Applicant Name: ?????
Application Receipt Date: 2010/02/02 Prior Review: Prior Review Date: NA
I. Applicant Request: Upgrade Reason Change RE Code Change
Issues: The applicant states, in effect, that he was young and in the wrong place at the wrong time. He made a mistake and has paid a huge price for it. Since his separation he has turned his life around, has two year old triplets that he has to take care of and support. It is hard to find a job, and he is trying to better himself for his family and need the chance to prove that he is the person he set out to be in life. He just made some bad choices in his past.
II. Were Proper Discharge and Separation Authority procedures followed?
Tender Offer: NA
See Attachments: Legal Medical Minority Opinion Exhibits
III. Discharge Under Review
Unit CDR Recommended Discharge: Date: NA
Discharge Received: Date: 080219 Chapter: 3 AR: 635-200
Reason: Court-Martial RE: SPD: JJD Unit/Location: 978th Military Police Company, 76th Military Police Battalion, US Army Air Defense Artillery Center, Fort Bliss, TX
Time Lost: Military confinement for 101 days from (060320-060628).
Article 15s (Charges/Dates/Punishment): None
Courts-Martial (Charges/Dates/Punishment): 060320, Special Court-Martial for wrongfully possessing, introducing and or using cocaine between on or about (050901-051130), made a false official statement to a CID Agent on or about (051130), wrongfully introduced some amount of cocaine on divers occasions, between on or about (051001-051130), wrongfully distributed some amount of cocaine on divers occasions between on or about (051001-051130), wrongfully used cocaine on divers occasions between on or about (051001-051130). The applicant was sentenced to be discharged from the service with a bad conduct discharge, forfeiture of $950.00 pay per month for six months, confined for six months, and to be reduced to Private (E-1).
Counseling Records Available: Yes No
IV. Soldiers Overall Record
Age at current enlistment: 20
Current ENL Date: 050322 Current ENL Term: 5 Years ?????
Current ENL Service: 2 Yrs, 7 Mos, 19 Days The computation includes 601 days of excess leave from (060629-080219).
Total Service: 2 Yrs, 7 Mos, 19 Days ?????
Previous Discharges: None
Highest Grade: E-1 Performance Ratings Available: Yes No
MOS: 31B10 Military Police GT: 94 EDU: HS Grad Overseas: None Combat: None
Decorations/Awards: NDSM, ASR
V. Post-Discharge Activity
City, State: ?????
Post Service Accomplishments: None submitted by the applicant.
VI. Facts, Circumstances, and Legal Basis for Separation
a. Facts and Circumstances:
The evidence of record shows that on 1 March 2004, the applicant was found guilty by a special court-martial of wrongfully possessing, introducing and or using cocaine between on or about (050901-051130), making a false official statement to a CID Agent on or about (051130), wrongfully introducing some amount of cocaine on divers occasions, between on or about (051001-051130), wrongfully distributing some amount of cocaine on divers occasions between on or about (051001-051130), and wrongfully using cocaine on divers occasions between on or about (051001-051130). The applicant was sentenced to be discharged from the service with a bad conduct discharge, forfeiture of $950.00 pay per month for six months, confined for six months, and to be reduced to Private (E-1).
On 11 September 2006, the sentence was approved. The record of trial was forwarded to The Judge Advocate General of The Army for review by the Court of Military Review. The United States Army Court of Military Review affirming the approved findings of guilty and the sentence are not part of the available record. However, on 21 September 2007, the sentence having been affirmed pursuant to Article 71c having been complied with, the sentence was ordered to be executed. The applicant was discharged from the Army with a Bad Conduct Discharge and reduced to the lowest enlisted grade.
b. Legal Basis for Separation:
Army Regulation 635-200 sets forth the basic authority for the separation of enlisted personnel. Chapter 3, Section IV, establishes policy and procedures for separating members with a dishonorable or bad conduct discharge; and provides that a Soldier will be given a bad conduct discharge pursuant only to an approved sentence of a general or special court-martial; and that the appellate review must be completed and the affirmed sentence ordered duly executed.
c. Response to Issues, Recommendation and Rationale:
After a careful review of all the applicants military records, the analyst found no mitigating factors that would warrant clemency. There was a full consideration of all faithful and honorable service as well as the incidents of misconduct. The evidence of record indicates the applicant was adjudged guilty by a court-martial and that the sentence was approved by the convening authority. Court-martial convictions stand as adjudged or modified by appeal through the judicial process. The analyst is empowered to recommend a change to the discharge only if clemency is determined to be appropriate. Clemency is an act of mercy, or instance of leniency, to moderate the severity of the punishment imposed.
The analyst noted the applicant's issue that he was young and in the wrong place at the wrong time. He made a mistake and has paid a huge price for it. Since his separation he has turned his life around, has two year old triplets that he has to take care of and support, and it is hard for him to find a job, The analyst found that the applicant met entrance qualification standards to include age. The analyst further found no evidence that the applicant was any less mature than other soldiers of the same age who successfully completed military service.
Additionally, the Board does not grant relief solely for the purpose of gaining employment or enhancing employment opportunities. After a thorough review of the applicants record and the issue submitted with the application, the analyst found no cause for clemency and therefore recommends to the Board to deny clemency.
VII. Summary of Army Discharge Review Board Hearing
Type of Hearing: Date: 20 October 2010 Location: Washington, DC
Did the Applicant Testify? Yes No
Counsel: None
Witnesses/Observers: NA
Exhibits Submitted: DD Form 293 dated 12 January 2010.
VIII. Board Discussion, Determination, and Recommendation
After carefully examining the applicants record of service during the period of enlistment under review and considering the analysts recommendation and rationale, the Board found no cause for clemency and therefore voted to deny relief.
IX. Board Decision
XI. Certification Signature
Board Vote: Approval Authority:
Character - Change 0 No change 5
Reason - Change 0 No change 0
(Board member names available upon request)
EDGAR J. YANGER
Colonel, U.S. Army
X. Board Action Directed President, Army Discharge Review Board
Issue a new DD Form 214
Change Characterization to:
Change Reason to: No Change
Other: No Change
RE Code:
Grade Restoration: No Yes Grade: No Change
Legend:
AWOL Absent Without Leave GCM General Court Martial NA Not applicable SCM Summary Court Martial
BCD Bad Conduct Discharge GD General Discharge NIF Not in the file SPCM Special Court Martial
CG Company Grade Article 15 HD Honorable Discharge OAD Ordered to Active Duty UNC Uncharacterized Discharge
DD Dishonorable Discharge HS High School Graduate OMPF Official Military Personnel File UOTH Under Other Than Honorable
FG Field Grade Article 15 IADT Initial Active Duty Training RE Reentry Code Conditions
ARMY DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD - CASE REPORT AND DIRECTIVE
Case Number AR20100007957
______________________________________________________________________________
Page 1 of 3 pages
ARMY | DRB | CY2008 | AR20080012818
Applicant Name: Application Receipt Date: 2008/08/11 Prior Review: Prior Review Date: NA I. Applicant Request: Upgrade Reason Change RE Code Change Issues: See DD Form 293 and the attached documents submitted by the Applicant. Board Action Directed President, Army Discharge Review Board Issue a new DD Form 214 Change Characterization to: Change Reason to: No Change Other: NA RE Code: Grade Restoration: No Yes Grade: NA ARMY DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD - CASE REPORT AND DIRECTIVE Case Number...
ARMY | DRB | CY2010 | AR20100026295
The evidence of record indicates the applicant was adjudged guilty by a court-martial and that the sentence was approved by the convening authority. After a thorough review of the applicants record and the issue and self-authored statement submitted with the application, the analyst found no cause for clemency and therefore recommends to the Board to deny clemency. Board Action Directed President, Army Discharge Review Board Issue a new DD Form 214 Change Characterization to: Change...
ARMY | DRB | CY2010 | AR20100012318
Post Service Accomplishments: None submitted by the applicant. Chapter 3, Section IV, establishes policy and procedures for separating members with a dishonorable or bad conduct discharge; and provides that a Soldier will be given a bad conduct discharge pursuant only to an approved sentence of a general or special court-martial; and that the appellate review must be completed and the affirmed sentence ordered duly executed. Board Action Directed President, Army Discharge Review...
ARMY | DRB | CY2008 | AR20080007224
Applicant Name: ????? Discharge Under Review Unit CDR Recommended Discharge: Date: NIF Discharge Received: Date: 041105 Chapter: 3 AR: 635-200 Reason: Court-Martial, Other RE: SPD: JJD Unit/Location: Battery D, 1st Battalion, 4th Air Defense Artillery, APO AE 09185 Time Lost: Military Confinement for 96 days from (030410-030714), as a result of the special court-martial sentence. After a thorough review of the applicants record and the issue submitted with the application, the analyst...
ARMY | DRB | CY2010 | AR20100018464
Applicant Name: ????? After a thorough review of the applicants records and the issue and documents submitted with the application, the analyst found no cause for clemency and therefore recommends to the Board to deny clemency. Board Action Directed President, Army Discharge Review Board Issue a new DD Form 214 Change Characterization to: Change Reason to: No Change Other: No Change RE Code: Grade Restoration: No Yes Grade: No Change Legend: AWOL Absent Without Leave GCM General Court...
USMC | DRB | 2006_Marine | MD0600556
Documentation In addition to the service record, the following additional documentation, submitted by the Applicant, was considered:Applicant’s DD Form 214Excepts from Service Record (5 pgs) PART II - SUMMARY OF SERVICE Prior Service (component, dates of service, type of discharge): Inactive: USMCR (DEP) 19990520 - 19990524 COG Active: None Period of Service Under Review :Date of Enlistment: 19990525 Date of Discharge: 20041227 Length of Service (years, months, days):Active: 050702(Does not...
ARMY | DRB | CY2012 | AR20120003355
Discharge Under Review Unit CDR Recommended Discharge: Date: NIF Discharge Received: Date: 060331 Chapter: 3 AR: 635-200 Reason: Court-Martial, Other RE: SPD: JJD Unit/Location: A Co, 2d Bn, 69th Armored Regiment, Fort Benning, GA Time Lost: 98 days, military confinement (031107-040212) Article 15s (Charges/Dates/Punishment): None Courts-Martial (Charges/Dates/Punishment): 031212, failed to report to his designated place of duty on divers occasions, disobeyed a lawful order from a...
ARMY | DRB | CY2007 | AR20070012123
Applicant Request Request: Upgrade Reason Change RE Code Change Issues: I have been discharged now for over three years, and every time I go for employment my discharge from the Army is the only thing they see. The evidence of record clearly shows that the applicant was adjudged guilty by court-martial and that the sentence was approved by the convening authority. After a thorough review of the applicants record and the issues he submitted, the analyst found no cause for clemency and...
ARMY | DRB | CY2006 | AR20060006354
He was sentenced to be discharged with a bad-conduct discharge and confinement for 12 months. Board Discussion, Determination, and Recommendation After carefully examining the applicants record of service during the period of enlistment under review and considering the analysts recommendation and rationale, the Board determined that the discharge was both proper and equitable and voted not to change it. Certification Signature and Date Approval Authority: ROBERT L. HOUSE Colonel, U.S....
ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080015905
IN THE CASE OF: BOARD DATE: 02 December 2008 DOCKET NUMBER: AR20080015905 THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE: 1. Headquarters, U.S. Army Armor Center and Fort Knox, Fort Knox, Kentucky, General Court-Martial Order Number 59, dated 13 March 2008, shows that the sentence to a bad conduct discharge, adjudged on 24 May 2007, has been finally affirmed and that the bad conduct discharge would be executed. When authorized, it is issued to a Soldier whose military record is satisfactory...