Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | DRB | CY2008 | AR20080008359
Original file (AR20080008359.txt) Auto-classification: Denied
Applicant Name:  ?????

Application Receipt Date: 2008/05/23	Prior Review:     Prior Review Date: NA     

I.  Applicant Request:  Upgrade     Reason Change     RE Code Change    

Issues: The Applicant states in effect:  "I believe my discharge and reentry code should be changed because I know that I have learned a very valuable lesson.  I loved being apart of the military, I think I was a very good soldier and had alot to offer the army.  I don't have any excuse for my actions, the were dishonoralbe to myself, my family, and most of all, the Army.  After returning from Iraq, I let my problems get the best of me. Instead of turning to my unit for help, I took the wrong actions that eventually ended my career.  There isn't a day that goes by that I don't regret my actions.  I am now trying to re-enlist in the National Gaurd and I would love the opertunity to show that I have changed and that I am 100% on bourd to serve honerably.  In conclusion, I feel that if you change my discharge and my reentry level from a 4 to a 3, I have no doubt in my mind that I will serve my country honorably."

II.  Were Proper Discharge and Separation Authority procedures followed?	     
Tender Offer:   NA

See Attachments:  Legal     Medical     Minority Opinion     Exhibits 

III.  Discharge Under Review
Unit CDR Recommended Discharge: 	   Date: 040920
Discharge Received: 			   Date: 041116   Chapter: 14-12c(2)    AR: 635-200
Reason: Misconduct	   RE:     SPD: JKK   Unit/Location: 57th Med Air Ambl Co, Fort Bragg, NC 

Time Lost: None

Article 15s (Charges/Dates/Punishment): 040406, wrongful use of marijuana (040224-040302), reduction to E-2, forfeiture of $596 x 2 (suspended), 30 days restriction, 45 days extra duty (FG)

040614, wrongful use of marijuana (040429-040514), forfeiture of $500 x 2, 45 days extra duty and restriction (FG)

Courts-Martial (Charges/Dates/Punishment): None

Counseling Records Available: Yes    No 

IV.  Soldier’s Overall Record
Age at current enlistment:  19
Current ENL Date: 000203    Current ENL Term: 6 Years  ?????
Current ENL Service: 	04 Yrs, 09Mos, 14Days ?????
Total Service:  		04 Yrs, 09Mos, 14Days ?????
Previous Discharges: 	None
Highest Grade: E-4		Performance Ratings Available: Yes    No 
MOS: 15T10/UH-60 Hel Rpr   GT: 105   EDU: GED   Overseas: SWA   Combat: Iraq (030502-030929)
Decorations/Awards: ARCOM, AAM-2, AGCM, NDSM, GWOTEM, GWOTSM, ASR

V.  Post-Discharge Activity
City, State:  Helena, Montana
Post Service Accomplishments: None listed

VI.  Facts, Circumstances, and Legal Basis for Separation

       a.  Facts and Circumstances:
       The evidence of record shows that on 20 September 2004, the unit commander notified the applicant of initiation of separation action under the provisions of Chapter 14, paragraph14-12c(2), AR 635-200, by reason of misconduct—for abuse of illegal drugs in that he wrongfully tested positive for marijuana on two occasions (040303 and 040514), with a general under honorable conditions discharge.  He was advised of his rights.  The applicant’s election of rights is not contained in the available record and the analyst presumed government regularity.  The applicant would have consulted with legal counsel, and advised of the impact of the discharge action.  The unit commander subsequently recommended separation from the service and waiver of further rehabilitative efforts.  The intermediate commander reviewed the proposed discharge action and recommended approval of the separation action with a general under honorable conditions discharge.  On 7 October 2004, the separation authority waived further rehabilitative efforts and directed that the applicant be discharged with a characterization of service of general under honorable conditions.

       b.  Legal Basis for Separation:  
       Army Regulation 635-200 sets forth the basic authority for the separation of enlisted personnel.  Chapter 14 of this regulation establishes policy and prescribes procedures for separating members for misconduct.  Specific categories include minor disciplinary infractions, a pattern of misconduct, and commission of a serious offense, to include abuse of illegal drugs, convictions by civil authorities and desertion or absence without leave.  Action will be taken to separate a member for misconduct when it is clearly established that rehabilitation is impractical or unlikely to succeed.  Army policy states that an under other than honorable conditions discharge is normally considered appropriate, however, a general under honorable conditions or an honorable discharge may be granted.   

       c.  Response to Issues, Recommendation and Rationale:  
       After carefully examining the applicant’s record of service during the period of enlistment under review and the issue submitted with the application, the analyst determined that the discharge was both proper and equitable.  The applicant, by violating the Army's policy not to possess or use illegal drugs, compromised the trust and confidence placed in a soldier.  The applicant, as a soldier, had the duty to support and abide by the Army's drug policies.  By abusing illegal drugs, the applicant knowingly risked a military career and diminished the quality of service below that meriting a fully honorable discharge.  Furthermore, at the time of discharge the applicant was appropriately assigned a reentry eligibility (RE) code of “4.”  An RE code of “4” cannot be waived and the applicant is no longer eligible for reenlistment.   Therefore, the analyst determined the reason for discharge and the characterization of service were both proper and equitable and recommends to the Board to deny relief. 
       
       
       
       
       
       
       
       
       
       
       
       
       
       
       
       
       
       
       
       
       
       
       
       
       

VII.  Summary of Army Discharge Review Board Hearing

Type of Hearing: 		Date: 11 March 2009         Location: Washington, D.C.

Did the Applicant Testify?  Yes     No  

Counsel: NA

Witnesses/Observers: NA 

Exhibits Submitted: NA

VIII.  Board Discussion, Determination, and Recommendation
After carefully examining the applicant’s record of service during the period of enlistment under review and considering the analyst’s recommendation and rationale, the Board determined that the discharge was both proper and equitable and voted to deny relief.  
        
IX.  Board Decision						
	XI.  Certification Signature
Board Vote:  							          Approval Authority:	
Character - Change 0    No change 5
Reason -     Change 0    No change 5
(Board member names available upon request)
								         EDGAR J. YANGER			 
								         Colonel, U.S. Army
X.  Board Action Directed					         President, Army Discharge Review Board
Issue a new DD Form 214  					
Change Characterization to: 			         
Change Reason to: NA
Other: NA										
RE Code: 
Grade Restoration:   No   Yes   Grade: NA
ARMY DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD - CASE REPORT AND DIRECTIVE

Case Number AR20080008359
______________________________________________________________________________


Page 1 of 3 pages

Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | DRB | CY2009 | AR20090011262

    Original file (AR20090011262.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    On 21 April 2009, the applicant consulted with legal counsel, was advised of the impact of the discharge action and did not submit a statement in his own behalf. On 24 April 2009, the separation authority waived further rehabilitative efforts and directed that the applicant be discharged with a characterization of service of general, under honorable conditions. Board Action Directed President, Army Discharge Review Board Issue a new DD Form 214 Change Characterization to: Change Reason to:...

  • ARMY | DRB | CY2009 | AR20090008214

    Original file (AR20090008214.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    On 4 April 2006, the separation authority waived further rehabilitative efforts and directed that the applicant be discharged with a characterization of service of general, under honorable conditions. However, the separation authority approved the applicant's discharge under the provisions of Chapter 14, paragraph 14-12c, AR 635-200, by reason of commission of a serious offense, with a characterization of service of "General, Under Honorable Conditions." Board Action Directed President,...

  • ARMY | DRB | CY2008 | AR20080016522

    Original file (AR20080016522.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Applicant Name: ????? By abusing illegal drugs, the applicant knowingly risked a military career and the misconduct diminished the quality of service below that meriting a fully honorable discharge. Board Action Directed President, Army Discharge Review Board Issue a new DD Form 214 Change Characterization to: Change Reason to: No Change Other: NA RE Code: Grade Restoration: No Yes Grade: NA ARMY DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD - CASE REPORT AND DIRECTIVE Case Number...

  • ARMY | DRB | CY2008 | AR20080016138

    Original file (AR20080016138.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Facts and Circumstances: The evidence of record shows that on 22 April 2008, the unit commander notified the applicant of initiation of separation action under the provisions of Chapter 14, paragraph 14-12c, AR 635-200, by reason of misconduct—for knowingly possessing a Toshiba hard drive, on a Dell laptop computer, which contained photographic images and video files of child pornography, with an Under Other Than Honorable conditions discharge. The applicant consulted with legal counsel,...

  • AF | DRB | CY2006 | AR20060015152

    Original file (AR20060015152.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant consulted with legal counsel, was advised of the impact of the discharge action, and did not submit a statement in his own behalf. The applicant, as a NCO, had the duty to support and abide by the Army's drug policies. Certification Signature and Date Approval Authority: MARK E. COLLINS Colonel, U.S. Army President, Army Discharge Review Board Official: CHRISTINE U. MARTINSON DATE: 14 December 2007 Lieutenant Colonel, U.S. Army Chief, Secretary Recorder ARMY DISCHARGE REVIEW...

  • ARMY | DRB | CY2008 | AR20080010661

    Original file (AR20080010661.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Applicant Name: ????? want to provide the best life for my family as possible and in order for me to achieve this I need the assistance of the review board in the upgrading of my discharge. Facts and Circumstances: The evidence of record shows that on 23 August 2006, the unit commander notified the applicant of initiation of separation action under the provisions of Chapter 14, AR 635-200, by reason of misconduct-commission of a serious offense for abuse of illegal drugs; additionally, he...

  • ARMY | DRB | CY2009 | AR20090009349

    Original file (AR20090009349.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Applicant Name: ????? Facts and Circumstances: The evidence of record shows that on 19 April 2000, the unit commander notified the applicant of initiation of separation action under the provisions of Chapter 14, paragraph 14-12c(2), AR 635-200, by reason of misconduct for abuse of illegal drugs on two occasions and failure to report, with a general, under honorable conditions discharge. On 10 May 2000, the applicant consulted with legal counsel, was advised of the impact of the discharge...

  • ARMY | DRB | CY2006 | AR20060007483

    Original file (AR20060007483.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Facts and Circumstances: Evidence of record shows that on 29 March 1995, the unit commander notified the applicant of initiation of separation action under the provisions of Chapter 14, AR 635-200, by reason of misconduct—pattern of misconduct (he pleaded guility in Magistrate's Court to the offenses of DUI and leaving the scene of an accident, he also unlawfully entered a female barracks room, and received negative counseling statements for disobeying NCO's), with a general, under honorable...

  • ARMY | DRB | CY2009 | AR20090009429

    Original file (AR20090009429.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Applicant Name: ????? On 7 August 2002, the applicant consulted with legal counsel, was advised of the impact of the discharge action, (unconditionally waived his right to an administrative separation board), and submitted a statement in his own behalf which is not contained in the record. On 20 August 2002, the separation authority waived further rehabilitative efforts and directed that the applicant be discharged with a characterization of service of general, under honorable conditions.

  • ARMY | DRB | CY2009 | AR20090011250

    Original file (AR20090011250.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Applicant Name: ????? I believe that even though my conduct in the army was not becoming during my time in service several times, I have learned from my mistakes to become a better person and should not be looked upon badly by the U.S Army that I proudly served and wish to serve in once again. Board Action Directed President, Army Discharge Review Board Issue a new DD Form 214 Change Characterization to: Change Reason to: No Change Other: NA RE Code: Grade Restoration: No Yes Grade:...