Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | DRB | CY2010 | AR20100010530
Original file (AR20100010530.txt) Auto-classification: Denied
Applicant Name:  ?????

Application Receipt Date: 2010/03/08	Prior Review:     Prior Review Date: NA     

I.  Applicant Request:  Upgrade     Reason Change     RE Code Change    

Issues: The applicant states, in effect, that she wants an upgrade because she was just starting to get a handle on her depression. Now that she has received medical care for her depression, she no longer needs to self medicate. She is a single parent and can't receive benefits for school without an honorable discharge. 

II.  Were Proper Discharge and Separation Authority procedures followed?	     
Tender Offer:   NA

See Attachments:  Legal     Medical     Minority Opinion     Exhibits 

III.  Discharge Under Review
Unit CDR Recommended Discharge: 	   Date: 020902
Discharge Received: 			   Date: 021120   Chapter: 14-12b       AR: 635-200
Reason: Misconduct	   RE:     SPD: JKA   Unit/Location: HQ & HQ Company, 13th Signal Battalion, 1st Cavalry Division, Fort Hood, TX 

Time Lost: None

Article 15s (Charges/Dates/Punishment): 020501, wrongfully used ecstasy between on or about (010809-010910), reduction to Private (E-1), restriction and extra duty for 45 days, and an oral reprimand (FG)

Courts-Martial (Charges/Dates/Punishment): None

Counseling Records Available: Yes    No 

IV.  Soldier’s Overall Record
Age at current enlistment:  18
Current ENL Date: 000906    Current ENL Term: 6 Years  ?????
Current ENL Service: 	2 Yrs, 2 Mos, 15 Days ?????
Total Service:  		2 Yrs, 2 Mos, 15 Days ?????
Previous Discharges: 	None
Highest Grade: E-3		Performance Ratings Available: Yes    No 
MOS: 74B10 Information System Oper   GT: 95   EDU: HS Grad   Overseas: None   Combat: None
Decorations/Awards: NDSM, ASR

V.  Post-Discharge Activity
City, State:  ?????
Post Service Accomplishments: None submitted by the applicant.

VI.  Facts, Circumstances, and Legal Basis for Separation

       a.  Facts and Circumstances:
       The evidence of record shows that on 25 September 2002, the unit commander notified the applicant of initiation of separation action under the provisions of Chapter 14-12b, AR 635-200, by reason of a pattern of misconduct; in that she received a Field Grade Article 15 for testing positive for ecstasy, and after that she failed two additional urinalysis, by testing positive for cocaine, methamphetamines, and marijuana, with a general, under honorable conditions discharge. 
       
       She was advised of her rights.  The applicant consulted with legal counsel, was advised of the impact of the discharge action, requested consideration of her case by an administrative separation board, even though she was not entitled to one and she was not being recommended for an under other than honorable conditions discharge.  The applicant submitted a statement in her own behalf.  The unit commander subsequently recommended separation from the service and waiver of further rehabilitative efforts.  The intermediate commander reviewed the proposed discharge action and recommended approval of the separation action with a general, under honorable conditions discharge. 
       
       On 31 October 2002, the separation packet was forewarded to the General Court-Martial Convening Authority to determine whether the applicant should be separated UP AR 635-200, Chapter 14-12b, or whether her medical condition was the underlying cause of her incidents of misconduct and that her case should be processed through medical disability channels. 
       
       On 31 October 2002, the General Court-Martial Convening Authority reviewed the separation packet and found that the applicant's medical condition was not a substantial factor in causing the misconduct and further found it not otherwise appropriate for her separation to proceed through medical channels, and returned the separation packet to the commander for action consistent with the findings of the General Court-Martial Convening Authority.  On 5 November 2002, the separation authority waived further rehabilitative efforts and directed that the applicant be discharged with a characterization of service of general, under honorable conditions. 

       b.  Legal Basis for Separation:  
       Army Regulation 635-200 sets forth the basic authority for the separation of enlisted personnel.  Chapter 14 of this regulation establishes policy and prescribes procedures for separating members for misconduct.  Specific categories include minor disciplinary infractions, a pattern of misconduct, and commission of a serious offense, to include abuse of illegal drugs, convictions by civil authorities and desertion or absence without leave.  Action will be taken to separate a member for misconduct when it is clearly established that rehabilitation is impractical or unlikely to succeed.  Army policy states that an under other than honorable conditions discharge is normally considered appropriate, however, a general, under honorable conditions or an honorable discharge may be granted. 

       c.  Response to Issues, Recommendation and Rationale:  
       After a careful review of all the applicant’s military records, and the issue he submitted, the analyst determined that the characterization of service is improper.  
       
       The analyst noted that the government introduced into the discharge packet the results of a biochemical test that was part of the applicant’s Army Substance Abuse Program (ASAP) treatment plan.  This is limited use information as defined in AR 600-85.  Use of this information mandates award of a fully honorable characterization of service.  
       
       Accordingly, the analyst recommends that the applicant’s characterization of service be upgraded to fully honorable.  However, the analyst found that the reason for discharge was fully supported by the record and therefore, remains both proper and equitable.  

VII.  Summary of Army Discharge Review Board Hearing

Type of Hearing: 		Date: 8 November 2010         Location: Washington, DC

Did the Applicant Testify?  Yes     No  

Counsel: None

Witnesses/Observers: NA 

Exhibits Submitted: DD Form 293 dated 21 January 2010.





VIII.  Board Discussion, Determination, and Recommendation
After carefully examining the applicant’s record of service during the period of enlistment under review and considering the analyst’s recommendation and rationale, the Board noted that the government introduced a document into the discharge process revealing that the applicant had self-referred to the Alcohol and Drug Prevention and Control Program for substance abuse.  This is limited use information as defined in AR 600-85.  Use of this information mandates award of a fully honorable discharge.  Accordingly, the Board voted to change the characterization of service to fully honorable.  However, the board found that the reason for discharge was fully supported by the record and voted not to change it. 
        
IX.  Board Decision						
	XI.  Certification Signature
Board Vote:  							          Approval Authority:	
Character - Change 5    No change 0
Reason -     Change 0    No change 5
(Board member names available upon request)
								         EDGAR J. YANGER			 
								         Colonel, U.S. Army
X.  Board Action Directed					         President, Army Discharge Review Board
Issue a new DD Form 214  					
Change Characterization to: 			         
Change Reason to: No Change
Other: No Change										
RE Code: 
Grade Restoration:   No   Yes   Grade: No Change

























Legend:
AWOL    	Absent Without Leave		GCM   General Court Martial	NA   Not applicable			SCM	Summary Court Martial
BCD   	Bad Conduct Discharge	GD      General Discharge	NIF   Not in the file			SPCM	Special Court Martial
CG 	Company Grade Article 15	HD      Honorable Discharge	OAD   Ordered to Active Duty		UNC	Uncharacterized Discharge  
DD 	Dishonorable Discharge	HS       High School Graduate	OMPF   Official Military Personnel File	UOTH  	Under Other Than Honorable 
FG	Field Grade Article 15		IADT   Initial Active Duty Training	RE     Reentry Code				Conditions 

ARMY DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD - CASE REPORT AND DIRECTIVE

Case Number AR20100010530
______________________________________________________________________________


Page 1 of 3 pages

Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | DRB | CY2009 | AR20090012296

    Original file (AR20090012296.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The separation authority waived further rehabilitative efforts and directed that the applicant be discharged with a characterization of service of general, under honorable conditions. Accordingly, the Board voted to change the characterization of service to fully honorable. Board Action Directed President, Army Discharge Review Board Issue a new DD Form 214 Change Characterization to: Change Reason to: NA Other: NA RE Code: Grade Restoration: No Yes Grade: NA Legend: AWOL Absent Without...

  • ARMY | DRB | CY2012 | AR20120009476

    Original file (AR20120009476.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Facts and Circumstances: The evidence of record shows that on 10 February 2005, unit commander notified the applicant of initiation of separation action under the provisions of Chapter 14, paragraph 14-12c, AR 635-200, by reason of misconduct—commission of a serious offense, specifically for wrongfully using MDMA (ecstasy) with a general, under honorable conditions discharge. On 10 February 2005, the applicant declined legal counsel, was advised of the impact of the discharge action, waived...

  • ARMY | DRB | CY2006 | AR20060011669

    Original file (AR20060011669.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Current ENL Service: 02 Yrs, 00Mos, 22Days ????? The applicant consulted with legal counsel, was advised of the impact of the discharge action, and did not submit a statement in her own behalf. The intermediate commander reviewed the proposed discharge action and recommended approval of the separation action with a general, under honorable conditions discharge.

  • ARMY | DRB | CY2012 | AR20120000238

    Original file (AR20120000238.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Applicant Name: ????? Applicant Request: Upgrade Reason Change RE Code Change Issues: The applicant states, “I feel like I was discharged because of my commander personal reasons, because I did not do enough for them to discharge me from the military. Facts and Circumstances: The evidence of record shows that on 7 September 2011, the unit commander notified the applicant of initiation of separation action under the provisions of Chapter 14, paragraph 14-12b, AR 635-200, by reason of...

  • ARMY | DRB | CY2012 | AR20120000107

    Original file (AR20120000107.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Applicant Name: ????? Facts and Circumstances: The evidence of record shows that on 2 July 2008, the unit commander notified the applicant of initiation of separation action under the provisions of Chapter 14, paragraph 14-12b, AR 635-200, by reason pattern of misconduct for, disobeying a lawful order (080609, 070516, 080124) and failure to report (080515, 080317, 080109), with a general, under honorable conditions discharge. On 28 July 2008, the separation authority waived further...

  • ARMY | DRB | CY2009 | AR20090007696

    Original file (AR20090007696.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The intermediate commander reviewed the proposed discharge action and recommended approval of the separation action with a general, under honorable conditions discharge. On 24 April 2007, the separation packet was forewarded to the separation approving authority with the subject: separation under the provisions of AR 635-200, Chapter 14-12c, Commission of a serious offense; however, the separation authority approved the recommendation for separation under the provisions of AR 635-200,...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | AR20120001080

    Original file (AR20120001080.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Applicant Name: ????? On 17 December 2010, the separation authority approved the recommendation of the administrative separation board, and directed the applicant’s discharge with a characterization of service of under other than honorable conditions. The record shows that on 17 December 2010, the separation approving authority (GCMCA) indicated in his memorandum that in the foregoing board action pertaining to the applicant, after careful consideration of her case, the findings and...

  • AF | DRB | CY2006 | AR20060016707

    Original file (AR20060016707.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The intermediate commander reviewed the proposed discharge action and recommended approval of the separation action with a general, under honorable conditions discharge. On 21 December 2004, the separation authority waived further rehabilitative efforts and directed that the applicant be discharged with a characterization of service of general, under honorable conditions. Certification Signature and Date Approval Authority: MARK E. COLLINS Colonel, U.S. Army President, Army Discharge...

  • ARMY | DRB | CY2006 | AR20060014478

    Original file (AR20060014478.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Current ENL Service: 01 Yrs, 07Mos, 23Days ????? The intermediate commander reviewed the proposed discharge action and recommended approval of the separation action with a general, under honorable conditions discharge. Certification Signature and Date Approval Authority: MARK E. COLLINS Colonel, U.S. Army President, Army Discharge Review Board Official: CHRISTINE U. MARTINSON DATE: 20 November 2007 Lieutenant Colonel, U.S. Army Chief, Secretary Recorder ARMY DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD - CASE...

  • ARMY | DRB | CY2009 | AR20090009853

    Original file (AR20090009853.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Facts and Circumstances: The evidence of record shows that on 14 August 2007, the unit commander notified the applicant of initiation of separation action under the provisions of Chapter 14, paragraph 14-12c, AR 635-200, by reason of misconduct commission of serious offense, abuse of illegal drugs, also committed a number of offenses which constituted a pattern of misconduct, wrongfully disobeyed orders from noncommissioned officers, on more than one occasion wrongfully consumed alcohol...