Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | DRB | CY2008 | AR20080017560
Original file (AR20080017560.txt) Auto-classification: Denied
Applicant Name:  ?????

Application Receipt Date: 2008/11/03	Prior Review:     Prior Review Date: NA     

I.  Applicant Request:  Upgrade     Reason Change     RE Code Change    

Issues: See DD Form 293 and attached documents submitted by the applicant. 

II.  Were Proper Discharge and Separation Authority procedures followed?	     
Tender Offer:   NA

See Attachments:  Legal     Medical     Minority Opinion     Exhibits 

III.  Discharge Under Review
Unit CDR Recommended Discharge: 	NIF   Date: NIF
Discharge Received: 			   Date: 070815   Chapter: 13      AR: 135-178
Reason: NIF	   RE:     SPD: NA   Unit/Location: 489th CA Bn, Knoxvville, TN 

Time Lost: NIF

Article 15s (Charges/Dates/Punishment): NIF

Courts-Martial (Charges/Dates/Punishment): NIF

Counseling Records Available: Yes    No 

IV.  Soldier’s Overall Record
Age at current enlistment:  22
Current ENL Date: 040225    Current ENL Term: 8 Years  ?????
Current ENL Service: 	03 Yrs, 05Mos, 22Days ?????
Total Service:  		03 Yrs, 05Mos, 22Days the analyst utilized applicant's enlistment contract, separation orders and DD Form 214 for computation of period of enlistment under review and total service.
Previous Discharges: 	AD-050418-060617/HD
                                         (Concurrent Service)
Highest Grade: E-4		Performance Ratings Available: Yes    No 
MOS: 38A10 Civil Affairs Spec   GT: NIF   EDU: HS Grad   Overseas: Southwest Asia   Combat: Iraq (050614-060513)
Decorations/Awards: ARCOM, AGCM, NDSM, ICM, GWOTSM, AFRM-W/"M" DEV, ASR, OSR

V.  Post-Discharge Activity
City, State:  Varnell, GA
Post Service Accomplishments: None Listed

VI.  Facts, Circumstances, and Legal Basis for Separation

       a.  Facts and Circumstances:
       The applicant’s record is void of the specific facts and circumstances concerning the events that led to a discharge from the United States Army Reserve.  However, the evidence of record  shows that on 31 July 2007, DA, HQ, United States Army, Civil Affairs and Psychological  Operations Command (A), Fort Bragg, NC, Orders 07-212-00005, discharged the applicant from the United States Army Reserve, effective date:  15 August 2007, with a general, under honorable conditions discharge. 
       
       
       

       b.  Legal Basis for Separation:  
       Army Regulation 135-178 (Separation of Enlisted Personnel) provides for the separation of enlisted personnel of the Army Reserve and Army National Guard.  Chapter 13, paragraph 13-1 of the regulation, ineffect at the time, governed separation of unsatisfactory participation in the ready reserve.  When discharged under this provision, Army policy states that the characterization of service will normally be under other than honorable conditions.  The regulation also permitted the characterization of service as general, under honorable conditions.

       c.  Response to Issues, Recommendation and Rationale:  
       After a careful review of all the applicant’s available military records during the period of enlistment under review, the issues and documents he submitted with the application, the analyst found no mitigating factors that would merit an upgrade of the applicant's discharge.  The applicant’s record is void of the specific facts and circumstances concerning the events that led to a discharge from the United States Army Reserve.  However, on 31 July 2007, DA, HQ, United States Army, Civil Affairs and Psychological  Operations Command (A), Fort Bragg, NC, Orders 07-212-00005, discharged the applicant from the United States Army Reserve, effective date:  15 August 2007, with a general, under honorable conditions discharge.   This document identifies the characterization of the discharge and the analyst presumed Government regularity in the discharge process.  Barring evidence to the contrary, the analyst was satisfied that all requirements of law and regulation were met and the rights of the applicant were fully protected throughout the separation process.  Furthermore, the analyst noted the applicant’s issue; however, if the applicant desires to reenlist, he should contact the local recruiter to determine his eligibility to reenlist.  Those individuals can best advise a former service member as to the needs of the Army at the time, and are required to process waivers of reentry eligibility (RE) codes.  Further, in review of the applicant’s available service record, the analyst found that his prior or subsequent service did not overcome the reason for discharge and characterization of service granted.  Finally, the analyst determined that the applicant’s Official Military Personnel File (OMPF) does not contain the specific documents that would indicate the reason for his separation from the United States Army Reserve.  If the applicant desires to appear before a personal appearance Board, the burden of proof remains with the applicant to provide the appropriate documents or other evidence sufficient to explain the facts, circumstances, and reasons underlying the separation action for the Board’s consideration.  In view of the foregoing, the analyst determined that the reason for discharge and the characterization of service were both proper and equitable and recommends to the Board to deny relief.

VII.  Summary of Army Discharge Review Board Hearing

Type of Hearing: 		Date: 2 September 2009         Location: Washington, DC

Did the Applicant Testify?  Yes     No  

Counsel: NA

Witnesses/Observers: NA 

Exhibits Submitted: NA

VIII.  Board Discussion, Determination, and Recommendation
After carefully examining the applicant’s record of service during the period of enlistment under review and considering the analyst’s recommendation and rationale, the Board determined that the discharge was both proper and equitable and voted to deny relief.  









        
IX.  Board Decision						
	XI.  Certification Signature
Board Vote:  							          Approval Authority:	
Character - Change 0    No change 5
Reason -     Change 0    No change 5
(Board member names available upon request)
								         EDGAR J. YANGER			 
								         Colonel, U.S. Army
X.  Board Action Directed					         President, Army Discharge Review Board
Issue a new DD Form 214  					
Change Characterization to: 			         
Change Reason to: No Change
Other: NA										
RE Code: 
Grade Restoration:   No   Yes   Grade: None
ARMY DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD - CASE REPORT AND DIRECTIVE

Case Number AR20080017560
______________________________________________________________________________


Page 1 of 3 pages

Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | DRB | CY2008 | AR20080014629

    Original file (AR20080014629.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Applicant Name: ????? Current ENL Service: 03 Yrs, 05Mos, 08Days ????? Further, the analyst determined that the applicant’s Official Military Personnel File (OMPF) does not contain all the specific documents that would indicate the reason for the separation action from the United States Army.

  • AF | DRB | CY2006 | AR20060016550

    Original file (AR20060016550.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The evidence of record indicates that Orders 06-079-00005, dated 20 March 2006, Department of the Army Headquarters, 90th Regional Readiness Command, North Little Rock, AR, discharged the applicant from the United States Army Reserve, effective 20 March 2006, with an under other than honorable conditions discharge. However the record indicates that Orders 06-079-00005, dated 20 March 2006, Department of the Army Headquarters, 90th Regional Readiness Command, North Little Rock, AR discharged...

  • ARMY | DRB | CY2006 | AR20060010503

    Original file (AR20060010503.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Current ENL Service: 03 Yrs, 07Mos, 22Days ????? The evidence of record shows that on 9 September 2004, DA, HQ, 70th Regional Readiness Command, Seattle, Washington, Orders 04-253-00010, discharged the applicant from the United States Army Reserve, effective date: 9 September 2004, with a general, under honorable conditions discharge. Board Discussion, Determination, and Recommendation After carefully examining the applicant’s record of service during the period of enlistment under review...

  • ARMY | DRB | CY2008 | AR20080002559

    Original file (AR20080002559.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Applicant Name: ????? Facts and Circumstances: The evidence of record shows that on 9 May 2007, the unit commander (LTC, CA, USAR, Commanding), notified the applicant of initiation of separation action under the provisions of Chapter 13, AR 135-178, by reason of unsatisfactory participation for failure to report for more than nine unit training assemblies, with an under other than honorable conditions discharge. Board Discussion, Determination, and Recommendation After carefully examining...

  • ARMY | DRB | CY2006 | AR20060009753

    Original file (AR20060009753.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Facts, Circumstances, and Legal Basis for Separation a. Therefore, the reason for discharge and the characterization of service were both proper and equitable. Board Action Directed No Change Issue a new DD Form 214 Change Characterization to: Change Reason to: NA Other: NA RE Code: Grade Restoration: No Yes Grade: NA XI.

  • ARMY | DRB | CY2008 | AR20080001879

    Original file (AR20080001879.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Applicant Name: ????? Discharge Under Review Unit CDR Recommended Discharge: Date: NIF Discharge Received: Date: 040809 Chapter: 13 AR: 135-178 Reason: Unsatisfactory Participation in the Ready Reserve RE: SPD: NA Unit/Location: HQ, 5th Bde, 78th Div, Fort Meade, MD Time Lost: NIF Article 15s (Charges/Dates/Punishment): NIF Courts-Martial (Charges/Dates/Punishment): NIF Counseling Records Available: Yes No IV. In view of the foregoing, the analyst determined that the reason for discharge...

  • ARMY | DRB | CY2009 | AR20090000708

    Original file (AR20090000708.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    I have dedicated the last 24 years on my life the the US Military. I requested, through my counsel at the time, a board by First Army, but was denied. Discharge Under Review Unit CDR Recommended Discharge: Date: NIF Discharge Received: Date: 080121 Chapter: 8-35i(1) & Chapter 12 AR: NGR 600-200 & AR 135-178 Reason: Acts or Pattern of Misconduct RE: SPD: NA Unit/Location: 1049th Transportation Co, Seaford, DE Time Lost: None Article 15s (Charges/Dates/Punishment): None Courts-Martial...

  • ARMY | DRB | CY2006 | AR20060008881

    Original file (AR20060008881.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Current ENL Service: 00 Yrs, 07Mos, 07Days ????? Army Regulation 135-178 also provides, except in cases of serious misconduct, that a soldier’s service will be uncharacterized when her separation is initiated while the soldier is in entry level status. Certification Signature and Date Approval Authority: MARK E. COLLINS Colonel, U.S. Army President, Army Discharge Review Board Official: MARY E. SHAW DATE: 31 May 2007 Lieutenant Colonel, U.S. Army Chief, Secretary Recorder ARMY DISCHARGE...

  • ARMY | DRB | CY2010 | AR20100015302

    Original file (AR20100015302.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Applicant Name: ????? Facts, Circumstances, and Legal Basis for Separation a. Therefore, based on the available evidence, the analyst presumes government regularity in the discharge process and concludes that it appears the reason for discharge and the characterization of service were both proper and equitable and recommends to the Board to deny relief.

  • ARMY | DRB | CY2008 | AR20080008850

    Original file (AR20080008850.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    Facts and Circumstances: The evidence of record shows that on 31 December 2007, the unit commander notified the applicant of initiation of separation action under the provisions of Chapter 8, paragraph 8-35j, NGR 600-200, by reason of unsatisfactory participation for missing multiple unit training assemblies, with an under other than honorable conditions discharge. Board Action Directed President, Army Discharge Review Board Issue a new DD Form 214 Change Characterization to: General, Under...