Search Decisions

Decision Text

AF | DRB | CY2006 | AR20060016223
Original file (AR20060016223.txt) Auto-classification: Denied
Application Receipt Date: 061122	

Prior Review    Prior Review Date: None

I.  Applicant Request
Request:  Upgrade     Reason Change     RE Code Change    

Issues: See enclosed DD Form 293 submitted by the applicant.

II.  Were Proper Discharge and Separation Authority procedures followed?  
Yes    No        Tender Offer:        

See Attachments:  Legal     Medical     Minority Opinion     Exhibits 

III.  Original Character of Discharge
Unit CDR Recommended Discharge:    Date: NIF
Discharge Received:     Date: 990914   
Chapter: 14    AR: 635-200
Reason: Misconduct
RE:     SPD: JKN
Unit/Location: 557th CS CO, Maint Rear DS, Fort Irwin, CA 

Time Lost: Total time lost 2 days (981206-981207).  Reason for lost time was not found in the available records.

Article 15s (Charges/Dates/Punishment): None

Court-Martials (Charges/Dates/Punishment): None

Counseling Records Available: Yes    No 

IV.  Soldier's Overall Record
DOB:  790511  
Current ENL Date: 970723    Current ENL Term: 04 Years       
Current ENL Service: 02 Yrs, 01Mos, 20Days      
Total Service:  02 Yrs, 01Mos, 20Days      
Previous Discharges: None
Highest Grade: E3
Performance Ratings Available: Yes    No 
MOS: 45K10/Armament Repairer   GT: 108   EDU: HS Grad   Overseas: None   Combat: None
Decorations/Awards: ASR
V.  Post-Discharge Activity
Home of Record:
Current Address: 
Post Service Accomplishments: None Listed

VI.  Facts, Circumstances, and Legal Basis for Separation

      a.  Facts and Circumstances:
      The applicant's record is void of the specific facts and circumstances concerning the events that led to his discharge from the Army.  However, the record contains a properly constituted DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty), which was not authenticated by the applicant's signature.  His DD Form 214 indicates that he was discharged under the provisions of Chapter 14-12a, AR 635-200, by reason of misconduct-minor disciplinary infractions with a characterization of service of general, under honorable conditions and a reeentry eligibility (RE) code of 3.  Furthermore, the DD Form 214 shows a Separation Code of JKN (i.e., misconduct-minor infractions).

      b.  Legal Basis for Separation:  
      Army Regulation 635-200 sets forth the basic authority for the separation of enlisted personnel.  Chapter 14 establishes policy and prescribes procedures for separating members for misconduct.  Specific categories include minor disciplinary infractions, a pattern of misconduct, and commission of a serious offense, to include abuse of illegal drugs, convictions by civil authorities and desertion or absence without leave.  Action will be taken to separate a member for misconduct when it is clearly established that rehabilitation is impractical or unlikely to succeed.  Army policy states that an under other than honorable conditions discharge is normally considered appropriate, but a general discharge under honorable conditions or an honorable discharge may be granted.
      
      c.  Response to Issues, Recommendation and Rationale:  
      After a careful review of all the applicant's available records for the period of enlistment under review, and the issue he submitted, the analyst found no mitigating factors that would merit an upgrade of the applicant's discharge.  The applicant's record is void of the specific facts and circumstances concerning the events that led to his discharge from the Army.  However, the applicant's record does contain a properly constituted DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty), which was not authenticated by the applicant's signature.  This document identifies the reason and characterization of the discharge and the analyst presumed Government Regularity in the discharge process.  The DD Form 214 indicates that the applicant was discharged under the provisions of Chapter 14, AR 635-200, Paragraph 12a by reason of misconduct-minor infractions with a characterization of service of general, under honorable conditions.  Barring evidence to the contrary, the analyst was satisfied that all requirements of law and regulation were met and the rights of the applicant were fully protected throughout the separation process.  Furthermore, the analyst noted the applicant's issue, however, eligibility for veteran's benefits to include educational benefits under the Montgomery GI Bill does not fall within the purview of the Army Discharge Review Board.  Accordingly, the applicant should contact a local office of the Department of Veterans Affairs for further assistance.  In view of the foregoing the analyst determined the reason for discharge and the characterization of service were both proper and equitable.   

VII.  Summary of Army Discharge Review Board Hearing 

Type of Hearing: 			Date: 19 December 2007              
Location: Washington, DC

Did the Applicant Testify?  Yes     No  

Counsel: NA

Witnesses/Observers: NA 

Exhibits Submitted: NA

VIII.  Board Decision
The discharge was:			Proper	 	Improper	
				                 	Equitable	 	Inequitable	

The characterization of service was:   Proper	 	Improper	
				                 	Equitable	 	Inequitable	

The narrative reasons were: 	       	Equitable	 	Inequitable	

DRB voting record:  		      Change 0    No change 5   - Character
		 			      Change 0    No change 5   - Reason
					      (Board member names available upon request)

IX.  Board Discussion, Determination, and Recommendation
After carefully examining the applicant's record of service during the period of enlistment under review and considering the analyst's recommendation and rationale, the Board determined that the discharge was both proper and equitable, and voted to deny relief.

Case report reviewed and verified by: Eric S. Moore, Examiner									        
X.  Board Action Directed
No Change 
Issue a new DD Form 214  
Change Characterization to:    
Change Reason to: NA
Other: NA
RE Code:  
Grade Restoration:   No   Yes  Grade: NA

XI.  Certification Signature and Date
Approval Authority: 

MARK E. COLLINS
Colonel, U.S. Army
President, Army Discharge Review Board

Official: 


CHRISTINE U. MARTINSON			DATE: 27 December 2007
Lieutenant Colonel, U.S. Army
Chief, Secretary Recorder
ARMY DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD - CASE REPORT AND DIRECTIVE

Case Number AR20060016223

Applicant Name:  Mr.         
______________________________________________________________________


Page 1 of 5 pages

Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | DRB | CY2009 | AR20090008174

    Original file (AR20090008174.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The intermediate commander reviewed the proposed discharge action and recommended approval of the separation action with a general, under honorable conditions discharge. The separation authority waived further rehabilitative efforts and directed that the applicant be discharged with a characterization of service of general, under honorable conditions. Board Action Directed President, Army Discharge Review Board Issue a new DD Form 214 Change Characterization to: Change Reason to: No...

  • ARMY | DRB | CY2008 | AR20080015694

    Original file (AR20080015694.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Facts and Circumstances: The evidence of record shows that on 18 June 2007, the unit commander notified the applicant of initiation of separation action under the provisions of Chapter 14, Paragraph 14-12a, AR 635-200, by reason of misconduct-minor discliplinary actions for receiving numerous counseling statements for misconduct, with a general, under honorable conditions discharge. The intermediate commander reviewed the proposed discharge action and recommended approval of the separation...

  • ARMY | DRB | CY2007 | AR20070013317

    Original file (AR20070013317.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Applicant Name: ????? The intermediate commander reviewed the proposed discharge action and recommended approval of the separation action with a general under honorable conditions discharge. The separation authority waived further rehabilitative efforts and directed that the applicant be discharged with a characterization of service of general under honorable conditions.

  • ARMY | DRB | CY2010 | AR20100009611

    Original file (AR20100009611.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The separation authority waived further rehabilitative efforts and directed the applicant’s discharge with a characterization of service of general, under honorable conditions. Therefore, the analyst recommends no change to the RE code. Board Action Directed President, Army Discharge Review Board Issue a new DD Form 214 Change Characterization to: Change Reason to: No Change Other: NA RE Code: Grade Restoration: No Yes Grade: NA Legend: AWOL Absent Without Leave GCM General Court Martial...

  • ARMY | DRB | CY2009 | AR20090010300

    Original file (AR20090010300.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Applicant Name: ????? He provides several medical documents for the Board's consideration. Board Action Directed President, Army Discharge Review Board Issue a new DD Form 214 Change Characterization to: Change Reason to: NA Other: NA RE Code: Grade Restoration: No Yes Grade: NA ARMY DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD - CASE REPORT AND DIRECTIVE Case Number AR20090010300 ______________________________________________________________________________ Page 1 of 3 pages

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2007 | 20070009643

    Original file (20070009643.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Applicant Name: ????? Facts and Circumstances: The evidence of record shows that on 31 May 2006, the unit commander notified the Applicant of initiation of separation action under the provisions of Chapter 14, AR 635-200, by reason of misconduct—for displaying a pattern of misconduct consisting of serious disciplinary infractions, for having received Article 15s for positive urinalysis (040624) and failure to report (051206), with a general under honorable conditions discharge. On 9 June...

  • ARMY | DRB | CY2006 | AR20060010072

    Original file (AR20060010072.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Original Character of Discharge Unit CDR Recommended Discharge: Date: 961011 Discharge Received: Date: 961023 Chapter: 11 AR: 635-200 Reason: Entry Level Performance and Conduct. Board Discussion, Determination, and Recommendation After carefully examining the applicant’s record of service during the period of enlistment under review and considering the analyst’s recommendation and rationale, the Board determined that the discharge was both proper and equitable, and voted to deny relief. ...

  • ARMY | DRB | CY2006 | AR20060011662

    Original file (AR20060011662.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Facts and Circumstances: Evidence of record shows that on 26 August 1993, the unit commander notified the applicant of initiation of separation action under the provisions of Chapter 11, AR 635-200, by reason of entry level performance and conduct (you have no desire to successfully complete basic training, motivation level has been nonexistant and performance has been below average), with an uncharacterized discharge. Board Discussion, Determination, and Recommendation After carefully...

  • ARMY | DRB | CY2007 | AR20070009643

    Original file (AR20070009643.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Current ENL Service: 00 Yrs, 07 Mos, 11 Days ????? Facts and Circumstances: The evidence of record shows that on 31 May 2006, the unit commander notified the Applicant of initiation of separation action under the provisions of Chapter 14, AR 635-200, by reason of misconduct—for displaying a pattern of misconduct consisting of serious disciplinary infractions, for having received Article 15s for positive urinalysis (040624) and failure to report (051206), with a general under honorable...

  • ARMY | DRB | CY2009 | AR20090012953

    Original file (AR20090012953.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Applicant Name: ????? Facts and Circumstances: The evidence of record shows that on 20 Aug 07, the unit commander notified the applicant of initiation of separation action under the provisions of Chapter 14, paragraph 14-12a, AR 635-200, by reason of misconduct— minor disciplinary infractions for dereliction of duties x2, making false official statements x3, failure to obey orders x3 and failing to report x3, with a general, under honorable conditions discharge. On 21 Aug 07, the applicant...