Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | DRB | CY2008 | AR20080016441
Original file (AR20080016441.txt) Auto-classification: Denied
Applicant Name:  ?????

Application Receipt Date: 081020	Prior Review:     Prior Review Date: NA     

I.  Applicant Request:  Upgrade     Reason Change     RE Code Change    

Issues: See DD Form 293 and supporting documentation submitted by the Applicant.

II.  Were Proper Discharge and Separation Authority procedures followed?	     
Tender Offer:   NA

See Attachments:  Legal     Medical     Minority Opinion     Exhibits 

III.  Discharge Under Review
Unit CDR Recommended Discharge: 	   Date: Undated
Discharge Received: 			   Date: 080820   Chapter: 5-17    AR: 635-200
Reason: Condition, Not a Disability	   RE:     SPD: JFV   Unit/Location: HHC, 63rd Sig Bn (Rear Det), 35th Sig Bde, Ft. Gordon, GA 

Time Lost: AWOL 221 days (070416-071127), mode of return NIF.

Article 15s (Charges/Dates/Punishment): None

Courts-Martial (Charges/Dates/Punishment): SPCM, 080602, AWOL 221 days; General Officer reprimand and reduction to the grade of E1 (080723).

Counseling Records Available: Yes    No 

IV.  Soldier’s Overall Record
Age at current enlistment:  33
Current ENL Date: 040929    Current ENL Term: 03 Years  ?????
Current ENL Service: 	03 Yrs, 03 Mos, 10 Days ?????
Total Service:  		04 Yrs, 02 Mos, 09 Days (Includes previous discharge and prior inactive service)
Previous Discharges: 	ADT - 040105-040730/HD
Highest Grade: E4		Performance Ratings Available: Yes    No 
MOS: 23B  IT Spec   GT: 118   EDU: College Degree   Overseas: Republic of Korea   Combat: None
Decorations/Awards: AAM, NDSM, GWOTSM, KDSM, ASR, OSR

V.  Post-Discharge Activity
City, State:  Bloomington, NY
Post Service Accomplishments: None submitted by the Applicant. 

VI.  Facts, Circumstances, and Legal Basis for Separation

       a.  Facts and Circumstances:
       The evidence of record shows that on 080623, the Applicant was diagnosed with a significant dysthymic disorder, major depression, and adjustment disorder with disturbance of emotions and conduct.  Further, the evidence of record shows that the Applicant received a special court-martial conviction on 080602 for being AWOL (070416-071127) which resulted in a General Officer reprimand and reduction to the grade of E1.  On 31 July 2008, the unit commander notified the Applicant of initiation of separation action under the provisions of Chapter 5, paragraph 5-17, AR 635-200, by reason of physical condition, not a disability with a general, under honorable conditions discharge.  The Applicant was advised of her rights, consulted with legal counsel, was advised of the impact of the discharge action, and submitted a statement in her own behalf.  The unit commander subsequently recommended separation from the service with an honorable discharge.  The intermediate commander reviewed the proposed discharge action and recommended approval of the separation action with a general, under honorable conditions discharge.  On 8 August 2008, the separation authority directed that the Applicant be discharged with a characterization of service of general, under honorable conditions.

       b.  Legal Basis for Separation:  
       Army Regulation 635-200 provides the basic authority for the separation of enlisted personnel.  Paragraph 5-17 specifically provides that a Soldier may be separated for other physical or mental conditions not amounting to a disability under Army Regulation 635-40, which interferes with assignment to or performance of duty.  The regulation requires that the condition interferes with the Soldiers’ ability to perform duty, and requires that the diagnosis be so severe that the Soldier’s ability to function in the military environment is significantly impaired.  Army Regulation 635-200 states that a Soldier being separated under this paragraph will be awarded a characterization of service of honorable, under honorable conditions, or an uncharacterized description of service if in entry-level status.  A general, under honorable conditions discharge is normally inappropriate for individuals separated under the provisions of Chapter 5-17 unless properly notified of the specific factors in his/her service that warrant such characterization.

       c.  Response to Issues, Recommendation and Rationale:  
       After a careful review of the Applicant’s military records for the period of enlistment under review and the issue and documents she submitted, the analyst recommends that relief be denied in this case.  A mental status evaluation by competent medical authority diagnosed the Applicant with an adjustment disorder with depressed mood.  The unit commander subsequently recommended separation under provisions of AR 635-200, Chapter 5, paragraph 5-17, by reason of other designated physical or mental condition not amounting to a disability, with a general, under honorable conditions discharge and informed the Applicant as to the specific factors in her service record that would warrant a general discharge.  Furthermore, the analyst found no evidence of arbitrary or capricious actions by the command.  The analyst was satisfied that all requirements of law and regulation were met and the rights of the Applicant were fully protected throughout the separation process.  Therefore, the analyst determined the narrative reason for discharge  and the characterization was both proper and equitable and recommends to the Board to deny relief.

VII.  Summary of Army Discharge Review Board Hearing

Type of Hearing: 		Date: 7 August 2009         Location: Washington, D.C.

Did the Applicant Testify?  Yes     No  

Counsel: NA

Witnesses/Observers: NA 

Exhibits Submitted: NA

VIII.  Board Discussion, Determination, and Recommendation
After carefully examining the Applicant’s record of service during the period of enlistment under review and considering the analyst’s recommendation and rationale, the Board determined that the discharge was both proper and equitable and voted to deny relief.










        
IX.  Board Decision						
	XI.  Certification Signature
Board Vote:  							          Approval Authority:	
Character - Change 0    No change 5
Reason -     Change 0    No change 5
(Board member names available upon request)
								         EDGAR J. YANGER			 
								         Colonel, U.S. Army
X.  Board Action Directed					         President, Army Discharge Review Board
Issue a new DD Form 214  					
Change Characterization to: 			         
Change Reason to: No Change
Other: No Change										
RE Code: 
Grade Restoration:   No   Yes   Grade: No Change
ARMY DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD - CASE REPORT AND DIRECTIVE

Case Number AR20080016441
______________________________________________________________________________


Page 1 of 3 pages

Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | DRB | CY2009 | AR20090007353

    Original file (AR20090007353.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Applicant Name: ????? On 1 November 2007, the separation authority approved the discharge with an under other than honorable conditions discharge. Chapter 10 of that regulation provides, in pertinent part, that a member who has committed an offense or offenses for which the authorized punishment includes a punitive discharge may submit a request for a discharge for the good of the service in lieu of trial by court-martial.

  • ARMY | DRB | CY2009 | AR20090010670

    Original file (AR20090010670.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    On 24 January 2008, the applicant consulted with legal counsel, was advised of the impact of the discharge action, unconditionally waived his right to an administrative separation board, and did not submit a statement in his own behalf. On 27 June 2008, the separation authority waived further rehabilitative efforts and directed that the applicant be discharged with a characterization of service of under other than honorable conditions. Board Action Directed President, Army Discharge Review...

  • ARMY | DRB | CY2009 | AR20090006808

    Original file (AR20090006808.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant waived his rights to legal counsel, and did not submit a statement in his own behalf. On 4 November 2008, the separation authority waived further rehabilitative efforts and directed that the applicant be discharged with a characterization of service of general under honorable conditions. Board Action Directed President, Army Discharge Review Board Issue a new DD Form 214 Change Characterization to: Change Reason to: No Change Other: NA RE Code: Grade Restoration: No Yes...

  • ARMY | DRB | CY2009 | AR20090006913

    Original file (AR20090006913.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Facts and Circumstances: The evidence of record shows that on 4 December 2008, the unit commander notified the applicant of initiation of separation action under the provisions of Chapter 14, paragraph 12c, AR 635-200, by reason of misconduct commission of serious offense for AWOL, disobey a lawful command, make a false official statement, wrongfully used peyote, stalked female Soldiers, stole government property and wrongfully wore unauthorized insignia, with an under other than honorable...

  • ARMY | DRB | CY2009 | AR20090006599

    Original file (AR20090006599.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Applicant Name: ????? Facts and Circumstances: The evidence of record shows that on 25 March 2009, the unit commander notified the applicant of initiation of separation action under the provisions of Chapter 14, paragraph 12b, AR 635-200, for pattern of misconduct in that his misconduct range from driving under the influence of alcohol; being incapacitated for the proper performance of his duties because of the wrongful previous overindulgence in intoxicating liquor; being drunk on duty,...

  • ARMY | DRB | CY2009 | AR20090008483

    Original file (AR20090008483.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Applicant Name: ????? On 15 December 2008, the separation authority waived further rehabilitative efforts and directed that the applicant be discharged with a characterization of service of general, under honorable conditions. Board Action Directed President, Army Discharge Review Board Issue a new DD Form 214 Change Characterization to: Change Reason to: NA Other: NA RE Code: Grade Restoration: No Yes Grade: NA ARMY DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD - CASE REPORT AND DIRECTIVE Case Number...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | AR20100030450

    Original file (AR20100030450.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    After a thorough review of the applicant’s records and the issues and documents submitted with the application, the analyst found no cause for clemency and therefore recommends to the Board to deny clemency. Board Discussion, Determination, and Recommendation After carefully examining the applicant’s record of service during the period of enlistment under review and considering the analyst’s recommendation and rationale, the Board determined that the discharge was both proper and equitable,...

  • ARMY | DRB | CY2009 | AR20090015682

    Original file (AR20090015682.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Facts and Circumstances: Evidence of record shows that on 1 April 2008, the unit commander notified the applicant of initiation of separation action under the provisions of Chapter 14, paragraph 14-12c, AR 635-200, by reason of misconduct—commission of a serious offense for wrongfully using marijuana on three separate occasions; AWOL (070422-070521; 070522-070613; 070614-070619; 070727-070730; 070810-070813; 070814-071127); failure to report on diverse occasions; and disrespect toward an...

  • ARMY | DRB | CY2008 | AR20080001200

    Original file (AR20080001200.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Applicant Name: Application Receipt Date: 2008/01/14 Prior Review: Prior Review Date: NA I. Facts and Circumstances: The evidence of record shows that on 1 November 2005, the unit commander notified the applicant of initiation of separation action under the provisions of Chapter 14, AR 635-200, by reason of misconduct (Serious Offense) — for on 7 September 2005 the applicant tested positive for THC (marijuana), with a general under honorable conditions discharge. On 17 November 2005, the...

  • ARMY | DRB | CY2008 | AR20080014594

    Original file (AR20080014594.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Applicant Name: ????? A general, under honorable conditions discharge is normally inappropriate for individuals separated under the provisions of Chapter 5-17. c. Response to Issues, Recommendation and Rationale: After a careful review of all the applicant’s military records during the period of enlistment under review and the issue and documents submitted with the application, the analyst found no mitigating factors that would merit a change to the narrative reason for discharge on the...