DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY
Army Discharge Review Board
1901 South Bell Street
Arlington, VA 22202-4508
9 December 2005
Office of the President
The Army Discharge Review Board reviewed your case and determined
that relief is warranted. The Board has directed the ARBA Support
Division, St. Louis, MO, to take action as indicated on the enclosed OSA
Form 172, Case Report and Directive. This document reflects the findings,
conclusions, and reasons for the Board's decision. The official
notification of any change to your official military personnel record,
including the appropriate documentation, will be mailed to you by the ARBA
Support Division.
If you believe that the decision in your case is unclear, not
responsive to the issues raised, or does not otherwise agree with the
decisional document requirements of DoD Directive 1332.28, you may submit a
complaint in accordance with Enclosure 5 of that directive. You should
read Enclosure 5 of that directive before submitting a complaint. The
complaint procedure does not permit you to challenge the merits of the
decision, but is designed solely to ensure that the decisional document
meets applicable requirements for clarity and responsiveness. You may
obtain a copy of DoD Directive 1332.28 by writing to: DA Review Boards
Agency, Attention: (Reading Room), The Pentagon, Washington, DC 20310-
1809.
Should you have any questions relating to the documentation
implementing the Board's decision, you should contact: ARBA Support
Division, ATTN: SFMR-RBL-SL, 9700 Page Avenue, St. Louis, Missouri, 63132-
5200.
Sincerely,
Robert L. House
Colonel, U.S. Army
President
Enclosure
MILITARY REVIEW BOARDS
Case Report & Directive
PART I - IDENTIFICATION DATA
NAME:
COUNSEL: ADDRESS:
PHONE:
ALTERNATE PERSON(S) TO BE NOTIFIED: ADDRESS:
RELATIONSHIP: PHONE:
TYPE REPORT:
( X ) Original
( ) Addendum
REMARKS
Case Management Data
( ) Response to other correspondence required upon completion of case.
( ) DD Form 149 in file. Send case to ABCMR.
OSA FORM 172 (REVISED) 22 May 98 Cover Sheet
PART II - APPLICATION DATA
(Note: Part I deleted under the Privacy Act on Reading Room copy)
1. Character of Discharge: Under Other Than Honorable Conditions
2. Date of discharge (or REFRAD): 020319
3. Authority for separation:
a. Regulation: Chapter 14, Paragraph 14-12b, AR 635-200
b. Reason: Misconduct
4. Prior review(s): NONE
PART III - SERVICE HISTORY
SECTION A - Period of Service Under Review
1. Service data: 2. Awards and decorations:
AAM
a. Period entered for: 4 Years GCMDL
b. Entry date: 991130 ASR
c. Age: 23 Years DOB: 761003
d. Educational level: HS
e. Aptitude area score:
GT: 85 3. Highest grade achieved:
f. Length of Service: E4
2 Year(s) 3 Month(s) 20 Day(s)
4. Performance evaluations:
NONE
PART III - SERVICE HISTORY
SECTION A - Period of Service Under Review - Continued
5. Periods of unauthorized absence: NONE
Status Inclusive dates
AWOL
Mil conf
Civil conf
Other
6. Nonjudicial punishment:
Date Offense(s)
011217 Disrespect to CPT (011128); attempt to kick a MAJ
(011128);
DOLO from CPT (011128); assault SSG and TSGT (011128);
refuse
to submit to breath test (011128); and, disorderly conduct
(011128) (Field Grade)
011019 Failed to go and wrongful overindulgence (010924) (Company
Grade)
__________________
000207 GOMOR - Drunk driving
7. Court-Martial data: NONE
a. SCM:
Date Offense(s)
b. SPCM:
Date Offense(s)
c. GCM:
Date Offense(s)
8. Remarks: The official record contains a Bar to Reenlistment; two
Military Police Reports (dated 011016 and 991223); and,
an Alcohol Influence Report (dated 991223).
SECTION B - Prior Service Data
Other discharge(s):
Service From To Type Discharge
RA 961119 991129 Honorable
PART IV - PREHEARING REVIEW
SECTION A-ANALYST’S ASSESSMENT
l. Facts and Circumstances:
a. Evidence of record shows that on 20 December 2001, the unit
commander notified the applicant of initiation of separation action under
the provisions of Chapter l4, AR 635-200, by reason of misconduct—patterns
of misconduct, with an under other than honorable conditions discharge. He
was advised of his rights. The applicant consulted with legal counsel, was
advised of the impact of the discharge action, and did not submit a
statement in his own behalf. 0n 26 December 2001, the applicant submitted
a conditional waiver for an administrative separation board contingent upon
receiving a general discharge. On 12 January 2002, the separating
authority denied the applicant’s conditional waiver and directed that he
appear before an administration separation board. On 19 February 2002,
board of officers met; applicant appeared with counsel. The board
recommended separation with an under other than honorable conditions
discharge. On 21 February 2002, the separation authority approved the
findings and recommendations of the board, waived further rehabilitative
efforts and directed that the applicant be discharged with a
characterization of service of under other than honorable conditions.
b. On 7 February 2003, the applicant was discharged. At the time of
discharge, the applicant had completed 2 years, 3 months, and 20 days of
active military service in the period under review and had a total of 5
years, 4 months, and 1 day of military service.
2. Legal/Regulatory Basis for Separation Action: Army Regulation 635-200
sets forth the basic authority for the separation of enlisted personnel.
Chapter l4 establishes policy and prescribes procedures for separating
members for misconduct. Specific categories include minor disciplinary
infractions, a pattern of misconduct, commission of a serious offense, to
include abuse of illegal drugs, convictions by civil authorities and
desertion or absence without leave. Action will be taken to separate a
member for misconduct when it is clearly established that rehabilitation is
impractical or unlikely to succeed. Army policy states that an under other
than honorable conditions discharge is normally considered appropriate, but
a general discharge under honorable conditions or an honorable discharge
may be granted.
SECTION B-APPLICANT’S SUBMISSIONS
1. Issue(s) of propriety and/or equity submitted by applicant or counsel.
As stated on applicant’s DD Form 293.
2. Exhibit(s) submitted:
A-1: DD Form 293, dated 041122.
A-2: Counsel Issues: NONE
B-l: Other Documents: NONE
PART IV - PREHEARING REVIEW (CONTINUED)
SECTION C - Medical and/or Legal Advisory Opinion
Referred to ( ) Medical Advisor ( ) Legal Advisor
a. Medical prehearing comments (if applicable):
b. Legal prehearing comments (if applicable):
PART V - SUMMARY OF HEARING
SECTION A-Attendees and exhibits
1. Review/hearing information:
a. Type requested:
( X ) Records review ( ) Hearing
b. Type Held:
( X )Records review ( ) Hearing
( ) Tender Offer
c. Review/hearing location and date: Washington, D.C. on 7 December
2005.
d. Appearance by:
Applicant ( ) Yes ( X ) No
Counsel ( ) Yes ( X ) No
e. Applicant testified: ( ) Yes ( X ) No
f. Counsel presentation: ( ) Yes ( X ) No
g. Witness(es) testified: ( ) Yes ( X ) No
2. Exhibit(s) submitted at hearing:
PART VI - ISSUES AND FINDINGS
1. a. Applicant's issue(s) of propriety and/or equity:
( X ) Same as those listed on DD Form 293 and Part IV, Section A
of this case report and directive.
( ) Revised issue(s) furnished in writing by applicant as
follows:
( X ) Additional issue(s) identified during review/hearing as
follows:
Board Issue: (5) The characterization of service is too harsh.
b. Request: ( X ) Recharacterization ( ) Change of Reason
2. Finding(s), conclusion(s), and reason(s) for the Board's decision(s) on
issues of propriety and/or equity:
a. Propriety: The applicant has not submitted an issue of
propriety and the ADRB has not otherwise relied upon an
issue of propriety to change the discharge.
b. Equity: The parenthetical number(s) below correspond(s) to
the issue number(s) on the DD Form 293, or in Part VI,
Paragraph 1, above.
(1-4) See Paragraph 3, below.
(5) The issue is accepted. The Board carefully examined the
applicant’s record of service during the period of enlistment under review.
There was a full consideration of all faithful and honorable service as
well as the infractions of discipline, the extent thereof, and the
seriousness of the offenses. The Board does not condone the applicant’s
misconduct; however, determined that the characterization of service is too
harsh. The applicant's misconduct was mitigated by service of sufficient
length and merit to warrant an upgrade of the discharge being reviewed.
Accordingly, the Board voted to grant relief in the form of an upgrade of
characterization of service to general, under honorable conditions. The
Board determined that the reason for discharge was both proper and
equitable and voted not to change it.
3. Response(s) to item(s) not addressed as decisional issue(s):
Inasmuch as the Board voted to grant the full relief requested,
response to the remaining issues is neither required nor rendered.
PART VII - BOARD ACTION
SECTION A - Conclusions/Decisions/Vote
1. Board conclusion(s):
The discharge was:
( X ) Proper.
( ) Improper as to characterization. Change characterization to
.
( ) Improper as to reason. Change reason to
under .
( ) Equitable.
( X ) Inequitable as to characterization. Change characterization to
General, Under Honorable Conditions.
( ) Inequitable as to reason. Change reason to
under .
( ) Both proper and equitable, but characterization/reason for
separation cited was an administrative/clerical error and should
be changed to under
.
2. Voting record: Change No Change
Reason 0 5
Characterization 4 1
The names and votes of the members of the Board are recorded in
Part IX of this document and can be obtained by writing to the address
below. The request must contain the CASE NO. located in the upper right
corner of this document.
Department of the Army Review Boards Agency
ATTN: Promulgation Team
1901 South Bell Street, 2nd Floor
Arlington, VA 22202-4508
3. Minority views: NONE
PART VII - BOARD ACTION
SECTION B - Verification and Authentication
Case report reviewed and verified
Ms. McKim-Spilker
Case Reviewing Official
PART VIII - DIRECTIVE/CERTIFICATION
SECTION A - DIRECTIVE
TO: ARBA Support Division-St Louis Date: 9 December 2005
The Army Discharge Review Board, established under the provisions of
Section 30, Public Law 346, 78th Congress, 22 June 1944 and codified as
Title 10, United States Code, Section 1553, in the case of the applicant
named in Part I directs that the ARBA Support Division-St Louis issue a new
DD Form 2l4 to the applicant which reflects the following directed
change(s):
( X ) Change characterization of discharge to General, Under
Honorable Conditions.
SECTION B - CERTIFICATION
Approval Authority:
ROBERT L. HOUSE
Colonel, U.S. Army
President, Army Discharge
Review Board
Official:
ESMERALDA G. PROCTOR
Lieutenant Colonel, U.S. Army
Chief, Secretary Recorder
EXHIBITS:
A - Application for review of discharge C - Other
B - Material submitted by applicant
INDEX RECORD:
AR Number: 20050005549 INDEX NUMBERS: A9406
Date of Review: 051207 A9218
Character of Service: UD A0100
Date of Discharge: 020319
Authority: AR 635-200 C14
Reason: A6750
Results of Board Action/
Vote/Affirmation: GD 4-1 A
PART IX - VOTING RECORD
Name Reason Characterization
CHANGE NC HON UHC NC
UNCHAR
1. Mbr X X
2. Mbr X X
3. Mbr X X
4. COL COLLINS, MARK Mbr X X
5. PO X X
ARMY | DRB | CY2001 | 2001059225
His DD Form 214 indicates that he was discharged under the provisions of Chapter 5, AR 635-200 by reason of personality disorder, with a characterization of service of honorable. EXHIBITS: A - Application for review of discharge C - Other B - Material submitted by applicant AR Number: 2001059225 INDEX NUMBERS: A9456 Date of Review: 010822 A1200 Character of Service: HD Date of Discharge: 991223 Authority: AR 635-200 C5 Reason: A8600 Results of Board Action/ Vote/Affirmation: MD 4-1 A Name...
ARMY | DRB | CY2004 | AR2004106137
SECTION B - Prior Service Data NONE Other discharge(s): Service From To Type Discharge PART IV - PREHEARING REVIEW SECTION A-ANALYST’S ASSESSMENT l. Facts and Circumstances: a. Minority views: NONE PART VII - BOARD ACTION SECTION B - Verification and Authentication Case report reviewed and verified MR. RON WILLIAMS Case Reviewing Official PART VIII - DIRECTIVE/CERTIFICATION SECTION A - DIRECTIVE TO: ARBA Support Division-St Louis Date: 27 October 2004 The Army Discharge Review Board,...
ARMY | DRB | CY2004 | AR2004101323
On 27 February 2002, the intermediate commander reviewed the proposed discharge action and recommended approval of the separation action with a general discharge. The separation authority waived further rehabilitative efforts and directed that the applicant be discharged with a characterization of service of general, under honorable conditions. SECTION B - CERTIFICATION Approval Authority: ROBERT L. HOUSE Colonel, U.S. Army President, Army Discharge Review Board Official: MARY E....
ARMY | DRB | CY2003 | 2003092168
Prior review(s): NONE PART III - SERVICE HISTORY SECTION A - Period of Service Under Review 1. The applicant consulted with legal counsel, was advised of the impact of the discharge action, and submitted a statement in his own behalf. EXHIBITS: A - Application for review of discharge C - Other B - Material submitted by applicant
ARMY | DRB | CY2004 | AR2004104457
On 20 February 2002, the separation authority waived further rehabilitative efforts and directed that the applicant be discharged with a characterization of service of general, under honorable conditions. Accordingly, the Board voted to change the characterization of service to fully honorable. SECTION B - CERTIFICATION Approval Authority: ROBERT L. HOUSE Colonel, U.S. Army President, Army Discharge Review Board Official: MARY E. SHAW Lieutenant Colonel, U.S. Army Chief, Secretary...
ARMY | DRB | CY2003 | 2003088199
The applicant consulted with legal counsel, was advised of the impact of the discharge action, waived an administrative separation board contingent upon receiving a general, under honorable conditions discharge, and did not submit a statement in his own behalf. The Board determined that the reason for discharge was both proper and equitable and voted not to change it. EXHIBITS: A - Application for review of discharge C - Other B - Material submitted by applicant
ARMY | DRB | CY2003 | AR2003096728
On 4 November 2002, the Deputy Assistant Secretary (Army Review Boards) approved the recommendation of the Army Ad Hoc Review Board and directed that the applicant be discharge with a characterization of service of under other than honorable conditions. Exhibit(s) submitted at hearing: three (3) documents PART VI - ISSUES AND FINDINGS 1. a. The Board determined that the reason for discharge was proper and equitable and voted not to change it.
ARMY | DRB | CY2004 | AR2004105225
Remarks: NONE SECTION B - Prior Service Data NONE Other discharge(s): Service From To Type Discharge PART IV - PREHEARING REVIEW SECTION A-ANALYST’S ASSESSMENT l. Facts and Circumstances: a. The intermediate commander reviewed the proposed discharge action and recommended approval of the separation action with a general, under honorable conditions discharge. SECTION B - CERTIFICATION Approval Authority: ROBERT L. HOUSE Colonel, U.S. Army President, Army Discharge Review...
ARMY | DRB | CY2003 | 2003083584
Applicant's issue(s) of propriety and/or equity: ( X ) Same as those listed on DD Form 293 and Part IV, Section A of this case report and directive. PART VII - BOARD ACTIONSECTION B - Verification and Authentication Case report reviewed and verified MR. RIVERA Case Reviewing Official PART VIII - DIRECTIVE/CERTIFICATIONSECTION A - DIRECTIVE NONE SECTION B - CERTIFICATION Approval Authority:SPURGEON A. MOORE Colonel, U.S. Army President, Army Discharge Review Board EXHIBITS: A - Application...
ARMY | DRB | CY2004 | AR20040002574
Period entered for: 3 Years b. Evidence of record shows that on 5 March 2002, the unit commander notified the applicant of initiation of separation action under the provisions of Chapter l4, AR 635-200, by reason of misconduct—pattern of misconduct, with an under other than honorable conditions discharge. Minority views: NONE PART VII - BOARD ACTION SECTION B - Verification and Authentication Case report reviewed and verified MR. RON WILLIAMS Case Reviewing Official PART VIII -...