Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | DRB | CY2009 | AR20090007515
Original file (AR20090007515.txt) Auto-classification: Denied
Applicant Name:  

Application Receipt Date: 2009/04/02	Prior Review:     Prior Review Date: NA     

I.  Applicant Request:  Upgrade     Reason Change     RE Code Change    

Issues: See DD Form 293 and attached documents submitted by the applicant.

II.  Were Proper Discharge and Separation Authority procedures followed?	     
Tender Offer:   NA

See Attachments:  Legal     Medical     Minority Opinion     Exhibits 

III.  Discharge Under Review
Unit CDR Recommended Discharge: 	NIF   Date: NIF
Discharge Received: 			   Date: NIF   Chapter: 4       AR: 635-200
Reason: Completion of Required Active Service	   RE:     SPD: LBK   Unit/Location: HHC 1/325 AIR, Ft Bragg, NC 

Time Lost: None

Article 15s (Charges/Dates/Punishment): None

Courts-Martial (Charges/Dates/Punishment): None

Counseling Records Available: Yes    No 

IV.  Soldier’s Overall Record
Age at current enlistment:  18
Current ENL Date: 010518    Current ENL Term: 4 Years  ?????
Current ENL Service: 	4 Yrs, 02Mos, 07Days ?????
Total Service:  		4 Yrs, 02Mos, 07Days ?????
Previous Discharges: 	NA
Highest Grade: E4		Performance Ratings Available: Yes    No 
MOS: 31U/ Signal Support Systems Specialist   GT: 105   EDU: GED   Overseas: None   Combat: None
Decorations/Awards: AGCM, ASR

V.  Post-Discharge Activity
City, State:  Kingston, PA
Post Service Accomplishments: The applicant states that he is in the local College studying to become a History teacher.

VI.  Facts, Circumstances, and Legal Basis for Separation

       a.  Facts and Circumstances:
       The applicant's record is void of the specific facts and circumstances concerning the events that led to his discharge from the Army. The record does not include a DD Form 214, however, the record containes a memorandum from Department of the Army, US Human Resources Command, 1 Reserve Way, St. Louis, Missouri 63132 providing an Official Statement of Service, dated 29 October 2008.  The Memorandum provides the dates of Active Duty as 010518-050711, the Character of Service, general, under honorable conditions, Reason for Discharge as Completion of Requried Active Service and Reserve Service from 010511-010517.
       
       
       

       b.  Legal Basis for Separation:  
       Army Regulation 635-200, in effect at the time, set forth the basic authority for separation of enlisted personnel.  Chapter 4 of that regulation provided, in pertinent part, for the separation of individuals at completion of required service (i.e., expiration term of service).

       c.  Response to Issues, Recommendation and Rationale:  
       After a careful review of the entire applicant’s military records, the issues, and the supporting documents evidence he submitted, the analyst determined that the evidence was not sufficiently mitigating to warrant an upgrade of the discharge under review.  The applicant’s discharge was appropriate because the quality of his service was not consistent with the Army's standards for acceptable personal conduct and performance of duty.  By his misconduct, the applicant diminished the quality of his service below that meriting a fully honorable discharge.  The applicant provided no corroborating evidence demonstrating that either the command's action was erroneous or that the applicant’s service mitigated the misconduct or poor duty performance.  Furthermore, the record does not support the issue that the applicant suffers from Post Traumatic Stress Disorder and no evidence to support it has been submitted by the applicant, that the discharge was the result of any medical condition.  Finally, the analyst determined that the applicant’s Official Military Personnel File (OMPF) does not contain all the specific documents that would indicate the reason for the separation action from the United States Army.  If the applicant desires to appear before a personal appearance Board, the burden of proof remains with the former Soldier to provide the appropriate documents or other evidence sufficient to explain the facts, circumstances, and reasons underlying the separation action, for the Board’s consideration.  In view of the foregoing, the analyst determined that the reason for discharge and the characterization of service were both proper and equitable and recommends to the Board to deny relief. 

VII.  Summary of Army Discharge Review Board Hearing

Type of Hearing: 		Date: 8 July 2009         Location: Washington, DC

Did the Applicant Testify?  Yes     No  

Counsel: NA

Witnesses/Observers: NA 

Exhibits Submitted: NA

VIII.  Board Discussion, Determination, and Recommendation
After carefully examining the applicant’s record of service during the period of enlistment under review and considering the analyst’s recommendation and rationale, the Board determined that the discharge was both proper and equitable and voted to deny relief.  
        
IX.  Board Decision						
	XI.  Certification Signature
Board Vote:  							          Approval Authority:	
Character - Change 0    No change 5
Reason -     Change 0    No change 5
(Board member names available upon request)
								         EDGAR J. YANGER			 
								         Colonel, U.S. Army
X.  Board Action Directed					         President, Army Discharge Review Board
Issue a new DD Form 214  					
Change Characterization to: 			         
Change Reason to: No Change
Other: NA										
RE Code: 
Grade Restoration:   No   Yes   Grade: NA
ARMY DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD - CASE REPORT AND DIRECTIVE

Case Number AR20090007515
______________________________________________________________________________


Page 1 of 2 pages

Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | DRB | CY2007 | AR20070009995

    Original file (AR20070009995.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Applicant Name: ????? That DD Form 214 indicates that the applicant was discharged under the provisions of Chapter 9, AR 635-200, by reason of drug rehabilitation failure, with a characterization of service of honorable. The narrative reason specified by Army Regulations for a discharge under this Chapter is "Drug Rehabilitation Failure", and the separation code is "JPC."

  • ARMY | DRB | CY2006 | AR20060007020

    Original file (AR20060007020.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Current ENL Service: 00 Yrs, 07Mos, 00Days ????? Facts, Circumstances, and Legal Basis for Separation a. Certification Signature and Date Approval Authority: MARK E. COLLINS Colonel, U.S. Army President, Army Discharge Review Board Official: MARY E. SHAW DATE: 30 March 2007 Lieutenant Colonel, U.S. Army Chief, Secretary Recorder ARMY DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD - CASE REPORT AND DIRECTIVE Case Number AR20060007020 Applicant Name:...

  • ARMY | DRB | CY2010 | AR20100017072

    Original file (AR20100017072.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Facts and Circumstances: The evidence of record shows that on 3 November 2009, after careful consideration of medical records, laboratory findings, and medical examinations, the Entrance Physical Standards Board (EPSBD) found that the applicant was medically unfit for enlistment in accordance with current medical fitness standards, in that he was diagnosed as having a bipolar disorder, and in the opinion of the evaluating physicians the condition existed prior to service. Army Regulation...

  • ARMY | DRB | CY2009 | AR20090005452

    Original file (AR20090005452.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    On 16 August 1999, the separation authority waived further rehabilitative efforts and directed that the applicant be discharged with a characterization of service of general, under honorable conditions. Board Discussion, Determination, and Recommendation After carefully examining the applicant’s record of service during the period of enlistment under review and considering the analyst’s recommendation and rationale, the Board determined that the discharge was both proper and equitable and...

  • ARMY | DRB | CY2006 | AR20060012049

    Original file (AR20060012049.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Original Character of Discharge Unit CDR Recommended Discharge: Date: 040908 Discharge Received: Date: 041028 Chapter: 14 AR: 635-200 Reason: Misconduct RE: SPD: JKQ Unit/Location: 403rd Transportation Company, 7th Transportation Battalion, Fort Bragg, NC 28310-5000 Time Lost: Absent without leave for a total of 147 days (040317-040810). Facts and Circumstances: Evidence of record shows that on 8 September 2004, the unit commander notified the applicant of initiation of separation action...

  • ARMY | DRB | CY2006 | AR20060005782

    Original file (AR20060005782.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant consulted with legal counsel, was advised of the impact of the discharge action, and did not submit a statement in his own behalf. The intermediate commander reviewed the proposed discharge action and recommended approval of the separation action with a general, under honorable conditions discharge. Certification Signature and Date Approval Authority: ROBERT L. HOUSE Colonel, U.S. Army President, Army Discharge Review Board Official: MARY E. SHAW DATE: 070216 Lieutenant...

  • ARMY | DRB | CY2008 | AR20080012698

    Original file (AR20080012698.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Discharge Under Review Unit CDR Recommended Discharge: Date: NIF Discharge Received: Date: 020326 Chapter: 10 AR: 635-200 Reason: In Lieu of Trial by Court-Martial RE: SPD: KFS Unit/Location: C Co, 203rd Forward Support Battalion (FSB), 3rd INF DIV (Mech), Fort Benning, GA Time Lost: AWOL, 228 days (010330-011118), mode of return unknown. On 28 February 2002, the separation authority approved the discharge with a characterization of service of under other than honorable conditions. Board...

  • ARMY | DRB | CY2008 | AR20080016465

    Original file (AR20080016465.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Applicant Name: ????? Facts and Circumstances: Evidence of record shows that on 6 December 2004, the unit commander notified the applicant of initiation of separation action under the provisions of Chapter 14, AR 635-200, by reason of misconduct—commission of a serious offense for wrongfully consuming alcohol while under the age of 21 and failure to obey a lawful general order, Policy Letter JA-04-01, with a general, under honorable conditions discharge. Board Action Directed President,...

  • ARMY | DRB | CY2009 | AR20090012512

    Original file (AR20090012512.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Applicant Request: Upgrade Reason Change RE Code Change Issues: See DD Form 293 and attached documents submitted by the applicant. The analyst determined that no such unusual circumstances were present in the applicant’s record and his service did not warrant an honorable discharge. Board Action Directed President, Army Discharge Review Board Issue a new DD Form 214 Change Characterization to: Change Reason to: No Change Other: NA RE Code: Grade Restoration: No Yes Grade: None ARMY...

  • ARMY | DRB | CY2008 | AR20080004272

    Original file (AR20080004272.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The DD Form 214 indicates that the applicant was discharged under the provisions of Chapter 14, AR 635-200, paragraph 12b by reason of misconduct, with service uncharacterized. The narrative reason specified by Army Regulations for a discharge under this paragraph is "Separation Because of Misconduct", and the separation code is "JKA." Board Action Directed President, Army Discharge Review Board Issue a new DD Form 214 Change Characterization to: Change Reason to: NA Other: NA RE...