PART II - APPLICATION DATA
(Note: Part I deleted under the Privacy Act on Reading Room copy)
1. Character of Discharge: General, Under Honorable Conditions
2. Date of discharge (or REFRAD): 910822
3. Authority for separation:
a. Regulation: Chapter 14, AR 635-200
b. Reason: Misconduct
4. Prior review(s): Records Review/941214
PART III - SERVICE HISTORY
SECTION A - Period of Service Under Review
1. Service data: 2. Awards and
decorations:
AAM
a. Period entered for: 4 Years NDSM
b. Entry date: 880503 ASR
c. Age: 20 Years DOB: 671010
d. Educational level: 13 Years
e. Aptitude area score:
GT: 110 3. Highest grade
achieved:
f. Length of Service: E4
3 Years 3 Months 20 Days
4. Performance evaluations:
NONE
PART III - SERVICE HISTORY
SECTION A - Period of Service Under Review - Continued
5. Periods of unauthorized absence: NONE
Status Inclusive dates
AWOL
Mil conf
Civil conf
Other
6. Nonjudicial punishment:
Date Offense(s)
910306 Disobeyed a lawful order from a CW4 (910121),
Incapacitated for the performance of her duties
(910201)(Company Grade)
7. Court-Martial data: NONE
a. SCM:
Date Offense(s)
b. SPCM:
Date Offense(s)
c. GCM:
Date Offense(s)
8. Remarks: Local Bar to Reenlistment approved on 910516.
SECTION B - Prior Service Data
NONE
Other discharge(s):
Service From To Type Discharge
PART IV - PREHEARING REVIEW
SECTION A-ANALYST’S ASSESSMENT
l. Facts and Circumstances:
a. Evidence of record shows that on 25 June 1991, the unit commander
notified the applicant of initiation of separation action under the
provisions of Chapter l4, AR 635-200, by reason of misconduct-commission of
a serious offense, with a general, under honorable conditions discharge.
The specific reasons for the action included willfully disobeying a lawful
order from a CW4 and for being incapacitated for the proper performance of
her duties as a result of wrongful overindulgence in intoxicating liquor or
drugs. She was advised of her rights. The applicant consulted with legal
counsel, was advised of the impact of the discharge action, and on 2 July
1991, she submitted a statement in her own behalf. The unit commander
subsequently recommended separation from the service and waiver of further
rehabilitative efforts. The proper legal authority reviewed the proposed
discharge action with no legal objections. On 7 August 1991, the
separation authority waived further rehabilitative efforts and directed
that the applicant be discharged with a characterization of service of
general, under honorable conditions.
b. On 22 August 1991, the applicant was discharged. At the time of
discharge, the applicant had completed 3 years, 3 months, and 20 days of
active military service in the period under review.
2. Legal/Regulatory Basis for Separation Action: Army Regulation 635-200
sets forth the basic authority for the separation of enlisted personnel.
Chapter l4 establishes policy and prescribes procedures for separating
members for misconduct. Specific categories include minor disciplinary
infractions, a pattern of misconduct, commission of a serious offense, to
include abuse of illegal drugs, convictions by civil authorities and
desertion or absence without leave. Action will be taken to separate a
member for misconduct when it is clearly established that rehabilitation is
impractical or unlikely to succeed. Army policy states that an under other
than honorable conditions discharge is normally considered appropriate, but
a general discharge under honorable conditions or an honorable discharge
may be granted.
SECTION B-APPLICANT’S SUBMISSIONS
1. Issue(s) of propriety and/or equity submitted by applicant or counsel.
As stated on applicant’s DD Form 293.
2. Exhibit(s) submitted:
A-1: DD Form 293, dated 031120, with five (5) enclosures.
A-2: Counsel Issues: NONE
B-l: Other Documents: NONE
PART IV - PREHEARING REVIEW (CONTINUED)
SECTION C - Medical and/or Legal Advisory Opinion
Referred to ( ) Medical Advisor ( ) Legal Advisor
a. Medical prehearing comments (if applicable):
b. Legal prehearing comments (if applicable):
PART V - SUMMARY OF HEARING
SECTION A-Attendees and exhibits
1. Review/hearing information:
a. Type requested:
( ) Records review ( X ) Hearing
b. Type Held:
( )Records review ( X ) Hearing
( ) Tender Offer
c. Review/hearing location and date: Tampa, FL on 17 May 2004.
d. Appearance by:
Applicant ( X ) Yes ( ) No
Counsel ( X ) Yes ( ) No
e. Applicant testified: ( X ) Yes ( ) No
f. Counsel presentation: ( X ) Yes ( ) No
g. Witness(es) testified: ( ) Yes ( X ) No
2. Exhibit(s) submitted at hearing: 4 documents; two new issues.
PART VI - ISSUES AND FINDINGS
1. a. Applicant's issue(s) of propriety and/or equity:
( X ) Same as those listed on DD Form 293 and Part IV, Section A
of this case report and directive.
( ) Revised issue(s) furnished in writing by applicant as
follows:
( X ) Additional issue(s) identified during review/hearing as
follows:
Board Issue: (6) The discharge is inequitable.
b. Request: ( X ) Recharacterization ( ) Change of Reason
2. Finding(s), conclusion(s), and reason(s) for the Board's decision(s) on
issues of propriety and/or equity:
a. Propriety: The applicant has not submitted an issue of
propriety and the ADRB has not otherwise relied upon an
issue of propriety to change the discharge.
b. Equity: The parenthetical number(s) below correspond(s) to
the issue number(s) on the DD Form 293, or in Part VI,
Paragraph 1, above.
(6) The issue is accepted. The Board carefully examined the
applicant’s record of service during the period of enlistment under review
and heard her testimony. There was a full consideration of all faithful
and honorable service as well as the infractions of discipline, the extent
thereof, and the seriousness of the offenses. Although the Board does not
condone the applicant’s misconduct, the Board determined that the minor
nature of her misconduct did not warrant the granting of a general, under
honorable conditions discharge. The Board also noted that the length and
quality of the applicant’s mitigated the discrediting entries in her
service record. Finally, the applicant has provided evidence of favorable
post-service conduct and the Board found that the discharge is now
inequitable. Accordingly, the Board voted to grant partial relief in the
form of an upgrade of characterization of service to fully honorable and to
change the reason for discharge to Secretarial Authority.
(1-5) The issues are rejected. The Board determined that the
applicant was appropriately assigned an RE code of 3 and voted not to
change it. If the applicant desires to reenlist, she should contact the
local recruiter to determine her eligibility to reenlist. Those
individuals can best advise a former service member as to the needs of the
Army at the time, and are required to process waivers of RE codes. This
Board is not empowered to reinstate benefits administered by the Department
of Veterans Affairs (DVA). The DVA administers veteran’s benefits in
accordance with its own policies and regulations. The applicant must
address questions concerning her entitlement to educational benefits to the
DVA.
3. Response(s) to item(s) not addressed as decisional issue(s): NONE
PART VII - BOARD ACTION
SECTION A - Conclusions/Decisions/Vote
1. Board conclusion(s):
The discharge was:
( X ) Proper.
( ) Improper as to characterization. Change characterization to
.
( ) Improper as to reason. Change reason to
under .
( ) Equitable.
( X ) Inequitable as to characterization. Change characterization to
Honorable.
( X ) Inequitable as to reason. Change reason to Secretarial
Authority
under Chapter 5, AR 635-200.
( ) Both proper and equitable, but characterization/reason for
separation cited was an administrative/clerical error and should
be changed to under
.
2. Voting record: Change No Change
Reason 3 2
Characterization 5 0
The names and votes of the members of the Board are recorded in
Part IX of this document and can be obtained by writing to the address
below. The request must contain the CASE NO. located in the upper right
corner of this document.
Department of the Army Review Boards Agency
ATTN: Promulgation Team
1941 Jefferson Davis Highway, 2nd Floor
Arlington, VA 22202-4508
3. Minority views: NONE
PART VII - BOARD ACTION
SECTION B - Verification and Authentication
Case report reviewed and verified
Ms. McKim-Spilker
Case Reviewing Official
PART VIII - DIRECTIVE/CERTIFICATION
SECTION A - DIRECTIVE
TO: ARBA Support Division-St Louis Date: 28 May 2004
The Army Discharge Review Board, established under the provisions of
Section 30, Public Law 346, 78th Congress, 22 June 1944 and codified as
Title 10, United States Code, Section 1553, in the case of the applicant
named in Part I directs that the ARBA Support Division-St Louis issue a new
DD Form 2l4 to the applicant which reflects the following directed
change(s):
( X ) Change characterization of discharge to Honorable.
( X ) Change reason and authority for discharge to
Secretarial Authority, AR 635-200.
( X ) Other (see remarks below).
Remarks: This action does not entail a change in RE code.
SECTION B - CERTIFICATION
Approval Authority:
ROBERT L. HOUSE
Colonel, U.S. Army
President, Army Discharge
Review Board
Official:
MARY E. SHAW
Lieutenant Colonel, U.S. Army
Chief, Secretary Recorder
EXHIBITS:
A - Application for review of discharge C - Other
B - Material submitted by applicant
INDEX RECORD:
AR Number: 2004100694 INDEX NUMBERS: A9236
Date of Review: 040517 A9222
Character of Service: GD A9456
Date of Discharge: 910822 A1200
Authority: AR 635-200 C14 A0100
Reason: A6730
Results of Board Action/
Vote/Affirmation: HD 5-0 A
PART IX - VOTING RECORD
Name Reason Characterization
CHANGE NC HON UHC NC
UNCHAR
1. Mbr X X
2. Mbr X X
3. Mbr X X
4. Mbr X X
5. PO X X
ARMY | DRB | CY2002 | 2002067863
Evidence of record shows that the unit commander notified the applicant of initiation of separation action under the provisions of Chapter l4, AR 635-200, by reason of misconduct-pattern of misconduct, with a general, under honorable conditions discharge. The applicant consulted with legal counsel, was advised of the impact of the discharge action, requested a hearing by a board of officers, and did not submit a statement in his own behalf. On 5 May 1992, the applicant was discharged.
ARMY | DRB | CY2002 | 2002068691
Period entered for: 3 Years (1 month-ext.) It also noted that the characterization of service for this type of discharge is normally under other than honorable conditions and that the applicant was aware of that prior to requesting discharge. The Board, being convinced that the reason for discharge and the characterization of service were both proper and equitable, voted to deny relief.
ARMY | DRB | CY2004 | AR2004105604
Issue(s) of propriety and/or equity submitted by applicant or counsel. Notwithstanding the propriety of the applicant’s discharge, the Board noted that because the applicant was in an entry-level status, the approving authority had two options as to characterization of service. SECTION B - CERTIFICATION Approval Authority: ROBERT L. HOUSE Colonel, U.S. Army President, Army Discharge Review Board Official: MARY E. SHAW Lieutenant Colonel, U.S. Army Chief, Secretary Recorder EXHIBITS: A -...
ARMY | DRB | CY1997 | 199701604
920211: Applicant was discharged.2. The Board, being convinced that the reason for discharge and the characterization of service were both proper and equitable, voted to deny relief.3. CASE NO: AD97-01604 PART VII - BOARD ACTIONSECTION B - Verification and Authentication Case report reviewed and verified COL SHATZER Post Hearing Reviewer PART VIII - DIRECTIVE/CERTIFICATIONSECTION A - DIRECTIVE (X) NONE SECTION B - CERTIFICATION WILLIAM E. MATHEWS Colonel, U.S. Army President, Army...
ARMY | DRB | CY2002 | 2002077942
On 14 February 1991, the separation authority waived further rehabilitative efforts and directed that the applicant be discharged with a characterization of service of general, under honorable conditions. Applicant's issue(s) of propriety and/or equity: ( X ) Same as those listed on DD Form 293 and Part IV, Section A of this case report and directive. Minority views: NONE PART VII - BOARD ACTION SECTION B - Verification and Authentication Case report reviewed and verified MR. RON...
ARMY | DRB | CY2000 | 2000044853
On 8 August 1990, the applicant was discharged. PART VII - BOARD ACTIONSECTION B - Verification and Authentication Case report reviewed and verified Ms. McKim-Spilker Case Reviewing Official PART VIII - DIRECTIVE/CERTIFICATIONSECTION A - DIRECTIVE NONE SECTION B - CERTIFICATION Approval Authority:WILSON A. SHATZER Colonel, U.S. Army President, Army Discharge Review Board EXHIBITS: A - Application for review of discharge C - Other B - Material submitted by applicant
ARMY | DRB | CY2000 | 2000041042
On 9 February 1987, the applicant returned her completed pregnancy counseling checklist and elected separation by reason of pregnancy under the provisions of Chapter 8, AR 635-200. The Board, being convinced that the reason for discharge was both proper and equitable voted not to change it.3. AR Number: 2000041042 INDEX NUMBERS: A9217 Date of Review: 000814 A0113 Character of Service: HD A0100 Date of Discharge: 870404 Authority: AR 635-200 C8 Reason: A2200 Results of Board...
ARMY | DRB | CY2003 | 2003085357
PART VII - BOARD ACTIONSECTION B - Verification and Authentication Case report reviewed and verified Ms. McKim-Spilker Case Reviewing Official PART VIII - DIRECTIVE/CERTIFICATIONSECTION A - DIRECTIVE NONE SECTION B - CERTIFICATION Approval Authority:SPURGEON A. MOORE Colonel, U.S. Army President, Army Discharge Review Board EXHIBITS: A - Application for review of discharge C - Other B - Material submitted by applicant AR Number: 2003085357 INDEX NUMBERS: A6201 Date of Review: 030410...
ARMY | DRB | CY2003 | 2003091621
Remarks: NONE SECTION B - Prior Service Data NONEOther discharge(s): ServiceFromToType Discharge PART IV - PREHEARING REVIEWSECTION A-ANALYST’S ASSESSMENT l. Facts and Circumstances:The evidence of record shows that on 15 February 2000, the unit commander notified the applicant of initiation of separation action under the provisions of Chapter l3, AR 635-200, by reason of unsatisfactory performance, with a general, under honorable conditions discharge. PART VII - BOARD ACTIONSECTION B -...
ARMY | DRB | CY2003 | 2003090541
On 2 February 2001, the separation authority waived further rehabilitative efforts and directed that the applicant be discharged with a characterization of service of general, under honorable conditions. PART VII - BOARD ACTIONSECTION B - Verification and Authentication Case report reviewed and verified MR. RIVERA Case Reviewing Official PART VIII - DIRECTIVE/CERTIFICATIONSECTION A - DIRECTIVE NONE SECTION B - CERTIFICATION Approval Authority:SPURGEON A. MOORE Colonel, U.S. Army President,...