Applicant Name: ?????
Application Receipt Date: 2008/09/18 Prior Review: Prior Review Date: NA
I. Applicant Request: Upgrade Reason Change RE Code Change
Issues: See DD Form 293 and attached documents submitted by the applicant.
II. Were Proper Discharge and Separation Authority procedures followed?
Tender Offer: NA
See Attachments: Legal Medical Minority Opinion Exhibits
III. Discharge Under Review
Unit CDR Recommended Discharge: NIF Date: NIF
Discharge Received: Date: 990206 Chapter: 4 AR: 635-200
Reason: Completion of Required Active Service RE: SPD: MBK Unit/Location: HHC, 42nd FA Det, HHB Det 1 (Rear), Troy, NY
Time Lost: None
Article 15s (Charges/Dates/Punishment): NIF
Courts-Martial (Charges/Dates/Punishment): NIF
Counseling Records Available: Yes No
IV. Soldiers Overall Record
Age at current enlistment: 25
Current ENL Date: 980924 Current ENL Term: NIF Years ?????
Current ENL Service: 00 Yrs, 04Mos, 13Days ?????
Total Service: 07 Yrs, 00Mos, 00Days ?????
Previous Discharges: ARNG-980626-980923/HD
(Concurrent Service)
Highest Grade: E-3 Performance Ratings Available: Yes No
MOS: 71L10 Admin Spec GT: 89 EDU: 14 Years Overseas: None Combat: None
Decorations/Awards: ARCAM-2, NDSM, ASR, NYSLFR, C/ACH,
V. Post-Discharge Activity
City, State: New York, NY
Post Service Accomplishments: None Listed
VI. Facts, Circumstances, and Legal Basis for Separation
a. Facts and Circumstances:
The applicant's record is void of the order releasing him from active duty training. However, the record does contain a properly constituted DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty), which was authenticated by the applicants signature. The DD Form 214 indicates that he was released from active duty training under the provisions of Chapter 4, AR 635-200, by reason of completion of required active service, with service uncharacterized. Furthermore, the DD Form 214 shows a Separation Code of MBK (i.e., completion of required active service). Following the completion of his MOS training course, the applicant was released from active duty training, on 6 February 1999, according to his DD Form 214, and transferred to AG State of New York, 99 South Lake Ave, Troy, NY 12180.
b. Legal Basis for Separation:
Army Regulation 635-200, in effect at the time, set forth the basic authority for separation of enlisted personnel. Chapter 4 of that regulation provided, in pertinent part, for the separation of individuals at completion of required service (i.e., expiration term of service).
c. Response to Issues, Recommendation and Rationale:
After a careful review of all the applicant's available military records during the period of enlistment under review, the issues and documents he submitted, the analyst found no mitigating factors that would merit an upgrade of the applicant's discharge. However, the evidence of record shows that the applicant, while in entry-level status, was released from active duty for training under the provisions of AR 635-200, Chapter 4, by reason of completion of required active service, with service uncharacterized. The characterization of service for Soldiers separated under this provision of the regulation will normally be honorable, unless the Soldier is in entry-level status. A Soldier is in entry-level status for the first 180 days of continuous active duty. Army Regulation 635-200 also provides, except in cases of serious misconduct, that a Soldiers service will be uncharacterized when separated in entry-level status. For ARNG Soldiers ordered to IADT/ADT, entry-level status terminates 180 days after the beginning of training. A fully honorable discharge is not authorized under ELS conditions. A fully honorable discharge may be granted only in cases which are clearly warranted by unusual circumstances involving outstanding personal conduct and/or performance of duty. The analyst determined that no such unusual circumstances were present in the applicants record and his service did not warrant an honorable discharge. Furthermore, the analyst noted the applicant's issue; however, eligibility for veteran's benefits to include educational benefits under the Montgomery GI Bill does not fall within the purview of the Army Discharge Review Board. Accordingly, the applicant should contact a local office of the Department of Veterans Affairs for further assistance. In view of the aforementioned, the analyst determined that the reason for discharge and characterization of service were both proper and equitable.
VII. Summary of Army Discharge Review Board Hearing
Type of Hearing: Date: 8 July 2009 Location: Washington, DC
Did the Applicant Testify? Yes No
Counsel: NA
Witnesses/Observers: NA
Exhibits Submitted: NA
VIII. Board Discussion, Determination, and Recommendation
After carefully examining the applicants record of service during the period of enlistment under review and considering the analysts recommendation and rationale, the Board determined that the discharge was both proper and equitable and voted to deny relief.
IX. Board Decision
XI. Certification Signature
Board Vote: Approval Authority:
Character - Change 0 No change 5
Reason - Change 0 No change 5
(Board member names available upon request)
EDGAR J. YANGER
Colonel, U.S. Army
X. Board Action Directed President, Army Discharge Review Board
Issue a new DD Form 214
Change Characterization to:
Change Reason to: No Change
Other: NA
RE Code:
Grade Restoration: No Yes Grade: None
ARMY DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD - CASE REPORT AND DIRECTIVE
Case Number AR20080014697
______________________________________________________________________________
Page 1 of 3 pages
ARMY | DRB | CY2009 | AR20090011900
The applicant was discharged under the provisions of Chapter 4, AR 635-200, by reason of completion of required active service, with a dishonorable discharge. The evidence of record shows that the applicant, while in entry-level status, was released from active duty for training under the provisions of Chapter 4, AR 635-200, by reason of completion of required active service, with service uncharacterized. Board Action Directed President, Army Discharge Review Board Issue a new DD Form...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | AR20110023343
Applicant Request: Upgrade Reason Change RE Code Change Issues: The applicant states: "I request that my DD214 be updated with the time in active duty service in 1997 corrected. l am requesting an updated/corrected copy of my DD214 that includes my time in service from July 1997 through December 1997 and May 1998 through August 1998 and will show an Honorable Discharge. Discharge Under Review Unit CDR Recommended Discharge: Date: NIF Discharge Received: Date: 980818 Chapter: 4 AR:...
ARMY | DRB | CY2008 | AR20080005975
Discharge Under Review Unit CDR Recommended Discharge: Date: NIF Discharge Received: Date: 011218 Chapter: 4 AR: 635-200 Reason: Completion of Required Active Service RE: SPD: MBK Unit/Location: M Co, Fort Lee, VA Time Lost: None Article 15s (Charges/Dates/Punishment): NIF Courts-Martial (Charges/Dates/Punishment): NIF Counseling Records Available: Yes No IV. The characterization of service for Soldiers separated under this provision of the regulation will normally be honorable, unless the...
ARMY | DRB | CY2008 | AR20080019120
c. Response to Issues, Recommendation and Rationale: After a careful review of all the applicant's available military records during the period of enlistment under review, the issue, and documents he submitted, the analyst recommend that relief be denied in this case. The evidence of record shows that the applicant, while in entry-level status, was released from active duty for training under the provisions of Chapter 4, AR 635-200, by reason of completion of required active service, with...
ARMY | DRB | CY2008 | AR20080000155
His DD Form 214 indicates that he was released from active duty training under the provisions of Chapter 4, AR 635-200 by reason of completion of required active service, with service uncharacterized. The evidence of record shows that the applicant, while in entry-level status, was released from active duty for training under the provisions of Chapter 4, AR 635-200, by reason of completion of required active service, with service uncharacterized. The characterization of service for...
ARMY | DRB | CY2010 | AR20100016681
Applicant Name: ????? The characterization of service for Soldiers separated under this provision of the regulation will normally be honorable. Yes No Counsel: None Witnesses/Observers: NA Exhibits Submitted: DD Form 293, DD Form 149, NGB Form 22, and DD Form 214 for the period of service under review.
ARMY | DRB | CY2012 | AR20120000793
His DD Form 214 indicates he was released from active duty training under the provisions of Chapter 4, AR 635-200 by reason of completion of required active service, with service uncharacterized. The evidence of record supports the fact that the applicant was discharged after the completion of a required period of active service. Further, Army Regulation 635-200, states, in effect, that only an honorable characterization of service may be awarded a Soldier upon completion of his required...
ARMY | DRB | CY2008 | AR20080015408
The evidence of record shows that the applicant, while in entry-level status, was released from active duty for training under the provisions of Chapter 4, AR 635-200, by reason of completion of required active service, with service uncharacterized. The characterization of service for Soldiers separated under this provision of the regulation will normally be honorable, unless the Soldier is in entry-level status. Board Action Directed President, Army Discharge Review Board Issue a new DD...
ARMY | DRB | CY2009 | AR20090003592
However, the evidence of record shows that the applicant, while in entry-level status, was released from active duty for training under the provisions of AR 635-200, Chapter 4, by reason of completion of required active service, with service uncharacterized. Except for the forgoing modifications to the applicant's separation (SPD) code and the reentry eligibility (RE) code, the analyst determined that the reason for discharge and the characterization of service were both proper and...
ARMY | DRB | CY2008 | AR20080005129
The evidence of record shows that the applicant, while in entry-level status, was released from active duty for training under the provisions of AR 635-200, Chapter 4, by reason of completion of required active service, with a dishonorable discharge. The characterization of service for Soldiers separated under this provision of the regulation will normally be honorable, unless the Soldier is in entry-level status. Board Action Directed President, Army Discharge Review Board Issue a new DD...