty		UNC	Uncharacterized Discharge  
DD 	Dishonorable Discharge	HS       High School Graduate	OMPF   Official Military Personnel File	UOTH  	Under Other Than Honorable 
FG	Field Grade Article 15		IADT   Initial Active Duty Training	RE     Reentry Code				Conditions 

ARMY DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD - CASE REPORT AND DIRECTIVE

Case Number AR20110020093
______________________________________________________________________________


Page 3 of 4 pages

Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | DRB | CY2011 | AR20110015229

    Original file (AR20110015229.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Applicant Name: ????? On 21 September 2010, the separation authority waived further rehabilitative efforts and directed that the applicant be discharged with a characterization of service of general, under honorable conditions. The applicant was discharged under the provisions of Chapter 14, AR 635-200, by reason of misconduct, drug abuse with a general, under honorable conditions discharge.

  • ARMY | DRB | CY2009 | AR20090006742

    Original file (AR20090006742.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Applicant Name: ????? On 20 December 2007, the separation authority approved the discharge with a characterization of service of under other than honorable conditions. Board Action Directed President, Army Discharge Review Board Issue a new DD Form 214 Change Characterization to: Change Reason to: No Change Other: NA RE Code: Grade Restoration: No Yes Grade: NA ARMY DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD - CASE REPORT AND DIRECTIVE Case Number...

  • ARMY | DRB | CY2011 | AR20110018190

    Original file (AR20110018190.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    On 27 January 2011, the applicant waived legal counsel, was advised of the impact of the discharge action, and did not submit a statement in his own behalf. Yes No Counsel: None Witnesses/Observers: NA Exhibits Submitted: DD Form 293 dated 3 August 2011. Certification Signature Approval Authority: EDGAR J. YANGER Colonel, U.S. Army President, Army Discharge Review Board BONITA E. TROTMAN Lieutenant Colonel, U. S. Army Secretary Recorder Legend: AWOL Absent Without Leave GCM General Court...

  • ARMY | DRB | CY2011 | AR20110002279

    Original file (AR20110002279.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Applicant Name: ????? The unit commander recommended separation with a general, under honorable conditions discharge. c. Response to Issues, Recommendation and Rationale: After a careful review of all the applicant’s military records, and the issue submitted with the application, the analyst found no mitigating factors which would merit an upgrade of the applicant's discharge.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080019405

    Original file (20080019405.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    He was told his discharge would be under honorable conditions because the other persons involved were the ones who did the stealing. On 23 January 1975, the applicant accepted nonjudicial punishment (NJP) under the provisions of Article 15, Uniform Code of Military Justice (UCMJ), for stealing personal property of another Soldier valued at $20.00. Special Court-Martial Order Number 21, Headquarters, III Corps and Fort Hood, Texas, dated 19 July 1977, provided that the sentence to a bad...

  • ARMY | DRB | CY2010 | AR20100023834

    Original file (AR20100023834.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Applicant Name: ????? On 11 March 2010, the applicant consulted with legal counsel, was advised of the impact of the discharge action, voluntarily waived consideration of his case by an administrative separation board contingent upon him receiving a characterization of service no less favorable than a general, under honorable conditions discharge and did not submit a statement in his own behalf. On 19 April 2010, the applicant again consulted with legal counsel and waived consideration of...

  • ARMY | DRB | CY2009 | AR20090000305

    Original file (AR20090000305.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Applicant Name: ????? On 7 August 2002, the separation authority waived further rehabilitative efforts and directed that the applicant be discharged with a characterization of service of under other than honorable conditions. Board Action Directed President, Army Discharge Review Board Issue a new DD Form 214 Change Characterization to: Change Reason to: NA Other: NA RE Code: Grade Restoration: No Yes Grade: NA ARMY DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD - CASE REPORT AND DIRECTIVE Case Number...

  • ARMY | DRB | CY2008 | AR20080003459

    Original file (AR20080003459.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant consulted with legal counsel, was advised of the impact of the discharge action, requested consideration of his case by an administrative separation board, and did not submit a statement in his own behalf. The senior intermediate commander reviewed the proposed discharge action and recommended approval of the separation action with an under other than honorable conditions discharge. On 12 April 2006, the separation authority waived further rehabilitative efforts and directed...

  • USMC | DRB | 2005_Marine | MD0500957

    Original file (MD0500957.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    What I did to cause me to receive a Bad Conduct discharge I truly with all my heart regret y action.Now that I have been released from the Military Appellate Leave Status an been given a new chance to start my career over I respectfully request that my Bad Conduct Discharge be changed to General/under Honorable condition. Documentation In addition to the service record, the following additional documentation, submitted by the Applicant, was considered:Applicant’s DD Form 214 (3) PART II -...

  • ARMY | DRB | CY2011 | AR20110000704

    Original file (AR20110000704.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Current ENL Service: 3 Yrs, 11 Mos, 21 Days The applicant has a period of lost time that was not annotated on the DD Form 214 block 29; however, the DA Form 2-1 block 21, DD Form 2329 (Summary Court-Martial) and the unit commander's recommendation for separation indicates that the applicant was sentenced to a period of military confinement, which adjusted his ETS date. On 1 June 1999, the separation authority waived further rehabilitative efforts and directed that the applicant be...