Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | DRB | CY2008 | AR20080019120
Original file (AR20080019120.txt) Auto-classification: Denied
Applicant Name:  

Application Receipt Date: 2008/11/17	Prior Review:     Prior Review Date: NA     

I.  Applicant Request:  Upgrade     Reason Change     RE Code Change    

Issues: See DD Form 149 submitted in lieu of DD Form 293 submitted by the Applicant.  The Applicant states, "I was young and had issues with my mothers sickness and her following death. I have since spent various hours supporting my nation through volunteer effort in orginations such as CERT, Reserve Medical Corp, Free and Accepted Masons of the State of NY. I currently volunteer at The VA in Brooklyn".

II.  Were Proper Discharge and Separation Authority procedures followed?	     
Tender Offer:   NA

See Attachments:  Legal     Medical     Minority Opinion     Exhibits 

III.  Discharge Under Review
Unit CDR Recommended Discharge: 	NIF   Date: NIF
Discharge Received: 			   Date: 940504   Chapter: 4       AR: 635-200
Reason: Completion of Required Active Service	   RE:     SPD: MBK   Unit/Location: 447th SIG BN, Ft Gordon, GA 

Time Lost: None

Article 15s (Charges/Dates/Punishment): None

Courts-Martial (Charges/Dates/Punishment): None

Counseling Records Available: Yes    No 

IV.  Soldier’s Overall Record
Age at current enlistment:  19
Current ENL Date: 931023    Current ENL Term: 8 Years  ?????
Current ENL Service: 	00 Yrs, 04Mos, 01Days ?????
Total Service:  		8 Yrs, 0Mos, 01Days ?????
Previous Discharges: 	ARNG 931023-940103/NA
                                       ARNG 950505-960429/NA
                                        USAR   960430-011024/HD
Highest Grade: E3		Performance Ratings Available: Yes    No 
MOS: 74C10 Record Telecommunications Center Operator   GT: 114   EDU: GED   Overseas: None   Combat: None
Decorations/Awards: ASR, NDSM

V.  Post-Discharge Activity
City, State:  Brooklyn, NY
Post Service Accomplishments: The Applicant states he has since his discharge spent various hours supporting the Nation through volunteer efforts in organizations such as CERT, Reserve Medical Corps, Free and Accepted Masons of the State of NY and he currently volunteers at the VA in Brooklyn.

VI.  Facts, Circumstances, and Legal Basis for Separation

       a.  Facts and Circumstances:
       The evidence of record shows the applicant’s record is void of the specific facts and circumstances concerning the events that led to his discharge.  The record contains a properly constituted DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty), which was authenticated by the applicant’s signature.  The DD Form 214 indicates that he was released from active duty training under the provisions of Chapter 4, AR 635-200 by reason of completion of required active service, with service uncharacterized.  Furthermore, the DD Form 214 shows a Separation Code of MBK (i.e., completion of required active service).  Following completion of the MOS training course, the applicant was released from active duty training, with an effective date of 4 May 1994, and transferred to Co A, 101 Signal BN, Brooklyn, NY 11215-5194.

       b.  Legal Basis for Separation:  
       Army Regulation 635-200, in effect at the time, set forth the basic authority for separation of enlisted personnel.  Chapter 4 of that regulation provided, in pertinent part, for the separation of individuals at completion of required service (i.e., expiration term of service).

       c.  Response to Issues, Recommendation and Rationale:  
After a careful review of all the applicant's available military records during the period of enlistment under review, the issue, and documents he submitted, the analyst recommend that relief be denied in this case.  The evidence of record shows that the applicant, while in entry-level status, was released from active duty for training under the provisions of Chapter 4, AR 635-200, by reason of completion of required active service, with service uncharacterized.  The characterization of service for Soldiers separated under this provision of the regulation will normally be honorable, unless the Soldier is in entry-level status.  A Soldier is in entry-level status for the first 180 days of continuous active duty.  Army Regulation 635-200 also provides, except in cases of serious misconduct, that a Soldier’s service will be uncharacterized when separated in entry-level status.  For ARNG and USAR Soldiers ordered to IADT/ADT, entry-level status terminates 180 days after the beginning of training.  Soldiers in entry-level status, a general, under honorable conditions discharge is not authorized.  The analyst determined that the applicant’s Official Military Personnel File (OMPF) does not contain all the specific documents that would indicate the reason for the separation action from the United States Army.  Furthermore, the analyst noted the applicant's issue and noted that the applicant met entrance qualification standards to include age.  There is not evidence that the applicant was any less mature than other Soldiers of the same age who successfully completed military service.  The analyst further determined that the applicant had many legitimate avenues through which to obtain assistance or relief, without committing the misconduct, which led to the separation action under review.  In view of the aforementioned, the analyst determined that the reason for discharge and characterization of service were both proper and equitable.

VII.  Summary of Army Discharge Review Board Hearing

Type of Hearing: 		Date: 28 August 2009         Location: Washington, DC

Did the Applicant Testify?  Yes     No  

Counsel: NA

Witnesses/Observers: NA 

Exhibits Submitted: NA


















VIII.  Board Discussion, Determination, and Recommendation
After carefully examining the applicant’s record of service during the period of enlistment under review and considering the analyst’s recommendation and rationale, the Board determined that the discharge was both proper and equitable and voted to deny relief.  
        
IX.  Board Decision						
	XI.  Certification Signature
Board Vote:  							          Approval Authority:	
Character - Change 0    No change 5
Reason -     Change 0    No change 5
(Board member names available upon request)
								         EDGAR J. YANGER			 
								         Colonel, U.S. Army
X.  Board Action Directed					         President, Army Discharge Review Board
Issue a new DD Form 214  					
Change Characterization to: 			         
Change Reason to: No Change
Other: NA										
RE Code: 
Grade Restoration:   No   Yes   Grade: NA
ARMY DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD - CASE REPORT AND DIRECTIVE

Case Number AR20080019120
______________________________________________________________________________


Page 2 of 3 pages

Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | DRB | CY2008 | AR20080014697

    Original file (AR20080014697.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Applicant Name: ????? However, the evidence of record shows that the applicant, while in entry-level status, was released from active duty for training under the provisions of AR 635-200, Chapter 4, by reason of completion of required active service, with service uncharacterized. Board Action Directed President, Army Discharge Review Board Issue a new DD Form 214 Change Characterization to: Change Reason to: No Change Other: NA RE Code: Grade Restoration: No Yes Grade: None ARMY DISCHARGE...

  • ARMY | DRB | CY2008 | AR20080010827

    Original file (AR20080010827.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Applicant Name: ????? Army Regulation 635-200 states that a Soldier is in an entry-level status if the Soldier has not completed more than 180 days of creditable continuous active duty prior to the initiation of separation action. The analyst determined that no such unusual circumstances were present in the applicant’s record and her service did not warrant an honorable discharge.

  • ARMY | DRB | CY2009 | AR20090011900

    Original file (AR20090011900.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant was discharged under the provisions of Chapter 4, AR 635-200, by reason of completion of required active service, with a dishonorable discharge. The evidence of record shows that the applicant, while in entry-level status, was released from active duty for training under the provisions of Chapter 4, AR 635-200, by reason of completion of required active service, with service uncharacterized. Board Action Directed President, Army Discharge Review Board Issue a new DD Form...

  • ARMY | DRB | CY2009 | AR20090010759

    Original file (AR20090010759.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Applicant Name: ????? The separation authority approved the Chapter 10 request with an under other than honorable conditions discharge. Board Action Directed President, Army Discharge Review Board Issue a new DD Form 214 Change Characterization to: Change Reason to: NA Other: NA RE Code: Grade Restoration: No Yes Grade: NA ARMY DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD - CASE REPORT AND DIRECTIVE Case Number AR20090010759 ______________________________________________________________________________ Page 1...

  • ARMY | DRB | CY2012 | AR20120000793

    Original file (AR20120000793.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    His DD Form 214 indicates he was released from active duty training under the provisions of Chapter 4, AR 635-200 by reason of completion of required active service, with service uncharacterized. The evidence of record supports the fact that the applicant was discharged after the completion of a required period of active service. Further, Army Regulation 635-200, states, in effect, that only an honorable characterization of service may be awarded a Soldier upon completion of his required...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | AR20110023343

    Original file (AR20110023343.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Applicant Request: Upgrade Reason Change RE Code Change Issues: The applicant states: "I request that my DD214 be updated with the time in active duty service in 1997 corrected. l am requesting an updated/corrected copy of my DD214 that includes my time in service from July 1997 through December 1997 and May 1998 through August 1998 and will show an Honorable Discharge. Discharge Under Review Unit CDR Recommended Discharge: Date: NIF Discharge Received: Date: 980818 Chapter: 4 AR:...

  • ARMY | DRB | CY2009 | AR20090000127

    Original file (AR20090000127.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant consulted with legal counsel, was advised of the impact of the discharge action, voluntarily waived consideration his case by an administrative separation board contingent upon him receiving a characterization of service of no less favorable than general, under honorable conditions, and did not submit a statement in his own behalf. Board Discussion, Determination, and Recommendation After carefully examining the applicant’s record of service during the period of enlistment...

  • ARMY | DRB | CY2008 | AR20080011495

    Original file (AR20080011495.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Discharge Under Review Unit CDR Recommended Discharge: Date: Not In File Discharge Received: Date: 941213 Chapter: 4 AR: 635-200 Reason: Completion of Required Active Duty Training RE: SPD: MBK Unit/Location: E Trp, 153d Cavalry, Ocala, FL Time Lost: None Article 15s (Charges/Dates/Punishment): None Courts-Martial (Charges/Dates/Punishment): None Counseling Records Available: Yes No IV. The evidence of record shows that the applicant, while in entry-level status, was released from active...

  • ARMY | DRB | CY2006 | AR20060011718

    Original file (AR20060011718.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The characterization of service for Soldiers separated under this provision of regulation will normally be honorable, but will be uncharacterized if the Soldier is in an entry-level status. The characterization of service for Soldiers separated under this provision of the regulation will normally be honorable, unless the Soldier is in entry-level status. Certification Signature and Date Approval Authority: MARK E. COLLINS Colonel, U.S. Army President, Army Discharge Review...

  • ARMY | DRB | CY2008 | AR20080005129

    Original file (AR20080005129.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The evidence of record shows that the applicant, while in entry-level status, was released from active duty for training under the provisions of AR 635-200, Chapter 4, by reason of completion of required active service, with a dishonorable discharge. The characterization of service for Soldiers separated under this provision of the regulation will normally be honorable, unless the Soldier is in entry-level status. Board Action Directed President, Army Discharge Review Board Issue a new DD...