Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | DRB | CY2010 | AR20100015670
Original file (AR20100015670.txt) Auto-classification: Denied
Applicant Name:  ?????

Application Receipt Date: 2010/05/25	Prior Review:     Prior Review Date: NA     

I.  Applicant Request:  Upgrade     Reason Change     RE Code Change    

Issues: The applicant states, "I was injured on my duty time because of my discharge, I been trying to get medical attention and its been denied because of that injured I can't work.  I just want to get medical help to my injured and be able to support my family and everything its been denied.  I served my country for 3 years I was injured on my duty and because of my discharge I can't get medical attention and I needed right now because Im disable case my injured and I have a family to support".

II.  Were Proper Discharge and Separation Authority procedures followed?	     
Tender Offer:   NA

See Attachments:  Legal     Medical     Minority Opinion     Exhibits 

III.  Discharge Under Review
Unit CDR Recommended Discharge: 	   Date: 030828
Discharge Received: 			   Date: 030930   Chapter: 10    AR: 635-200
Reason: In Lieu of Trial by Court-Martial	   RE:     SPD: KFS   Unit/Location: HHC 4th CMMC, Ft Hood, TX 

Time Lost: AWOL x2; 1 day (030814-030814) returned to unit; 1 day (030818-030818) returned to unit; for a total of 2 days lost

Article 15s (Charges/Dates/Punishment): 030804, the applicant was read an Article 15 (CG) in which punishment was imposed; however, it is not in the record.  He requested an appeal, but went AWOL prior to the completion of the appeal.

Courts-Martial (Charges/Dates/Punishment): None

Counseling Records Available: Yes    No 

IV.  Soldier’s Overall Record
Age at current enlistment:  23
Current ENL Date: 000727    Current ENL Term: 4 Years  ?????
Current ENL Service: 	3 Yrs, 01Mos, 25Days ?????
Total Service:  		3 Yrs, 09Mos, 19Days ?????
Previous Discharges: 	USAR 990324-991117/HD
Highest Grade: E3		Performance Ratings Available: Yes    No 
MOS: 25L10 AN/TSQ-73 ADA Command & Control Sys Op Maintainer   GT: 109   EDU: HS Grad   Overseas: None   Combat: None
Decorations/Awards: NDSM, ASR

V.  Post-Discharge Activity
City, State:  Ciales, PR
Post Service Accomplishments: None submitted

VI.  Facts, Circumstances, and Legal Basis for Separation

       a.  Facts and Circumstances:
       The evidence of record shows that on 27 August 2003, the applicant was charged with AWOL x2 (030814-030815 and 030818-030819) and with wrongful use of cocaine (030719-030819). 
       
       Futher, on the checklist for pretrial confinement it is noted that on 030819, the applicant was admitted to Darnall Army Community Hospital for an attempted suicide.  Preliminary test results showed that the applicant tested positive for cocaine, vicotin, tylenol, sudafed, mortrin, no dose, phenergen with a blood alcohol content of 0.14.  Blood test also revealed the presence of herion, morphine and codine. 
       
       On 27 August 2003, the applicant consulted with legal counsel and voluntarily requested, in writing, discharge under the provisions of Chapter 10, AR 635-200 in lieu of trial by court-martial.  In this request, the applicant admitted guilt to the offense, or a lesser included offense.  Further, the applicant indicated he understood he could receive an under other than honorable conditions discharge and the discharge would have a significant effect on eligibility for veteran’s benefits.  The applicant did not submit a statement in his own behalf.  The applicant's chain of command recommended approval of the Chapter 10 request with an under other than honorable conditions discharge.  
       
       On 17 September 2003, the separation authority approved the Chapter 10 request and directed an under other than honorable conditions discharge.  The applicant was to be reduced to the lowest enlisted rank.

       b.  Legal Basis for Separation:  
       Army Regulation 635-200 sets forth the basic authority for the separation of enlisted personnel.  Chapter 10 of that regulation provides, in pertinent part, that a member who has committed an offense or offenses for which the authorized punishment includes a punitive discharge may submit a request for a discharge for the good of the Service in lieu of trial by court-martial.  The request may be submitted at any time after charges have been preferred and must include the individual’s admission of guilt.  Army policy states that although an honorable or general, under honorable conditions discharge is authorized, a discharge under other than honorable conditions is normally considered appropriate.  

       c.  Response to Issues, Recommendation and Rationale:  
       After a careful review of all the applicant’s military records, and the issue and documents submitted with the application, the analyst found no mitigating factors which would merit an upgrade of the applicant's discharge.  The evidence of record shows the applicant was charged with the commission of an offense punishable under the Uniform Code of Military Justice (UCMJ) with a punitive discharge.  The applicant consulted with defense counsel, and voluntarily in writing, requested separation from the Army in lieu of trial by court-martial.  In doing so, the applicant admitted guilt to the stipulated or lesser-included offenses under the UCMJ.  
       
       The analyst noted that all the requirements of law and regulation were met and the rights of the applicant were fully protected throughout the separation process.  It is also noted that the characterization of service for this type of discharge is normally under other than honorable conditions and the applicant was aware of it prior to requesting discharge.  
       
       The analyst determined that the applicant’s discharge was appropriate because the quality of service was not consistent with the Army's standards for acceptable personal conduct and performance of duty by military personnel.  The applicant, by violating the Army's policy not to possess or use illegal drugs, compromised the trust and confidence placed in a Soldier.  The applicant, as a Soldier, had the duty to support and abide by the Army's drug policies.  By abusing illegal drugs, the applicant knowingly risked a military career and diminished the quality of service below that meriting a fully honorable discharge.  
       
       The record does not support the applicant’s contention of an injury while on duty, and no evidence to support it has been submitted by the applicant, that the discharge was the result of any medical condition.  There is no evidence of record and the applicant has submitted no probative medical evidence that he had a medical problem which rendered him disqualified for further military service and that he was not able to perform his duties, with either medical limitation or medication.  
       
       Further, eligibility for veteran's benefits to include medical does not fall within the purview of the Army Discharge Review Board.  Accordingly, the applicant should contact a local office of the Department of Veterans Affairs for further assistance.
       
       Therefore, the analyst determined the reason for discharge and the characterization of service were both proper and equitable and recommends to the Board to deny relief. 

VII.  Summary of Army Discharge Review Board Hearing

Type of Hearing: 		Date: 11 February 2011         Location: Washington, DC

Did the Applicant Testify?  Yes     No  

Counsel: None

Witnesses/Observers: NA 

Exhibits Submitted: DD Form 214, 14 pages of his OMPF

VIII.  Board Discussion, Determination, and Recommendation
After carefully examining the applicant’s record of service during the period of enlistment under review and considering the analyst’s recommendation and rationale, the Board determined that the discharge was both proper and equitable and voted to deny relief.  
        
IX.  Board Decision						
	XI.  Certification Signature
Board Vote:  							          Approval Authority:	
Character - Change 0    No change 5
Reason -     Change 0    No change 5
(Board member names available upon request)
								         EDGAR J. YANGER			 
								         Colonel, U.S. Army
X.  Board Action Directed					         President, Army Discharge Review Board
Issue a new DD Form 214  					
Change Characterization to: 			         
Change Reason to: No Change
Other: NA										
RE Code: 
Grade Restoration:   No   Yes   Grade: NA














Legend:
AWOL    	Absent Without Leave		GCM   General Court Martial	NA   Not applicable			SCM	Summary Court Martial
BCD   	Bad Conduct Discharge	GD      General Discharge	NIF   Not in the file			SPCM	Special Court Martial
CG 	Company Grade Article 15	HD      Honorable Discharge	OAD   Ordered to Active Duty		UNC	Uncharacterized Discharge  
DD 	Dishonorable Discharge	HS       High School Graduate	OMPF   Official Military Personnel File	UOTH  	Under Other Than Honorable 
FG	Field Grade Article 15		IADT   Initial Active Duty Training	RE     Reentry Code				Conditions 

ARMY DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD - CASE REPORT AND DIRECTIVE

Case Number AR20100015670
______________________________________________________________________________


Page 3 of 3 pages

Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | DRB | CY2011 | AR20110012124

    Original file (AR20110012124.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Applicant Name: ????? Chapter 10 of that regulation provides, in pertinent part, that a member who has committed an offense or offenses for which the authorized punishment includes a punitive discharge may submit a request for a discharge for the good of the Service in lieu of trial by court-martial. Yes No Counsel: None Witnesses/Observers: NA Exhibits Submitted: DD Form 293 dated 25 May 2011 and a copy of his DD Form 214 for the period of service ending 31 October 2003.

  • ARMY | DRB | CY2007 | AR20070013996

    Original file (AR20070013996.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Applicant Request Request: Upgrade Reason Change RE Code Change Issues: See DD Form 293 submitted by the Applicant II. Facts, Circumstances, and Legal Basis for Separation a. The DD Form 214 indicates that the applicant was discharged under the provisions of Chapter 10, AR 635-200, for the good of the service in lieu trial by court-martial with a characterization of service of under other than honorable conditions.

  • ARMY | DRB | CY2008 | AR20080002781

    Original file (AR20080002781.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Applicant Name: ????? I believe my military records and service will show that I deserve the upgrade. Board Action Directed President, Army Discharge Review Board Issue a new DD Form 214 Change Characterization to: Change Reason to: NA Other: NA RE Code: Grade Restoration: No Yes Grade: NA ARMY DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD - CASE REPORT AND DIRECTIVE Case Number AR20080002781 ______________________________________________________________________________ Page 1 of 3 pages

  • ARMY | DRB | CY2010 | AR20100018702J

    Original file (AR20100018702J.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Applicant Name: ????? Chapter 10 of that regulation provides, in pertinent part, that a member who has committed an offense or offenses for which the authorized punishment includes a punitive discharge may submit a request for a discharge for the good of the Service in lieu of trial by court-martial. Yes No Counsel: None Witnesses/Observers: NA Exhibits Submitted: DD Form 293 and DD Form 214 for the period of service under review.

  • ARMY | DRB | CY2008 | AR20080015294

    Original file (AR20080015294.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Applicant Name: ????? Facts and Circumstances: The evidence of record shows that on 16 March 2006, the applicant was charged with being AWOL x2 (050625-050714 & 050725-060310). It is also noted that the characterization of service for this type of discharge is normally under other than honorable conditions and that the applicant was aware of that prior to requesting discharge.

  • ARMY | DRB | CY2010 | AR20100017572

    Original file (AR20100017572.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Applicant Name: ????? Discharge Under Review Unit CDR Recommended Discharge: Date: 061121 Discharge Received: Date: 061213 Chapter: 10 AR: 635-200 Reason: In Lieu of Trial by Court-Martial RE: SPD: KFS Unit/Location: Company A, 187TH Ordnance Battalion, Fort Jackson, SC Time Lost: AWOL x 1 from (060925-061107) for 44 days. Yes No Counsel: None Witnesses/Observers: NA Exhibits Submitted: Online application dated 27 June 2010.

  • ARMY | DRB | CY2010 | AR20100011403

    Original file (AR20100011403.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Applicant Name: ????? On 18 July 2008, the separation authority approved the discharge with a characterization of service of under other than honorable conditions. It is also noted that the characterization of service for this type of discharge is normally under other than honorable conditions and the applicant was aware of it prior to requesting discharge.

  • ARMY | DRB | CY2009 | AR20090010220

    Original file (AR20090010220.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Applicant Name: ????? Chapter 10 of that regulation provides, in pertinent part, that a member who has committed an offense or offenses for which the authorized punishment includes a punitive discharge may submit a request for a discharge for the good of the service in lieu of trial by court-martial. Board Action Directed President, Army Discharge Review Board Issue a new DD Form 214 Change Characterization to: Change Reason to: NA Other: NA RE Code: Grade Restoration: No Yes Grade:...

  • ARMY | DRB | CY2011 | AR20110003026

    Original file (AR20110003026.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Applicant Name: ????? Discharge Under Review Unit CDR Recommended Discharge: Date: 060131 Discharge Received: Date: 060222 Chapter: 10 AR: 635-200 Reason: In Lieu of Trial by Court-Martial RE: SPD: KFS Unit/Location: Troop E, 5th Battalion, 15th Cavalry, Fort Knox, KY Time Lost: AWOL x 1 from (051114-060122) for 70 days. Additionally, the analyst noted the applicant's issue requesting a change to the narrative reason for separation; however, the narrative reason for separation is governed...

  • ARMY | DRB | CY2009 | AR20090016180

    Original file (AR20090016180.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Applicant Name: ????? On 18 March 2009, the separation authority approved the Chapter 10 request with an under other than honorable conditions discharge. Chapter 10 of that regulation provides, in pertinent part, that a member who has committed an offense or offenses for which the authorized punishment includes a punitive discharge may submit a request for a discharge for the good of the Service in lieu of trial by court-martial.