Applicant Name: ?????
Application Receipt Date: 2010/02/22 Prior Review: Prior Review Date: NA
I. Applicant Request: Upgrade Reason Change RE Code Change
Issues: The applicant states, in effect, that he has an re code of 4, and that he made a mistake when he was in for his short stay in the Army. It has been 4 years since than and he realizes his mistake and it has cost him a lot of greef. He is a lot more mature and would love to serve his country and retire from the military. He is begging for a second chance to do his part in the service and requesting that his re code 4 be changed to a 3. He just wants to serve his country.
II. Were Proper Discharge and Separation Authority procedures followed?
Tender Offer: NA
See Attachments: Legal Medical Minority Opinion Exhibits
III. Discharge Under Review
Unit CDR Recommended Discharge: Date: 061024
Discharge Received: Date: 061114 Chapter: 9 AR: 635-200
Reason: Drug Rehabilitation Failure RE: SPD: JPC Unit/Location: 6th Military Police Detachment, 1-20th Aviation Regiment, Fort Rucker, AL
Time Lost: None
Article 15s (Charges/Dates/Punishment): 060421, unlawfully consume and or possess alcoholic beverages while under the age of 21 years on or about (060308), reduction to Private (E-1), forfeiture of 1/2 months pay ($640.00) for two months, extra duty and restriction for 45 days (FG)
Courts-Martial (Charges/Dates/Punishment): None
Counseling Records Available: Yes No
IV. Soldiers Overall Record
Age at current enlistment: 18
Current ENL Date: 050408 Current ENL Term: 5 Years ?????
Current ENL Service: 1 Yrs, 7 Mos, 7 Days ?????
Total Service: 1 Yrs, 7 Mos, 7 Days ?????
Previous Discharges: None
Highest Grade: E-2 Performance Ratings Available: Yes No
MOS: 31B10 Military Police GT: 100 EDU: GED Cert Overseas: None Combat: None
Decorations/Awards: NDSM, GWTSM, ASR
V. Post-Discharge Activity
City, State: ?????
Post Service Accomplishments: None submitted by the applicant.
VI. Facts, Circumstances, and Legal Basis for Separation
a. Facts and Circumstances:
The evidence of record indicates that on 28 August 2006, the unit commander in consultation with the Clinical Director/ASAP declared the applicant a rehabilitation failure. On 24 October 2006, the unit commander notified the applicant of initiation of separation action under the provisions of AR 635-200, Chapterb9-2, by reason of alcohol or other drug abuse rehabilitation failure; in that he tested positive for the use of cocaine while enrolled in the Army Substance Abuse program and was declared a rehabilitation/ASAP failure, with a general, under honorable conditions discharge. He was advised of his rights.
On 24 October 2006, the applicant consulted with legal counsel, was advised of the impact of the discharge action, and did not submit a statement in his own behalf. The unit commander subsequently recommended separation from the Army. The intermediate commander reviewed the proposed discharge action and recommended approval of the separation action with a general, under honorable conditions discharge.
On 3 November 2006, the separation authority waived further rehabilitative efforts and directed that the applicant be discharged with a characterization of service of general, under honorable conditions.
The applicant received a General Officer Memorandum of Reprimand for driving an automobile while under the influence of alcohol and for underage consumption of alcohol on (060413), (Administrative)
The record contains a MIlitary Police Report in reference to the applicant's offense of driving under the influence of alcohol dated 17 April 2006.
b. Legal Basis for Separation:
Army Regulation 635-200 sets forth the basic authority for the separation of enlisted personnel and outlines the procedures for discharging individuals because of alcohol or other drug abuse. A member who has been referred to the Alcohol and Drug Abuse Prevention and Control Program (ADAPCP) for alcohol/drug abuse may be separated because of inability or refusal to participate in, cooperate in, or successfully complete such a program if there is a lack of potential for continued Army service and rehabilitation efforts are no longer practical. Army policy states that an honorable or general, under honorable conditions discharge is authorized depending on the applicants overall record of service. However, an honorable discharge is required if restricted use information is used in the discharge process.
c. Response to Issues, Recommendation and Rationale:
After a careful review of all the applicants military records, and the issue he submitted, the analyst found no mitigating factors which would merit an upgrade of the applicant's discharge. The analyst noted that the applicant was enrolled in the Army Substance Abuse Program and was aware of the consequences of any action which would demonstrate any inability or refusal to participate in, cooperate in, or successfully complete such a program. As a result of the applicants actions and after consultation with the drug and alcohol abuse counselor, the command declared the Soldier a rehabilitation failure. The evidence of record establishes the fact that the applicant was properly counseled and afforded a reasonable opportunity to overcome his problems.
The analyst noted the applicant's issue that he has a reentry eligibility code of 4, and made a mistake while he was in for his short stay in the Army. He is a lot more mature and would love to serve his country and retire from the military. He is begging for a second chance to do his part in the service and requesting that his reentry eligibility code 4 be changed to a 3.
The analyst found that the applicant met entrance qualification standards to include age. The analyst further found no evidence that the applicant was any less mature than other soldiers of the same age who successfully completed military service. Further, at the time of discharge the applicant was appropriately assigned a reentry eligibility (RE) code of 4. An RE code of 4 cannot be waived and the applicant is no longer eligible for reenlistment.
In view of the foregoing, the analyst determined that the reason for discharge and the characterization of service were both proper and equitable and recommends to the Board to deny relief.
VII. Summary of Army Discharge Review Board Hearing
Type of Hearing: Date: 8 November 2010 Location: Washington, DC
Did the Applicant Testify? Yes No
Counsel: None
Witnesses/Observers: NA
Exhibits Submitted: DD Form 293 dated 1 February 2010.
VIII. Board Discussion, Determination, and Recommendation
After carefully examining the applicants record of service during the period of enlistment under review and considering the analysts recommendation and rationale, the Board determined that the discharge was both proper and equitable and voted to deny relief.
IX. Board Decision
XI. Certification Signature
Board Vote: Approval Authority:
Character - Change 0 No change 5
Reason - Change 0 No change 5
(Board member names available upon request)
EDGAR J. YANGER
Colonel, U.S. Army
X. Board Action Directed President, Army Discharge Review Board
Issue a new DD Form 214
Change Characterization to:
Change Reason to: No Change
Other: No Change
RE Code:
Grade Restoration: No Yes Grade: No Change
Legend:
AWOL Absent Without Leave GCM General Court Martial NA Not applicable SCM Summary Court Martial
BCD Bad Conduct Discharge GD General Discharge NIF Not in the file SPCM Special Court Martial
CG Company Grade Article 15 HD Honorable Discharge OAD Ordered to Active Duty UNC Uncharacterized Discharge
DD Dishonorable Discharge HS High School Graduate OMPF Official Military Personnel File UOTH Under Other Than Honorable
FG Field Grade Article 15 IADT Initial Active Duty Training RE Reentry Code Conditions
ARMY DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD - CASE REPORT AND DIRECTIVE
Case Number AR20100009021
______________________________________________________________________________
Page 1 of 3 pages
ARMY | DRB | CY2009 | AR20090014798
Applicant Name: ????? Applicant Request: Upgrade Reason Change RE Code Change Issues: The applicant states, in effect, that he is requesting an upgrade on his reentry code, and an under honorable condition to a honorable discharge. On 23 November 2008, the unit commander notified the applicant of initiation of separation action under the provisions of AR 635-200, Chapter 9, paragraph 2, by reason of drug rehabilitation failure in the Army Substance Abuse Program (ASAP), with a general,...
ARMY | DRB | CY2009 | AR20090019642
Applicant Name: ????? There is no evidence that the applicant was any less mature than other Soldiers of the same age who successfully completed military service. Board Action Directed President, Army Discharge Review Board Issue a new DD Form 214 Change Characterization to: Change Reason to: NA Other: NA RE Code: Grade Restoration: No Yes Grade: NA ARMY DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD - CASE REPORT AND DIRECTIVE Case Number...
ARMY | DRB | CY2010 | AR20100027127
Applicant Name: ????? On 20 February 2004, the unit commander notified the applicant of initiation of separation action under the provisions of Chapter 9, AR 635-200, by reason of alcohol abuse rehabilitation failure and his lack opf cooperation in the alcohol abuse rehabilitation program, with an honorable discharge. The narrative reason specified by Army Regulations for a discharge under this paragraph is "Alcohol Rehabilitation Failure," the separation code is "JPD," and the reentry...
ARMY | DRB | CY2008 | AR20080003413
Applicant Name: ????? Discharge Under Review Unit CDR Recommended Discharge: Date: 060515 Discharge Received: Date: 060630 Chapter: 9 AR: 635-200 Reason: Alcohol Rehabilitation Failure RE: SPD: JPD Unit/Location: A Trp, 2/4 Cav Regt., Ft Riley, KS Time Lost: None Article 15s (Charges/Dates/Punishment): 060310, Drunk on duty (060227), Reduction to E-1 (suspended), $297 (suspended), 14 days extra duty, 14 days restriction. The applicant consulted with legal counsel, was advised of the impact...
ARMY | DRB | CY2009 | AR20090006071
Current ENL Service: 1 Yrs, 9 Mos, 25 Days The applicant was AWOL for 7 days; however, the lost time was not deducted from the Net Active Service this Period on the DD Form 214, item 12c, nor was it shown in block 29 on the DD Form 214, Time Lost. The applicant waived legal counsel, was advised of the impact of the discharge action, and did not submit a statement in his own behalf. Board Action Directed President, Army Discharge Review Board Issue a new DD Form 214 Change Characterization...
ARMY | DRB | CY2009 | AR20090006295
Applicant Name: ????? The intermediate commander reviewed the proposed discharge action and recommended approval of the separation action with a general, under honorable conditions discharge. Board Action Directed President, Army Discharge Review Board Issue a new DD Form 214 Change Characterization to: Change Reason to: NA Other: NA RE Code: Grade Restoration: No Yes Grade: NA ARMY DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD - CASE REPORT AND DIRECTIVE Case Number...
ARMY | DRB | CY2013 | AR20130007119
The applicant was separated on 18 February 2011, under Army Regulation 635-200, Chapter 9, for drug rehabilitation failure, with an honorable discharge, a SPD code of JPC and a reentry code of 4. Army Regulation 635-5-1 (Separation Program Designator (SPD) Codes) provides the specific authorities (regulatory or directive), reasons for separating Soldiers from active duty, and the SPD codes to be entered on the DD Form 214. However, Army Regulation 635-5-1 (Separation Program Designator...
ARMY | DRB | CY2008 | AR20080003705
Applicant Name: ????? Facts and Circumstances: The evidence of record indicates that on 23 July 2007, the unit commander in consultation with the Clinical Director, Army Substance Abuse Program (ASAP), declared the applicant a rehabilitation failure. Board Action Directed President, Army Discharge Review Board Issue a new DD Form 214 Change Characterization to: Change Reason to: NA Other: NA RE Code: Grade Restoration: No Yes Grade: NA ARMY DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD - CASE REPORT AND...
ARMY | DRB | CY2009 | AR20090004770
Applicant Name: ????? Board Discussion, Determination, and Recommendation After carefully examining the applicants record of service during the period of enlistment under review and considering the analysts recommendation and rationale, the Board determined that the discharge was both proper and equitable and voted to deny relief. Board Action Directed President, Army Discharge Review Board Issue a new DD Form 214 Change Characterization to: Change Reason to: No Change Other: NA RE...
ARMY | DRB | CY2010 | AR20100009406
The analyst noted the applicant's issue that the Army limited use policy requires him to be separated with an honorable discharge. The evidence of record shows that the applicant was counseled on 30 November 2004 ( DA Form 4856) in reference to his involvement in an alcohol related incident and was told that he would be command referred to attend ASAP since he had a drinking problem. On 6 December 2004, it appears on the patient intake/screening record (DA Form 4465) that the applicant...