Applicant Name:  ?????

Application Receipt Date: 081118	Prior Review:     Prior Review Date: NA     

I.  Applicant Request:  Upgrade     Reason Change     RE Code Change    

Issues: See enclosed DD Form 293 and supporting documents submitted by the Applicant.  Applicant states, " I would like to try to attempt to change my RE-Code from a 4 to a 3 so I can right my wrong and try to serve my counrty once again."

II.  Were Proper Discharge and Separation Authority procedures followed?	     
Tender Offer:   No

See Attachments:  Legal     Medical     Minority Opinion     Exhibits 

III.  Discharge Under Review
Unit CDR Recommended Discharge: 	   Date: 070514
Discharge Received: 			   Date: 070606   Chapter: 10    AR: 635-200
Reason: In Lieu of Trial by Court-Martial	   RE:     SPD: KFS   Unit/Location: A Btry, 1-56th ADA, 6th ADA Bde, Ft. Bliss, TX 

Time Lost: AWOL 64 days (070204-070408), surrendered to military authorities.

Article 15s (Charges/Dates/Punishment): None

Courts-Martial (Charges/Dates/Punishment): None

Counseling Records Available: Yes    No 

IV.  Soldier’s Overall Record
Age at current enlistment:  19
Current ENL Date: 061019    Current ENL Term: 08 Years  USAR
Current ENL Service: 	00 Yrs, 05 Mos, 13 Days Excess leave 55 days (070413-070606)
Total Service:  		00 Yrs, 05 Mos, 13 Days ?????
Previous Discharges: 	None
Highest Grade: E1		Performance Ratings Available: Yes    No 
MOS: None   GT: NIF   EDU: HS Grad   Overseas: None   Combat: None
Decorations/Awards: None

V.  Post-Discharge Activity
City, State:  Hamilton, OH
Post Service Accomplishments: None submitted by the Applicant.

VI.  Facts, Circumstances, and Legal Basis for Separation

       a.  Facts and Circumstances:
       The evidence of record shows that on 12 April 2007, the Applicant was charged with AWOL (070204-070409).  On 12 April 2007, the Applicant was afforded the opportunity to consult with legal counsel and voluntarily requested, in writing, discharge under the provisions of Chapter 10, AR 635-200 in lieu of trial by court-martial.  In this request, the Applicant admitted guilt to the offense, or a lesser included offense.  Further, the Applicant indicated that she understood that she could receive an under other than honorable conditions discharge and that the discharge would have a significant effect on eligibility for veteran’s benefits.  The Applicant did not submit a statement in her own behalf.  The unit commander and intermediate commander recommended approval of an under other than honorable conditions discharge.   On 18 May 2007, the separation authority approved the discharge with a characterization of service of under other than honorable conditions.  The Applicant was to be reduced to the lowest enlisted rank.

       b.  Legal Basis for Separation:  
       Army Regulation 635-200 sets forth the basic authority for the separation of enlisted personnel.  Chapter 10 of that regulation provides, in pertinent part, that a member who has committed an offense or offenses for which the authorized punishment includes a punitive discharge may submit a request for a discharge for the good of the service in lieu of trial by court-martial.  The request may be submitted at any time after charges have been preferred and must include the individual’s admission of guilt.  Army policy states that although an honorable or general discharge is authorized, a discharge under other than honorable conditions is normally considered appropriate.  

       c.  Response to Issues, Recommendation and Rationale:  
       After a careful review of the Applicant’s military records, and the issue submitted with the application, the analyst found no mitigating factors that would merit an upgrade of the Applicant's discharge.  The evidence of record indicates that the Applicant was charged with the commission of an offense punishable under the Uniform Code of Military Justice (UCMJ) with a punitive discharge.  The applicant was affforded the opportunity to consult with defense counsel, and voluntarily in writing, requested separation from the Army in lieu of trial by court-martial.  In doing so, the Applicant admitted guilt to the stipulated or lesser-included offenses under the UCMJ.  The analyst noted that all the requirements of law and regulation were met and the rights of the Applicant were fully protected throughout the separation process.  It is also noted that the characterization of service for this type of discharge is normally under other than honorable conditions and that the Applicant was aware of that prior to requesting discharge.  Furthermore, the analyst noted the Applicant's issue and determined that the Applicant had many legitimate avenues through which to obtain assistance or relief, without committing the misconduct, which led to the separation action under review.  Therefore, the analyst determined the reason for discharge and the characterization of service were both proper and equitable and recommends to the Board to deny relief.

VII.  Summary of Army Discharge Review Board Hearing

Type of Hearing: 		Date: 23 June 2009         Location: Chicago, IL

Did the Applicant Testify?  Yes     No  

Counsel: None

Witnesses/Observers: Yes 

Exhibits Submitted: Police Reports (2 pages), Sworn Statement (1 page), Character References (4 pages).

VIII.  Board Discussion, Determination, and Recommendation
          After carefully examining the Applicant’s record of service during the period of enlistment under review and considering the analyst’s recommendation, rationale and her testimony, the Board determined that the characterization of service was too harsh based on the Applicant’s quality of service and post service accomplishment and, as a result, it is inequitable.  Accordingly, the Board voted to grant relief in the form of an upgrade of the characterization of service to uncharacterized.  The Board determined that the reason for discharge was proper and equitable and voted not to change it.










 
        
IX.  Board Decision						
	XI.  Certification Signature
Board Vote:  							          Approval Authority:	
Character - Change 3    No change 2
Reason -     Change 3    No change 2
(Board member names available upon request)
								         EDGAR J. YANGER			 
								         Colonel, U.S. Army
X.  Board Action Directed					         President, Army Discharge Review Board
Issue a new DD Form 214  					
Change Characterization to: 			         
Change Reason to: No Change
Other: No Change										
RE Code: 
Grade Restoration:   No   Yes   Grade: No Change
ARMY DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD - CASE REPORT AND DIRECTIVE

Case Number AR20080018972
______________________________________________________________________________


Page 2 of 3 pages