Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | DRB | CY2010 | AR20100011233
Original file (AR20100011233.txt) Auto-classification: Denied
Applicant Name:  ?????

Application Receipt Date: 2010/03/24	Prior Review:     Prior Review Date: NA     

I.  Applicant Request:  Upgrade     Reason Change     RE Code Change    

Issues: The applicant states, in effect, that he would like to use his GI loan to go to college and he is unable to find work and would not be able to attend without help. He does have a co-borrower and would much rather not have to put some one else in that situation. He is planning to attend Westwood College for Gaming Graphics and Design, and the cost is about $8,500 a term. The school is roughly 3 years long. He is not sure if he needs to send anything else in with this request for DD Form 214 upgrade. He would be happy to send any additional paperwork needed in to this office or the Department of Veterans Affairs. If for any reason he needs to be contacted and cannot be reached on the above phone number, call his cell phone number.

II.  Were Proper Discharge and Separation Authority procedures followed?	     
Tender Offer:   NA

See Attachments:  Legal     Medical     Minority Opinion     Exhibits 

III.  Discharge Under Review
Unit CDR Recommended Discharge: 	   Date: 060614
Discharge Received: 			   Date: 060626   Chapter: 14-12c(2)       AR: 635-200
Reason: Misconduct (Drug Abuse)	   RE:     SPD: JKK   Unit/Location: Maintenance Troop, Regimental Support Squadron, 2nd Stryker Cavalry Regiment, Fort Lewis, WA 

Time Lost: None

Article 15s (Charges/Dates/Punishment): 060519, wrongfully used cocaine between on or about (060406-060413), reduction to Private (E-1), foreiture of $636.00 pay per month for two months, extra duty and restriction for 45 days (FG)

Courts-Martial (Charges/Dates/Punishment): None

Counseling Records Available: Yes    No 

IV.  Soldier’s Overall Record
Age at current enlistment:  19
Current ENL Date: Reenl/050506    Current ENL Term: 5 Years  ?????
Current ENL Service: 	1 Yrs, 1 Mos, 21 Days ?????
Total Service:  		3 Yrs, 0 Mos, 3 Days ?????
Previous Discharges: 	RA 030624-050505/HD
Highest Grade: E-4		Performance Ratings Available: Yes    No 
MOS: 45K10 Armament Repairer   GT: 99   EDU: HS Grad   Overseas: Southwest Asia   Combat: Iraq (040912-051004)
Decorations/Awards: ARCOM, NDSM, GWTEM, GWTSM, ICMDL, ASR, OSR, CAB

V.  Post-Discharge Activity
City, State:  ?????
Post Service Accomplishments: The applicant stated in his issue that he plans to attend Westwood College for Gaming, Graphics and Design, which is 3 years long.





VI.  Facts, Circumstances, and Legal Basis for Separation

       a.  Facts and Circumstances:
       The evidence of record shows that on 14 June 2006, the unit commander notified the applicant of initiation of separation action under the provisions of Chapter 14-12c(2), AR 635-200, by reason of misconduct-commission of a serious offnese; in that he wrongfully used cocaine, with a general, under honorable conditions discharge.  He was advised of his rights.  The applicant waived legal counsel, was advised of the impact of the discharge action, and did not submit a statement in his own behalf. 
       
       The unit commander subsequently recommended separation from the service and waiver of further rehabilitative efforts.  The intermediate commander reviewed the proposed discharge action and recommended approval of the separation action with a general, under honorable conditions discharge.  On 15 June 2006, the separation authority waived further rehabilitative efforts and directed that the applicant be discharged with a characterization of service of general, under honorable conditions. 

       b.  Legal Basis for Separation:  
       Army Regulation 635-200 sets forth the basic authority for the separation of enlisted personnel.  Chapter 14 of this regulation establishes policy and prescribes procedures for separating members for misconduct.  Specific categories include minor disciplinary infractions, a pattern of misconduct, and commission of a serious offense, to include abuse of illegal drugs, convictions by civil authorities and desertion or absence without leave.  Action will be taken to separate a member for misconduct when it is clearly established that rehabilitation is impractical or unlikely to succeed.  Army policy states that an under other than honorable conditions discharge is normally considered appropriate, however, a general, under honorable conditions or an honorable discharge may be granted.  

       c.  Response to Issues, Recommendation and Rationale:  
       After carefully examining the applicant’s record of service during the period of enlistment under review and the issue submitted with the application, the analyst found no mitigating factors which would merit an upgrade of the applicant's discharge.   
       
       The analyst determined that the applicant’s discharge was appropriate because the quality of his service was not consistent with the Army's standards for acceptable personal conduct and performance of duty by military personnel.  The applicant, by violating the Army's policy not to possess or use illegal drugs, compromised the trust and confidence placed in a Soldier.  The applicant, as a Soldier, had the duty to support and abide by the Army's drug policies.  By abusing illegal drugs, the applicant knowingly risked a military career and diminished the quality of his service below that meriting a fully honorable discharge. 
       
       The analyst noted the applicant's issue that he would like to use his G I Loan to go to college and he is unable to find work and would not be able to attend without help.  The analyst congratulates the applicant on his attempt to enter college since departing the Army.  However, eligibility for veteran's benefits to include educational benefits under the Montgomery GI Bill does not fall within the purview of the Army Discharge Review Board.  Accordingly, the applicant should contact a local office of the Department of Veterans Affairs for further assistance.  Further, the Board does not grant relief solely for the purpose of gaining employment or enhancing employment opportunities.
       
       Therefore, the analyst determined that the reason for discharge and the characterization of service were both proper and equitable and recommends to the Board to deny relief. 

VII.  Summary of Army Discharge Review Board Hearing

Type of Hearing: 		Date: 8 December 2010         Location: Washington, DC

Did the Applicant Testify?  Yes     No  

Counsel: None

Witnesses/Observers: NA 

Exhibits Submitted: DD Form 293 dated 11 March 2010.

VIII.  Board Discussion, Determination, and Recommendation
After carefully examining the applicant’s record of service during the period of enlistment under review and considering the analyst’s recommendation and rationale, the Board determined that the discharge was both proper and equitable and voted to deny relief. 
        
IX.  Board Decision						
	XI.  Certification Signature
Board Vote:  							          Approval Authority:	
Character - Change 0    No change 5
Reason -     Change 0    No change 5
(Board member names available upon request)
								         EDGAR J. YANGER			 
								         Colonel, U.S. Army
X.  Board Action Directed					         President, Army Discharge Review Board
Issue a new DD Form 214  					
Change Characterization to: 			         
Change Reason to: No Change
Other: No Change										
RE Code: 
Grade Restoration:   No   Yes   Grade: No Change


























Legend:
AWOL    	Absent Without Leave		GCM   General Court Martial	NA   Not applicable			SCM	Summary Court Martial
BCD   	Bad Conduct Discharge	GD      General Discharge	NIF   Not in the file			SPCM	Special Court Martial
CG 	Company Grade Article 15	HD      Honorable Discharge	OAD   Ordered to Active Duty		UNC	Uncharacterized Discharge  
DD 	Dishonorable Discharge	HS       High School Graduate	OMPF   Official Military Personnel File	UOTH  	Under Other Than Honorable 
FG	Field Grade Article 15		IADT   Initial Active Duty Training	RE     Reentry Code				Conditions 

ARMY DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD - CASE REPORT AND DIRECTIVE

Case Number AR20100011233
______________________________________________________________________________


Page 1 of 3 pages

Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | DRB | CY2009 | AR20090011953

    Original file (AR20090011953.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The intermediate commander reviewed the proposed discharge action and recommended approval of the separation action with a general, under honorable conditions discharge. Therefore, the analyst determined that the reason for discharge, the characterization of service, to include the reentry eligibility (RE) code were both proper and equitable and recommends to the Board to deny relief. Board Action Directed President, Army Discharge Review Board Issue a new DD Form 214 Change...

  • ARMY | DRB | CY2009 | AR20090011633

    Original file (AR20090011633.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Facts and Circumstances: The evidence of record shows that on 3 August 2004, the unit commander notified the applicant of initiation of separation action under the provisions of Chapter 14, paragraph 14-12c, AR 635-200, by reason of misconduct-commission of a serious offense for AWOL (040601-040629), receiving two Article 15s and numerous counseling statements for failing to report to his appointed place of duty, with a general, under honorable conditions discharge. Yes No Counsel:...

  • ARMY | DRB | CY2010 | AR20100014161

    Original file (AR20100014161.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Applicant Name: ????? On 10 September 1999, the separation authority waived further rehabilitative efforts and directed that the applicant be discharged with a characterization of service of general, under honorable conditions. Board Action Directed President, Army Discharge Review Board Issue a new DD Form 214 Change Characterization to: Change Reason to: No Change Other: No Change RE Code: Grade Restoration: No Yes Grade: No Change Legend: AWOL Absent Without Leave GCM General Court...

  • ARMY | DRB | CY2012 | AR20120005299

    Original file (AR20120005299.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Applicant Name: ????? The applicant further contends being in very stressful and depressing situations at the time of separation, he was having serious problems in his marriage and used drugs to deal with the problems. The applicant also contends another Soldier was caught for his third DUI and only got demoted from Specialist to PFC, extra duty and some rehab and right back to work with no other repercussions; for this reason his discharge was unfair and inequitable because it was a one...

  • ARMY | DRB | CY2009 | AR20090007087

    Original file (AR20090007087.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    I am only trying to better myself and help my family out as well by going to college however I don't think i can make it when I try to transfer to a better university and find that I can't pay for the tuition by myself because I can't find a good job. The applicant states in his request that he and his therapist decided to take the necessary actions to be discharged from the Army Reserve before he had to report to initial active duty training. Board Action Directed President, Army...

  • ARMY | DRB | CY2012 | AR20120007581

    Original file (AR20120007581.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Applicant Name: ????? He completed over 177 missions while in Iraq and completed his combat tour before making that life changing mistake. After returning from lraq, he began having flashbacks, nightmares, and turned to alcohol to cope and he does not remember using cocaine.

  • ARMY | DRB | CY2009 | AR20090016574

    Original file (AR20090016574.txt) Auto-classification: Denied
  • ARMY | DRB | CY2009 | AR20090008214

    Original file (AR20090008214.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    On 4 April 2006, the separation authority waived further rehabilitative efforts and directed that the applicant be discharged with a characterization of service of general, under honorable conditions. However, the separation authority approved the applicant's discharge under the provisions of Chapter 14, paragraph 14-12c, AR 635-200, by reason of commission of a serious offense, with a characterization of service of "General, Under Honorable Conditions." Board Action Directed President,...

  • ARMY | DRB | CY2011 | AR20110021684

    Original file (AR20110021684.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Applicant Name: ????? However, the analyst determined that the applicant’s discharge was appropriate because the quality of his service was not consistent with the Army's standards for acceptable personal conduct and performance of duty by military personnel. Further, the analyst found no evidence of arbitrary or capricious actions by the command and was satisfied that all requirements of law and regulation were met and the rights of the applicant were fully protected throughout the...

  • ARMY | DRB | CY2008 | AR20080013696

    Original file (AR20080013696.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Applicant Name: ????? On 22 April 2003, the separation authority waived further rehabilitative efforts and directed that the applicant be discharged with a characterization of service of general under honorable conditions. Board Action Directed President, Army Discharge Review Board Issue a new DD Form 214 Change Characterization to: Change Reason to: NA Other: NA RE Code: Grade Restoration: No Yes Grade: NA ARMY DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD - CASE REPORT AND DIRECTIVE Case Number...