Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | DRB | CY2010 | AR20100011046
Original file (AR20100011046.txt) Auto-classification: Denied
Applicant Name:  ?????

Application Receipt Date: 2010/03/17	Prior Review:     Prior Review Date: NA     

I.  Applicant Request:  Upgrade     Reason Change     RE Code Change    

Issues: The applicant states, in effect, that he served his country honorably after September 11, 2001 and was an outstanding Soldier while he was defending his country. After he returned, he had some problems with his conduct. He was discharged in February of 2003 and since then, he has been a model citizen. He has not had any problems, legal or illegal and has been a successful suvivor for the past 7 years. Due to the recession, he has been unemployed for nearly 10 months.

He decided to go back to college and has enrolled at the University of Phoenix, but he can't get approved for the GI Bill until his discharge becomes fully honorabley. He is a good, decent, hard working man who is trying to better himself with a quality education. Due to the recession and his discharge status, paying for school has become a nightmare. Please help him to better himself and in turn, this country, by upgrading his discharge to fully honorable so he can get help, he believes he earned when he laced up his boots and went to Iraq.   

II.  Were Proper Discharge and Separation Authority procedures followed?	     
Tender Offer:   NA

See Attachments:  Legal     Medical     Minority Opinion     Exhibits 

III.  Discharge Under Review
Unit CDR Recommended Discharge: 	   Date: NIF
Discharge Received: 			   Date: 030221   Chapter: 14-12c(2)       AR: 635-200
Reason: Misconduct	   RE:     SPD: JKK   Unit/Location: HQ & HQ Battery, 3rd Battalion, 82nd Field Artillery, 1st Cavalry Division, Fort Hood, TX 

Time Lost: None

Article 15s (Charges/Dates/Punishment): 030114, wrongfully used marijuana on or between (021112-021212), forfeiture o f $575.00 pay per month for 2 months, extra duty and restriction for 45 days (FG)

Article 15, 020430, wrongfully possessed ecstasy on or about (011213), reduction to Private (E-1), forfeiture of $552.00 pay per month for 2 months, restriction and extra duty for 45 days (FG)

Courts-Martial (Charges/Dates/Punishment): None

Counseling Records Available: Yes    No 

IV.  Soldier’s Overall Record
Age at current enlistment:  22
Current ENL Date: 010604    Current ENL Term: 5 Years  The applicant required a moral waiver at the time of enlistment, which was approved on (010604)
Current ENL Service: 	1 Yrs, 8 Mos, 18 Days ?????
Total Service:  		1 Yrs, 8 Mos, 18 Days ?????
Previous Discharges: 	None
Highest Grade: E-3		Performance Ratings Available: Yes    No 
MOS: 82C10 Field Artillery Surveyor   GT: 107   EDU: HS Grad   Overseas: None   Combat: None
Decorations/Awards: ASR

V.  Post-Discharge Activity
City, State:  ?????
Post Service Accomplishments: None submitted by the applicant.

VI.  Facts, Circumstances, and Legal Basis for Separation

       a.  Facts and Circumstances:
       The evidence of record shows that the unit commander notified the applicant of initiation of separation action under the provisions of Chapter 14-12c, AR 635-200, by reason of misconduct-commission of a serious offense; in that he tested positive for marijuana and ecstasy, with a general, under honorable conditions discharge.  He was advised of his rights.  The applicant waived legal counsel, was advised of the impact of the discharge action, and did not submit a statement in his own behalf.  The unit commander subsequently recommended separation from the service and waiver of further rehabilitative efforts.  The intermediate commander reviewed the proposed discharge action and recommended approval of the separation action with a general, under honorable conditions discharge.  The separation authority waived further rehabilitative efforts and directed that the applicant be discharged with a characterization of service of general, under honorable conditions. 

       b.  Legal Basis for Separation:  
       Army Regulation 635-200 sets forth the basic authority for the separation of enlisted personnel.  Chapter 14 of this regulation establishes policy and prescribes procedures for separating members for misconduct.  Specific categories include minor disciplinary infractions, a pattern of misconduct, and commission of a serious offense, to include abuse of illegal drugs, convictions by civil authorities and desertion or absence without leave.  Action will be taken to separate a member for misconduct when it is clearly established that rehabilitation is impractical or unlikely to succeed.  Army policy states that an under other than honorable conditions discharge is normally considered appropriate, however, a general, under honorable conditions or an honorable discharge may be granted. 

       c.  Response to Issues, Recommendation and Rationale:  
       After carefully examining the applicant’s record of service during the period of enlistment under review and the issue submitted with the application, the analyst found no mitigating factors which would merit an upgrade of the applicant's discharge.  
       
       The analyst determined that the applicant’s discharge was appropriate because the quality of his service was not consistent with the Army's standards for acceptable personal conduct and performance of duty by military personnel.  The applicant, by violating the Army's policy not to possess or use illegal drugs, compromised the trust and confidence placed in a Soldier.  The applicant, as a Soldier, had the duty to support and abide by the Army's drug policies.  By abusing illegal drugs, the applicant knowingly risked a military career and diminished the quality of his service below that meriting a fully honorable discharge.
       
       The analyst noted the applicant's issue that due to the recession, he has been unemployed for nearly 10 months and he has decided to go back to college and has enrolled at the University of Phoenix, but he can't get approved for the GI Bill until his discharge becomes fully honorabley.  The analyst acknowledges the applicant's successful transition to civilian life and commends the applicant for his efforts. 
       
       However after considering the applicant’s quality of service during the initial portion of the enlistment under review, this service was determined not to be sufficiently meritorious to warrant an upgrade to the characterization of discharge.  Further, eligibility for veteran's benefits to include educational benefits under the Montgomery GI Bill does not fall within the purview of the Army Discharge Review Board.  Accordingly, the applicant should contact a local office of the Department of Veterans Affairs for further assistance.  
       
       Therefore, the analyst determined that the reason for discharge and the characterization of service were both proper and equitable and recommends to the Board to deny relief.
       
       
       
       
       
       

VII.  Summary of Army Discharge Review Board Hearing

Type of Hearing: 		Date: 3 December 2010         Location: Washington, DC

Did the Applicant Testify?  Yes     No  

Counsel: None

Witnesses/Observers: NA 

Exhibits Submitted: DD Form 293 dated 26 February 2010.

VIII.  Board Discussion, Determination, and Recommendation
After carefully examining the applicant’s record of service during the period of enlistment under review and considering the analyst’s recommendation and rationale, the Board determined that the discharge was both proper and equitable and voted to deny relief. 
        
IX.  Board Decision						
	XI.  Certification Signature
Board Vote:  							          Approval Authority:	
Character - Change 0    No change 5
Reason -     Change 0    No change 5
(Board member names available upon request)
								         EDGAR J. YANGER			 
								         Colonel, U.S. Army
X.  Board Action Directed					         President, Army Discharge Review Board
Issue a new DD Form 214  					
Change Characterization to: 			         
Change Reason to: No Change
Other: No Change										
RE Code: 
Grade Restoration:   No   Yes   Grade: No Change

















Legend:
AWOL    	Absent Without Leave		GCM   General Court Martial	NA   Not applicable			SCM	Summary Court Martial
BCD   	Bad Conduct Discharge	GD      General Discharge	NIF   Not in the file			SPCM	Special Court Martial
CG 	Company Grade Article 15	HD      Honorable Discharge	OAD   Ordered to Active Duty		UNC	Uncharacterized Discharge  
DD 	Dishonorable Discharge	HS       High School Graduate	OMPF   Official Military Personnel File	UOTH  	Under Other Than Honorable 
FG	Field Grade Article 15		IADT   Initial Active Duty Training	RE     Reentry Code				Conditions 

ARMY DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD - CASE REPORT AND DIRECTIVE

Case Number AR20100011046
______________________________________________________________________________


Page 1 of 3 pages

Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | DRB | CY2010 | AR20100016137

    Original file (AR20100016137.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Applicant Name: ????? It is also noted that the characterization of service for this type of discharge is normally under other than honorable conditions and the applicant was aware of it prior to requesting discharge. Board Discussion, Determination, and Recommendation After carefully examining the applicant’s record of service during the period of enlistment under review and considering the analyst’s recommendation and rationale, the Board determined that the discharge was both proper and...

  • ARMY | DRB | CY2007 | AR20070018441

    Original file (AR20070018441.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Facts and Circumstances: Evidence of record shows that on 16 March 2005, the unit commander notified the applicant of initiation of separation action under the provisions of Chapter 14, AR 635-200, by reason of misconduct—pattern of misconduct in that you failed to go to your appointed place of duty x 2 (040917), (040927), wrongfully appropriated a vehicle, the property of a PVT (041004), and failed to obey a lawful order issued by an individual having the authority to do so (041011), which...

  • ARMY | DRB | CY2010 | AR20100023469

    Original file (AR20100023469.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Applicant Name: ????? On 28 November 2007, the unit commander notified the applicant of initiation of separation action under the provisions of Chapter 14, paragraph 14-9, Section II, AR 635-200, by reason of misconduct- conviction by a civil court in a foreign country, with a general, under honorable conditions discharge. c. Response to Issues, Recommendation and Rationale: After a careful review of all the applicant’s military records, the issue and document submitted with the...

  • ARMY | DRB | CY2012 | AR20120008368

    Original file (AR20120008368.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Applicant Name: ????? Facts and Circumstances: The evidence of record shows that on 16 June 2008, the unit commander notified the applicant of initiation of separation action under the provisions of Chapter 14, paragraph 14-12c (2), AR 635-200, by reason of misconduct (Commission of a Serious Offense) for wrongful use of Ecstasy between on or about (080322 and 080324, 080419- 080421), wrongful use of D-methamphetamine (080322 and 080324, 080419-080421), with a general, under honorable...

  • ARMY | DRB | CY2010 | AR20100015300

    Original file (AR20100015300.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Applicant Name: ????? Board Discussion, Determination, and Recommendation After carefully examining the applicant’s record of service during the period of enlistment under review and considering the analyst’s recommendation and rationale, the Board determined that the discharge was both proper and equitable and voted to deny relief. Board Action Directed President, Army Discharge Review Board Issue a new DD Form 214 Change Characterization to: Change Reason to: No Change Other: No...

  • ARMY | DRB | CY2009 | AR20090010409

    Original file (AR20090010409.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Applicant Name: ????? The separation authority waived further rehabilitative efforts and directed that the applicant be discharged with a characterization of service of general, under honorable conditions. Board Action Directed President, Army Discharge Review Board Issue a new DD Form 214 Change Characterization to: Change Reason to: NA Other: NA RE Code: Grade Restoration: No Yes Grade: NA Legend: AWOL Absent Without Leave GCM General Court Martial NA Not applicable SCM Summary Court...

  • ARMY | DRB | CY2012 | AR20120009476

    Original file (AR20120009476.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Facts and Circumstances: The evidence of record shows that on 10 February 2005, unit commander notified the applicant of initiation of separation action under the provisions of Chapter 14, paragraph 14-12c, AR 635-200, by reason of misconduct—commission of a serious offense, specifically for wrongfully using MDMA (ecstasy) with a general, under honorable conditions discharge. On 10 February 2005, the applicant declined legal counsel, was advised of the impact of the discharge action, waived...

  • ARMY | DRB | CY2008 | AR20080010162

    Original file (AR20080010162.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Applicant Name: ????? On 12 September 2003, the separation authority waived further rehabilitative efforts and directed that the applicant be discharged with a characterization of service of general, under honorable conditions. Board Action Directed President, Army Discharge Review Board Issue a new DD Form 214 Change Characterization to: Change Reason to: No Change Other: NA RE Code: Grade Restoration: No Yes Grade: None ARMY DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD - CASE REPORT AND DIRECTIVE Case Number...

  • ARMY | DRB | CY2009 | AR20090018672

    Original file (AR20090018672.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Applicant Name: ????? On 9 January 2004, the separation authority waived further rehabilitative efforts and directed that the applicant be discharged with a characterization of service of general, under honorable conditions. Board Action Directed President, Army Discharge Review Board Issue a new DD Form 214 Change Characterization to: Change Reason to: No Change Other: No Change RE Code: Grade Restoration: No Yes Grade: No Change Legend: AWOL Absent Without Leave GCM General Court Martial...

  • ARMY | DRB | CY2010 | AR20100010530

    Original file (AR20100010530.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    On 5 November 2002, the separation authority waived further rehabilitative efforts and directed that the applicant be discharged with a characterization of service of general, under honorable conditions. Accordingly, the Board voted to change the characterization of service to fully honorable. Board Action Directed President, Army Discharge Review Board Issue a new DD Form 214 Change Characterization to: Change Reason to: No Change Other: No Change RE Code: Grade Restoration: No Yes Grade:...