Application Receipt Date: 060614	

Prior Review    Prior Review Date: None

I.  Applicant Request
Request:  Upgrade     Reason Change     RE Code Change    

Issues: See DD Form 293 and attached documents.

II.  Were Proper Discharge and Separation Authority procedures followed?  
Yes    No        Tender Offer:   ?????

See Attachments:  Legal     Medical     Minority Opinion     Exhibits 

III.  Original Character of Discharge
Unit CDR Recommended Discharge:    Date: NIF
Discharge Received:     Date: 040622   
Chapter: 10    AR: 635-200
Reason: In Lieu Of Trial By Court-Martial
RE:     SPD: KFS
Unit/Location: Rear Detachment, 3rd Squadron, 3rd Armored Cavalry Regiment, Fort Carson, CO 80913 

Time Lost: item 29, dates of time time lost during this period, on the applicant's DD Form 214, does not annotate any lost time.  However, the applicant was AWOL-4 days from (031004-031007), applicant returned to unit; AWOL-17 days from (031118-031204), applicant turned himself into a mental institution in Louisville, KY; Confinement Civil Authority-15 days from (031204-031219), Confinement Military Authority-3 days from (031219-031222), and again AWOL-87 days from (031230-040326), applicant's mode of return to military control NIF.  The applicant was AWOL for a total of 108 days, and confined for a total of 18 days.     

Article 15s (Charges/Dates/Punishment): None

Court-Martials (Charges/Dates/Punishment): None

Counseling Records Available: Yes    No 

IV.  Soldier’s Overall Record
DOB:  750926  
Current ENL Date: 000329    Current ENL Term: 6 Years  ?????
Current ENL Service:  03  Yrs, 11 Mos, 06 Days item 12c, on DD the Form 214, net active service this period is incorrect, should read 10 yrs, 07 mos, 12 days.  Item 12d, on the DD Form 214, total prior active service is incorrect, should read 5 yrs, 01 mos, 5 days.  Item 12e, on the DD Form 214, total prior inactive service is incorrect, should read, 1 yrs, 07 mos, 00 days.  
Total Service:  10  Yrs, 07 Mos, 12 Days ?????
Previous Discharges: RA-930723-960722/HD
                                      USARCG-960723-961007/NA
                                      ARNG-961008-980223/NA
                                      RA-980224-000328/HD
Highest Grade: E6
Performance Ratings Available: Yes    No 
MOS: 19D30 Cavalry Scout   GT: 87   EDU: HS Grad   Overseas: SouthWest Asia   Combat: Kuwait/Iraq (030315-030914)
Decorations/Awards: BSM, ARCOM, AAM (3), AGCM (2), NDSM (2), GWOTEM, GTOTSM, KDSM, ASR, OSR, NM, ALB
V.  Post-Discharge Activity
Home of Record: 
Current Address: 
Post Service Accomplishments: None Listed 

VI.  Facts, Circumstances, and Legal Basis for Separation

      a.  Facts and Circumstances:
      The evidence of record shows that on 6 April 2004, the applicant was charged with AWOL x 3 from (031004-031007), (031118-031204), (031230-040326), and  wrongful use of methamphetamines, between on or about (031004 and 031008). On 30 March 2004, the applicant consulted with legal counsel and voluntarily requested, in writing, discharge under the provisions of Chapter 10, AR 635-200 in lieu of trial by court-martial.  In this request, the applicant admitted guilt to the offense, or a lesser included offense.  Further, the applicant indicated that he understood that he would receive an under other than honorable conditions discharge and that the discharge would have some effect on eligibility for veteran’s benefits.  The applicant submitted a statement in his own behalf.  The applicant's unit and intermediate commanders recommended disapproval of the request for discharge in lieu of trial by court-martial with an under other than honorable conditions discharge.  On 23 April 2004, the separation authority disapproved the request for discharge in lieu of trial by court-martial.  On 26 May 2004, again the applicant consulted with legal counsel and voluntarily requested, in writing, discharge under the provisions of Chapter 10, AR 635-200 in lieu of trial by court-martial. The applicant submitted a statement in his own behalf.  The applicant's intermediate and senior commanders recommended approval of the request for discharge in lieu of trial by court-martial with an under other than honorable conditions discharge.  On 8 June 2004, the separation authority approved the discharge and directed that the applicant be separated from the Army with an under other than honorable conditions discharge.  The applicant was to be reduced to the lowest enlisted rank.       

      b.  Legal Basis for Separation:  
      Army Regulation 635-200 sets forth the basic authority for the separation of enlisted personnel.  Chapter 10 of that regulation provides, in pertinent part, that a member who has committed an offense or offenses for which the authorized punishment includes a punitive discharge may submit a request for a discharge for the good of the service in lieu of trial by court-martial.  The request may be submitted at any time after charges have been preferred and must include the individual’s admission of guilt.  Army policy states that although an honorable or general discharge is authorized, a discharge under other than honorable conditions is normally considered appropriate. 

      c.  Response to Issues, Recommendation and Rationale:  
      After a careful review of all the applicant’s military records during the period of enlistment under review, the issue and documents he submitted, the analyst recommends that the applicant’s characterization of service be upgraded to general, under honorable conditions.  This recommendation was made after full consideration of his faithful and honorable service, as well as his record of misconduct.  The evidence in this case supports a conclusion that the applicant’s characterization of service was too harsh, and as a result it is inequitable.  While the applicant's misconduct is not condoned, the analyst found that the overall length and quality of the applicant's service to include his combat service; and the medical circumstances surrounding the discharge (the comprehensive psychiatric evaluation by independent competent authority) mitigated the discrediting entries in his service record.  However, the  reason for discharge was both proper and equitable.  This action entails a restoration of grade to SSG/E6.
      
      
      
      
      
      
      

VII.  Summary of Army Discharge Review Board Hearing 

Type of Hearing: 			Date: 25 June 2007              
Location: Washington, DC

Did the Applicant Testify?  Yes     No  

Counsel: NA

Witnesses/Observers: NA 

Exhibits Submitted: NA




VIII.  Board Decision
The discharge was:			Proper	 	Improper	
				                 	Equitable	 	Inequitable	

The characterization of service was:   Proper	 	Improper	
				                 	Equitable	 	Inequitable	

The narrative reasons were: 	       	Equitable	 	Inequitable	

DRB voting record:  		      Change 3    No change 2   - Character
		 			      Change 0    No change 5   - Reason
					      (Board member names available upon request)

IX.  Board Discussion, Determination, and Recommendation
After carefully examining the applicant’s record of service during the period of enlistment under review and considering the analyst’s recommendation and rationale, the Board determined that the characterization of service was too harsh, and as result it is inequitable.  Accordingly, the Board voted to grant relief in the form of an upgrade of the characterization of service to general, under honorable conditions.  However, the Board determined that the reason for discharge was both proper and equitable and voted not to change it.  This action entails a restoration of grade to SSG/E6.
















 

Case report reviewed and verified by: Mr. Kenneth McFarley, Examiner									        
X.  Board Action Directed
No Change 
Issue a new DD Form 214  
Change Characterization to:    
Change Reason to: None
Other: NA
RE Code:  
Grade Restoration:   No   Yes  Grade: SSG/E6

XI.  Certification Signature and Date
Approval Authority: 

MARK E. COLLINS
Colonel, U.S. Army
President, Army Discharge Review Board

Official: 


MARY E. SHAW				DATE: 29 June 2007
Lieutenant Colonel, U.S. Army
Chief, Secretary Recorder
ARMY DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD - CASE REPORT AND DIRECTIVE

Case Number AR20060008507

Applicant Name:  Mr.        
______________________________________________________________________


Page 4 of 6 pages