Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | AR20110018739
Original file (AR20110018739.txt) Auto-classification: Denied
Applicant Name:  ?????

Application Receipt Date: 2011/09/19	Prior Review:     Prior Review Date: NA     

I.  Applicant Request:  Upgrade     Reason Change     RE Code Change    

Issues: The applicant states, in effect, that he is requesting an upgrade of his discharge to honorable in order to receive Veterans benefits and has been told to file it with the ADRB.

II.  Were Proper Discharge and Separation Authority procedures followed?	     
Tender Offer:   NA

See Attachments:  Legal     Medical     Minority Opinion     Exhibits 

III.  Discharge Under Review
Unit CDR Recommended Discharge: 	   Date: 090918
Discharge Received: 			   Date: 091006   Chapter: 5-17    AR: 635-200
Reason: Condition, Not a Disability	   RE:     SPD: JFV   Unit/Location: B Co, 43d AG Bn, Fort Leonard Wood, MO 

Time Lost: None

Article 15s (Charges/Dates/Punishment): None

Courts-Martial (Charges/Dates/Punishment): None

Counseling Records Available: Yes    No 

IV.  Soldier’s Overall Record
Age at current enlistment:  20
Current ENL Date: IADT 090826    Current ENL Term: 8  Years  ?????
Current ENL Service: 	00 Yrs, 01 Mos, 11 Days ?????
Total Service:  		00 Yrs, 06 Mos, 19 Days ?????
Previous Discharges: 	USAR 090318-091006/NIF (Concurrent Service)
Highest Grade: E-3		Performance Ratings Available: Yes    No 
MOS: None   GT: 127   EDU: HS Grad   Overseas: None   Combat: None
Decorations/Awards: None

V.  Post-Discharge Activity
City, State:  Ligonier, PA
Post Service Accomplishments: None listed

VI.  Facts, Circumstances, and Legal Basis for Separation

       a.  Facts and Circumstances:
       On 18 September 2009, the unit commander notified the applicant of initiation of separation action under the provisions of Chapter 5, paragraph 5-17, AR 635-200, by reason of a physical or mental condition which was not a disability, specifically for being diagnosed by competent medical authority with an adjustment disorder with anxiety, tearfulness, loss of appetite, depressed mood, insomnia, suicidal ideation, and inability to adapt to the training environment which was severe enough to affect his ability to continue to train and become a Soldier.  The unit commander recommended the applicant’s separation from the Army with an uncharacterized discharge.
        
       On 18 September 2009, the applicant declined legal counsel, was advised of the impact of the discharge action, and did not submit a statement on his behalf.  The unit commander subsequently recommended separation from the Service.  The intermediate commander reviewed the proposed discharge action and recommended approval of the separation with an uncharacterized discharge.  
       
       On 25 September 2009, the separation authority waived further rehabilitation and directed the applicant’s discharge with service uncharacterized.

       b.  Legal Basis for Separation:  
       Army Regulation 635-200 provides the basic authority for the separation of enlisted personnel.  Paragraph 5-17 specifically provides that a Soldier may be separated for other physical or mental conditions not amounting to a disability under Army Regulation 635-40, which interferes with assignment to or performance of duty.  The regulation requires that the condition interferes with the Soldiers’ ability to perform duty, and requires that the diagnosis be so severe that the Soldier’s ability to function in the military environment is significantly impaired.  Army Regulation 635-200 states that a Soldier being separated under this paragraph will be awarded a characterization of service of honorable, under honorable conditions, or an uncharacterized description of service if in entry-level status.  A general, under honorable conditions discharge is normally inappropriate for individuals separated under the provisions of Chapter 5-17 unless properly notified of the specific factors in the service that warrant such characterization.

       c.  Response to Issues, Recommendation and Rationale:  
       After a careful review of all the applicant’s military records, documents and the issue he submitted, the analyst found no mitigating factors that would merit an upgrade of the applicant's discharge.  
       
       The evidence of record shows that the applicant while in training status was diagnosed by competent medical authority a disorder with an anxiety disorder that affected his ability to continue to train and become a Soldier.  The diagnosis was so severe that the former Soldier’s ability to function in the military environment was significantly impaired.  
       
       The applicant’s service was uncharacterized because he was in an entry-level status.  A Soldier is in entry-level status (ELS) for the first 180 days of continuous active duty.  The purpose of the entry-level status is to provide the Soldier a probationary period.  Army Regulation 635-200 also provides, except in cases of serious misconduct, that a Soldier’s service will be uncharacterized when the separation is initiated while the Soldier is in entry level status.  An honorable discharge is not authorized under ELS conditions.  
       
       Further, for Soldiers in entry-level status, a fully honorable discharge may be granted only in cases which are clearly warranted by unusual circumstances involving outstanding personal conduct and/or performance of duty.  The analyst determined that no such unusual circumstances were present in the applicant’s record and his service did not warrant an honorable discharge.  The analyst found no evidence of arbitrary or capricious actions by the command and was satisfied that all requirements of law and regulation were met and the rights of the applicant were fully protected throughout the separation process.  
       
       The analyst noted the applicant's issue about receiving Veterans benefits; however, eligibility for these type of benefits to include educational benefits under the Post-9/11 or Montgomery GI Bill does not fall within the purview of the Army Discharge Review Board.  Accordingly, the applicant should contact a local office of the Department of Veterans Affairs for further assistance.
       
       In view of the foregoing, the analyst determined the reason for discharge and the characterization of service, were proper and equitable and recommends to the board to deny relief.  
       
       
       
       
       
       
       
       

VII.  Summary of Army Discharge Review Board Hearing

Type of Hearing: 		Date: 9 March 2012         Location: Washington, DC

Did the Applicant Testify?  Yes     No  

Counsel: None

Witnesses/Observers: NA 

Exhibits Submitted: DD Forms 149 and 214.

VIII.  Board Discussion, Determination, and Recommendation
After carefully examining the applicant's record of service during the period of enlistment under review, and considering the analyst's recommendation and rationale, the Board determined that the discharge was both proper and equitable and voted to deny relief.
        
IX.  Board Decision						
Board Vote:
Character - Change 0    No change 5
Reason -     Change 0    No change 5
(Board member names available upon request)

X.  Board Action Directed
Issue a new DD Form 214  
Change Characterization to: 
Change Reason to: NA
Other: NA
RE Code: 
Grade Restoration:   No   Yes   Grade: NA

XI.  Certification Signature
Approval Authority:




EDGAR J. YANGER
Colonel, U.S. Army
President, Army Discharge Review Board




BONITA E. TROTMAN
Lieutenant Colonel, U. S. Army
Secretary Recorder
?????



Legend:
AWOL    	Absent Without Leave		GCM   General Court Martial	NA   Not applicable			SCM	Summary Court Martial
BCD   	Bad Conduct Discharge	GD      General Discharge	NIF   Not in the file			SPCM	Special Court Martial
CG 	Company Grade Article 15	HD      Honorable Discharge	OAD   Ordered to Active Duty		UNC	Uncharacterized Discharge  
DD 	Dishonorable Discharge	HS       High School Graduate	OMPF   Official Military Personnel File	UOTH  	Under Other Than Honorable 
FG	Field Grade Article 15		IADT   Initial Active Duty Training	RE     Reentry Code				Conditions 
ARMY DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD - CASE REPORT AND DIRECTIVE

Case Number AR20110018739
______________________________________________________________________________


Page 1 of 3 pages

Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | DRB | CY2008 | AR20080017136

    Original file (AR20080017136.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Applicant Name: ????? The applicant’s service was uncharacterized because she was in an entry-level status. Board Action Directed President, Army Discharge Review Board Issue a new DD Form 214 Change Characterization to: Change Reason to: NA Other: NA RE Code: Grade Restoration: No Yes Grade: NA ARMY DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD - CASE REPORT AND DIRECTIVE Case Number AR20080017136 ______________________________________________________________________________ Page 1 of 3 pages

  • ARMY | DRB | CY2009 | AR20090001142

    Original file (AR20090001142.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Applicant Name: ????? Board Discussion, Determination, and Recommendation After carefully examining the applicant’s record of service during the period of enlistment under review and considering the analyst’s recommendation and rationale, the Board determined that the discharge was both proper and equitable and voted to deny relief. Board Action Directed President, Army Discharge Review Board Issue a new DD Form 214 Change Characterization to: Change Reason to: No Change Other: NA RE...

  • ARMY | DRB | CY2009 | AR20090000859

    Original file (AR20090000859.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Applicant Name: ????? On 11 August 2008, the separation authority directed that the applicant be discharged with an uncharacterized separation of service. Board Action Directed President, Army Discharge Review Board Issue a new DD Form 214 Change Characterization to: Change Reason to: NA Other: NA RE Code: Grade Restoration: No Yes Grade: NA ARMY DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD - CASE REPORT AND DIRECTIVE Case Number...

  • ARMY | DRB | CY2008 | AR20080013546

    Original file (AR20080013546.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Applicant Name: ????? The applicant’s service was uncharacterized because she was in an entry-level status. Board Action Directed President, Army Discharge Review Board Issue a new DD Form 214 Change Characterization to: Change Reason to: NA Other: NA RE Code: Grade Restoration: No Yes Grade: NA ARMY DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD - CASE REPORT AND DIRECTIVE Case Number AR20080013546 ______________________________________________________________________________ Page 1 of 3 pages

  • ARMY | DRB | CY2007 | AR20070013576

    Original file (AR20070013576.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Applicant Name: ????? On 23 March 2007, the unit commander notified the applicant of initiation of separation action under the provisions of Chapter 5-17, AR 635-200, by reason of a physical or mental condition, not a disability with an uncharacterized discharge for failure to adapt to military life and for missing many training requirements. The applicant’s service was uncharacterized because he was in an entry-level status.

  • ARMY | DRB | CY2008 | AR20080008127

    Original file (AR20080008127.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Applicant Name: ????? Board Discussion, Determination, and Recommendation After carefully examining the applicant’s record of service during the period of enlistment under review and considering the analyst’s recommendation and rationale, the Board determined that the discharge was both proper and equitable and voted to deny relief. Board Action Directed President, Army Discharge Review Board Issue a new DD Form 214 Change Characterization to: Change Reason to: NA Other: NA RE Code: Grade...

  • ARMY | DRB | CY2009 | AR20090008661

    Original file (AR20090008661.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Applicant Name: ????? The unit commander notified the applicant of initiation of separation action under the provisions of Chapter 5, paragraph 5-17, AR 635-200, by reason of bipolar and post traumatic stress disorder with conditions that could impair unit readiness and safety, and potentially interfere with his ability to effectively perform his military duties, and recommended that he be discharge with an entry level uncharacterized separation of service. Board Action Directed President,...

  • ARMY | DRB | CY2009 | AR20090009987

    Original file (AR20090009987.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Paragraph 5-17 specifically provides that a Soldier may be separated for other physical or mental conditions not amounting to a disability under Army Regulation 635-40, which interferes with assignment to or performance of duty. Board Discussion, Determination, and Recommendation After carefully examining the applicant’s record of service during the period of enlistment under review and considering the analyst’s recommendation and rationale, the Board determined that the discharge was both...

  • ARMY | DRB | CY2007 | AR20070013907

    Original file (AR20070013907.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Applicant Name: ????? On 12 January 2007, the unit commander notified the applicant of initiation of separation action under the provisions of Chapter 5-17, AR 635-200, by reason of other designated physical or mental condition, problems incompatible with military service, and recommended that she be discharged with an entry level uncharacterized separation of service. Certification Signature and Date Approval Authority: MARK E. COLLINS Colonel, U.S. Army President, Army Discharge Review...

  • ARMY | DRB | CY2009 | AR20090013769

    Original file (AR20090013769.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Applicant Name: ????? The narrative reason specified by Army Regulations for a discharge under this paragraph is "Condition, Not a Disability” and the separation code is "JFV." Board Action Directed President, Army Discharge Review Board Issue a new DD Form 214 Change Characterization to: Change Reason to: No Change Other: NA RE Code: Grade Restoration: No Yes Grade: NA Legend: AWOL Absent Without Leave GCM General Court Martial NA Not applicable SCM Summary Court Martial BCD Bad Conduct...