Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | DRB | CY2009 | AR20090006808
Original file (AR20090006808.txt) Auto-classification: Denied
Applicant Name:  

Application Receipt Date: 2009/04/14	Prior Review:     Prior Review Date: NA     

I.  Applicant Request:  Upgrade     Reason Change     RE Code Change    

Issues: See DD Form 149 and attached documents submitted by the Applicant.

II.  Were Proper Discharge and Separation Authority procedures followed?	     
Tender Offer:   NA

See Attachments:  Legal     Medical     Minority Opinion     Exhibits 

III.  Discharge Under Review
Unit CDR Recommended Discharge: 	NIF   Date: 081022
Discharge Received: 			   Date: 081125   Chapter: 14-12C(2)       AR: 635-200
Reason: Misconduct (Drug Abuse)	   RE:     SPD: JKK   Unit/Location: HSB, 1st BN, 37th FA, Ft Lewis, WA 

Time Lost: None

Article 15s (Charges/Dates/Punishment): 071127, wrongfully used MDMA (ecstasy) on or about (071102-071105); reduction to E2, forfeiture of $729 per month for two months, extra duty and restriction for  45 day all suspended to be automatically remitted if not vacated before 070111 (FG).

Courts-Martial (Charges/Dates/Punishment): None

Counseling Records Available: Yes    No 

IV.  Soldier’s Overall Record
Age at current enlistment:  21
Current ENL Date: 040324    Current ENL Term: 4 Years  ?????
Current ENL Service: 	4 Yrs, 08Mos, 02Days ?????
Total Service:  		4 Yrs, 08Mos, 02Days ?????
Previous Discharges: 	None
Highest Grade: E4		Performance Ratings Available: Yes    No 
MOS: 25U Sig Supt Sys Spec   GT: 111   EDU: HS Grad   Overseas: SWA   Combat: Iraq (060629-070615)
Decorations/Awards: ARCOM, AGCM, NDSM, GWOTSM, ASR, OSR, CAB, ICMw/BSS, OSB

V.  Post-Discharge Activity
City, State:  Colorado Springs, CO
Post Service Accomplishments: None submitted

VI.  Facts, Circumstances, and Legal Basis for Separation

       a.  Facts and Circumstances:
       The evidence of record shows that on 22 October 2008, the unit commander notified the applicant of initiation of separation action under the provisions of Chapter 1-18, paragraph c (3), AR 635-200, by vacating your suspended separation approved on 27 Mar 2008 and suspended until 26 March 2009.  The conditions for the suspended separation were that you would not commit any offense punishable under UMCJ during the suspension period.  The reason for recommending the vacation is you wrongfully used morphine between (080901-080909).  He was advised of his rights.  The applicant waived his rights to legal counsel, and did not submit a statement in his own behalf.  The unit commander subsequently recommended separation from the service and waiver of further rehabilitative efforts.  The intermediate commander reviewed the proposed discharge action and recommended approval of the separation action with a general under honorable conditions discharge.  On 4 November 2008, the separation authority waived further rehabilitative efforts and directed that the applicant be discharged with a characterization of service of general under honorable conditions.

       b.  Legal Basis for Separation:  
       Army Regulation 635-200 sets forth the basic authority for the separation of enlisted personnel.  Chapter 14 of this regulation establishes policy and prescribes procedures for separating members for misconduct.  Specific categories include minor disciplinary infractions, a pattern of misconduct, and commission of a serious offense, to include abuse of illegal drugs, convictions by civil authorities and desertion or absence without leave.  Action will be taken to separate a member for misconduct when it is clearly established that rehabilitation is impractical or unlikely to succeed.  Army policy states that an under other than honorable conditions discharge is normally considered appropriate, however, a general under honorable conditions or an honorable discharge may be granted.   

       c.  Response to Issues, Recommendation and Rationale:  
       After carefully examining the applicant’s record of service during the period of enlistment under review and the issue and documents submitted with the application, the analyst determined that the discharge was both proper and equitable.  The applicant, by violating the Army's policy not to possess or use illegal drugs, compromised the trust and confidence placed in a Soldier.  The applicant, as a Soldier, had the duty to support and abide by the Army's drug policies.  By abusing illegal drugs, the applicant knowingly risked a military career and diminished the quality of service below that meriting a fully honorable discharge. Furthermore, the record does not support the issue that the applicant suffers from Post Traumatic Stress Disorder and no evidence to support it has been submitted by the applicant, that the discharge was the result of any medical condition.  Therefore, the analyst determined the reason for discharge and the characterization of service were both proper and equitable and recommends to the Board to deny relief. 

VII.  Summary of Army Discharge Review Board Hearing

Type of Hearing: 		Date: 19 June 2009         Location: Washington, DC

Did the Applicant Testify?  Yes     No  

Counsel: NA

Witnesses/Observers: NA 

Exhibits Submitted: NA

VIII.  Board Discussion, Determination, and Recommendation
After carefully examining the applicant’s record of service during the period of enlistment under review and considering the analyst’s recommendation and rationale, the Board determined that the discharge was both proper and equitable and voted to deny relief.  
        
IX.  Board Decision						
	XI.  Certification Signature
Board Vote:  							          Approval Authority:	
Character - Change 0    No change 5
Reason -     Change 0    No change 5
(Board member names available upon request)
								         EDGAR J. YANGER			 
								         Colonel, U.S. Army
X.  Board Action Directed					         President, Army Discharge Review Board
Issue a new DD Form 214  					
Change Characterization to: 			         
Change Reason to: No Change
Other: NA										
RE Code: 
Grade Restoration:   No   Yes   Grade: NA
ARMY DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD - CASE REPORT AND DIRECTIVE

Case Number AR20090006808
______________________________________________________________________________


Page 1 of 2 pages

Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | DRB | CY2007 | AR20070015153

    Original file (AR20070015153.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Current ENL Service: 00 Yrs, 08Mos, 02Days Includes two period of AWOL (050328, and 050610-050706) Total Service: 02 Yrs, 08Mos, 11Days The applicant's DD Form 214 under review incorrectly show the applicant Date Entered AD This Period" as; year 2002, month 12, and day 17, should read as; year 2002, month 11, and day 20, as found on the applicant's enlistment contract. Facts and Circumstances: Evidence of record shows that on 10 August 2005, the unit commander notified the applicant of...

  • ARMY | DRB | CY2008 | AR20080012850

    Original file (AR20080012850.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Facts and Circumstances: Evidence of record shows that on 27 June 2008, the unit commander notified the applicant of initiation of separation action under the provisions of Chapter 14, paragraph 12b, AR 635-200, by reason of misconduct—pattern of misconduct for violating a lawful order (080522), with a general, under honorable conditions discharge. The intermediate commander reviewed the proposed discharge action and recommended approval of the separation action with a general, under...

  • ARMY | DRB | CY2008 | AR20080002340

    Original file (AR20080002340.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Applicant Name: ????? The applicant consulted with legal counsel, was advised of the impact of the discharge action, unconditionally waived consideration of his case by an administrative separation board, and did not submit a statement in his own behalf. On 12 August 1998, the separation authority waived further rehabilitative efforts and directed that the applicant be discharged with a characterization of service of general, under honorable conditions.

  • ARMY | DRB | CY2008 | AR20080015275

    Original file (AR20080015275.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant consulted with legal counsel, was advised of the impact of the discharge action, and submitted a statement in his own behalf. On 29 January 2002, the separation authority waived further rehabilitative efforts and directed that the applicant be discharged with a characterization of service of general under honorable conditions. Board Action Directed President, Army Discharge Review Board Issue a new DD Form 214 Change Characterization to: Change Reason to: No Change Other:...

  • ARMY | DRB | CY2009 | AR20090005535

    Original file (AR20090005535.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Facts, Circumstances, and Legal Basis for Separation a. The DD Form 214 indicates that the applicant was discharged under the provisions of Chapter 9, AR 635-200, for alcohol rehabilitation failure with a characterization of service of general, under honorable conditions. Board Action Directed President, Army Discharge Review Board Issue a new DD Form 214 Change Characterization to: Change Reason to: No Change Other: NA RE Code: Grade Restoration: No Yes Grade: NA ARMY DISCHARGE REVIEW...

  • ARMY | DRB | CY2006 | AR20060008931

    Original file (AR20060008931.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The intermediate commander reviewed the proposed discharge action and recommended approval of the separation action with a general, under honorable conditions discharge. On 21 September 2001, the separation authority waived further rehabilitative efforts and directed that the applicant be discharged with a characterization of service of general, under honorable conditions. Certification Signature and Date Approval Authority: ROBERT L. HOUSE Colonel, U.S. Army President, Army Discharge...

  • ARMY | DRB | CY2009 | AR20090018306

    Original file (AR20090018306.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Applicant Name: ????? Facts and Circumstances: The evidence of record shows that on 3 October 2006, the unit commander notified the applicant of initiation of separation action under the provisions of Chapter 14, paragraph 12c, AR 635-200, by reason of misconduct (Commission of a Serious Offense) — for use of illegal drugs, with a general, under honorable conditions discharge. Board Action Directed President, Army Discharge Review Board Issue a new DD Form 214 Change Characterization...

  • ARMY | DRB | CY2009 | AR20090010575

    Original file (AR20090010575.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Applicant Name: ????? Facts and Circumstances: The evidence of record shows that on 23 April 2008, the unit commander notified the applicant of initiation of separation action under the provisions of Chapter 14, paragraph 14-12c, AR 635-200, by reason of misconduct-commission of a serious offense for making a false official statement to an officer, noncommissioned officer, and a special agent, with a general, under honorable conditions discharge. On 18 April 2006, the separation authority...

  • ARMY | DRB | CY2008 | AR20080011240

    Original file (AR20080011240.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Applicant Name: ????? Facts and Circumstances: The evidence of record shows that on 5 January 2007, the unit commander notified the applicant of initiation of separation action under the provisions of Chapter 14, paragraph 12(C)2, AR 635-200, by reason of misconduct drug abuse, with a general under honorable conditions discharge. Board Action Directed President, Army Discharge Review Board Issue a new DD Form 214 Change Characterization to: Change Reason to: No Change Other: NA RE...

  • ARMY | DRB | CY2009 | AR20090010708

    Original file (AR20090010708.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Applicant Name: ????? On 22 April 2003, the separation authority waived further rehabilitative efforts and directed that the applicant be discharged with a characterization of service of general, under honorable conditions. The narrative reason specified by Army Regulations for a discharge under this paragraph is "Misconduct (Drug Abuse)", the separation code is "JKK", and the reentry code is "RE 4".