Applicant Name: ?????
Application Receipt Date: 080201 Prior Review: Prior Review Date: NA
I. Applicant Request: Upgrade Reason Change RE Code Change
Issues: The applicant states that he is trying to go to school for self-improvement.
II. Were Proper Discharge and Separation Authority procedures followed?
Tender Offer: NA
See Attachments: Legal Medical Minority Opinion Exhibits
III. Discharge Under Review
Unit CDR Recommended Discharge: Date: 980202
Discharge Received: Date: 980304 Chapter: 14 AR: 635-200
Reason: Misconduct RE: SPD: JKA Unit/Location: HHC Co., 1st Brigade, Fort Riley, Kansas.
Time Lost: AWOL for 3 days (970716-970718), returned to duty.
Article 15s (Charges/Dates/Punishment): 971208, for without authority, absent from unit on or about 970716-970718, forfeiture $450.00 for two months (suspended), extra duty and restriction for 45 days (FG).
970331, willfully disobeyed order , wrongfully consumming alcohol while under the age of 21, and wrongfully driving without a driver license (961208), reduction to E1, forfeiture of $437.00 for two months (suspended), extra duty and restriction for 45 days (FG).
Courts-Martial (Charges/Dates/Punishment): None
Counseling Records Available: Yes No
IV. Soldiers Overall Record
Age at current enlistment: 19
Current ENL Date: 960304 Current ENL Term: 04 Years ?????
Current ENL Service: 02 Yrs, 00Mos, 01Days ?????
Total Service: 02 Yrs, 00Mos, 01Days ?????
Previous Discharges: None
Highest Grade: E2 Performance Ratings Available: Yes No
MOS: 31U Signal Support Systems GT: 99 EDU: HS Grad Overseas: None Combat: None
Decorations/Awards: ASR.
V. Post-Discharge Activity
City, State: Fort Smith, AR
Post Service Accomplishments: Not Listed
VI. Facts, Circumstances, and Legal Basis for Separation
a. Facts and Circumstances:
The evidence of record shows that on 02 February, 1998, the unit commander notified the applicant of initiation of separation action under the provisions of Chapter 14, AR 635-200, by reason of misconductfor operating a vehicle while under the influence of alcohol (961209), minor in consumption, driving without a driver's license (961209), AWOL (970716-970718), lost military identification card, arrested for disorderly conduct, with a general under honorable conditions discharge. He was advised of his rights. The applicant consulted with legal counsel, was advised of the impact of the discharge action, and did not submit a statement in his own behalf. The unit commander subsequently recommended separation from the service and waiver of further rehabilitative efforts. The intermediate commander reviewed the proposed discharge action and recommended approval of the separation action with a general under honorable conditions discharge. On 9 February 1998, the separation authority waived further rehabilitative efforts and directed that the applicant be discharged with a characterization of service of general under honorable conditions.
b. Legal Basis for Separation:
Army Regulation 635-200 sets forth the basic authority for the separation of enlisted personnel. Chapter 14 establishes policy and prescribes procedures for separating members for misconduct. Specific categories include minor disciplinary infractions, a pattern of misconduct, and commission of a serious offense, to include abuse of illegal drugs, convictions by civil authorities and desertion or absence without leave. Action will be taken to separate a member for misconduct when it is clearly established that rehabilitation is impractical or unlikely to succeed. Army policy states that an under other than honorable conditions discharge is normally considered appropriate, however, a general under honorable conditions or an honorable discharge may be granted.
c. Response to Issues, Recommendation and Rationale:
After a careful review of all the applicants military records, and the issue and documents he submitted, the analyst found no mitigating factors that would merit an upgrade of the applicant's discharge. The applicants discharge was appropriate because the quality of his service was not consistent with the Army's standards for acceptable personal conduct and performance of duty by military personnel. By his misconduct, the applicant diminished the quality of his service below that meriting a fully honorable discharge. The applicant provided no independent corroborating evidence demonstrating that either the command's action was erroneous or that the applicants service mitigated the misconduct or poor duty performance. Therefore, the analyst determined that the reason for discharge and the characterization of service were both proper and equitable and recommends to the Board to deny relief.
VII. Summary of Army Discharge Review Board Hearing
Type of Hearing: Date: 14 November 2008 Location: Washington, DC
Did the Applicant Testify? Yes No
Counsel: NA
Witnesses/Observers: NA
Exhibits Submitted: NA
VIII. Board Discussion, Determination, and Recommendation
After carefully examining the applicants record of service during the period of enlistment under review and considering the analysts recommendation and rationale, the Board determined that the discharge was both proper and equitable and voted to deny relief.
IX. Board Decision
XI. Certification Signature
Board Vote: Approval Authority:
Character - Change 0 No change 5
Reason - Change 0 No change 5
(Board member names available upon request)
EDGAR J. YANGER
Colonel, U.S. Army
President, Army Discharge Review Board
Issue a new DD Form 214
Change Characterization to:
Change Reason to: NA
Other: NA
RE Code:
Grade Restoration: No Yes Grade: NA
ARMY DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD - CASE REPORT AND DIRECTIVE
Case Number AR20080002100
______________________________________________________________________________
Page 1 of 3 pages
ARMY | DRB | CY2007 | AR20070015225
Applicant Name: ????? On 31 January 1997, the separation authority waived further rehabilitative efforts and directed that the applicant be discharged with a characterization of service of general under honorable conditions. Board Discussion, Determination, and Recommendation After carefully examining the applicants record of service during the period of enlistment under review and considering the analysts recommendation and rationale, the Board determined that the discharge was both...
ARMY | DRB | CY2008 | AR20080005098
Applicant Name: ????? The applicant consulted with legal counsel, was advised of the impact of the discharge action, requested personal apperarance before an administrative separation board, and did not submit a statement in his own behalf. On 25 October 2005, the separation authority waived further rehabilitative efforts and directed that the applicant be discharged with a characterization of service of general, under honorable conditions.
ARMY | DRB | CY2008 | AR20080007770
Applicant Name: ????? Applicant Request: Upgrade Reason Change RE Code Change Issues: The Applicant states, "I SERVED THREE YEARS HONORABLY WITHOUT BEING IN ANY TROUBLE. On 5 November 2002, the separation authority waived further rehabilitative efforts and directed that the applicant be discharged with a characterization of service of other than honorable conditions discharge.
ARMY | DRB | CY2009 | AR20090001846
On 27 July 2006, the separation authority waived further rehabilitative efforts and directed that the applicant be discharged with a characterization of service of general, under honorable conditions. The applicable Army regulation states that there are circumstances in which the conduct or performance of duty reflected by an isolated incident provides the basis for a characterization. Board Action Directed President, Army Discharge Review Board Issue a new DD Form 214 Change...
ARMY | DRB | CY2009 | AR20090020625
On 20 January 2009, the applicant consulted with legal counsel, was advised of the impact of the discharge action, voluntarily waived consideration of his case by an Administrative Separation Board contingent upon him receiving a characterization of service no less favorable than general, under honorable conditions and did not submit a statement in his own behalf. On 9 February 2009, the separation authority approved the conditional waiver request, waived further rehabilitative efforts and...
ARMY | DRB | CY2009 | AR20090007736
Applicant Name: ????? Facts and Circumstances: The evidence of record shows that on 27 May 2008, the unit commander notified the applicant of initiation of separation action under the provisions of Chapter 14, paragraph 14-12c, AR 635-200, by reason of misconduct for assaulting a child under the age of 15, causing bodily harm, with a general, under honorable conditions discharge. Board Action Directed President, Army Discharge Review Board Issue a new DD Form 214 Change Characterization...
ARMY | DRB | CY2008 | AR20080008644
The applicant consulted with legal counsel, was advised of the impact of the discharge action, and submitted a statement in his own behalf. On 24 July 2007, the separation authority waived further rehabilitative efforts and directed that the applicant be discharged with a characterization of service of general, under honorable conditions. Board Action Directed President, Army Discharge Review Board Issue a new DD Form 214 Change Characterization to: Change Reason to: NA Other: NA RE...
ARMY | DRB | CY2008 | AR20080002552
Applicant Name: ????? Facts and Circumstances: The evidence of record shows that on 25 July 2007, the unit commander notified the applicant of initiation of separation action under the provisions of Chapter 14, AR 635-200, by reason of misconduct-pattern of misconduct for receiving multiple Article 15s which clearly indicated a pattern of misconduct with no hope of rehabilitation, with a general, under honorable conditions discharge. c. Response to Issues, Recommendation and...
ARMY | DRB | CY2008 | AR20080004432
Were Proper Discharge and Separation Authority procedures followed? The separation authority directed that the applicant be discharged with a characterization of service of honorable conditions. Board Action Directed President, Army Discharge Review Board Issue a new DD Form 214 Change Characterization to: Change Reason to: NA Other: NA RE Code: Grade Restoration: No Yes Grade: NA ARMY DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD - CASE REPORT AND DIRECTIVE Case Number...
ARMY | DRB | CY2008 | AR20080004432
Were Proper Discharge and Separation Authority procedures followed? The separation authority directed that the applicant be discharged with a characterization of service of honorable conditions. Board Action Directed President, Army Discharge Review Board Issue a new DD Form 214 Change Characterization to: Change Reason to: NA Other: NA RE Code: Grade Restoration: No Yes Grade: NA ARMY DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD - CASE REPORT AND DIRECTIVE Case Number...