Applicant Name: ?????
Application Receipt Date: 2008/06/23 Prior Review: Prior Review Date: NA
I. Applicant Request: Upgrade Reason Change RE Code Change
Issues: The applicant states "It was a miscommunication. I love the Army. I have recently had another child with my wife. I would like the best health for my family, and the military is all I know. I grew up with my father knowing the military, what to do how to do. It is what I do best. I'm workin on my side to expunge this Assault, from Tx records. My family want this for me, I want this for me. I have never had a record up to this point, and the only reason why I chose guilty is so that I could get out of jail to confront my wife, an deploy with my unit. Unfortunately that didn't happen. But with my persistances and your help we can change this. I need the narration and the RE code changed."
II. Were Proper Discharge and Separation Authority procedures followed?
Tender Offer: NA
See Attachments: Legal Medical Minority Opinion Exhibits
III. Discharge Under Review
Unit CDR Recommended Discharge: NIF Date: NIF
Discharge Received: Date: 070802 Chapter: 8-35i(3) AR: NGR 600-200
Reason: Conviction by criminal Court for domestic violence RE: SPD: NA Unit/Location: 132nd MP Co Guard Rear, West Columbia, SC
Time Lost: NIF
Article 15s (Charges/Dates/Punishment): NIF
Courts-Martial (Charges/Dates/Punishment): NIF
Counseling Records Available: Yes No
IV. Soldiers Overall Record
Age at current enlistment: 25
Current ENL Date: 070303 Current ENL Term: 4 Years 11 Months, 19 Days/with a recommendation for approval of a moral waiver (070123)
Current ENL Service: 00 Yrs, 05Mos, 00Days ?????
Total Service: 03 Yrs, 05Mos, 11Days ?????
Previous Discharges: USAR-020429-020916/NA
RA-020917-050509/HD
(Break In Service)
Highest Grade: E-1 Performance Ratings Available: Yes No
MOS: 19D10 Cavalry Scout GT: 93 EDU: HS Grad Overseas: Korea (Prior Service) Combat: NIF
Decorations/Awards: NDSM, GWOTSM, KDSM, ASR, OSR (All Prior Service)
V. Post-Discharge Activity
City, State: Crabtree, PA
Post Service Accomplishments: None Listed
VI. Facts, Circumstances, and Legal Basis for Separation
a. Facts and Circumstances:
The specific facts and circumstances pertaining to the applicants discharge from the Army National Guard State of South Carolina and as a Reserve of the Army are not contained in the available records. However, the record does contain a properly constituted NGB Form 22 (Report of Separation and Record of Service), which the applicant was unavailable for signature. It indicates that the applicant was discharged under the provisions of Paragraph 8-35i(3), NGR 600-200, by reason of conviction by criminal court for domestic violence, with a characterization of service of general, under honorable conditions, with a reenlistment eligibility (RE) code of "4." On 2 August 2007, State of South Carolina Military Department, Office of the Adjutant General, Columbia, SC, Orders 214-816, discharged the applicant from the Army National Guard and as a Reserve of the Army, effective date: 2 August 2007, with a general, under honorable conditions discharge.
b. Legal Basis for Separation:
National Guard Regulation (NGR) 600-200 and Army Regulation 135-178 govern procedures for the administrative separation of enlisted personnel of the Army National Guard and Army Reserve. Chapter 8 of NGR 600-200 covers, in pertinent part, reasons for discharge and separation of enlisted personnel from the State Army National Guard and as a Reserve of the Army. The regulation defines misconduct by reason of one or more of the following: minor disciplinary infractions, a pattern of misconduct, commission of a serious offense, abuse of illegal drugs, and conviction by civil authorities.
c. Response to Issues, Recommendation and Rationale:
After a careful review of all the applicants available military records during the period of enlistment under review, the issues and document he submitted, the analyst found no mitigating factors that would merit a change to the narrative reason for discharge. The applicants record is void of the specific facts and circumstances concerning the events that led to his discharge from the Army National Guard State of South Carolina and as a Reserve of the Army. However, the available records does contain a properly constituted NGB Form 22 (Report of Separation and Record of Service), which the applicant was unavailable for signature. This document identifies the reason and characterization of the discharge and the analyst presumed Government regularity in the discharge process. The evidence of record shows the applicant was discharged under the provisions of Chapter 8, Paragraph 8-35i(3), NGR 600-200, by reason of conviction by criminal court for domestic violence, with a characterization of service of general, under honorable conditions. Barring evidence to the contrary, the analyst was satisfied that all requirements of law and regulation were met and the rights of the applicant were fully protected throughout the separation process. Furthermore, the analyst noted the applicant's issue; however, NGR 600-200, paragraph 8-17 (preparation and distribution of NGB Form 22 (Report of Discharge and Record of Service), governs preparation of the NGB Form 22. The narrative reason specified for a discharge under parahraph 8-35i(3) is "Conviction by criminal Court for domestic violence." NGR 600-200, paragraph 8-17 (preparation and distribution of NGB Form 22) dictates that entry of the narrative reason for separation, entered in block 23 and separation code, entered in block 26 of the form, will be entered exactly as the regulation stipulates and no deviation is authorized. Further, at the time of discharge the applicant was appropriately assigned a reentry eligibility (RE) code of 4. An RE code of 4 cannot be waived and the applicant is no longer eligible for reenlistment. Finally, the analyst determined that the applicants Official Military Personnel File (OMPF) does not contain all the specific documents that would indicate the reason for the separation action from the United States Army. If the applicant desires to appear before a personal appearance Board, the burden of proof remains with the former Soldier to provide the appropriate documents or other evidence sufficient to explain the facts, circumstances, and reasons underlying the separation action, for the Boards consideration. In view of the foregoing, the analyst determined that the characterization of service, reason for discharge, and the reentry eligibility (RE) code were both proper and equitable and recommends to the Board to deny relief.
VII. Summary of Army Discharge Review Board Hearing
Type of Hearing: Date: 1 April 2009 Location: Washington, DC
Did the Applicant Testify? Yes No
Counsel: NA
Witnesses/Observers: NA
Exhibits Submitted: NA
VIII. Board Discussion, Determination, and Recommendation
After carefully examining the applicants record of service during the period of enlistment under review and considering the analysts recommendation and rationale, the Board determined that the discharge was both proper and equitable and voted to deny relief.
IX. Board Decision
XI. Certification Signature
Board Vote: Approval Authority:
Character - Change 0 No change 5
Reason - Change 0 No change 5
(Board member names available upon request)
EDGAR J. YANGER
Colonel, U.S. Army
X. Board Action Directed President, Army Discharge Review Board
Issue a new DD Form 214
Change Characterization to:
Change Reason to: No Change
Other: NA
RE Code:
Grade Restoration: No Yes Grade: None
ARMY DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD - CASE REPORT AND DIRECTIVE
Case Number AR20080010691
______________________________________________________________________________
Page 1 of 3 pages
ARMY | DRB | CY2009 | AR20090000708
I have dedicated the last 24 years on my life the the US Military. I requested, through my counsel at the time, a board by First Army, but was denied. Discharge Under Review Unit CDR Recommended Discharge: Date: NIF Discharge Received: Date: 080121 Chapter: 8-35i(1) & Chapter 12 AR: NGR 600-200 & AR 135-178 Reason: Acts or Pattern of Misconduct RE: SPD: NA Unit/Location: 1049th Transportation Co, Seaford, DE Time Lost: None Article 15s (Charges/Dates/Punishment): None Courts-Martial...
ARMY | DRB | CY2008 | AR20080002109
Applicant Name: ????? Applicant Request: Upgrade Reason Change RE Code Change Issues: The Applicant states in effect: "I enlisted with asthma but i was told when i went to basic if there were any secrets that i was hiding i i came forward at the present time there would be no repercations against me for comming forward and telling the truth. The evidence of record shows the applicant was discharged under the provisions of Chapter 8, paragraph 8-35i(1), NGR 600-200, by reason of acts or...
ARMY | DRB | CY2009 | AR20090013386
Applicant Name: ????? The NGB Form 22 shows the applicant was discharged under the provisions of Chapter 8, paragraph 8-35i(2), NGR 600-200, by reason of conviction by a criminal court with a characterization of service of under other than honorable conditions. Board Discussion, Determination, and Recommendation After carefully examining the applicants record of service during the period of enlistment under review and considering the analysts recommendation and rationale, the Board...
ARMY | DRB | CY2008 | AR20080018071
Legal Basis for Separation: National Guard Regulation (NGR) 600-200 and Army Regulation 135-78 govern procedures covering enlisted personnel management of the Army National Guard. Therefore, the analyst determined that the reason for discharge and the characterization of service remains both proper and equitable and recommends to the Board to deny relief. Board Discussion, Determination, and Recommendation After carefully examining the applicants record of service during the period of...
ARMY | DRB | CY2008 | AR20080011273
Application Receipt Date: 2008/07/17 Prior Review: Prior Review Date: NA I. It indicates that the applicant was discharged under the provisions of Paragraph 8-35i(1), NGR 600-200, by reason of acts or patterns of misconduct, with a characterization of service of general, under honorable conditions, with a reenlistment eligibility (RE) code of "3." c. Response to Issues, Recommendation and Rationale: After a careful review of all the applicants available military records during the period...
ARMY | DRB | CY2013 | AR20130005017
The applicant states he served in the Army and Army National Guard and was discharged honorably. Discharge Received: General, Under Honorable Conditions c. Date of Discharge: 1 August 2008 d. Reason/Authority/SPD/RE Code: Misconduct (Abuse of Illegal Drugs), NGR 600-200, RE-3 e. Unit of assignment: HHC, 1st Bn, 178th Inf, Illinois Army National Guard, Chicago, IL f. Current Enlistment Date/Term: 15 September 2003, NIF g. Current Enlistment Service: 4 years, 10 months, 17 days h. Total...
ARMY | DRB | CY2008 | AR20080010590
Applicant Name: ????? Applicant Request: Upgrade Reason Change RE Code Change Issues: The Applicant states in effect: "I was in Pa. Department of Corrections at the time of my Discharge and at no time to my knowledge did I do anything fraudulently at the time of my entry into the armed services, nor has anyone made me aware of what I could have done that was fraudulent. Board Action Directed President, Army Discharge Review Board Issue a new DD Form 214 Change Characterization to: Change...
ARMY | DRB | CY2007 | AR20070015239
It indicates that the applicant was discharged under the provisions of Paragraph 8-27f, NGR 600-200, by reason of unsatisfactory participation with a characterization of service of general, under honorable conditions and a reenlistment eligibility (RE) Code of " 3." Legal Basis for Separation: National Guard Regulation (NGR) 600-200 and Army Regulation 135-91 govern procedures covering enlisted personnel management of the Army National Guard. Board Discussion, Determination, and...
ARMY | DRB | CY2008 | AR20080007909
The evidence of record shows the applicant was discharged under the provisions of Chapter 8, paragraph 8-26e(2), NGR 600-200, by reason of acts or a pattern of misconduct with a characterization of service of general, under honorable conditions. Board Discussion, Determination, and Recommendation After carefully examining the applicants record of service during the period of enlistment under review and considering the analysts recommendation and rationale, the Board determined that the...
ARMY | DRB | CY2009 | AR20090005108
Applicant Name: ????? Legal Basis for Separation: National Guard Regulation (NGR) 600-200 and Army Regulation 135-91 govern procedures covering enlisted personnel management of the Army National Guard. The evidence of record shows the applicant was discharged under the provisions of Chapter 8, paragraph 8-35i (1), NGR 600-200, by reason of acts or patterns of misconduct with a characterization of service of general, under honorable conditions.