PART II - APPLICATION DATA

      (Note: Part I deleted under the Privacy Act on Reading Room copy)

1.  Character of Discharge:  Uncharacterized

2.  Date of discharge (or REFRAD):  000525

3.  Authority for separation:

      a.  Regulation:  Chapter 5, Paragraph 5-13, AR 635-200

      b.  Reason:  Personality Disorder

4.  Prior review(s):  Record Review/020220



                         PART III - SERVICE HISTORY

                 SECTION A - Period of Service Under Review

1.    Service data:                              2.  Awards and
    decorations:
                                           NONE
    a.  Period entered for:  4 Years
    b.  Entry date:  991117
    c.  Age:  18 Years   DOB:  810715
    d.  Educational level:  GED
    e.  Aptitude area score:
          GT:  114                               3.  Highest grade
achieved:
    f.  Length of Service:                         E1
          0 Years  6 Months  9 Days

                                               4.  Performance evaluations:

                                                   NONE

                         PART III - SERVICE HISTORY
           SECTION A - Period of Service Under Review - Continued

5.  Periods of unauthorized absence:  NONE

    Status       Inclusive dates
      AWOL

      Mil conf

      Civil conf

      Other


6.  Nonjudicial punishment:  NONE

      Date  Offense(s)



7.  Court-Martial data:  NONE

      a.  SCM:
            Date   Offense(s)


      b.  SPCM:
            Date   Offense(s)


      c.  GCM:
            Date   Offense(s)


8.    Remarks:  NONE


                       SECTION B - Prior Service Data
                                    NONE

Other discharge(s):

      Service    From  To    Type Discharge





                         PART IV - PREHEARING REVIEW

                       SECTION A-ANALYST’S ASSESSMENT
l.  Facts and Circumstances:

      a.  Evidence of record shows that on 14 April 2000, the applicant was
diagnosed with a personality disorder with antisocial and borderline
features.  On 8 May 2000, the unit commander notified the applicant of
initiation of separation action under the provisions of Chapter 5, AR 635-
200, by reason of personality disorder, with an uncharacterized discharge.
He was advised of his rights.  On 9 May 2000, the applicant waived legal
counsel, was advised of the impact of the discharge action, and did not
submit a statement in his own behalf.  On 9 May 2000, the unit commander
subsequently recommended separation from the service and waiver of further
rehabilitative efforts.  The intermediate commander reviewed the proposed
discharge action and recommended approval of the separation action with an
uncharacterized discharge.  On 11 May 2000, the proper legal authority
reviewed the separation action and found it to be legally sufficient for
further processing.  The separation authority waived further rehabilitative
efforts and directed that the applicant be discharged with an
uncharacterized characterization of service.

      b.  On 25 May 2000, the applicant was discharged.  At the time of
discharge, the applicant had completed 6 months and 9 days of active
military service.

2.  Legal/Regulatory Basis for Separation Action:  Army Regulation 635-200
provides the basic authority for the separation of enlisted personnel.
Paragraph 5-13 provides that a soldier may be separated for personality
disorder, not amounting to disability under Army Regulation 635-40 that
interferes with assignment to or performance of duty. The regulation
requires that the condition is a deeply ingrained maladaptive pattern of
behavior of long duration that interferes with the soldier’s ability to
perform duty.  The regulation also directs that commanders will not take
action prescribed in this chapter in lieu of disciplinary action, requires
that the diagnosis concludes the disorder is so severe that the soldier’s
ability to function in the military environment is significantly impaired,
and states that separation for personality disorder is not appropriate when
separation is warranted under chapter 4, 5, 7, 9, 10, 11, 13, 14, or 15;
Army regulation 604-10 or Army Regulation 635-40.  Army policy requires the
award of a fully honorable discharge in such cases.


                      SECTION B-APPLICANT’S SUBMISSIONS


1.  Issue(s) of propriety and/or equity submitted by applicant or counsel.
    As stated on applicant’s DD Form 293.

2.  Exhibit(s) submitted:

      A-1:  DD Form 293, dated 031004, with five (5) enclosures.
      A-2:  Counsel Issues:  NONE
      B-l:  Other Documents: NONE


                   PART IV - PREHEARING REVIEW (CONTINUED)

              SECTION C - Medical and/or Legal Advisory Opinion


Referred to ( ) Medical Advisor      ( ) Legal Advisor



      a.  Medical prehearing comments (if applicable):


      b.  Legal prehearing comments (if applicable):











                         PART V - SUMMARY OF HEARING

                      SECTION A-Attendees and exhibits

1.  Review/hearing information:


      a. Type requested:
         (   ) Records review             ( X ) Hearing

      b. Type Held:
         (   )Records review              ( X ) Hearing
                                          (   ) Tender Offer

      c. Review/hearing location and date:  Atlanta, GA on 20 May 2004.

      d. Appearance by:
         Applicant                 ( X ) Yes   (   ) No
         Counsel                   (   ) Yes   ( X ) No

      e.  Applicant testified:     ( X ) Yes   (   ) No

      f.  Counsel presentation:    (   ) Yes   ( X ) No

      g.  Witness(es) testified:   (   ) Yes   ( X ) No

2.  Exhibit(s) submitted at hearing:  NONE
                        PART VI - ISSUES AND FINDINGS

1.  a.  Applicant's issue(s) of propriety and/or equity:

          ( X )  Same as those listed on DD Form 293 and Part IV, Section A
              of this case report and directive.
          (   )  Revised issue(s) furnished in writing by applicant as
              follows:
          (   )  Additional issue(s) identified during review/hearing as
              follows:

      b.  Request:  ( X ) Recharacterization     ( X ) Change of Reason

2.  Finding(s), conclusion(s), and reason(s) for the Board's decision(s) on
issues of propriety and/or equity:

      a.  Propriety:   The parenthetical number(s) below correspond(s) to
                   the issue number(s) on the DD Form 293, or in Part VI,
                   Paragraph 1, above.

        (1)  The issues are rejected.  The Board carefully examined the
applicant’s record of service during the period of enlistment under review
and heard his testimony.  The Board noted the applicant’s contentions;
however, did not find said contentions sufficiently mitigating to warrant
an upgrade of the discharge under review.  The evidence of record shows
that competent medical authority diagnosed the applicant with a personality
disorder with antisocial and borderline features, and cleared him for
administrative action deemed appropriate by command.  In view of the
foregoing, the applicant’s unit commander initiated separation action under
the provisions of Chapter 5, Paragraph 5-13, AR 635-200, by reason of a
personality disorder with service uncharacterized.  At the time of
initiation of the separation action the applicant had served less than 180
days of continuous active duty service and was in an entry-level status
(ELS).  Army Regulation 635-200 provides, except in cases of serious
misconduct, that a soldier’s service will be uncharacterized when his
separation is initiated while the soldier is in entry-level status.
Further, the appropriate authority approved the applicant’s discharge by
reason of a personality disorder with service uncharacterized.  A fully
honorable discharge may be granted only in cases which are clearly
warranted by unusual circumstances involving outstanding personal conduct
and/or performance of duty.  The Board determined that no such unusual
circumstances were present in the applicant’s record and his service did
not warrant an honorable discharge.  The Board, being convinced that the
reason for discharge and the characterization of service were both proper
and equitable, voted to deny relief.

      b.  Equity:      The applicant has not submitted an issue of equity
                   and the ADRB has not otherwise relied upon an issue of
                   equity to change the discharge.  The major factors upon
                   which the discharge was based are set forth in Parts III
                   and IV of this decisional document.

3.  Response(s) to item(s) not addressed as decisional issue(s):  NONE

                           PART VII - BOARD ACTION
                   SECTION A - Conclusions/Decisions/Vote

1.    Board conclusion(s):

      The discharge was:

      ( X ) Proper.
      (   ) Improper as to characterization.  Change characterization to
                                               .
      (   ) Improper as to reason.  Change reason to
                                   under                      .

      ( X ) Equitable.
      (   ) Inequitable as to characterization.  Change characterization to
                                         .
      (   ) Inequitable as to reason.  Change reason to
                                 
            under                                 .
      (   ) Both proper and equitable, but characterization/reason for
           separation cited was an administrative/clerical error and should
           be changed to                      under
                                   .

2.  Voting record:      Change   No Change
                  Reason       0         5
    Characterization       0         5

        The names and votes of the members of the Board are recorded in
Part IX of this document and can be obtained by writing to the address
below.  The request must contain the CASE NO. located in the upper right
corner of this document.

                  Department of the Army Review Boards Agency
                  ATTN:  Promulgation Team
                  1941 Jefferson Davis Highway, 2nd Floor
                  Arlington, VA  22202-4508



3.  Minority views:  NONE
                           PART VII - BOARD ACTION
                 SECTION B - Verification and Authentication

Case report reviewed and verified

                          
MR. RIVERA
Case Reviewing Official

                     PART VIII - DIRECTIVE/CERTIFICATION
                            SECTION A - DIRECTIVE

                                    NONE

                          SECTION B - CERTIFICATION

Approval Authority:


ROBERT L. HOUSE
Colonel, U.S. Army
President, Army Discharge
   Review Board

Official:




MARY E. SHAW
Lieutenant Colonel, U.S. Army
Chief, Secretary Recorder

EXHIBITS:
A - Application for review of discharge                  C - Other
B - Material submitted by applicant

INDEX RECORD:

AR Number:  2004104473                    INDEX NUMBERS:  A8601
Date of Review:  040520                                   A0113
Character of Service:  EL                                 A9217
Date of Discharge:  000525                                A9309
Authority:  AR 635-200 C5
Reason:  A8600
Results of Board Action/
Vote/Affirmation:  NC 5-0 A













                           PART IX - VOTING RECORD

    Name                                   Reason          Characterization
                                           CHANGE   NC     HON  UHC   NC
UNCHAR

    1.      Mbr          X                 X       

    2.      Mbr          X                 X       

    3.      Mbr          X                 X       

    4.      Mbr          X                 X       

    5.      PO           X                 X