Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | DRB | CY2008 | AR20080016439
Original file (AR20080016439.txt) Auto-classification: Denied
Applicant Name:   

Application Receipt Date: 2008/10/20	Prior Review:     Prior Review Date: NA     

I.  Applicant Request:  Upgrade     Reason Change     RE Code Change    

Issues: See DD Form 293 and supporting documentation submitted by the Applicant.

II.  Were Proper Discharge and Separation Authority procedures followed?	     
Tender Offer:   NA

See Attachments:  Legal     Medical     Minority Opinion     Exhibits 

III.  Discharge Under Review
Unit CDR Recommended Discharge: 	   Date: NIF
Discharge Received: 			   Date: 061201   Chapter: NIF    AR: 135-178
Reason: NIF	   RE:     SPD: NIF   Unit/Location: HQ, USA Civil Affairs and Psychological Ops Cmd (A), Ft. Bragg, NC 

Time Lost: NIF

Article 15s (Charges/Dates/Punishment): NIF

Courts-Martial (Charges/Dates/Punishment): NIF

Counseling Records Available: Yes    No 

IV.  Soldier’s Overall Record
Age at current enlistment:  25
Current ENL Date: 000623    Current ENL Term: 08 Years  USAR
Current ENL Service: 	06 Yrs, 05 Mos, 09 Days Moral Waiver
Total Service:  		06 Yrs, 05 Mos, 09 Days ?????
Previous Discharges: 	IADT - 040113-050621/HD  Concurrent Service
Highest Grade: E4		Performance Ratings Available: Yes    No 
MOS: 63W  Wheel Veh Rpr   GT: NIF   EDU: HS Grad   Overseas: NIF   Combat: NIF
Decorations/Awards: AAM, ARCAM, NDSM, GWOTSM, AFRM, ASR, ARCOTR

V.  Post-Discharge Activity
City, State:  Yakima, WA
Post Service Accomplishments: None submitted by the Applicant.

VI.  Facts, Circumstances, and Legal Basis for Separation

       a.  Facts and Circumstances:
       The evidence shows the Applicant’s record is void of the specific facts and circumstances concerning the events that led to his discharge from the United States Army Reserve.  The record indicates that on 7 November 2006, Department of the Army, Headquarters, United States Army Civil Affairs and Psychological Operations Command (A), Fort Bragg, NC, Orders 06-311-00003, discharged the Applicant from the United States Army Reserve, effective 1 December 2006, with an under other than honorable conditions discharge.  These same Orders reduced the Applicant in rank from E2 to E1 effective 3 November 2006.

       b.  Legal Basis for Separation:  
       Army Regulation 135-178 sets forth the basic authority for the separation of enlisted personnel from the United States Army Reserve.  Chapter 12 of this regulation establishes policy and prescribes procedures for separating members for misconduct.  Specific categories include minor disciplinary infractions, a pattern of misconduct, and commission of a serious offense, to include abuse of illegal drugs, and convictions by civil authorities.  Action will be taken to separate a member for misconduct when it is clearly established that rehabilitation is impractical or unlikely to succeed.  Army policy states that an under other than honorable conditions discharge is normally considered appropriate, however, a general under honorable conditions or an honorable discharge may be granted

       c.  Response to Issues, Recommendation and Rationale:  
       After a careful review of the Applicant’s available military records, and the issue submitted with the application as to the propriety of the discharge, the analyst determined that the Applicant’s available record of service during the period under review as a U.S. Army Reserve Soldier is void of the specific facts and circumstances concerning the events that led to his discharge from the Army Reserve.  However, the Applicant’s record does contain a properly constituted order which was authenticated by the appropriate military authority.  This document identifies the characterization of the discharge and the analyst presumed Government regularity in the discharge process.  Barring evidence to the contrary, the analyst was satisfied that all requirements of law and regulation were met and the rights of the Applicant were fully protected throughout the separation process.  The Applicant provided no independent corroborating evidence demonstrating that either the command's action was erroneous or that the Applicant’s service mitigated the type of discharge he received from the U.S. Army Reserve.   The analyst determined that the Applicant’s Official Military Personnel File (OMPF) does not contain all the specific documents that would indicate the reason for the separation action from the United States Army.  If the Applicant desires to appear before a personal appearance Board, the burden of proof remains with the former Soldier to provide the appropriate documents or other evidence sufficient to explain the facts, circumstances, and reasons underlying the separation action, for the Board’s consideration.  In light of the foregoing, the analyst determined the reason for discharge and the characterization of service were both proper and equitable and recommends to the Board to deny relief.

VII.  Summary of Army Discharge Review Board Hearing

Type of Hearing: 		Date: 7 August 2009         Location: Washington, D.C.

Did the Applicant Testify?  Yes     No  

Counsel: NNA

Witnesses/Observers: NA 

Exhibits Submitted: NA

VIII.  Board Discussion, Determination, and Recommendation
After carefully examining the Applicant’s record of service during the period of enlistment under review and considering the analyst’s recommendation and rationale, the Board determined that the discharge was both proper and equitable and voted to deny relief.  
        
IX.  Board Decision						
	XI.  Certification Signature
Board Vote:  							          Approval Authority:	
Character - Change 0    No change 5
Reason -     Change 0    No change 5
(Board member names available upon request)
								         EDGAR J. YANGER			 
								         Colonel, U.S. Army
X.  Board Action Directed					         President, Army Discharge Review Board
Issue a new DD Form 214  					
Change Characterization to: 			         
Change Reason to: No Change
Other: No Change										
RE Code: 
Grade Restoration:   No   Yes   Grade: No Change
ARMY DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD - CASE REPORT AND DIRECTIVE

Case Number AR20080016439
______________________________________________________________________________


Page 1 of 2 pages

Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | DRB | CY2007 | AR20070013911

    Original file (AR20070013911.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Facts, Circumstances, and Legal Basis for Separation a. Legal Basis for Separation: Army Regulation 135-178 govern procedures for discharges for enlisted personnel of the United States Army Reserve. An enlisted member separated for misconduct which includes unsatisfactory participation will normally be furnished a characterization of service of under other than honorable conditions in accordance with Army Regulation 135-178. c. Response to Issues, Recommendation and Rationale: After a...

  • ARMY | DRB | CY2008 | AR20080002559

    Original file (AR20080002559.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Applicant Name: ????? Facts and Circumstances: The evidence of record shows that on 9 May 2007, the unit commander (LTC, CA, USAR, Commanding), notified the applicant of initiation of separation action under the provisions of Chapter 13, AR 135-178, by reason of unsatisfactory participation for failure to report for more than nine unit training assemblies, with an under other than honorable conditions discharge. Board Discussion, Determination, and Recommendation After carefully examining...

  • ARMY | DRB | CY2006 | AR20060009263

    Original file (AR20060009263.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The evidence of record shows that on 21 April 2004, Orders 04-112-0004, DA, HQ, United States Army, Civil Affairs and Psychological Operations Command (A), Fort Bragg, North Carolina, discharged the applicant from the United States Army Reserve, effective date: 21 April 2004, with an general, under honorable conditions discharge. Legal Basis for Separation: Army Regulation 135-178 (Separation of Enlisted Personnel) provides for the separation of enlisted personnel of the Army Reserve and...

  • ARMY | DRB | CY2008 | AR20080012663

    Original file (AR20080012663.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Applicant Name: ????? However, on 15 May 2008, DA HQ, Civil Affairs and Psychological Operations Command, Fort Bragg, NC, Orders 08-136-00014, discharged the applicant from the United States Army Reserve, effective date: 16 May 2008, with an under other than honorable conditions discharge. Board Action Directed President, Army Discharge Review Board Issue a new DD Form 214 Change Characterization to: Change Reason to: No Change Other: NA RE Code: Grade Restoration: No Yes Grade: None ARMY...

  • ARMY | DRB | CY2008 | AR20080017560

    Original file (AR20080017560.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Applicant Name: ????? Further, in review of the applicant’s available service record, the analyst found that his prior or subsequent service did not overcome the reason for discharge and characterization of service granted. Board Discussion, Determination, and Recommendation After carefully examining the applicant’s record of service during the period of enlistment under review and considering the analyst’s recommendation and rationale, the Board determined that the discharge was both...

  • ARMY | DRB | CY2008 | AR20080001426

    Original file (AR20080001426.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Legal Basis for Separation: Army Regulation 135-178 provides for the separation of members of the Army National Guard and Army Reserve when it is determined that a service member is unqualified for further military service. c. Response to Issues, Recommendation and Rationale: After a careful review of all the applicant’s military records, and the issue he submitted, the analyst determined that the applicant’s available record of service during the period under review is void of the specific...

  • ARMY | DRB | CY2009 | AR20090008979

    Original file (AR20090008979.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Applicant Name: ????? Legal Basis for Separation: Army Regulation 135-178 (Separation of Enlisted Personnel) provides for the separation of enlisted personnel from the United States Army Reserve. Board Action Directed President, Army Discharge Review Board Issue a new DD Form 214 Change Characterization to: Change Reason to: NA Other: NA RE Code: Grade Restoration: No Yes Grade: NA ARMY DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD - CASE REPORT AND DIRECTIVE Case Number...

  • ARMY | DRB | CY2008 | AR20080001437

    Original file (AR20080001437.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Applicant Name: ????? Legal Basis for Separation: Army Regulation 135-178 (Separation of Enlisted Personnel) provides for the separation of enlisted personnel of the Army Reserve and Army National Guard. c. Response to Issues, Recommendation and Rationale: After a careful review of all the applicant’s available military records for the period of enlistment under review, the issues and document she submitted, the analyst found no mitigating factors that would merit an upgrade of the...

  • ARMY | DRB | CY2009 | AR20090007210

    Original file (AR20090007210.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Applicant Name: ????? On 30 May 2002, DA, HQS, U.S. Army Special Operations Command, Fort Bragg, NC, Orders R150-03, discharged the applicant from the United States Army Reserve, effective date: 24 April 2002, with a general, under honorable conditions discharge. However, in review of the applicant’s available service record, the analyst found that these accomplishments did not overcome the reason for discharge and characterization of service granted.

  • ARMY | DRB | CY2006 | AR20060009753

    Original file (AR20060009753.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Facts, Circumstances, and Legal Basis for Separation a. Therefore, the reason for discharge and the characterization of service were both proper and equitable. Board Action Directed No Change Issue a new DD Form 214 Change Characterization to: Change Reason to: NA Other: NA RE Code: Grade Restoration: No Yes Grade: NA XI.