Applicant Name: ?????
Application Receipt Date: 2008/10/01 Prior Review: Prior Review Date: NA
I. Applicant Request: Upgrade Reason Change RE Code Change
Issues: See DD Form 293 and attached documents submitted by the applicant.
II. Were Proper Discharge and Separation Authority procedures followed?
Tender Offer: NA
See Attachments: Legal Medical Minority Opinion Exhibits
III. Discharge Under Review
Unit CDR Recommended Discharge: NIF Date: NIF
Discharge Received: Date: 080208 Chapter: 3 AR: 635-200
Reason: Court-Martial, Other RE: SPD: JD Unit/Location: A Trp, 3-1 CAV, Fort Benning, GA
Time Lost: Confinement/Military Authorities for 23 days (070119-070211).
Article 15s (Charges/Dates/Punishment): 060922, wrongful use of cocaine; reduction to E-1, forfeiture of $500 x 2, 45 days extra duty and 45 days restriction (FG). However, this document is not part of the available record, see Staff Judge Advocate's Memorandum dated (070226).
Courts-Martial (Charges/Dates/Punishment): 070119, SPCM, wrongful use of cocaine x 2, on divers occasions between (060101-060901) and (061101-061127); confinement for 30 days and discharged with a bad conduct discharge.
Counseling Records Available: Yes No
IV. Soldiers Overall Record
Age at current enlistment: 22
Current ENL Date: 040331 Current ENL Term: 4 Years the applicant was separated from service on incomplete records, a DD Form 215 will be issued to provide missing information.
Current ENL Service: 03 Yrs, 09Mos, 16Days ?????
Total Service: 06 Yrs, 00Mos, 01Days includes 362 days of excess leave (070212-080208)
Previous Discharges: RA-020115-040330/HD
Highest Grade: E-4 Performance Ratings Available: Yes No
MOS: 11B10 Infantryman GT: 122 EDU: GED Cert Overseas: Southwest Asia Combat: Iraq (Dates NIF)
Decorations/Awards: ARCOM, AAM, NDSM, GWOTEM, ICM, GWOTSM, ASR, OSR, CIB
V. Post-Discharge Activity
City, State: Ogden, UT
Post Service Accomplishments: None Listed
VI. Facts, Circumstances, and Legal Basis for Separation
a. Facts and Circumstances:
The evidence of record shows that on 19 January 2007, the applicant was found guilty by a special court-martial of wrongful use of cocaine x 2, on divers occasions between (060101-060901) and (061101-061127). He was confined for 30 days and discharged with a bad conduct discharge. On 16 March 2007, the sentence was approved. Further, the record of trial being forwarded to The Judge Advocate General of The Army for review by the Court of Military Review, and also the United States Army Court of Military Review affirming the approved findings of guilty and the sentence; however, these documents are not part of the available record and the analyst presumed Government regularity in the discharge process. On 21 November 2007, the sentence having been affirmed pursuant to Article 71c having been complied with, the sentence was ordered to be executed.
b. Legal Basis for Separation:
Army Regulation 635-200 sets forth the basic authority for the separation of enlisted personnel. Chapter 3, Section IV, establishes policy and procedures for separating members with a dishonorable or bad conduct discharge; and provides that a Soldier will be given a bad conduct discharge pursuant only to an approved sentence of a general or special court-martial; and that the appellate review must be completed and the affirmed sentence ordered duly executed.
c. Response to Issues, Recommendation and Rationale:
After a careful review of all the applicants military records during the period of enlistment under review, the issues and document he submitted, the analyst found no mitigating factors that would warrant clemency. The evidence of record clearly shows that the applicant was adjudged guilty by court-martial and that the sentence was approved by the convening authority. Court-martial convictions stand as adjudged or modified by appeal through the judicial process. The Board is empowered to change the discharge only if clemency is determined to be appropriate. Clemency is an act of mercy, or instance of leniency, to moderate the severity of the punishment imposed. After a thorough review of the applicants record and the issues he submitted, the analyst found no cause for clemency and recommends to the Board no clemency. Furthermore, the analyst noted the applicant's issue; however, eligibility for veteran's benefits to include educational benefits under the Montgomery GI Bill does not fall within the purview of the Army Discharge Review Board. Accordingly, the applicant should contact a local office of the Department of Veterans Affairs for further assistance. Finally, at the time of discharge the applicant was appropriately assigned a reentry eligibility (RE) code of 4. An RE code of 4 cannot be waived and the applicant is no longer eligible for reenlistment. In view of the foregoing, the analyst determined that the characterization of service, reason for discharge to include the reentry elgibility (RE) code was both proper and equitable.
VII. Summary of Army Discharge Review Board Hearing
Type of Hearing: Date: 21 July 2009 Location: Washington, DC
Did the Applicant Testify? Yes No
Counsel: NA
Witnesses/Observers: NA
Exhibits Submitted: NA
VIII. Board Discussion, Determination, and Recommendation
After carefully examining the applicants record of service during the period of enlistment under review and considering the analysts recommendation and rationale, the Board found no cause for clemency and therefore voted to deny relief.
IX. Board Decision
XI. Certification Signature
Board Vote: Approval Authority:
Character - Change 0 No change 5
Reason - Change 0 No change 5
(Board member names available upon request)
EDGAR J. YANGER
Colonel, U.S. Army
X. Board Action Directed President, Army Discharge Review Board
Issue a new DD Form 214
Change Characterization to:
Change Reason to: No Change
Other: NA
RE Code:
Grade Restoration: No Yes Grade: None
ARMY DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD - CASE REPORT AND DIRECTIVE
Case Number AR20080015283
______________________________________________________________________________
Page 1 of 2 pages
ARMY | DRB | CY2010 | AR20100008065
Applicant Name: ????? The evidence of record clearly shows that the applicant was adjudged guilty by court-martial and that the sentence was approved by the convening authority. After a thorough review of the applicants record and the issues he submitted, the analyst found no cause for clemency and recommends to the Board no clemency.
ARMY | DRB | CY2010 | AR20100007957
Applicant Name: ????? The applicant was discharged from the Army with a Bad Conduct Discharge and reduced to the lowest enlisted grade. After a thorough review of the applicants record and the issue submitted with the application, the analyst found no cause for clemency and therefore recommends to the Board to deny clemency.
ARMY | DRB | CY2010 | AR20100026295
The evidence of record indicates the applicant was adjudged guilty by a court-martial and that the sentence was approved by the convening authority. After a thorough review of the applicants record and the issue and self-authored statement submitted with the application, the analyst found no cause for clemency and therefore recommends to the Board to deny clemency. Board Action Directed President, Army Discharge Review Board Issue a new DD Form 214 Change Characterization to: Change...
ARMY | DRB | CY2008 | AR20080000625
Facts and Circumstances: Evidence of record shows that on 7 October 2007, the unit commander notified the applicant of initiation of separation action under the provisions of Chapter 14, AR 635-200, by reason of misconduct-commission of a serious offense for receiving a Summary Court-Martial (070902), for failure to report, disrespect towards an officer, assaulted an NCO, dereliction of duty, consuming alcohol, resisted apprehension, and wrongfully communicated a threat towards a CPT x 3...
ARMY | DRB | CY2012 | AR20120006535
The evidence of record indicates the applicant was adjudged guilty by a court-martial and that the sentence was approved by the convening authority. After a thorough review of the applicants records, the issue and documents submitted with the application, the analyst found no cause for clemency and therefore recommends to the Board to deny clemency. Certification Signature Approval Authority: ARCHIE L. DAVIS III Colonel, U.S. Army President, Army Discharge Review Board BONITA E....
ARMY | DRB | CY2010 | AR20100018464
Applicant Name: ????? After a thorough review of the applicants records and the issue and documents submitted with the application, the analyst found no cause for clemency and therefore recommends to the Board to deny clemency. Board Action Directed President, Army Discharge Review Board Issue a new DD Form 214 Change Characterization to: Change Reason to: No Change Other: No Change RE Code: Grade Restoration: No Yes Grade: No Change Legend: AWOL Absent Without Leave GCM General Court...
ARMY | DRB | CY2008 | AR20080007224
Applicant Name: ????? Discharge Under Review Unit CDR Recommended Discharge: Date: NIF Discharge Received: Date: 041105 Chapter: 3 AR: 635-200 Reason: Court-Martial, Other RE: SPD: JJD Unit/Location: Battery D, 1st Battalion, 4th Air Defense Artillery, APO AE 09185 Time Lost: Military Confinement for 96 days from (030410-030714), as a result of the special court-martial sentence. After a thorough review of the applicants record and the issue submitted with the application, the analyst...
ARMY | DRB | CY2008 | AR20080004279
The applicant consulted with legal counsel, was advised of the impact of the discharge action, voluntarily waived consideration of his case by an administrative separation board contingent upon him receiving a characterization of service no less favorable than honorable, and did not submit a statement in his own behalf. On 9 October 2007, the separation authority approved the findings and recommendation of the administrative separation board and directed that the applicant be discharged...
ARMY | DRB | CY2010 | AR20100018698
Applicant Name: ????? Chapter 3, Section IV, establishes policy and procedures for separating members with a dishonorable or bad conduct discharge; and provides that a soldier will be given a bad conduct discharge pursuant only to an approved sentence of a general or special court-martial; and that the appellate review must be completed and the affirmed sentence ordered duly executed. Board Action Directed President, Army Discharge Review Board Issue a new DD Form 214 Change...
ARMY | DRB | CY2008 | AR20080012818
Applicant Name: Application Receipt Date: 2008/08/11 Prior Review: Prior Review Date: NA I. Applicant Request: Upgrade Reason Change RE Code Change Issues: See DD Form 293 and the attached documents submitted by the Applicant. Board Action Directed President, Army Discharge Review Board Issue a new DD Form 214 Change Characterization to: Change Reason to: No Change Other: NA RE Code: Grade Restoration: No Yes Grade: NA ARMY DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD - CASE REPORT AND DIRECTIVE Case Number...