PART II - APPLICATION DATA
(Note: Part I deleted under the Privacy Act on Reading Room copy)
1. Character of Discharge: Under Other Than Honorable Conditions
2. Date of discharge (or REFRAD): 900126
3. Authority for separation:
a. Regulation: Chapter 10, AR 635-100
b. Reason: In Lieu of Trial by Court-Martial
4. Prior review(s): NONE
PART III - SERVICE HISTORY
SECTION A - Period of Service Under Review
1. Service data: 2. Awards and
decorations:
GCMDL
a. Period entered for: 3 Yrs. (22 mos. ext) ASR
b. Entry date: 860226 (970609) OSR
c. Age: 32 Years DOB: 530924
d. Educational level: HS Grad
e. Aptitude area score:
GT: 115 3. Highest grade
achieved:
f. Length of Service: E4
3 Year(s) 9 Month(s) 27 Day(s)
4. Performance evaluations:
NONE
PART III - SERVICE HISTORY
SECTION A - Period of Service Under Review - Continued
5. Periods of unauthorized absence:
Status Inclusive dates
AWOL 880721-880724
Mil conf 891003-891102
Civil conf
Other
6. Nonjudicial punishment:
Date Offense(s)
881123 DOLO from 1LT not to call Mrs.__ or be seen with her
husband (880514); DOLO from 1LT to report to him (880610);
AWOL (880721-880725) (Field Grade)
7. Court-Martial data:
a. SCM:
Date Offense(s)
891003 Failed to go to work on time (890808) and (890811);
disrespect to SSG (890918); DOLO from SSG (890918)
b. SPCM:
Date Offense(s)
c. GCM:
Date Offense(s)
8. Remarks: NONE
SECTION B - Prior Service Data
Other discharge(s):
Service From To Type Discharge
USAR 790504 790820 NA
RA 790821 830820 Honorable
USAR (IRR) 830820 850503 Honorable
PART IV - PREHEARING REVIEW
SECTION A-ANALYST’S ASSESSMENT
l. Facts and Circumstances:
a. The evidence of record shows that on 3 October 1989, the
applicant was convicted by Summary Court-Martial of failing to go and
disrespect to a noncommissioned officer. She was sentenced to 30 days
confinement at the US Army Confinement Facility, Mannheim, Germany. On 25
October 1989, the applicant was transferred to the Personnel Control
Facility at Fort Sill, Oklahoma, for completion of her confinement. On 13
December 1989, the applicant was charged with failing to go at the time
prescribed to a work detail and disobeying a lawful order from a
noncommissioned officer. The applicant consulted with legal counsel and
voluntarily requested, in writing, discharge under the provisions of
Chapter l0, AR 635-200 in lieu of trial by court-martial. In this request,
the applicant admitted guilt to the offense, or lesser-included offenses.
Further, the applicant indicated that she understood that she could receive
an under other than honorable conditions discharge and that the discharge
would have a significant effect on eligibility for veteran’s benefits. The
applicant submitted a statement in her own behalf. The unit commander
recommended approval of an under other than honorable conditions discharge.
On 22 January 1990, the separation authority approved the discharge with
an under other than honorable conditions discharge.
b. On 26 January 1990, the applicant was discharged. At the time of
discharge, the applicant had completed 3 years, 9 months, and 27 days of
active military service and accrued 4 days of lost time in the period under
review and had a total of 9 years, 9 months and 27 days of active military
service.
2. Legal/Regulatory Basis for Separation Action: Army Regulation 635-200
sets forth the basic authority for the separation of enlisted personnel.
Chapter l0 of that regulation provides, in pertinent part, that a member
who has committed an offense or offenses for which the authorized
punishment includes a punitive discharge may submit a request for a
discharge for the good of the service in lieu of trial by court-martial.
The requests may be submitted at any time after charges have been preferred
and must include the individual’s admission of guilt. Army policy states
that although an honorable or general discharge is authorized, a discharge
UOHC is normally considered appropriate.
SECTION B-APPLICANT’S SUBMISSIONS
1. Issue(s) of propriety and/or equity submitted by applicant or counsel.
As stated on applicant’s DD Form 293.
2. Exhibit(s) submitted:
A-1: DD Form 293, dated 030528.
A-2: Counsel Issues: NONE
B-l: Other Documents: NONE
PART IV - PREHEARING REVIEW (CONTINUED)
SECTION C - Medical and/or Legal Advisory Opinion
Referred to ( ) Medical Advisor ( ) Legal Advisor
a. Medical prehearing comments (if applicable):
b. Legal prehearing comments (if applicable):
PART V - SUMMARY OF HEARING
SECTION A-Attendees and exhibits
1. Review/hearing information:
a. Type requested:
( X ) Records review ( ) Hearing
b. Type Held:
( X )Records review ( ) Hearing
( ) Tender Offer
c. Review/hearing location and date: Washington, D.C. on 6 October
2004.
d. Appearance by:
Applicant ( ) Yes ( X ) No
Counsel ( ) Yes ( X ) No
e. Applicant testified: ( ) Yes ( X ) No
f. Counsel presentation: ( ) Yes ( X ) No
g. Witness(es) testified: ( ) Yes ( X ) No
2. Exhibit(s) submitted at hearing:
PART VI - ISSUES AND FINDINGS
1. a. Applicant's issue(s) of propriety and/or equity:
( X ) Same as those listed on DD Form 293 and Part IV, Section A
of this case report and directive.
( ) Revised issue(s) furnished in writing by applicant as
follows:
( X ) Additional issue(s) identified during review/hearing as
follows:
Board Issue: (2) The characterization of service is too harsh.
b. Request: ( X ) Recharacterization ( ) Change of Reason
2. Finding(s), conclusion(s), and reason(s) for the Board's decision(s) on
issues of propriety and/or equity:
a. Propriety: The applicant has not submitted an issue of
propriety and the ADRB has not otherwise relied upon an
issue of propriety to change the discharge.
b. Equity: The parenthetical number(s) below correspond(s) to
the issue number(s) on the DD Form 293, or in Part VI,
Paragraph 1, above.
(2) The issue is accepted. The Board carefully examined the
applicant’s record of service during the period of enlistment under review.
There was a full consideration of all faithful and honorable service as
well as the infractions of discipline, the extent thereof, and the
seriousness of the offenses. The Board does not condone the applicant’s
misconduct; however, determined that the characterization of service is too
harsh. The applicant's misconduct was mitigated by service of sufficient
length and merit to warrant an upgrade of the discharge being reviewed.
Accordingly, the Board voted to grant partial relief in the form of an
upgrade of characterization of service to general, under honorable
conditions. The Board determined that the reason for discharge was both
proper and equitable and voted not to change it.
(1) The issue is rejected. The Board determined that the
applicant’s misconduct diminished the quality of her service below that
meriting a fully honorable discharge. The applicant was charged with the
commission of an offense punishable under the Uniform Code of Military
Justice (UCMJ) with a punitive discharge. The Board noted that, after
consulting with defense counsel, the applicant voluntarily, and in writing,
requested separation from the Army in lieu of trial by court-martial. In
doing so, the applicant admitted guilt to the stipulated or lesser-included
offenses under the UCMJ.
3. Response(s) to item(s) not addressed as decisional issue(s): NONE
PART VII - BOARD ACTION
SECTION A - Conclusions/Decisions/Vote
1. Board conclusion(s):
The discharge was:
( X ) Proper.
( ) Improper as to characterization. Change characterization to
.
( ) Improper as to reason. Change reason to
under .
( ) Equitable.
( X ) Inequitable as to characterization. Change characterization to
General, Under Honorable Conditions.
( ) Inequitable as to reason. Change reason to
under .
( ) Both proper and equitable, but characterization/reason for
separation cited was an administrative/clerical error and should
be changed to under
.
2. Voting record: Change No Change
Reason 0 5
Characterization 5 0
The names and votes of the members of the Board are recorded in
Part IX of this document and can be obtained by writing to the address
below. The request must contain the CASE NO. located in the upper right
corner of this document.
Department of the Army Review Boards Agency
ATTN: Promulgation Team
1901 South Bell Street, 2nd Floor
Arlington, VA 22202-4508
3. Minority views: NONE
PART VII - BOARD ACTION
SECTION B - Verification and Authentication
Case report reviewed and verified
Ms. McKim-Spilker
Case Reviewing Official
PART VIII - DIRECTIVE/CERTIFICATION
SECTION A - DIRECTIVE
TO: ARBA Support Division-St Louis Date: 8 October 2004
The Army Discharge Review Board, established under the provisions of
Section 30, Public Law 346, 78th Congress, 22 June 1944 and codified as
Title 10, United States Code, Section 1553, in the case of the applicant
named in Part I directs that the ARBA Support Division-St Louis issue a new
DD Form 2l4 to the applicant which reflects the following directed
change(s):
( X ) Change characterization of discharge to General, Under
Honorable Conditions.
( X ) Other (see remarks below).
Remarks: This action does not include a restoration of grade.
SECTION B - CERTIFICATION
Approval Authority:
ROBERT L. HOUSE
Colonel, U.S. Army
President, Army Discharge
Review Board
Official:
MARY E. SHAW
Lieutenant Colonel, U.S. Army
Chief, Secretary Recorder
EXHIBITS:
A - Application for review of discharge C - Other
B - Material submitted by applicant
INDEX RECORD:
AR Number: 2004104096 INDEX NUMBERS: A9406
Date of Review: 041006 A9218
Character of Service: UD A0100
Date of Discharge: 900126
Authority: AR 635-200 C10
Reason: A7000
Results of Board Action/
Vote/Affirmation: GD 4-1 A
PART IX - VOTING RECORD
Name Reason Characterization
CHANGE NC HON UHC NC
UNCHAR
1. LTC PROCTOR, ESMERALDA G. Mbr X X
2. Mbr X X
3. Mbr X X
4. Mbr X X
5. PO X X
ARMY | DRB | CY2000 | 2000043550
It also noted that the characterization of service for this type of discharge is normally under other than honorable conditions and that the applicant was aware of that prior to requesting discharge. The Board, being convinced that the reason for discharge and the characterization of service were both proper and equitable, voted to deny relief.3. AR Number: 2000043550 INDEX NUMBERS: A9217 Date of Review: 000726 A0100 Character of Service: UD A9333 Date of Discharge: 900405 Authority: AR...
ARMY | DRB | CY1999 | 99033061
Chapter l0 of that regulation provides, in pertinent part, that a member who has committed an offense or offenses for which the authorized punishment includes a punitive discharge may submit a request for a discharge for the good of the service in lieu of trial by court-martial. It also noted that the characterization of service for this type of discharge is normally under other than honorable conditions and that the applicant was aware of that prior to requesting discharge. The Board,...
ARMY | DRB | CY2001 | 2001060705
Chapter l0 of that regulation provides, in pertinent part, that a member who has committed an offense or offenses for which the authorized punishment includes a punitive discharge may submit a request for a discharge for the good of the service in lieu of trial by court-martial. It also noted that the characterization of service for this type of discharge is normally under other than honorable conditions and that the applicant was aware of that prior to requesting discharge. AR Number:...
ARMY | DRB | CY2004 | AR20040000751
SECTION B - Prior Service Data NONE Other discharge(s): Service From To Type Discharge PART IV - PREHEARING REVIEW SECTION A-ANALYST’S ASSESSMENT l. Facts and Circumstances: a. The intermediate commander reviewed the proposed discharge action and recommended approval of the separation action with a general, under honorable conditions discharge. SECTION B - CERTIFICATION Approval Authority: ROBERT L. HOUSE Colonel, U.S. Army President, Army Discharge Review Board Official: MARY E....
ARMY | DRB | CY2004 | AR2004105027
Remarks: NONE SECTION B - Prior Service Data NONE Other discharge(s): Service From To Type Discharge PART IV - PREHEARING REVIEW SECTION A-ANALYST’S ASSESSMENT l. Facts and Circumstances: a. Evidence of record shows that on 30 January 1990, the unit commander notified the applicant of initiation of separation action under the provisions of Chapter l3, AR 635-200, by reason of unsatisfactory performance, with a general, under honorable conditions discharge. SECTION B -...
ARMY | DRB | CY2004 | AR2004100699
It also noted that the characterization of service for this type of discharge is normally under other than honorable conditions and that the applicant was aware of that prior to requesting discharge. The Board, being convinced that the reason for discharge and the characterization of service were both proper and equitable, voted to deny relief. Minority views: NONE PART VII - BOARD ACTION SECTION B - Verification and Authentication Case report reviewed and verified MR. RIVERA Case...
ARMY | DRB | CY1999 | 99032250
The applicant consulted with legal counsel, was advised of the impact of the discharge action, and submitted a statement in his behalf. Applicant's issue(s) of propriety and/or equity: ( X ) Same as those listed on DD Form 293 and Part IV, Section A of this case report and directive. However, in review of the applicant’s entire service record, the Board found that these accomplishments did not overcome the reason for discharge and characterization of service granted.
ARMY | DRB | CY1997 | 199700564
Prior review(s): ( X ) NONE PART III - SERVICE HISTORYSECTION A - Period of Service Under Review 1. Summary of facts and circumstances concerning discharge: 931130: Unit commander notified the applicant of initiation of separation action under the provisions of Chapter 14, AR 635-200, for misconduct. CASE NO: AD97-00564 PART IX - VOTING RECORD Name Reason Characterization CHANGENCHONUHCNCUNCHAR 1.
ARMY | DRB | CY2002 | 2002073756
Remarks: Bar to Reenlistment (990108) SECTION B - Prior Service Data NONE Other discharge(s): Service From To Type Discharge PART IV - PREHEARING REVIEW SECTION A-ANALYSTS ASSESSMENT l. Facts and Circumstances: a. Applicant's issue(s) of propriety and/or equity: ( X ) Same as those listed on DD Form 293 and Part IV, Section A of this case report and directive. SECTION B - CERTIFICATION Approval Authority: SPURGEON A. MOORE Colonel, U.S. Army President, Army Discharge Review...
ARMY | DRB | CY2003 | AR2003094113
On 28 May 2002, the applicant was discharged. Applicant's issue(s) of propriety and/or equity: ( X ) Same as those listed on DD Form 293 and Part IV, Section A of this case report and directive. Minority views: NONE PART VII - BOARD ACTION SECTION B - Verification and Authentication Case report reviewed and verified Ms. McKim-Spilker Case Reviewing Official PART VIII - DIRECTIVE/CERTIFICATION SECTION A - DIRECTIVE NONE SECTION B - CERTIFICATION Approval Authority: SPURGEON A....