Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | DRB | CY2006 | AR20060014946
Original file (AR20060014946.txt) Auto-classification: Denied
Application Receipt Date: 061020	

Prior Review    Prior Review Date: None

I.  Applicant Request
Request:  Upgrade     Reason Change     RE Code Change    

Issues: I was home on leave in January from the republic of South Korea. I had missed my flight and called my squad leader to let him know what was happening. I got a call back from the squad leader and was told to turn myself into the authorities. So I tried for two days to have myself arrested but the police state and city could not hold me because I had no warrants or anything so they let me go. So I went to the nearest base which was FT. Hood and turned myself into the mp station. The mp's did not arrest me but gave me some cash to get something to eat and reported back to them in the morning and was sent to Oklahoma to be held until they got into contact with my unit. They told me that they could not reach my unit which was odd but I did not trust them and they started to out process me and others. Later to find out when I got my phone back and was able to call my squad leader after I was already discharged, he said nobody contacted him, my first sergeant or my sergeant major. I never thought about leaving the army I was not prepared for this I wanted too retire from the military. There is nothing more embarrassing to come home like that after being in Iraq my family was so proud of me and then to come home like this it just not right. I have seen people go AWOL and come back for twice the period I was and they where not kicked out like this. They did not even send me my DD form 214 to the right address I know I gave her the right address I wrote it down personally. In short I would just like discharge to upgrade so that I can reenlist into the military its all I know and I was good at it. The facts are I was AWOL for 20 days in total. I was in contact with my leaders I was not hiding or running away from the army. I just want my life back. I want to do what I have grown to love. I reenlisted in Iraq.  Why would I do that if I wanted out so bad?

II.  Were Proper Discharge and Separation Authority procedures followed?  
Yes    No        Tender Offer:        

See Attachments:  Legal     Medical     Minority Opinion     Exhibits 

III.  Original Character of Discharge
Unit CDR Recommended Discharge:    Date: 050325
Discharge Received:     Date: 050712   
Chapter: 10    AR: 635-200
Reason: In Lieu of Trial by Court-Martial
RE:     SPD: KFS
Unit/Location: D Co, 2-9 IN Regt, Camp Casey, Korea 

Time Lost: AWOL, 47 days (050126-050313), surrendered at Fort Hood.

Article 15s (Charges/Dates/Punishment): None

Court-Martials (Charges/Dates/Punishment): None

Counseling Records Available: Yes    No 

IV.  Soldier's Overall Record
DOB:  820316  
Current ENL Date: 030831    Current ENL Term: 4 Years       
Current ENL Service: 1 Yrs, 10 Mos, 12 Days Includes 110 days of excess leave  (050325-050712)
Total Service:  04 Yrs, 01Mos, 08Days      
Previous Discharges: RA-010418-030830/HD
Highest Grade: E4
Performance Ratings Available: Yes    No 
MOS: 11B10 (Infantryman)   GT: NIF   EDU: GED   Overseas: Korea    Combat: Iraq (Dates NIF), applicant's re-enlistment documents show he re-enlisted in Iraq
Decorations/Awards: None
V.  Post-Discharge Activity
Home of Record: 
Current Address: 
Post Service Accomplishments: None listed

VI.  Facts, Circumstances, and Legal Basis for Separation

      a.  Facts and Circumstances:
      The evidence of record shows that on 24 March 2005, the applicant was charged with AWOL (050126-050313).  On 25 March 2005, the applicant consulted with legal counsel and voluntarily requested, in writing, discharge under the provisions of Chapter 10, AR 635-200 in lieu of trial by court-martial.  In this request, the applicant admitted guilt to the offense, or a lesser included offense.  Further, the applicant indicated that he understood that he could receive an under other than honorable conditions discharge and that the discharge would have a significant effect on eligibility for veteran's benefits.  The applicant did not submit a statement in his own behalf.  The unit commander recommended approval of an under other than honorable conditions discharge.  On 20 June 2005, the separation authority approved the discharge with an under other than honorable conditions discharge.  The applicant was to be reduced to the lowest enlisted rank.    

      b.  Legal Basis for Separation:  
      Army Regulation 635-200 sets forth the basic authority for the separation of enlisted personnel.  Chapter 10 of that regulation provides, in pertinent part, that a member who has committed an offense or offenses for which the authorized punishment includes a punitive discharge may submit a request for a discharge for the good of the service in lieu of trial by court-martial.  The request may be submitted at any time after charges have been preferred and must include the individual's admission of guilt.  Army policy states that although an honorable or general discharge is authorized, a discharge under other than honorable conditions is normally considered appropriate.  

      c.  Response to Issues, Recommendation and Rationale:  
After a careful review of all the applicant's military records, and the issue he submitted, the analyst found no mitigating factors that would merit an upgrade of the applicant's discharge.  The evidence of record shows the applicant was charged with the commission of an offense punishable under the Uniform Code of Military Justice (UCMJ) with a punitive discharge.  The applicant consulted with defense counsel, and voluntarily in writing, requested separation from the Army in lieu of trial by court-martial.  In doing so, the applicant admitted guilt to the stipulated or lesser-included offenses under the UCMJ.  The analyst noted that all the requirements of law and regulation were met and the rights of the applicant were fully protected throughout the separation process.  It is also noted that the characterization of service for this type of discharge is normally under other than honorable conditions and that the applicant was aware of that prior to requesting discharge.  Furthermore, at the time of discharge the applicant was appropriately assigned a reentry eligibility (RE) code of "4."  An RE code of "4" can not be waived and the applicant is no longer eligible for reenlistment.  Therefore, the analyst determined that the reason for discharge and the characterization of service were both proper and equitable and recommends to the Board to deny relief.  

VII.  Summary of Army Discharge Review Board Hearing 

Type of Hearing: 		Date: 5 December 2007  Location: Washington DC

Did the Applicant Testify?  Yes     No  

Counsel: NA

Witnesses/Observers: NA 

Exhibits Submitted: NA

VIII.  Board Decision
The discharge was:			Proper	 	Improper	
				                 	Equitable	 	Inequitable	

The characterization of service was:   Proper	 	Improper	
				                 	Equitable	 	Inequitable	

The narrative reasons were: 	       	Equitable	 	Inequitable	

DRB voting record:  		      Change 2    No change 3   - Character
		 			      Change 0    No change 5   - Reason
					(Board member names available upon request)

IX.  Board Discussion, Determination, and Recommendation
After carefully examining the applicant's record of service during the period of enlistment under review and considering the analyst's recommendation and rationale, the Board determined that the discharge was both proper and equitable and voted to deny relief.  

Case report reviewed and verified by: Chuck Busick, Examiner									        
X.  Board Action Directed
No Change 
Issue a new DD Form 214  
Change Characterization to:    
Change Reason to: NA
Other: NA
RE Code:  
Grade Restoration:   No   Yes  Grade: 

XI.  Certification Signature and Date
Approval Authority: 

MARK E. COLLINS
Colonel, U.S. Army
President, Army Discharge Review Board

Official: 

CHRISTINE U. MARTINSON			DATE: 7 December 2007
Lieutenant Colonel, U.S. Army
Chief, Secretary Recorder
ARMY DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD - CASE REPORT AND DIRECTIVE

Case Number AR20060014946

Applicant Name:  Mr.       
______________________________________________________________________

Page 1 of 6 pages

Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | DRB | CY2010 | AR20100007063

    Original file (AR20100007063.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    During this time, my unit deployed and I was left in the rear detachment. All of this was present at the time of separation and was quite obvious to anyone in the chain of command who was responsible enough to conduct a thorough evaluation of a soldier. On 12 January 2009, the applicant consulted with legal counsel, was advised of the impact of the discharge action, voluntarily waived consideration of his case by an Administrative Separation Board contingent upon him receiving a...

  • USMC | DRB | 2003_Marine | MD03-01382

    Original file (MD03-01382.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    MD03-01382 Applicant’s Request The application for discharge review was received on 20030812. So people in society treated me so different it was hard to even go to school. 990708: Charges preferred to special court-martial for violation of the Uniform Code of Military Justice (UCMJ) Article 86: Unauthorized absence (UA) from 980317 to 990601 (441 days/A).

  • ARMY | DRB | CY2009 | AR20090008983

    Original file (AR20090008983.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Applicant Name: ????? Discharge Under Review Unit CDR Recommended Discharge: Date: Not in File Discharge Received: Date: 070403 Chapter: 10 AR: 635-200 Reason: In Lieu of Trial by Court-Martial RE: SPD: KFS Unit/Location: A Co, 3-81 AR Bn, Fort Knox, KY Time Lost: 50 days, AWOL (060914-061102), surrendered; AWOL again for 41 days (070209-070321), surrendered. It is also noted that the characterization of service for this type of discharge is normally under other than honorable conditions...

  • ARMY | DRB | CY2008 | AR20080003934

    Original file (AR20080003934.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Applicant Request: Upgrade Reason Change RE Code Change Issues: The applicant states " When I enlisted in the Military in 2002, I did so while living with my immediate family. Chapter 10 of that regulation provides, in pertinent part, that a member who has committed an offense or offenses for which the authorized punishment includes a punitive discharge may submit a request for a discharge for the good of the service in lieu of trial by court-martial. It is also noted that the...

  • ARMY | DRB | CY2009 | AR20090012814

    Original file (AR20090012814.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Applicant Name: ????? I also feel my discharge should be upgraded because this was my first offense. Board Action Directed President, Army Discharge Review Board Issue a new DD Form 214 Change Characterization to: Change Reason to: No Change Other: NA RE Code: Grade Restoration: No Yes Grade: NA Legend: AWOL Absent Without Leave GCM General Court Martial NA Not applicable SCM Summary Court Martial BCD Bad Conduct Discharge GD General Discharge NIF Not in the file SPCM Special Court...

  • ARMY | DRB | CY2011 | AR20110019895

    Original file (AR20110019895.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Applicant Name: ????? I would go through basic and everything else again just to have to chance to show that I can be one of the best Soldiers out there. Certification Signature Approval Authority: EDGAR J. YANGER Colonel, U.S. Army President, Army Discharge Review Board BONITA E. TROTMAN Lieutenant Colonel, U. S. Army Secretary Recorder Legend: AWOL Absent Without Leave GCM General Court Martial NA Not applicable SCM Summary Court Martial BCD Bad Conduct Discharge GD General Discharge NIF...

  • ARMY | DRB | CY2008 | AR20080019786

    Original file (AR20080019786.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    I got to the point i couldnt stop thinking about the problem even at work. The intermediate commander reviewed the proposed discharge action and recommended approval of the separation action with a general, under honorable conditions discharge. Board Action Directed President, Army Discharge Review Board Issue a new DD Form 214 Change Characterization to: Change Reason to: No Change Other: NA RE Code: Grade Restoration: No Yes Grade: None ARMY DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD - CASE REPORT AND...

  • ARMY | DRB | CY2008 | AR20080004299

    Original file (AR20080004299.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Applicant Name: ????? The DD Form 214 indicates that the applicant was discharged under the provisions of Chapter 10, AR 635-200, for the good of the service in lieu trial by court-martial with a characterization of service of under other than honorable conditions. In the absence of information to the contrary, the Analyst was satisfied that all requirements of law and regulation were met and the rights of the applicant were fully protected throughout the separation process.

  • ARMY | DRB | CY2012 | AR20120013601

    Original file (AR20120013601.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Facts and Circumstances: The evidence of record shows that on 4 August 2011, the unit commander notified the applicant of initiation of separation action under the provisions of Chapter 14, paragraph 14-12c, AR 635-200, by reason of misconduct, commission of a serious offense, for driving while impaired, with a general, under honorable conditions discharge. Army policy states that an under other than honorable conditions discharge is normally considered appropriate; however, a general,...

  • ARMY | DRB | CY2009 | AR20090001835

    Original file (AR20090001835.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Applicant Request: Upgrade Reason Change RE Code Change Issues: The applicant stated, "i made alot of mistakes and i have learned over the years.i have changed my life and i want to go in the national guard.i have got married and have to kids.i work for a mobile dental company that goes to nursing homes and i get to work with elderly people.i love my job and the people i get to see. i would give my life for this country that i live in.i am asking for my diginity back. On 27 June 1994, the...