Applicant Name: ?????
Application Receipt Date: 2011/09/19 Prior Review: Prior Review Date: NA
I. Applicant Request: Upgrade Reason Change RE Code Change
Issues: The applicant states, in effect, that he is requesting an upgrade of his discharge to honorable in order to receive Veterans benefits and has been told to file it with the ADRB.
II. Were Proper Discharge and Separation Authority procedures followed?
Tender Offer: NA
See Attachments: Legal Medical Minority Opinion Exhibits
III. Discharge Under Review
Unit CDR Recommended Discharge: Date: 090918
Discharge Received: Date: 091006 Chapter: 5-17 AR: 635-200
Reason: Condition, Not a Disability RE: SPD: JFV Unit/Location: B Co, 43d AG Bn, Fort Leonard Wood, MO
Time Lost: None
Article 15s (Charges/Dates/Punishment): None
Courts-Martial (Charges/Dates/Punishment): None
Counseling Records Available: Yes No
IV. Soldiers Overall Record
Age at current enlistment: 20
Current ENL Date: IADT 090826 Current ENL Term: 8 Years ?????
Current ENL Service: 00 Yrs, 01 Mos, 11 Days ?????
Total Service: 00 Yrs, 06 Mos, 19 Days ?????
Previous Discharges: USAR 090318-091006/NIF (Concurrent Service)
Highest Grade: E-3 Performance Ratings Available: Yes No
MOS: None GT: 127 EDU: HS Grad Overseas: None Combat: None
Decorations/Awards: None
V. Post-Discharge Activity
City, State: Ligonier, PA
Post Service Accomplishments: None listed
VI. Facts, Circumstances, and Legal Basis for Separation
a. Facts and Circumstances:
On 18 September 2009, the unit commander notified the applicant of initiation of separation action under the provisions of Chapter 5, paragraph 5-17, AR 635-200, by reason of a physical or mental condition which was not a disability, specifically for being diagnosed by competent medical authority with an adjustment disorder with anxiety, tearfulness, loss of appetite, depressed mood, insomnia, suicidal ideation, and inability to adapt to the training environment which was severe enough to affect his ability to continue to train and become a Soldier. The unit commander recommended the applicants separation from the Army with an uncharacterized discharge.
On 18 September 2009, the applicant declined legal counsel, was advised of the impact of the discharge action, and did not submit a statement on his behalf. The unit commander subsequently recommended separation from the Service. The intermediate commander reviewed the proposed discharge action and recommended approval of the separation with an uncharacterized discharge.
On 25 September 2009, the separation authority waived further rehabilitation and directed the applicants discharge with service uncharacterized.
b. Legal Basis for Separation:
Army Regulation 635-200 provides the basic authority for the separation of enlisted personnel. Paragraph 5-17 specifically provides that a Soldier may be separated for other physical or mental conditions not amounting to a disability under Army Regulation 635-40, which interferes with assignment to or performance of duty. The regulation requires that the condition interferes with the Soldiers ability to perform duty, and requires that the diagnosis be so severe that the Soldiers ability to function in the military environment is significantly impaired. Army Regulation 635-200 states that a Soldier being separated under this paragraph will be awarded a characterization of service of honorable, under honorable conditions, or an uncharacterized description of service if in entry-level status. A general, under honorable conditions discharge is normally inappropriate for individuals separated under the provisions of Chapter 5-17 unless properly notified of the specific factors in the service that warrant such characterization.
c. Response to Issues, Recommendation and Rationale:
After a careful review of all the applicants military records, documents and the issue he submitted, the analyst found no mitigating factors that would merit an upgrade of the applicant's discharge.
The evidence of record shows that the applicant while in training status was diagnosed by competent medical authority a disorder with an anxiety disorder that affected his ability to continue to train and become a Soldier. The diagnosis was so severe that the former Soldiers ability to function in the military environment was significantly impaired.
The applicants service was uncharacterized because he was in an entry-level status. A Soldier is in entry-level status (ELS) for the first 180 days of continuous active duty. The purpose of the entry-level status is to provide the Soldier a probationary period. Army Regulation 635-200 also provides, except in cases of serious misconduct, that a Soldiers service will be uncharacterized when the separation is initiated while the Soldier is in entry level status. An honorable discharge is not authorized under ELS conditions.
Further, for Soldiers in entry-level status, a fully honorable discharge may be granted only in cases which are clearly warranted by unusual circumstances involving outstanding personal conduct and/or performance of duty. The analyst determined that no such unusual circumstances were present in the applicants record and his service did not warrant an honorable discharge. The analyst found no evidence of arbitrary or capricious actions by the command and was satisfied that all requirements of law and regulation were met and the rights of the applicant were fully protected throughout the separation process.
The analyst noted the applicant's issue about receiving Veterans benefits; however, eligibility for these type of benefits to include educational benefits under the Post-9/11 or Montgomery GI Bill does not fall within the purview of the Army Discharge Review Board. Accordingly, the applicant should contact a local office of the Department of Veterans Affairs for further assistance.
In view of the foregoing, the analyst determined the reason for discharge and the characterization of service, were proper and equitable and recommends to the board to deny relief.
VII. Summary of Army Discharge Review Board Hearing
Type of Hearing: Date: 9 March 2012 Location: Washington, DC
Did the Applicant Testify? Yes No
Counsel: None
Witnesses/Observers: NA
Exhibits Submitted: DD Forms 149 and 214.
VIII. Board Discussion, Determination, and Recommendation
After carefully examining the applicant's record of service during the period of enlistment under review, and considering the analyst's recommendation and rationale, the Board determined that the discharge was both proper and equitable and voted to deny relief.
IX. Board Decision
Board Vote:
Character - Change 0 No change 5
Reason - Change 0 No change 5
(Board member names available upon request)
X. Board Action Directed
Issue a new DD Form 214
Change Characterization to:
Change Reason to: NA
Other: NA
RE Code:
Grade Restoration: No Yes Grade: NA
XI. Certification Signature
Approval Authority:
EDGAR J. YANGER
Colonel, U.S. Army
President, Army Discharge Review Board
BONITA E. TROTMAN
Lieutenant Colonel, U. S. Army
Secretary Recorder
?????
Legend:
AWOL Absent Without Leave GCM General Court Martial NA Not applicable SCM Summary Court Martial
BCD Bad Conduct Discharge GD General Discharge NIF Not in the file SPCM Special Court Martial
CG Company Grade Article 15 HD Honorable Discharge OAD Ordered to Active Duty UNC Uncharacterized Discharge
DD Dishonorable Discharge HS High School Graduate OMPF Official Military Personnel File UOTH Under Other Than Honorable
FG Field Grade Article 15 IADT Initial Active Duty Training RE Reentry Code Conditions
ARMY DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD - CASE REPORT AND DIRECTIVE
Case Number AR20110018739
______________________________________________________________________________
Page 1 of 3 pages
ARMY | DRB | CY2008 | AR20080017136
Applicant Name: ????? The applicants service was uncharacterized because she was in an entry-level status. Board Action Directed President, Army Discharge Review Board Issue a new DD Form 214 Change Characterization to: Change Reason to: NA Other: NA RE Code: Grade Restoration: No Yes Grade: NA ARMY DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD - CASE REPORT AND DIRECTIVE Case Number AR20080017136 ______________________________________________________________________________ Page 1 of 3 pages
ARMY | DRB | CY2009 | AR20090001142
Applicant Name: ????? Board Discussion, Determination, and Recommendation After carefully examining the applicants record of service during the period of enlistment under review and considering the analysts recommendation and rationale, the Board determined that the discharge was both proper and equitable and voted to deny relief. Board Action Directed President, Army Discharge Review Board Issue a new DD Form 214 Change Characterization to: Change Reason to: No Change Other: NA RE...
ARMY | DRB | CY2009 | AR20090000859
Applicant Name: ????? On 11 August 2008, the separation authority directed that the applicant be discharged with an uncharacterized separation of service. Board Action Directed President, Army Discharge Review Board Issue a new DD Form 214 Change Characterization to: Change Reason to: NA Other: NA RE Code: Grade Restoration: No Yes Grade: NA ARMY DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD - CASE REPORT AND DIRECTIVE Case Number...
ARMY | DRB | CY2008 | AR20080013546
Applicant Name: ????? The applicants service was uncharacterized because she was in an entry-level status. Board Action Directed President, Army Discharge Review Board Issue a new DD Form 214 Change Characterization to: Change Reason to: NA Other: NA RE Code: Grade Restoration: No Yes Grade: NA ARMY DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD - CASE REPORT AND DIRECTIVE Case Number AR20080013546 ______________________________________________________________________________ Page 1 of 3 pages
ARMY | DRB | CY2007 | AR20070013576
Applicant Name: ????? On 23 March 2007, the unit commander notified the applicant of initiation of separation action under the provisions of Chapter 5-17, AR 635-200, by reason of a physical or mental condition, not a disability with an uncharacterized discharge for failure to adapt to military life and for missing many training requirements. The applicants service was uncharacterized because he was in an entry-level status.
ARMY | DRB | CY2008 | AR20080008127
Applicant Name: ????? Board Discussion, Determination, and Recommendation After carefully examining the applicants record of service during the period of enlistment under review and considering the analysts recommendation and rationale, the Board determined that the discharge was both proper and equitable and voted to deny relief. Board Action Directed President, Army Discharge Review Board Issue a new DD Form 214 Change Characterization to: Change Reason to: NA Other: NA RE Code: Grade...
ARMY | DRB | CY2009 | AR20090008661
Applicant Name: ????? The unit commander notified the applicant of initiation of separation action under the provisions of Chapter 5, paragraph 5-17, AR 635-200, by reason of bipolar and post traumatic stress disorder with conditions that could impair unit readiness and safety, and potentially interfere with his ability to effectively perform his military duties, and recommended that he be discharge with an entry level uncharacterized separation of service. Board Action Directed President,...
ARMY | DRB | CY2009 | AR20090009987
Paragraph 5-17 specifically provides that a Soldier may be separated for other physical or mental conditions not amounting to a disability under Army Regulation 635-40, which interferes with assignment to or performance of duty. Board Discussion, Determination, and Recommendation After carefully examining the applicants record of service during the period of enlistment under review and considering the analysts recommendation and rationale, the Board determined that the discharge was both...
ARMY | DRB | CY2007 | AR20070013907
Applicant Name: ????? On 12 January 2007, the unit commander notified the applicant of initiation of separation action under the provisions of Chapter 5-17, AR 635-200, by reason of other designated physical or mental condition, problems incompatible with military service, and recommended that she be discharged with an entry level uncharacterized separation of service. Certification Signature and Date Approval Authority: MARK E. COLLINS Colonel, U.S. Army President, Army Discharge Review...
ARMY | DRB | CY2009 | AR20090013769
Applicant Name: ????? The narrative reason specified by Army Regulations for a discharge under this paragraph is "Condition, Not a Disability and the separation code is "JFV." Board Action Directed President, Army Discharge Review Board Issue a new DD Form 214 Change Characterization to: Change Reason to: No Change Other: NA RE Code: Grade Restoration: No Yes Grade: NA Legend: AWOL Absent Without Leave GCM General Court Martial NA Not applicable SCM Summary Court Martial BCD Bad Conduct...