Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | DRB | CY2007 | AR20070004887aC071121

Application Receipt Date: 070404

Prior Review    Prior Review Date: None

I.  Applicant Request
Request:  Upgrade     Reason Change     RE Code Change

Issues: See applicant's attached DD Form 293 and supporting documents.

II.  Were Proper Discharge and Separation Authority procedures followed?
Yes    No        Tender Offer:        

See Attachments:  Legal     Medical     Minority Opinion     Exhibits

III.  Original Character of Discharge
Unit CDR Recommended Discharge:    Date: 960416
Discharge Received:     Date: 960430
Chapter: 10    AR: 635-200
Reason: In Lieu of Trial by Court-Martial
RE:     SPD: KFS
Unit/Location: Headquarters and Headquarters Company, 17th Area Support
Group, APO AP 96343-5006

Time Lost: None

Article 15s (Charges/Dates/Punishment): None

Court-Martials (Charges/Dates/Punishment): 960307/General Court
Martial/Indecent liberties with a child and attempted rap of a female under
16 years of age.  He was sentence to be reprimanded and to be reduced to
the grade of E5.

Counseling Records Available: Yes    No

IV.  Soldier’s Overall Record
DOB:  660906
Current ENL Date: 930402    Current ENL Term: 04 Years  The applicant
extended his period of enlistment 18 months on (950324) giving him a new
ETS of (981001)
Current ENL Service: 03 Yrs, 00Mos, 29Days      
Total Service:  10 Yrs, 03Mos, 10Days      
Previous Discharges: RA-860121-890713/HD
                                      RA-890714-930401/HD

Highest Grade: E6
Performance Ratings Available: Yes    No
MOS: 88M10 (Motor Transportation Operator)   GT: 110   EDU: HS Grad
Overseas: Germany, Sinai, Japan   Combat: None
Decorations/Awards: ARCOM (3d Award), AGCM (3d Award), JSAM, AAM (3d
Award), NDSM, SWAM, NCOPDR, ASR, OSR (2d Award), Multinational Force and
Observers Medal (2d Award)
V.  Post-Discharge Activity
Home of Record:
Current Address:
Post Service Accomplishments: See attached documents.

VI.  Facts, Circumstances, and Legal Basis for Separation

      a.  Facts and Circumstances:
      The evidence of record shows that on 4 December 1995, the applicant
was charged with committing an indecent act upon the body of a female under
16 years of age, not the wife of the Soldier on or about 8 November 1995,
and attempting to rape a person who had not attained the age of 16 years on
or about 8 November 1995.  On 8 April 1996, the applicant consulted with
legal counsel and voluntarily requested, in writing, discharge under the
provisions of Chapter 10, AR 635-200 in lieu of trial by court-martial.  In
this request, the applicant admitted guilt to the offense, or a lesser
included offense.  Further, the applicant indicated that he understood that
he could receive an under other than honorable conditions discharge and
that the discharge would have a significant effect on eligibility for
veteran’s benefits.  The applicant did not submit a statement in his own
behalf.  The unit commander and intermediate commander recommended approval
of an under other than honorable conditions discharge.  On 19 April 1996,
the separation authority approved the discharge with an under other than
honorable conditions discharge.  The applicant was to be reduced to the
lowest enlisted rank.


      The applicant has a CID Report of Investigation dated 8 January 1996,
in his Official Military Personnel File.







      b.  Legal Basis for Separation:
      Army Regulation 635-200 sets forth the basic authority for the
separation of enlisted personnel.  Chapter 10 of that regulation provides,
in pertinent part, that a member who has committed an offense or offenses
for which the authorized punishment includes a punitive discharge may
submit a request for a discharge for the good of the service in lieu of
trial by court-martial.  The request may be submitted at any time after
charges have been preferred and must include the individual’s admission of
guilt.  Army policy states that although an honorable or general discharge
is authorized, a discharge under other than honorable conditions is
normally considered appropriate.

      c.  Response to Issues, Recommendation and Rationale:
      After a careful review of all the applicant’s military records,
documents, and the issue he submitted, the analyst found several mitigating
factors that would merit a partial upgrade of the applicant's
characterization of service to general, under honorable conditions.  The
analyst does not condone the applicant’s misconduct; however, the evidence
in this case supports a conclusion that the characterization of service was
too harsh, and as a result it is now inequitable.  The analyst found that
the length and quality of the applicant's service, and his post service
accomplishments mitigated the discrediting entries in his service record.
However, the analyst determined that the reason for discharge was both
proper and equitable.

VII.  Summary of Army Discharge Review Board Hearing

Type of Hearing:                  Date: 5 November 2007
Location: Washington, DC

Did the Applicant Testify?  Yes     No

Counsel:      

Witnesses/Observers:      

Exhibits Submitted:      



VIII.  Board Decision
The discharge was:                Proper           Improper
                                             Equitable        Inequitable

The characterization of service was:   Proper            Improper
                                             Equitable        Inequitable

The narrative reasons were:             Equitable        Inequitable

DRB voting record:                 Change          No change         -
Character
                                   Change          No change         -
Reason
                                   (Board member names available upon
request)

IX.  Board Discussion, Determination, and Recommendation
     

Case report reviewed and verified by: Eric S. Moore, Examiner

X.  Board Action Directed
No Change
Issue a new DD Form 214
Change Characterization to:
Change Reason to:      
Other:      
RE Code:
Grade Restoration:   No   Yes  Grade:      

XI.  Certification Signature and Date
Approval Authority:

MARK E. COLLINS
Colonel, U.S. Army
President, Army Discharge Review Board

Official:


CHRISTINE U. MARTINSON            DATE:      
Lieutenant Colonel, U.S. Army
Chief, Secretary Recorder

Similar Decisions

  • AF | DRB | CY2007 | AR20070004887

    Original file (AR20070004887.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Applicant Request Request: Upgrade Reason Change RE Code Change Issues: See applicant's attached DD Form 293 and supporting documents. On 19 April 1996, the separation authority approved the discharge with an under other than honorable conditions discharge. Chapter 10 of that regulation provides, in pertinent part, that a member who has committed an offense or offenses for which the authorized punishment includes a punitive discharge may submit a request for a discharge for the good of the...

  • ARMY | DRB | CY2007 | AR20070002054

    Original file (AR20070002054.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Applicant Request Request: Upgrade Reason Change RE Code Change Issues: See applicant's attached DD Form 293 and supporting documents. Facts, Circumstances, and Legal Basis for Separation a. Board Discussion, Determination, and Recommendation The Board found the discharge was proper and equitable and voted not to change it.

  • ARMY | DRB | CY2006 | AR20060012926

    Original file (AR20060012926.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    On 19 September 1996, the applicant consulted with legal counsel and voluntarily requested, in writing, discharge under the provisions of Chapter 10, AR 635-200 in lieu of trial by court-martial. The unit commander's recommendation for approval of the requested separtation action was not found in the available record and the analyst presumed Government Regularity in the discharge process. Board Discussion, Determination, and Recommendation After carefully examining the applicant’s record...

  • ARMY | DRB | CY2007 | AR20070002054aC071031

    The separation authority approved the discharge with an under other than honorable conditions discharge. Army policy states that although an honorable or general discharge is authorized, a discharge under other than honorable conditions is normally considered appropriate. Yes No Counsel: Witnesses/Observers: Exhibits Submitted: VIII.

  • ARMY | DRB | CY2006 | AR20060007406

    Original file (AR20060007406.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    On 19 October 1995, the applicant voluntarily tendered his resignation from the service under the provisions of Chapter 4, AR 635-120, resignation in lieu of further elimination proceedings. The record is void of the separation authority's approval letter directing that the applicant be discharge from the service, and the analyst presumed Government Regularity in the discharge process. Board Discussion, Determination, and Recommendation After carefully examining the applicant’s record of...

  • ARMY | DRB | CY2006 | AR20060011746

    Original file (AR20060011746.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Original Character of Discharge Unit CDR Recommended Discharge: Date: 930406 Discharge Received: Date: 930506 Chapter: 10 AR: 635-200 Reason: For the Good of the Service, In Lieu of Court-Martial RE: SPD: KFS Unit/Location: 13th United States Army Field Artillery Detachment, APO NY 09354 Time Lost: Absent without leave for a total of 1,047 days (900420-930301). On 13 April 1993, the separation authority approved the discharge with an under other than honorable conditions discharge. ...

  • AF | DRB | CY2007 | AR20070000708

    Original file (AR20070000708.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Facts and Circumstances: Evidence of record shows that on 30 June 2005, the Commander, United States Army Europe and Seventh Army, APO AE 09014, notified the applicant of initiation of elimination proceedings under the provisions of Chapter 4, AR 600-8-24, by reason of misconduct, moral or professional dereliction (acts of personal misconduct as substantiated by an Article 15 dated 13 October 2004 and a General Officer Memorandum of Reprimand). On 4 May 2006, the applicant voluntarily...

  • ARMY | DRB | CY2006 | AR20060009786

    Original file (AR20060009786.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant consulted with legal counsel, was advised of the impact of the discharge action, waived consideration of his case by an administrative separation board contingent upon him receiving a characterization of service no less favorable than a general, under honorable conditions discharge, and did not submit a statement in his own behalf. The intermediate commander reviewed the proposed discharge action and recommended approval of the separation action with a general, under honorable...

  • ARMY | DRB | CY2006 | Ar20060013140

    Original file (Ar20060013140.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Facts, Circumstances, and Legal Basis for Separation a. On 31 May 2006, the Deputy Assistant Secretary (Army Review Boards) approved the recommendation of the Army Ad Hoc Review Board and directed that the applicant be discharge with a characterization of service of under other than honorable conditions. Board Action Directed No Change Issue a new DD Form 214 Change Characterization to: Change Reason to: NA Other: NA RE Code: Grade Restoration: No Yes Grade: XI.

  • ARMY | DRB | CY2006 | AR20060007740

    Original file (AR20060007740.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Current ENL Service: 01 Yrs, 02Mos, 15Days ????? Accordingly, the Board voted to grant partial relief in the form of an upgrade of the characterization of service to general, under honorable conditions. Board Action Directed No Change Issue a new DD Form 214 Change Characterization to: Change Reason to: NA Other: NA RE Code: Grade Restoration: No Yes Grade: E5 XI.