Applicant Name: ?????
Application Receipt Date: 2009/05/26 Prior Review: Prior Review Date: NA
I. Applicant Request: Upgrade Reason Change RE Code Change
Issues: The applicant states, "I joined the Army to get away from a life that was going nowhere. My time spent in the service was, for the most part, honorable. I had a rouugh time in Iraq trying to deal with the death of my grandmother. Upon my return home I also had to deal with a divorce. I made some bad choices. But I am very much trying to move on, I have moved away from the bad influences and am about to be remarried. The effects that my discharge has had on me trying to get into school and get a job has made things difficult. I am hoping that an upgrade in my discharge will help."
II. Were Proper Discharge and Separation Authority procedures followed?
Tender Offer: NA
See Attachments: Legal Medical Minority Opinion Exhibits
III. Discharge Under Review
Unit CDR Recommended Discharge: Date: 080403
Discharge Received: Date: 080404 Chapter: 14-12c(2) AR: 635-200
Reason: Misconduct (Drug Abuse) RE: SPD: JKK Unit/Location: 1st Maintenance Co, 541st CSSB, Ft Riley, KS
Time Lost: None
Article 15s (Charges/Dates/Punishment): 071102, wrongfully used cocaine (071001-071004); reduction to E1, forfeiture of $650 pay for one month, extra duty and restriction 45 days (FG).
080317, wrongfully used marijuana (080113-080213); reduction to E1, forfeiture of $673 pay for two months, extra duty and restriction 45 days (FG).
Courts-Martial (Charges/Dates/Punishment): None
Counseling Records Available: Yes No
IV. Soldiers Overall Record
Age at current enlistment: 23
Current ENL Date: 051102 Current ENL Term: 3 Years 27 weeks
Current ENL Service: 2 Yrs, 05Mos, 03Days ?????
Total Service: 2 Yrs, 05Mos, 03Days ?????
Previous Discharges: None
Highest Grade: E3 Performance Ratings Available: Yes No
MOS: 63B10 Wheeled Vehicle Mech GT: 114 EDU: GED Overseas: SWA Combat: Iraq (060826-070818)
Decorations/Awards: NDSM, GWOTSM, ICM
V. Post-Discharge Activity
City, State: Durham, NC
Post Service Accomplishments: None submitted by the applicant.
VI. Facts, Circumstances, and Legal Basis for Separation
a. Facts and Circumstances:
The evidence of record shows that on 1 April 2008, the unit commander notified the applicant of initiation of separation action under the provisions of Chapter 14, paragraph 14-12c(2), AR 635-200, by reason of misconduct for receiving two Field Grade Articles 15 for testing positive for cocaine and marijuana, with a general, under honorable conditions discharge.
She was advised of her rights. The applicant consulted with legal counsel, was advised of the impact of the discharge action and did not submit a statement in her own behalf. The unit commander subsequently recommended separation from the Army and waiver of further rehabilitative efforts. The intermediate commander reviewed the proposed discharge action and recommended approval of the separation action with a general, under honorable conditions discharge.
On 3 April 2008, the separation authority waived further rehabilitative efforts and directed that the applicant be discharged with a characterization of service of general, under honorable conditions.
b. Legal Basis for Separation:
Army Regulation 635-200 sets forth the basic authority for the separation of enlisted personnel. Chapter 14 of this regulation establishes policy and prescribes procedures for separating members for misconduct. Specific categories include minor disciplinary infractions, a pattern of misconduct, and commission of a serious offense, to include abuse of illegal drugs, convictions by civil authorities and desertion or absence without leave. Action will be taken to separate a member for misconduct when it is clearly established that rehabilitation is impractical or unlikely to succeed. Army policy states that an under other than honorable conditions discharge is normally considered appropriate; however, a general, under honorable conditions or an honorable discharge may be granted.
c. Response to Issues, Recommendation and Rationale:
After carefully examining the applicants record of service during the period of enlistment under review and the issue submitted with the application, the analyst determined that the discharge was both proper and equitable.
The applicant, by violating the Army's policy not to possess or use illegal drugs, compromised the trust and confidence placed in a Soldier. The applicant, as a Soldier, had the duty to support and abide by the Army's drug policies. By abusing illegal drugs, the applicant knowingly risked a military career and diminished the quality of service below that meriting a fully honorable discharge.
Further, the analyst noted that applicant's issue and determined that eligibility for veteran's benefits to include educational benefits under the Montgomery GI Bill does not fall within the purview of the Army Discharge Review Board. Accordingly, the applicant should contact a local office of the Department of Veterans Affairs for further assistance.
Therefore, the analyst determined the reason for discharge and the characterization of service were both proper and equitable and recommends to the Board to deny relief.
VII. Summary of Army Discharge Review Board Hearing
Type of Hearing: Date: 5 March 2010 Location: Washington, DC
Did the Applicant Testify? Yes No
Counsel: NA
Witnesses/Observers: NA
Exhibits Submitted: NA
VIII. Board Discussion, Determination, and Recommendation
After carefully examining the applicants record of service during the period of enlistment under review and considering the analysts recommendation and rationale, the Board determined that the discharge was both proper and equitable and voted to deny relief.
IX. Board Decision
XI. Certification Signature
Board Vote: Approval Authority:
Character - Change 0 No change 5
Reason - Change 0 No change 5
(Board member names available upon request)
EDGAR J. YANGER
Colonel, U.S. Army
X. Board Action Directed President, Army Discharge Review Board
Issue a new DD Form 214
Change Characterization to:
Change Reason to: No Change
Other: NA
RE Code:
Grade Restoration: No Yes Grade: NA
ARMY DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD - CASE REPORT AND DIRECTIVE
Case Number AR20090008984
______________________________________________________________________________
Page 3 of 3 pages
ARMY | DRB | CY2008 | AR20080018071
Legal Basis for Separation: National Guard Regulation (NGR) 600-200 and Army Regulation 135-78 govern procedures covering enlisted personnel management of the Army National Guard. Therefore, the analyst determined that the reason for discharge and the characterization of service remains both proper and equitable and recommends to the Board to deny relief. Board Discussion, Determination, and Recommendation After carefully examining the applicants record of service during the period of...
ARMY | DRB | CY2009 | AR20090005323
Applicant Name: ????? The applicant consulted with legal counsel, was advised of the impact of the discharge action, waived consideration of his case by an administrative separation board, and submitted a statement in his own behalf. Board Action Directed President, Army Discharge Review Board Issue a new DD Form 214 Change Characterization to: Change Reason to: No Change Other: NA RE Code: Grade Restoration: No Yes Grade: None ARMY DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD - CASE REPORT AND DIRECTIVE Case...
ARMY | DRB | CY2009 | AR20090012693
Facts and Circumstances: The evidence of record shows that the unit commander notified the applicant of initiation of separation action under the provisions of Chapter 14, paragraph 14-12c(2)(e), AR 635-200, by reason of misconduct commission of a serious offense for wrongful use of marijuana on three occasions between (010128-010228, 010924-011024 and 011111-011211), with an under other than honorable conditions discharge. On 16 August 2002, the applicant consulted with legal counsel again...
ARMY | DRB | CY2009 | AR20090015084
Chapter 10 of that regulation provides, in pertinent part, that a member who has committed an offense or offenses for which the authorized punishment includes a punitive discharge may submit a request for a discharge for the good of the Service in lieu of trial by court-martial. It is also noted that the characterization of service for this type of discharge is normally under other than honorable conditions and that the applicant was aware of that prior to requesting discharge. ...
ARMY | DRB | CY2009 | AR20090012930
The intermediate commander reviewed the proposed discharge action and recommended approval of the separation action with a general, under honorable conditions discharge. The narrative reason specified by Army Regulations for a discharge under this paragraph is "Misconduct (Drug Abuse)," the separation code is "JKK," and the reentry code is "RE 4." Board Action Directed President, Army Discharge Review Board Issue a new DD Form 214 Change Characterization to: Change Reason to: NA Other:...
AF | DRB | CY2006 | AR20060015663
The applicant consulted with legal counsel, was advised of the impact of the discharge action, and submitted a statement in her own behalf. The intermediate commander reviewed the proposed discharge action and recommended approval of the separation action with a general, under honorable conditions discharge. On 17 July 2006, the separation authority waived further rehabilitative efforts and directed that the applicant be discharged with a characterization of service of general, under...
ARMY | DRB | CY2008 | AR20080003440
It is hard at times to even think about my service due to the shame I feel for the mistake I made. Facts and Circumstances: The evidence of record shows that on 3 August 2004, the unit commander notified the applicant of initiation of separation action under the provisions of Chapter 14, AR 635-200, by reason of misconductCommission of a Serious Offense for gross disregard of Army rules and regulations and is a disruptive influence on the unit; demonstrated an inability to comply with...
ARMY | DRB | CY2009 | AR20090020465
I wish that I had never made the choice to wrongfully use illegal drugs. Based on the available record and the statement the applicant submitted the analyst determined that the applicant had many legitimate avenues through which to obtain assistance or relief (i.e., Chaplain, Army Community Services, Army Substance Abuse Program), without committing the misconduct, which led to the separation action under review. Therefore, based on the available evidence, the analyst presumes government...
ARMY | DRB | CY2009 | AR20090009815
The intermediate commander reviewed the proposed discharge action and recommended approval of the separation action with a general, under honorable conditions discharge. On 16 May 2008, the separation authority waived further rehabilitative efforts and directed that the applicant be discharged with a characterization of service of general, under honorable conditions. Board Action Directed President, Army Discharge Review Board Issue a new DD Form 214 Change Characterization to: Change...
ARMY | DRB | CY2010 | AR20100007046
Applicant Name: ????? Facts and Circumstances: The evidence of record shows that on 19 June 2007, the unit commander notified the applicant of initiation of separation action under the provisions of Chapter 14, paragraph 14-12b, AR 635-200, by reason of pattern of misconduct for disobeying a lawful order x2 (070110 & 060720), failed to go to the appointed place of duty x7 (060608, 060717, 060718, 060719, 060720, 061121 & 061122), made a false official statement (060908), disrespectful in...