Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | DRB | CY2008 | AR20080004272
Original file (AR20080004272.txt) Auto-classification: Denied
Applicant Name:  ?????

Application Receipt Date: 080317	Prior Review:     Prior Review Date: NA     

I.  Applicant Request:  Upgrade     Reason Change     RE Code Change    

Issues: See enclosed DD Form 293 and documents submitted by the Applicant

II.  Were Proper Discharge and Separation Authority procedures followed?	     
Tender Offer:   NA

See Attachments:  Legal     Medical     Minority Opinion     Exhibits 

III.  Discharge Under Review
Unit CDR Recommended Discharge: 	   Date: NIF
Discharge Received: 			   Date: 950303   Chapter: 14       AR: 635-200
Reason: Misconduct	   RE:     SPD: JKA   Unit/Location: Co D 369th Signal Bn, 15th Signal Bde TR Ft. Gordon, GA 

Time Lost: None

Article 15s (Charges/Dates/Punishment): 950202 fail to obey lawful order issued by a CPT x3 (950125, 950127, 950128), failed to go to appointed place of duty (950202, reduction to E-2, forfeiture of $478 for two months, restriction and extra duty for 45 days (FG).

941203 failed to obey lawful order issued by a CPT (941122), failed to obey lawful order issued by a LTC (941126), reduction to E-3, forfeiture of $200 for one month, restriction and extra duty for 14 days (CG).


Courts-Martial (Charges/Dates/Punishment): None

Counseling Records Available: Yes    No 

IV.  Soldier’s Overall Record
Age at current enlistment:  30
Current ENL Date: 941027    Current ENL Term: 4 Years  ?????
Current ENL Service: 	o0 Yrs, 04Mos, 07Days ?????
Total Service:  		08 Yrs, 02Mos, 01Days Includes 03/09/27 of Inactive Service
Previous Discharges: 	 ARNG 920415-940414/HD
                                        RA 860515-900510/HD
Highest Grade: E4		Performance Ratings Available: Yes    No 
MOS: 29S10 Field Comsec Equipment   GT: 110   EDU: College Grad   Overseas: Korea   Combat: None
Decorations/Awards: AGCM, NDSM, ASR, OSR

V.  Post-Discharge Activity
City, State:  Petersburg, VA
Post Service Accomplishments: None listed

VI.  Facts, Circumstances, and Legal Basis for Separation

       a.  Facts and Circumstances:
       The facts and circumstances pertaining to the applicant’s discharge from the Army are not contained in the available records.  However, the record contains a properly constituted DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty), which was authenticated by the applicant.  The DD Form 214 indicates that the applicant was discharged under the provisions of Chapter 14, AR 635-200, paragraph 14-12B by reason of misconduct, with an uncharacterized discharge. Furthermore, the DD Form 214 shows a Separation Code of JKA (i.e., misconduct).  

       b.  Legal Basis for Separation:  
       Army Regulation 635-200 sets forth the basic authority for the separation of enlisted personnel.  It states that an honorable discharge is a separation with honor, and is appropriate when the quality of the Soldier’s service is so meritorious that any other characterization would be inappropriate.  Chapter 14 of this regulation establishes policy and prescribes procedures for separating members for misconduct.  Specific categories include minor disciplinary infractions, a pattern of misconduct, and commission of a serious offense, to include abuse of illegal drugs, convictions by civil authorities and desertion or absence without leave.  Action will be taken to separate a member for misconduct when it is clearly established that rehabilitation is impractical or unlikely to succeed.  Army policy states that an under other than honorable conditions discharge is normally considered appropriate, however, a general under honorable conditions or an honorable discharge may be granted.   

       c.  Response to Issues, Recommendation and Rationale:  
After a careful review of all the applicant’s military records, and the issue and documents he submitted with the application, the analyst determined that the applicant’s available record of service during the period of enlistment under review is void of the specific facts and circumstances concerning the events that led to the discharge from the Army.  However, the applicant’s record does contain a properly constituted DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty), which was authenticated by the applicant's signature.  This document identifies the reason and characterization of the discharge and the analyst presumed Government regularity in the discharge process.  The DD Form 214 indicates that the applicant was discharged under the provisions of Chapter 14, AR 635-200, paragraph 12b by reason of misconduct, with service uncharacterized.  Barring evidence to the contrary, the analyst was satisfied that all requirements of law and regulation were met and the rights of the applicant were fully protected throughout the separation process.  Furthermore, the applicant was discharged under the provisions of Chapter 14, Paragraph 14-12b, AR 635-200.  The narrative reason specified by Army Regulations for a discharge under this paragraph is "Separation Because of Misconduct", and the separation code is "JKA."  Army Regulation 635-5, Separation Documents, governs preparation of the DD Form 214 and dictates that entry of the narrative reason for separation, entered in block 28 and separation code, entered in block 26 of the form, will be entered exactly as listed in tables 2-2 or 2-3 of AR 635-5-1, Separation Program Designator (SPD) Codes.  The regulation further stipulates that no deviation is authorized.  There is no provision for any other reason to be entered under this regulation.  Therefore, the analyst determined the reason for discharge and the characterization of service were both proper and equitable and recommends to the Board to deny relief.




















       

VII.  Summary of Army Discharge Review Board Hearing

Type of Hearing: 		Date: 16 January 2009         Location: Washington, D.C.

Did the Applicant Testify?  Yes     No  

Counsel: NA

Witnesses/Observers: NA 

Exhibits Submitted: NA

VIII.  Board Discussion, Determination, and Recommendation
After carefully examining the applicant’s record of service during the period of enlistment under review and considering the analyst’s recommendation and rationale, the Board determined that the discharge was both proper and equitable and voted to deny relief.  
        
IX.  Board Decision						
	XI.  Certification Signature
Board Vote:  							          Approval Authority:	
Character - Change 0    No change 5
Reason -     Change 0    No change 5
(Board member names available upon request)
								         EDGAR J. YANGER			 
								         Colonel, U.S. Army
X.  Board Action Directed					         President, Army Discharge Review Board
Issue a new DD Form 214  					
Change Characterization to: 			         
Change Reason to: NA
Other: NA										
RE Code: 
Grade Restoration:   No   Yes   Grade: NA
ARMY DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD - CASE REPORT AND DIRECTIVE

Case Number AR20080004272
______________________________________________________________________________


Page 1 of 3 pages

Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | DRB | CY2008 | AR20080019844

    Original file (AR20080019844.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant consulted with legal counsel, was advised of the impact of the discharge action, and did not submit a statement in his own behalf. The separation authority waived further rehabilitative efforts and directed that the applicant be discharged with a characterization of service of general, under honorable conditions. Board Action Directed President, Army Discharge Review Board Issue a new DD Form 214 Change Characterization to: Change Reason to: No Change Other: NA RE Code: Grade...

  • ARMY | DRB | CY2009 | AR20090010219

    Original file (AR20090010219.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Facts and Circumstances: The evidence of record shows that on 8 October 2007, the unit commander notified the applicant of initiation of separation action under the provisions of Chapter 14, paragraph 14-12b, AR 635-200, by reason of pattern of misconduct—for substandard duty performance, negative counseling statements and recent and ongoing violations of the Uniform Code of Military Justice (UCMJ) throughout the course of mobilization and deployment, with a general, under honorable...

  • ARMY | DRB | CY2008 | AR20080007857

    Original file (AR20080007857.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Facts and Circumstances: Evidence of record shows that on 8 June 2001, the unit commander notified the applicant of initiation of separation action under the provisions of Chapter 14, AR 635-200, by reason of misconduct—pattern of misconduct, in that she received two Article 15s in violation of Articles 91 x 2 and 92 x 5; also, she received several counseling statements for violating policy letters and disobeying lawful orders, with a general, under honorable conditions discharge. On 26...

  • ARMY | DRB | CY2008 | AR20080019245

    Original file (AR20080019245.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The DD Form 214 indicates that the applicant was discharged under the provisions of AR 635-200, paragraph, Chapter 14-12b by reason of pattern of misconduct, with a characterization of service of general, under honorable conditions. The narrative reason specified by Army Regulations for a discharge under this paragraph is "Pattern of Misconduct", and the separation code is "JKA." Board Action Directed President, Army Discharge Review Board Issue a new DD Form 214 Change Characterization...

  • ARMY | DRB | CY2010 | AR20100019899

    Original file (AR20100019899.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Applicant Name: ????? On 15 January 2002, the separation authority waived further rehabilitative efforts and directed that the applicant be discharged with a characterization of service of general, under honorable conditions. Board Action Directed President, Army Discharge Review Board Issue a new DD Form 214 Change Characterization to: Change Reason to: block 25, separation authority to AR 635-200, Chapter 14, paragraph 14-12b, block 26, separation code to "JKA" and block 28, narrative...

  • ARMY | DRB | CY2009 | AR20090021831

    Original file (AR20090021831.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Applicant Name: ????? Facts and Circumstances: The evidence of record shows that on 1 October 2001, the unit commander notified the applicant of initiation of separation action under the provisions of Chapter 14-12b, AR 635-200, by reason of a pattern of misconduct; in that he has numerous failure to repair, disobeying orders and disrespect to a noncommissioned officer, with a general, under honorable conditions discharge. Board Action Directed President, Army Discharge Review Board Issue...

  • ARMY | DRB | CY2008 | AR20080013725

    Original file (AR20080013725.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Applicant Name: ????? Board Discussion, Determination, and Recommendation After carefully examining the applicant’s record of service during the period of enlistment under review and considering the analyst’s recommendation and rationale, the Board determined that the discharge was both proper and equitable and voted to deny relief. Board Action Directed President, Army Discharge Review Board Issue a new DD Form 214 Change Characterization to: Change Reason to: NA Other: NA RE Code: Grade...

  • ARMY | DRB | CY2008 | AR20080010930

    Original file (AR20080010930.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Applicant Name: ????? Additionally, the analyst found that someone in the separation process erroneously entered on the applicant's DD Form 214, block 27, reentry eligibility (RE) code of "4." Board Action Directed President, Army Discharge Review Board Issue a new DD Form 214 Change Characterization to: Change Reason to: No Change Other: change block 25, separation authority to "paragraph 14-12b" and block 26, separation (SPD) code to "JKA" under the provisions of Chapter 14, AR 635-200.

  • ARMY | DRB | CY2009 | AR20090002517

    Original file (AR20090002517.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Applicant Name: ????? Board Discussion, Determination, and Recommendation After carefully examining the applicant’s record of service during the period of enlistment under review and considering the analyst’s recommendation and rationale, the Board directs ARBA St. Louis to administratively change block 25, "Separation Authority" to "Paragraph 14-12b, block 26, "Separation Code (SPD)" to "JKA" and block 28, "Narrative Reason For Separation" changed to "Pattern of Misconduct." Board Action...

  • ARMY | DRB | CY2010 | AR20100008261

    Original file (AR20100008261.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Applicant Name: ????? Facts and Circumstances: The evidence of record shows that on 2 April 2008, the unit commander notified the applicant of initiation of separation action under the provisions of Chapter 14, paragraph 14-12b, AR 635-200, by reason of misconduct-pattern of misconduct for receiving a Field Grade Article 15 (080319) for disrespecting an officer x 2 (080312), wrongfully possessing alcohol and wrongfully consuming alcohol (071101-080312), and drunk on duty (080312), receiving...