Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | DRB | CY2009 | AR20090017534
Original file (AR20090017534.txt) Auto-classification: Denied
Applicant Name:  ?????

Application Receipt Date: 2009/01/05	Prior Review:     Prior Review Date: NA     

I.  Applicant Request:  Upgrade     Reason Change     RE Code Change    

Issues: See DD Form 293 and attached documents submitted by the applicant.

II.  Were Proper Discharge and Separation Authority procedures followed?	     
Tender Offer:   NA

See Attachments:  Legal     Medical     Minority Opinion     Exhibits 

III.  Discharge Under Review
Unit CDR Recommended Discharge: 	   Date: 080804
Discharge Received: 			   Date: 080828   Chapter: 9     AR: 635-200
Reason: Alcohol Rehabilitation Failure	   RE:     SPD: JPD   Unit/Location: HHB, 2-377 PFAR, Fort Richardson, AK 

Time Lost: None

Article 15s (Charges/Dates/Punishment): 080227, driving while drunk (071212), and underage drinking (071212); reduction to E-1, forfeiture of $670 pay x 2 months, extra duty for 45 days, and restriction for 45 days (FG).

Courts-Martial (Charges/Dates/Punishment): None

Counseling Records Available: Yes    No 

IV.  Soldier’s Overall Record
Age at current enlistment:  19
Current ENL Date: 071019    Current ENL Term: 4 Years  ?????
Current ENL Service: 	00 Yrs, 10Mos, 10Days ?????
Total Service:  		03 Yrs, 01Mos, 03Days ?????
Previous Discharges: 	RA-050726-071018/HD
Highest Grade: E-4		Performance Ratings Available: Yes    No 
MOS: 13F1P Fire Support Spec   GT: 113   EDU: GED   Overseas: Southwest Asia   Combat: Iraq (061010-071201)
Decorations/Awards: ARCOM, NDSM, ICM-W/CS, GWOTSM, ASR, OSR-2, CAB

V.  Post-Discharge Activity
City, State:  Burlington, WI
Post Service Accomplishments: The applicant claims that he is a volunteer EMT on the city's rescue; and currently a full time student pursuing an Associate Degree in Information Technology. 

VI.  Facts, Circumstances, and Legal Basis for Separation

       a.  Facts and Circumstances:
       The evidence of record indicates that on 10 July 2008, the unit commander in consultation with the Clinical Director/ASAP (see  DA Form 4466) declared the applicant a rehabilitation failure.  On 29 July 2008, the unit commander notified the applicant of initiation of separation action under the provisions of Chapter 9, AR 635-200, by reason of alcohol or other drug abuse rehabilitation failure/ASAP failure, with a general, under honorable conditions discharge.  He was advised of his rights.  The applicant consulted with legal counsel, was advised of the impact of the discharge action, waived consideration of his case by an administrative separation board contingent upon his receiving a characterization of service of no less favorable than honorable, and submitted a statement in his own behalf.  The unit commander subsequently recommended separation from the service.  The intermediate commander reviewed the proposed discharge action and recommended approval of the separation action with a general, under honorable conditions discharge.  On 7 August 2008, the separation authority directed that the applicant be discharged with a characterization of service of general, under honorable conditions.
       
       The applicant's record contains a Memorandum of Reprimand (MOR) dated 13 March 2008, for driving under the influence (DUI) of alcohol and underage drinking (Administrative). 
       
       The applicant's record contains a General Officer Memorandum of Reprimand (GOMOR) dated 20 December 2007, for driving under the influence of alcohol, causing damage to property, fleeing the scene of an accident, and underage drinking (Administrative).

       b.  Legal Basis for Separation:  
       Army Regulation 635-200 sets forth the basic authority for the separation of enlisted personnel.   Chapter 9 contains the authority and outlines the procedures for discharging individuals because of alcohol or other drug abuse.  A member who has been referred to the Alcohol and Drug Abuse Prevention and Control Program (ADAPCP) for alcohol/drug abuse may be separated because of inability or refusal to participate in, cooperate in, or successfully complete such a program if there is a lack of potential for continued Army service and rehabilitation efforts are no longer practical.  Army policy states that an honorable or general discharge is authorized depending on the applicant’s overall record of service.  However, an honorable discharge is required if restricted use information is used in the discharge process.

       c.  Response to Issues, Recommendation and Rationale:  
       After a careful review of all the applicant’s military records during the period of enlistment under review, the issues and documents he submitted, the analyst found no mitigating factors that would merit an upgrade of the  applicant's discharge.  The analyst noted that the applicant was enrolled in the Army Substance Abuse Program (ASAP) and was aware of the consequences of any action which would demonstrate any inability or refusal to participate in, cooperate in, or successfully complete such a program.  As a result of the applicant’s actions and after consultation with the drug and alcohol abuse counselor, the command declared the Soldier a rehabilitation failure.  The evidence of record establishes the fact that the applicant was properly counseled and afforded a reasonable opportunity to overcome his problems.  Furthermore, the analyst noted the applicant's issue in reference to him being sent to the Warrior Transition Unit (WTU) due to his post traumatic stress disorder (PTSD) and traumatic brain injury (TBI); however, the evidence of record shows that the applicant was receiving treatment at the Community Mental Health Clinic for his PTSD and TBI; while also enrolled in ASAP due to him driving under the influence of alcohol.  While enrollled in ASAP the applicant was cited for driving under the influence and underage drinking and was assessed as a rehabilitation failure.  Subsequently, the unit commander initiated separation action  under the provisions of Chapter 9, AR 635-200, by reason of alcohol or other drug abuse rehabilitation failure/ASAP failure.  Further, the analyst found no evidence of arbitrary or capricious actions by the command.  The analyst was satisfied that all requirements of law and regulation were met and the rights of the applicant were fully protected throughout the separation process.  Finally, the analyst acknowledges the applicant's successful transition to civilian life and noted the many accomplishments outlined with the application and in the documents with the application.  However, in review of the applicant’s entire service record, the analyst found that these accomplishments did not overcome the reason for discharge and characterization of service granted.  In view of the foregoing, the analyst determined that the reason for discharge and the characterization of service were both proper and equitable and recommends to the Board to deny relief.

VII.  Summary of Army Discharge Review Board Hearing

Type of Hearing: 		Date: 10 November 2009         Location: Washington, DC

Did the Applicant Testify?  Yes     No  

Counsel: NA

Witnesses/Observers: NA 

Exhibits Submitted: NA

VIII.  Board Discussion, Determination, and Recommendation
After carefully examining the applicant’s record of service during the period of enlistment under review and considering the analyst’s recommendation and rationale, the Board determined that the discharge was both proper and equitable and voted to deny relief.

IX.  Board Decision						
	XI.  Certification Signature
Board Vote:  							          Approval Authority:	
Character - Change 0    No change 5
Reason -     Change 0    No change 5
(Board member names available upon request)
								         EDGAR J. YANGER			 
								         Colonel, U.S. Army
X.  Board Action Directed					         President, Army Discharge Review Board
Issue a new DD Form 214  					
Change Characterization to: 			         
Change Reason to: No Change
Other: NA										
RE Code: 
Grade Restoration:   No   Yes   Grade: None
ARMY DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD - CASE REPORT AND DIRECTIVE

Case Number AR20090017534
______________________________________________________________________________

Page 1 of 3 pages

Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | DRB | CY2010 | AR20100009021

    Original file (AR20100009021.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Applicant Name: ????? On 3 November 2006, the separation authority waived further rehabilitative efforts and directed that the applicant be discharged with a characterization of service of general, under honorable conditions. Board Action Directed President, Army Discharge Review Board Issue a new DD Form 214 Change Characterization to: Change Reason to: No Change Other: No Change RE Code: Grade Restoration: No Yes Grade: No Change Legend: AWOL Absent Without Leave GCM General Court...

  • ARMY | DRB | CY2009 | AR20090012955

    Original file (AR20090012955.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Applicant Request: Upgrade Reason Change RE Code Change Issues: The applicant requests an upgrade of his discharge to fully honorable and a change to the reentry eligibility (RE) code for reenlistment eligibility. On 23 January 2009, the unit commander notified the applicant of initiation of separation action under the provisions of Chapter 9, paragraph 2, AR 635-200, by reason of alcohol or other drug abuse rehabilitation failure/Army Substance Abuse Program (ASAP) failure, with a general,...

  • ARMY | DRB | CY2008 | AR20080010767

    Original file (AR20080010767.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    I started military service January 2004. I had no previous history of alcohol abuse prior to returning from Iraq, I had never consumed alcohol before. Discharge Under Review Unit CDR Recommended Discharge: Date: 070728 Discharge Received: Date: 070817 Chapter: 14-12c(2) AR: 635-200 Reason: Misconduct (Drug Abuse) RE: SPD: JKK Unit/Location: C Co, 801st Bde Spt Bn, Fort Campbell, KY Time Lost: 63 days, confined by civil authorities (070616-070817).

  • ARMY | DRB | CY2007 | AR20070002020aC071031

    Original file (AR20070002020aC071031.doc) Auto-classification: Approved

    Facts and Circumstances: Evidence of record shows that on 1 February 2001, the unit commander notified the applicant of initiation of separation action under the provisions of Chapter 14, AR 635-200, by reason of misconduct—commission of a serious offense (disobeying a lawful command from a (SGT), driving while drunk on or about 14 October 2000, drunk while on duty 1 November 2000, wrongful use of marijuana between on or about 12 November 2000 and 11 December 2000, and driving while driving...

  • AF | DRB | CY2007 | AR20070002020

    Original file (AR20070002020.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    Current ENL Service: 00 Yrs, 10Mos, 24Days (Applicant's DD Form 214 Item 12a "Date Entered AD This Period" incorrectly shows date as: year 98, month 01, day 08, should read year 98, month 04, day 15, information is based on applicant's enlistment contract dated (980415)). Facts and Circumstances: Evidence of record shows that on 1 February 2001, the unit commander notified the applicant of initiation of separation action under the provisions of Chapter 14, AR 635-200, by reason of...

  • ARMY | DRB | CY2011 | AR20110005766

    Original file (AR20110005766.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Discharge Under Review Unit CDR Recommended Discharge: Date: 101012 Discharge Received: Date: 101218 Chapter: 9 AR: 635-200 Reason: Alcohol Rehabilitation Failure RE: SPD: JPD Unit/Location: 574th Quartermaster Supply Company, 18th Combat Sustainment Support Battalion, APO, AE Germany Time Lost: Military confinement from (101123-101211) for 19 days, as part of the applicant's punishment imposed from a Summary Court-Martial. On 12 October 2010, the applicant consulted with legal counsel, was...

  • ARMY | DRB | CY2009 | AR20090000877

    Original file (AR20090000877.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Applicant Name: ????? The applicant consulted with legal counsel, was advised of the impact of the discharge action, and did not submit a statement in his own behalf. Board Discussion, Determination, and Recommendation After carefully examining the applicant’s record of service during the period of enlistment under review and considering the analyst’s recommendation and rationale, the Board determined that the discharge was both proper and equitable and voted to deny relief.

  • ARMY | DRB | CY2012 | AR20120006931

    Original file (AR20120006931.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Applicant Name: ????? On 5 May 2010, the unit commander notified the applicant of initiation of separation action under the provisions of Chapter 9, AR 635-200, by reason of alcohol rehabilitation/ASAP failure, with a general, under honorable conditions discharge. On 23 June 2010, the separation authority approved the recommendation of the administrative separation board and directed the applicant’s discharge with a characterization of service of general, under honorable conditions.

  • ARMY | DRB | CY2012 | AR20120007117

    Original file (AR20120007117.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Applicant Name: ????? The record shows that the applicant waived his rights to consult with legal counsel, and did not submit a statement in his own behalf. The unit commander subsequently recommended separation from the Army.

  • ARMY | DRB | CY2008 | AR20080006331

    Original file (AR20080006331.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The separation authority approved the applicant's discharge under the provisions of AR 635-200, Chapter 9, alcohol or other drug rehabilitation failure. Furthermore, according to AR 635-5-1, Separation Program Designator (SPD) codes, the narrative reason for separation should have been "alcohol rehabilitation failure" and the separation (SPD) code "JPD." Board Action Directed President, Army Discharge Review Board Issue a new DD Form 214 Change Characterization to: Change Reason to:...