Applicant Name: ?????
Application Receipt Date: 2009/10/07 Prior Review: Prior Review Date: NA
I. Applicant Request: Upgrade Reason Change RE Code Change
Issues: The applicant states, in effect, that he is requesting an upgrade so that he can at least be considered for a viable job. While in basic training at Fort Benning, GA, he was butt stroked by a member (PVT) in his basic training company as ordered to do so by his platoon guide (PVT) who thought he was sleeping. He complained to the senior drill sergeant, SFC, about the hit on the head.
He told him to quit whining and get back to the platoon. After about two weeks, there was no action on his complaint, so he just left Fort Benning in his BDUs, bought some civilian clothes and returned to Idaho to resume his life. After about 114 days, he was arrested by the civilian authorities and returned to military control from which he was subsequently granted a Chapter 10 discharge under less than honorable conditions, in lieu of court martial. He did not resist the offered discharge as he did not feel he could successfully defend his actions.
II. Were Proper Discharge and Separation Authority procedures followed?
Tender Offer: NA
See Attachments: Legal Medical Minority Opinion Exhibits
III. Discharge Under Review
Unit CDR Recommended Discharge: Date: 060202
Discharge Received: Date: 060421 Chapter: 10 AR: 635-200
Reason: In Lieu of Trial by Court-Martial RE: SPD: KFS Unit/Location: F Company, 1st Battalion, 19th Infantry Training Brigade, Fort Benning, GA.
Time Lost: AWOL x 1, for a total of 206 days from (050529-051220). The applicant was apprehended by the civilian authorities at Nampa, Idaho and was transferred to Fort Sill, OK.
Article 15s (Charges/Dates/Punishment): None
Courts-Martial (Charges/Dates/Punishment): None
Counseling Records Available: Yes No
IV. Soldiers Overall Record
Age at current enlistment: 20
Current ENL Date: 050309 Current ENL Term: 3 Years 19 Weeks
Current ENL Service: 0 Yrs, 6 Mos, 21 Days The computation includes 114 days of excess leave from (051229-060421).
Total Service: 0 Yrs, 6 Mos, 21 Days ?????
Previous Discharges: None
Highest Grade: E-1 Performance Ratings Available: Yes No
MOS: None GT: NIF EDU: GED Cert Overseas: None Combat: None
Decorations/Awards: ASR
V. Post-Discharge Activity
City, State: ?????
Post Service Accomplishments: None submitted by the applicant.
VI. Facts, Circumstances, and Legal Basis for Separation
a. Facts and Circumstances:
The evidence of record shows that on 28 December 2005, the applicant was charged with AWOL from (050529-051220). On 29 December 2005, the applicant consulted with legal counsel and voluntarily requested, in writing, discharge under the provisions of Chapter 10, AR 635-200 in lieu of trial by court-martial. In this request, the applicant admitted guilt to the offense, or a lesser included offense.
Further, the applicant indicated that he understood that he could receive an under other than honorable conditions discharge and that the discharge would have a significant effect on eligibility for veterans benefits. The applicant did not submit a statement in his own behalf. The unit commander and intermediate commander's recommended approval of an under other than honorable conditions discharge. On 22 March 2006, the separation authority approved the discharge with an under other than honorable conditions discharge. The applicant was to be reduced to the lowest enlisted rank.
b. Legal Basis for Separation:
Army Regulation 635-200 sets forth the basic authority for the separation of enlisted personnel. Chapter 10 of that regulation provides, in pertinent part, that a member who has committed an offense or offenses for which the authorized punishment includes a punitive discharge may submit a request for a discharge for the good of the Service in lieu of trial by court-martial. The request may be submitted at any time after charges have been preferred and must include the individuals admission of guilt. Army policy states that although an honorable or general, under honorable conditions discharge is authorized, a discharge under other than honorable conditions is normally considered appropriate.
c. Response to Issues, Recommendation and Rationale:
After a careful review of all the applicants military records, and the issue submitted with the application, the analyst found no mitigating factors that would merit an upgrade of the applicant's discharge. The evidence of record shows the applicant was charged with the commission of an offense punishable under the Uniform Code of Military Justice (UCMJ) with a punitive discharge. The applicant consulted with defense counsel, and voluntarily in writing, requested separation from the Army in lieu of trial by court-martial. In doing so, the applicant admitted guilt to the stipulated or lesser-included offenses under the UCMJ.
The analyst noted that all the requirements of law and regulation were met and the rights of the applicant were fully protected throughout the separation process. It is also noted that the characterization of service for this type of discharge is normally under other than honorable conditions and that the applicant was aware of that prior to requesting discharge.
The analyst noted the applicant's issue that he is requesting an upgrade so that he can at least be considered for a viable job. Also, while in basic training at Fort Benning, GA, he was butt stroked by a member (PVT) in his basic training company as ordered to do so by his platoon guide (PVT), who thought he was sleeping. He complained to the senior drill sergeant SFC, about the hit on the head. He told him to quit whining and get back to the platoon. After about two weeks, there was no action on his complaint, so he just left Fort Benning in his BDUs.
The analyst found no evidence of arbitrary or capricious actions by the command. The analyst was satisfied that all requirements of law and regulation were met and the rights of the applicant were fully protected throughout the separation process. Further, the applicant provided no independent corroborating evidence demonstrating that either the command's action was erroneous or that the applicants service mitigated the misconduct or poor duty performance.
Additionally, the Board does not grant relief solely for the purpose of gaining employment or enhancing employment opportunities.
Therefore, the analyst determined that the reason for discharge and the characterization of service were both proper and equitable and recommends to the Board to deny relief.
VII. Summary of Army Discharge Review Board Hearing
Type of Hearing: Date: 6 August 2010 Location: Washington, DC
Did the Applicant Testify? Yes No
Counsel: None
Witnesses/Observers: NA
Exhibits Submitted: None submitted by the applicant.
VIII. Board Discussion, Determination, and Recommendation
After carefully examining the applicants record of service during the period of enlistment under review and considering the analysts recommendation and rationale, the Board determined that the discharge was both proper and equitable and voted to deny relief.
IX. Board Decision
XI. Certification Signature
Board Vote: Approval Authority:
Character - Change 0 No change 5
Reason - Change 0 No change 5
(Board member names available upon request)
EDGAR J. YANGER
Colonel, U.S. Army
X. Board Action Directed President, Army Discharge Review Board
Issue a new DD Form 214
Change Characterization to:
Change Reason to: No Change
Other: No Change
RE Code:
Grade Restoration: No Yes Grade: No Change
Legend:
AWOL Absent Without Leave GCM General Court Martial NA Not applicable SCM Summary Court Martial
BCD Bad Conduct Discharge GD General Discharge NIF Not in the file SPCM Special Court Martial
CG Company Grade Article 15 HD Honorable Discharge OAD Ordered to Active Duty UNC Uncharacterized Discharge
DD Dishonorable Discharge HS High School Graduate OMPF Official Military Personnel File UOTH Under Other Than Honorable
FG Field Grade Article 15 IADT Initial Active Duty Training RE Reentry Code Conditions
ARMY DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD - CASE REPORT AND DIRECTIVE
Case Number AR20090017733
______________________________________________________________________________
Page 1 of 3 pages
ARMY | DRB | CY2008 | AR20080018507
Applicant Name: ????? Chapter 10 of that regulation provides, in pertinent part, that a member who has committed an offense or offenses for which the authorized punishment includes a punitive discharge may submit a request for a discharge for the good of the service in lieu of trial by court-martial. Board Action Directed President, Army Discharge Review Board Issue a new DD Form 214 Change Characterization to: Change Reason to: NA Other: NA RE Code: Grade Restoration: No Yes Grade:...
ARMY | DRB | CY2006 | AR20060014776
Chapter 10 of that regulation provides, in pertinent part, that a member who has committed an offense or offenses for which the authorized punishment includes a punitive discharge may submit a request for a discharge for the good of the service in lieu of trial by court-martial. The request may be submitted at any time after charges have been preferred and must include the individuals admission of guilt. Certification Signature and Date Approval Authority: MARK E. COLLINS Colonel, U.S....
ARMY | DRB | CY2007 | AR20070018438
Applicant Name: ????? It is also noted that the characterization of service for this type of discharge is normally under other than honorable conditions and that the applicant was aware of that prior to requesting discharge. Yes No Counsel: NA Witnesses/Observers: NA Exhibits Submitted: NA VIII.
ARMY | DRB | CY2011 | AR20110015630
Applicant Name: ????? Yes No Counsel: None Witnesses/Observers: NA Exhibits Submitted: DD Form 293 dated 27 July 2011. Certification Signature Approval Authority: EDGAR J. YANGER Colonel, U.S. Army President, Army Discharge Review Board BONITA E. TROTMAN Lieutenant Colonel, U. S. Army Secretary Recorder Legend: AWOL Absent Without Leave GCM General Court Martial NA Not applicable SCM Summary Court Martial BCD Bad Conduct Discharge GD General Discharge NIF Not in the file SPCM Special Court...
ARMY | DRB | CY2008 | AR20080011533
Chapter 3, Section IV, establishes policy and procedures for separating members with a dishonorable or bad conduct discharge; and provides that a soldier will be given a bad conduct discharge pursuant only to an approved sentence of a general or special court-martial; and that the appellate review must be completed and the affirmed sentence ordered duly executed. The evidence of record indicates that the applicant was adjudged guilty by a court-martial and that the sentence was approved by...
ARMY | DRB | CY2011 | AR20110020289
Facts and Circumstances: The evidence of record shows that on 18 December 2008, the unit commander notified the applicant of initiation of separation action under the provisions of Chapter 15, paragraph 15-3a, AR 635-200, by reason of homosexual acts with a general, under honorable conditions discharge. The evidence of record shows that the applicant was discharged under the provisions of Chapter 15, paragraph 15-3a, AR 635-200, in effect at the time, by reason of homosexual acts with an...
ARMY | DRB | CY2006 | AR20060002388
Applicant Request Request: Upgrade Reason Change RE Code Change Issues: See DD Form 293 and attached documents. Facts, Circumstances, and Legal Basis for Separation a. His DD Form 214 indicates that he was discharged under the provisions of Chapter 10, AR 635-200, for the good of the service-in lieu of court-martial with a characterization of service of under other than honorable conditions.
ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | AR20110004592
Applicant Request: Upgrade Reason Change RE Code Change Issues: The applicant states, in effect, through counsel, that late in 2005, medical personnel in Iraq clearly and unequivocally stated that the applicant needed to be medically discharged from the service because of a mental health disorder and because of prior suicide attempts. On 2 January 2006, the separation authority approved the Chapter 10 request and directed the discharge with a characterization of service of under other than...
ARMY | DRB | CY2010 | AR20100000523
Chapter 10 of that regulation provides, in pertinent part, that a member who has committed an offense or offenses for which the authorized punishment includes a punitive discharge may submit a request for a discharge for the good of the Service in lieu of trial by court-martial. Additionally, the analyst understands that the applicant was 17 upon enlistment but he met entrance qualification standards to include age. Board Action Directed President, Army Discharge Review Board Issue a new...
ARMY | DRB | CY2009 | AR20090016451
Applicant Name: ????? Chapter 10 of that regulation provides, in pertinent part, that a member who has committed an offense or offenses for which the authorized punishment includes a punitive discharge may submit a request for a discharge for the good of the Service in lieu of trial by court-martial. It is also noted that the characterization of service for this type of discharge is normally under other than honorable conditions and that the applicant was aware of that prior to requesting...