Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | DRB | CY2011 | AR20110020289
Original file (AR20110020289.txt) Auto-classification: Denied
Applicant Name:  ?????

Application Receipt Date: 2011/10/11	Prior Review:     Prior Review Date: NA     

I.  Applicant Request:  Upgrade     Reason Change     RE Code Change    

Issues: The applicant submitted no issues of equity or propriety.  She indicated on her application that she would like the narrative reason for separation on her discharge changed.

II.  Were Proper Discharge and Separation Authority procedures followed?	     
Tender Offer:   NA

See Attachments:  Legal     Medical     Minority Opinion     Exhibits 

III.  Discharge Under Review
Unit CDR Recommended Discharge: 	   Date: 081218
Discharge Received: 			   Date: 081223   Chapter: 15-3a      AR: 635-200
Reason: Homosexual (Acts)	   RE:     SPD: JRA   Unit/Location: F Company, 309th Military Intelligence Battalion, Fort Huachuca, Arizona 

Time Lost: None

Article 15s (Charges/Dates/Punishment): None

Courts-Martial (Charges/Dates/Punishment): None

Counseling Records Available: Yes    No 

IV.  Soldier’s Overall Record
Age at current enlistment:  17
Current ENL Date: 080619    Current ENL Term: 4 Years  34 Weeks
Current ENL Service: 	0  Yrs, 6  Mos, 5  Days ?????
Total Service:  		0  Yrs, 6  Mos, 5  Days ?????
Previous Discharges: 	None
Highest Grade: E-2		Performance Ratings Available: Yes    No 
MOS: None   GT: 88   EDU: HS Grad   Overseas: None   Combat: None
Decorations/Awards: NDSM, GWOTSM

V.  Post-Discharge Activity
City, State:  ?????
Post Service Accomplishments: None

VI.  Facts, Circumstances, and Legal Basis for Separation

       a.  Facts and Circumstances:
       The evidence of record shows that on 18 December 2008, the unit commander notified the applicant of initiation of separation action under the provisions of Chapter 15, paragraph 15-3a, AR 635-200, by reason of homosexual acts with a general, under honorable conditions discharge.  The applicant admitted to her company commander in a sworn statement that she was homosexual and had engaged or had the propensity to engage in homosexual/bisexual acts.  She was caught on numerous occasions sleeping in the same bunk as PVT AM, groping and fondling her breasts and butt, and kissing PVT AM. Additionally, she failed to obey lawful written orders and threatened another Soldier’s well being.  She was advised of her rights.  
       
       The applicant waived her right to consult with legal counsel and indicated that she understood her right to an administrative separation board.   The unit commander subsequently recommended separation from the Army.  The intermediate commander reviewed the proposed action and recommended approval of the separation with an honorable discharge.  
       
       On 19 December 2008, the separation authority waived further rehabilitation and directed the applicant’s discharge with an honorable characterization of service.  

       b.  Legal Basis for Separation:  
       Army Regulation 635-200, in effect at the time, set forth the basic authority for the separation of enlisted personnel.  Chapter 15 of that regulation stated that active homosexuality was incompatible with military service and provided, in pertinent part, for the separation of members who actively engaged in homosexual conduct or who, by their statements, demonstrated a tendency to engage in homosexual conduct.  The Army regulation stated that when the sole basis for separation was homosexuality, a discharge under other than honorable conditions may be issued only if such characterization was warranted in accordance with Chapter 3, Section III, and if there was a finding that during the current term of service the Soldier attempted, solicited, or committed a homosexual act by using force, coercion or intimidation; with a person under 16 years of age; with a subordinate in circumstances that violate customary military superior subordinate relationships; openly in public view; for compensation; aboard a military vessel or aircraft; or in another location subject to military control if the conduct had, or was likely to have had, an adverse impact on discipline, good order, or morale due to the close proximity of other Soldiers of the Armed Forces.  In all other cases where no aggravating factors are present, the type of discharge would reflect the character of the Soldier’s overall record of service.  

       c.  Response to Issues, Recommendation and Rationale:  
       After a careful review of all the applicant’s military records and the issues and documents submitted with the application, the analyst determined that the narrative reason for the applicant’s separation is now inequitable based on the current standard.
       
       The evidence of record shows that the applicant was discharged under the provisions of Chapter 15, paragraph 15-3a, AR 635-200, in effect at the time, by reason of homosexual acts with an honorable characterization of service.
       
       Current law and regulations now allow Soldiers who are homosexual to serve openly.  Former Soldiers that were discharged under the old policy may request a change to the reason for their separation invoking the current standard.  The Board will consider any aggravating factors and in their absence, will change the narrative reason for the discharge to Secretarial Authority.  The applicant’s record contains a memorandum of intent to separate from her unit commander that shows the applicant had been caught sleeping in the same bunk with another Soldier, groping and fondling her breasts and butt and failed to obey lawful written orders and threatened another Soldier's well being. 
       
       The unit commander recommended a general, under honorable conditions dfischarge; however, the intermediate senior commander recommended an honorable discharge and the separation authority approved an honorable characterization of her service; thus, the analyst concluded that the honorable characterization being granted reflected the applicant's service.
       
       In view of the foregoing, the analyst recommends that the narrative reason of the applicant’s discharge be changed to “Secretarial Authority,” under the provisions of Chapter 5, AR 635-200, with a corresponding SPD Code of “JFF,” and a reentry code (RE) of “1.”

VII.  Summary of Army Discharge Review Board Hearing

Type of Hearing: 		Date: 30 May 2012         Location: Washington, DC

Did the Applicant Testify?  Yes     No  

Counsel: None

Witnesses/Observers: None 

Exhibits Submitted: DD Form 293 and a DD Form 214.

VIII.  Board Discussion, Determination, and Recommendation
After carefully examining the applicant’s record of service during the period of enlistment under review and notwithstanding the analyst’s recommendation and rationale, the Board determined that the discharge was both proper and equitable and voted to deny relief.  The Board did not concur with the analyst's recommendation due to the multiple acts of documented misconduct contained in the record.
        
IX.  Board Decision						
Board Vote:
Character - Change NA    No change NA
Reason -     Change 0    No change 5
(Board member names available upon request)

X.  Board Action Directed
Issue a new DD Form 214  
Change Characterization to: 
Change Reason to:  No Change
Other: NA
RE Code: 
Grade Restoration:   No   Yes   Grade: NA

XI.  Certification Signature
Approval Authority:




EDGAR J. YANGER
Colonel, U.S. Army
President, Army Discharge Review Board




BONITA E. TROTMAN
Lieutenant Colonel, U. S. Army
Secretary Recorder












Legend:
AWOL    	Absent Without Leave		GCM   General Court Martial	NA   Not applicable			SCM	Summary Court Martial
BCD   	Bad Conduct Discharge	GD      General Discharge	NIF   Not in the file			SPCM	Special Court Martial
CG 	Company Grade Article 15	HD      Honorable Discharge	OAD   Ordered to Active Duty		UNC	Uncharacterized Discharge  
DD 	Dishonorable Discharge	HS       High School Graduate	OMPF   Official Military Personnel File	UOTH  	Under Other Than Honorable 
FG	Field Grade Article 15		IADT   Initial Active Duty Training	RE     Reentry Code				Conditions 
ARMY DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD - CASE REPORT AND DIRECTIVE

Case Number AR20110020289
______________________________________________________________________________


Page 1 of 3 pages

Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | DRB | CY2006 | AR20060016811

    Original file (AR20060016811.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant waived legal counsel, was advised of the impact of the discharge action, and did not submit a statement in her own behalf. Army regulation states that when the sole basis for separation is homosexuality, a discharge under other than honorable conditions may be issued only if such characterization is warranted in accordance with chapter 3, section III, and if there is a finding that during the current term of service the Soldier attempted, solicited, or committed a homosexual...

  • ARMY | DRB | CY2012 | AR20120003957

    Original file (AR20120003957.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Applicant Name: ????? Discharge Under Review Unit CDR Recommended Discharge: Date: NIF Discharge Received: Date: 040826 Chapter: 15-3a AR: 635-200 Reason: Homosexual Act RE: SPD: JRA Unit/Location: 401st MP Co, Fort Hood, TX Time Lost: None Article 15s (Charges/Dates/Punishment): 040122, in that while at FOB Ironhorse, Iraq, between 1 August 2003 and 30 August 2003, violated a lawful general order, to wit: General Order Number 1A, United States Central Command, dated 19 December 2002, by...

  • ARMY | DRB | CY2013 | AR20130004722

    Original file (AR20130004722.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests an upgrade of her general, under honorable conditions discharge to honorable and a change to the narrative reason for discharge. On 5 March 2002, the separation authority directed the applicant’s discharge with a general under honorable conditions characterization of service. The evidence of record shows the applicant was separated under the provisions of Chapter 15, paragraph 15-3b, AR 635-200, by reason of homosexual admission, with a general under honorable...

  • ARMY | DRB | CY2013 | AR20130019565

    Original file (AR20130019565.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The DD Form 214 indicates that on 26 August 2004, the applicant was discharged under the provisions of Chapter 15, paragraph 15-3a, AR 635-200, for homosexual act, with a characterization of service of general, under honorable conditions. The record indicates the applicant achieved the rank of PFC/E-3 and was discharged as a PVT/E-1; thus, it appears the characterization of service was appropriate and in accordance with the regulation in effect at the time. However, in view of the current...

  • ARMY | DRB | CY2013 | AR20130006556

    Original file (AR20130006556.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Army Regulation 635-200, paragraph 3-7b, provides that a general discharge is a separation from the Army under honorable conditions. The record indicates the applicant had a period of 20 days of time lost under USC 972 (021016-021104); thus, it appears the characterization of service was appropriate and in accordance with the regulation in effect at the time. However, in view of the current standard it is recommended that the applicant's narrative reason for discharge be changed to...

  • ARMY | DRB | CY2008 | AR20080019151

    Original file (AR20080019151.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Applicant Name: ????? However, the analyst noted that the separation action under the provisions of Chapter 15, paragraph 15-2, AR 635-200 is the discharge policy, therefore the separation authority should read paragraph 15-3a, and the narrative reason specified by Army Regulations for a discharge under this paragraph is "Homosexual Conduct (Acts)” with the separation code as "JRA." Board Action Directed President, Army Discharge Review Board Issue a new DD Form 214 Change Characterization...

  • ARMY | DRB | CY2013 | AR20130001128

    Original file (AR20130001128.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests a change to the narrative reason for his discharge from the Army. The available evidence of record shows the applicant was discharged under the provisions of Chapter 15, paragraph 15-3a, AR 635-200, in effect at the time, by reason of a homosexual act. The Board considers any aggravating factors and in their absence, will change the narrative reason for the discharge to Secretarial Authority.

  • ARMY | DRB | CY2011 | AR20110017309

    Original file (AR20110017309.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Applicant Name: ????? Facts and Circumstances: The evidence of record shows that on 12 January 2010, the unit commander notified the applicant of initiation of separation action under the provisions of Chapter 15, paragraph 15-3c, AR 635-200, by reason of homosexual conduct (marriage or attempted marriage) with an honorable discharge. The Board will consider any aggravating factors and in their absence, will change the narrative reason for the discharge to Secretarial Authority.

  • ARMY | DRB | CY2012 | AR20120000104

    Original file (AR20120000104.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Discharge Under Review Unit CDR Recommended Discharge: Date: 070628 Discharge Received: Date: 070906 Chapter: 15-3b AR: 635-200 Reason: Homosexual Conduct (Admission) RE: SPD: JRB Unit/Location: U.S. Army Recruiting Company Redlands, U.S. Army Recruiting Battalion Southern California, Redlands, CA Time Lost: None Article 15s (Charges/Dates/Punishment): None Courts-Martial (Charges/Dates/Punishment): None Counseling Records Available: Yes No IV. The Board will consider any aggravating...

  • ARMY | DRB | CY2012 | AR20120009479

    Original file (AR20120009479.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Facts and Circumstances: The evidence of record shows that on 17 September 2009, the unit commander notified the applicant of initiation of separation action under the provisions of Chapter 15, paragraph 15-3b, AR 635-200, by reason of homosexual conduct for having created a rebuttable presumption that indicated she had the propensity to engage in homosexual or bisexual acts, with an honorable discharge. In view of the foregoing, the analyst recommends that the applicant's characterization...