Applicant Name: ?????
Application Receipt Date: 2010/06/11 Prior Review: Prior Review Date: NA
I. Applicant Request: Upgrade Reason Change RE Code Change
Issues: The applicant states "Well, I have been noticed by the department of "American Legion" saying that i can make a request for an upgrade of my dd214 to change from "uncharacterized to honorable", so I don't have troubles finding good jobs and possible is more easy to me if i want to re-enlist back to the US Army. Right now i am having difficulties finding a good job, specially as a "Security Officer" the field i do, because of the type of my discharge....I tried before to join in the US Army National Guard, and they told me will be better is i do an upgrade...But right now i am studying for the asvab for a future career in the army national guard if they give me the oportunity to join. So, thats the principal reason i am applying for an upgrade. if is possible i request more information in case this application be denied. Thanks for your help."
II. Were Proper Discharge and Separation Authority procedures followed?
Tender Offer: NA
See Attachments: Legal Medical Minority Opinion Exhibits
III. Discharge Under Review
Unit CDR Recommended Discharge: Date: 060112
Discharge Received: Date: 060203 Chapter: 11 AR: 635-200
Reason: Entry Level performance and Conduct RE: SPD: JGA Unit/Location: Delta Company, 369th Adjutant General Battalion, US Army Soldier Support Institute, Fort Jackson, SC
Time Lost: None
Article 15s (Charges/Dates/Punishment): None
Courts-Martial (Charges/Dates/Punishment): None
Counseling Records Available: Yes No
IV. Soldiers Overall Record
Age at current enlistment: 24
Current ENL Date: 050817 Current ENL Term: 4 Years 22 weeks
Current ENL Service: 0 Yrs, 5 Mos, 17 Days ?????
Total Service: 0 Yrs, 5 Mos, 17 Days ?????
Previous Discharges: None
Highest Grade: E-1 Performance Ratings Available: Yes No
MOS: None GT: 87 EDU: HS Letter Overseas: None Combat: None
Decorations/Awards: NDSM
V. Post-Discharge Activity
City, State: ?????
Post Service Accomplishments: None submitted by the applicant.
VI. Facts, Circumstances, and Legal Basis for Separation
a. Facts and Circumstances:
The evidence of record shows that on 6 January 2006, the unit commander notified the applicant of initiation of separation action under the provisions of Chapter 11, AR 635-200, by reason of entry level performance and conduct for failure to adapt to military environment, lack of motivation and disruptive behavior, with an uncharacterized discharge. He was advised of his rights.
On 12 January 2006, the applicant waived his right to consult with legal counsel, was advised of the impact of the discharge action, and did not submit a statement in his own behalf. The unit commander subsequently recommended separation from the Army and waiver of further rehabilitative efforts. The intermediate commander reviewed the proposed action and recommended approval with an uncharacterized discharge.
On 25 January 2006, the separation authority waived further rehabilitative efforts and directed the applicants separation from the Army with an uncharacterized discharge.
b. Legal Basis for Separation:
Army Regulation 635-200 sets forth the basic authority for the separation of enlisted personnel. Chapter 11, of this regulation, in pertinent part, states that a member may be separated for unsatisfactory performance, conduct, or both, while in an entry level status. This provision of the regulation applies to Soldiers who can not meet the minimum standards for training, have demonstrated that they are not qualified for retention because they can not adapt socially or emotionally to military life or because they lack the aptitude, ability, motivation or self discipline for military service, or they have demonstrated characteristics not compatible with satisfactory continued military service. The regulation requires an uncharacterized discharge for separation under this Chapter.
c. Response to Issues, Recommendation and Rationale:
After a careful review of all the applicants military records, and the issue submitted with the application, the analyst found no mitigating factors which would merit an upgrade of the applicant's discharge.
The separation authority approved the applicant's discharge as entry-level status, with the description of service as uncharacterized. Army Regulation 635-200 provides in pertinent part, that a Soldier is in entry-level status for the first 180 days of continuous active duty. The purpose of the entry-level status is to provide the Soldier a probationary period. Soldiers who are found to lack the necessary motivation, adaptability, self-discipline, ability, or attitude to become productive Soldiers may be expeditiously separated while in entry-level status. Army Regulation 635-200 also provides, except in cases of serious misconduct, that a Soldiers service will be uncharacterized when the separation is initiated while the Soldier is in entry level status.
The analyst noted the applicant's issue that he is requesting an honorable discharge. However, a fully honorable discharge may be granted only in cases which are clearly warranted by unusual circumstances involving outstanding personal conduct and or performance of duty. The analyst determined no such unusual circumstances were present in the applicants record and the applicant's service did not warrant an honorable discharge.
Further, if the applicant desires to reenlist, he in the Army National Guard he should continue to contact the local recruiter to determine his eligibility to reenlist. Those individuals can best advise a former service member as to the needs of the Army at the time, and are required to process waivers of reentry eligibility (RE) codes.
Additionally, the Board does not grant relief solely for the purpose of gaining employment or enhancing employment opportunities.
Therefore, the analyst determined that the reason for discharge and the characterization of service were both proper and equitable and recommends to the Board to deny relief.
VII. Summary of Army Discharge Review Board Hearing
Type of Hearing: Date: 23 February 2011 Location: Washington, DC
Did the Applicant Testify? Yes No
Counsel: None
Witnesses/Observers: NA
Exhibits Submitted: Online application dated 4 June 2010.
VIII. Board Discussion, Determination, and Recommendation
After carefully examining the applicants record of service during the period of enlistment under review and considering the analysts recommendation and rationale, the Board determined that the discharge was both proper and equitable and voted to deny relief.
IX. Board Decision
XI. Certification Signature
Board Vote: Approval Authority:
Character - Change 0 No change 5
Reason - Change 0 No change 5
(Board member names available upon request)
EDGAR J. YANGER
Colonel, U.S. Army
X. Board Action Directed President, Army Discharge Review Board
Issue a new DD Form 214
Change Characterization to:
Change Reason to: No Change
Other: No Change
RE Code:
Grade Restoration: No Yes Grade: No Change
Legend:
AWOL Absent Without Leave GCM General Court Martial NA Not applicable SCM Summary Court Martial
BCD Bad Conduct Discharge GD General Discharge NIF Not in the file SPCM Special Court Martial
CG Company Grade Article 15 HD Honorable Discharge OAD Ordered to Active Duty UNC Uncharacterized Discharge
DD Dishonorable Discharge HS High School Graduate OMPF Official Military Personnel File UOTH Under Other Than Honorable
FG Field Grade Article 15 IADT Initial Active Duty Training RE Reentry Code Conditions
ARMY DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD - CASE REPORT AND DIRECTIVE
Case Number AR20100016338
______________________________________________________________________________
Page 1 of 3 pages
ARMY | DRB | CY2007 | AR20070012676
I have changed over the years and become much more mature with the decisions that I have made. Facts and Circumstances: The evidence of record shows that on 11 April 1997, the unit commander notified the applicant of initiation of separation action under the provisions of Chapter 11, AR 635-200, by reason of entry level performance and conduct for his inability to adapt, with an uncharacterized discharge. Board Discussion, Determination, and Recommendation After carefully examining the...
ARMY | DRB | CY2009 | AR20090012838
Facts and Circumstances: The evidence of record shows that on 17 January 1997, the unit commander notified the applicant of initiation of separation action under the provisions of Chapter 11, AR 635-200, by reason of entry level performance and conduct for failure to adapt to military life, adjustment disorder with depressed mood, with an uncharacterized discharge. Board Discussion, Determination, and Recommendation After carefully examining the applicants record of service during the...
ARMY | DRB | CY2012 | AR20120000875
Applicant Name: ????? Those individuals can best advise a former service member as to the needs of the Army at the time, and are required to process waivers of reentry eligibility (RE) codes if appropriate. Certification Signature Approval Authority: ARCHIE L. DAVIS III Colonel, U.S. Army President, Army Discharge Review Board BONITA E. TROTMAN Lieutenant Colonel, U. S. Army Secretary Recorder Legend: AWOL Absent Without Leave GCM General Court Martial NA Not applicable SCM Summary Court...
ARMY | DRB | CY2009 | AR20090012479
Applicant Name: ????? The analyst noted the applicant's issue that he received a hardship discharge due to the death of his grandfather; however records show that the applicant was discharged under the provisions of Chapter 11-2c, AR 635-200, by reason of entry level performance and conduct for failure to adapt to military life. Board Action Directed President, Army Discharge Review Board Issue a new DD Form 214 Change Characterization to: Change Reason to: NA Other: NA RE Code: Grade...
ARMY | DRB | CY2008 | AR20080002555
The separation authority waived further rehabilitative efforts and directed that the applicant be separated from the Army with an uncharacterized discharge. c. Response to Issues, Recommendation and Rationale: After a careful review of all the applicants military records during the period of enlistment under review and the issues he submitted, the analyst noted from the evidence of record that the applicant received an uncharacterized separation while in an entry-level status (ELS). Board...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | AR20110005005
Facts and Circumstances: The evidence of record shows that on 22 June 2010, the unit commander notified the applicant of initiation of separation action under the provisions of Chapter 11, paragraph 11-3, AR 635-200, by reason of entry level performance and conduct for having failed to pass the Army Physical Fitness Test required to graduate from Basic Combat Training after having been provided with the counseling and rehabilitation required by paragraph 11-4, with an uncharacterized...
ARMY | DRB | CY2011 | AR20110012941
The separation authority approved the applicant's discharge as entry-level status, with the description of service as uncharacterized. Army Regulation 635-200 provides in pertinent part, that a Soldier is in entry-level status for the first 180 days of continuous active duty. Therefore, the analyst determined that the reason for discharge and the characterization of service were both proper and equitable and recommends to the Board to deny relief.
ARMY | DRB | CY2010 | AR20100019079
Facts, Circumstances, and Legal Basis for Separation a. Army Regulation 635-200 provides in pertinent part, that a Soldier is in entry-level status for the first 180 days of continuous active duty. Board Action Directed President, Army Discharge Review Board Issue a new DD Form 214 Change Characterization to: Change Reason to: No Change Other: NA RE Code: Grade Restoration: No Yes Grade: ?????
ARMY | DRB | CY2007 | AR20070012022
Facts and Circumstances: The evidence of record shows that the unit commander notified the applicant of initiation of separation action under the provisions of Chapter 11, AR 635-200, by reason of entry level performance and conduct for demonstrated character and behavior characteristics not compatible with satisfactory continued service, with an uncharacterized discharge. The separation authority waived further rehabilitative efforts and directed that the applicant be separated from the...
AF | DRB | CY2006 | AR20060016205
Facts and Circumstances: The evidence of record shows that on 26 September 1996, the unit commander notified the applicant of initiation of separation action under the provisions of Chapter 11, AR 635-200, by reason of entry level performance and conduct for failure to adapt to military life, refusal to participate in training, and for lack of motivation, with an uncharacterized discharge. Board Discussion, Determination, and Recommendation After carefully examining the applicant's record...