PART II - APPLICATION DATA
(Note: Part I deleted under the Privacy Act on Reading Room copy)
1. Character of Discharge: Uncharacterized
2. Date of discharge (or REFRAD): 900427
3. Authority for separation:
a. Regulation: Chapter 5, Paragraph 5-11, AR 635-200
b. Reason: Did Not Meet Procurement Medical Fitness Standards - No
Disability
4. Prior review(s): NONE
PART III - SERVICE HISTORY
SECTION A - Period of Service Under Review
1. Service data: 2. Awards and
decorations:
NONE
a. Period entered for: NIF
b. Entry date: 891113
c. Age: 19 Years DOB: 700304
d. Educational level: HS Grad
e. Aptitude area score:
GT: NIF 3. Highest grade
achieved:
f. Length of Service: E3
0 Years 5 Months 15 Days
4. Performance evaluations:
NONE
PART III - SERVICE HISTORY
SECTION A - Period of Service Under Review - Continued
5. Periods of unauthorized absence: NONE
Status Inclusive dates
AWOL
Mil conf
Civil conf
Other
6. Nonjudicial punishment: NONE
Date Offense(s)
7. Court-Martial data: NONE
a. SCM:
Date Offense(s)
b. SPCM:
Date Offense(s)
c. GCM:
Date Offense(s)
8. Remarks: NONE
SECTION B - Prior Service Data
NONE
Other discharge(s):
Service From To Type Discharge
PART IV - PREHEARING REVIEW
SECTION A-ANALYST’S ASSESSMENT
l. Facts and Circumstances:
a. The specific facts and circumstances pertaining to the
applicant’s discharge are not contained in the available records. The
record contains a properly constituted DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release
or Discharge from Active Duty), which was authenticated by the applicant’s
signature. His DD Form 214 indicates that he was discharged under the
provisions of Chapter 5, paragraph 5-11, AR 635-200 by reason of did not
meet procurement medical fitness standards – no disability, with service
uncharacterized.
b. On 27 April 1990, the applicant was released from initial active
duty for training and transferred to his Texas ARNG unit at Fort Worth,
Texas. At the time of release, the applicant had completed 5 months and 15
days of active military service in the period under review.
2. Legal/Regulatory Basis for Separation Action: Army Regulation 635-200
provides the basic authority for the separation of enlisted personnel.
Paragraph 5-11 specifically provides that soldiers who were not medically
qualified under procurement medical fitness standards, when accepted for
enlistment, or who became medically disqualified under these standards
prior to entry on active duty or active duty training or initial entry
training will be separated. A medical proceeding, regardless of the date
completed, must establish that a medical condition was identified by
appropriate medical authority within six months of the soldier’s initial
entrance on active duty, that the condition would have permanently or
temporarily disqualified the soldier for entry into the military service
had it been detected at that time, and the medical condition does not
disqualify the soldier from retention in the service under the provisions
of Army Regulation 40-501, chapter 3. The characterization of service for
soldiers separated under this provision of regulation will normally be
honorable, but will be uncharacterized if the soldier is in an entry-level
status. Army regulation states that a soldier is in an entry-level status
if the soldier has not completed more than 180 days of creditable
continuous active duty prior to the initiation of separation action.
SECTION B-APPLICANT’S SUBMISSIONS
1. Issue(s) of propriety and/or equity submitted by applicant or counsel.
As stated on applicant’s DD Form 293.
2. Exhibit(s) submitted:
A-1: DD Form 293, dated 040624, with twenty (20) enclosures.
A-2: Counsel Issues: NONE
B-l: Other Documents: NONE
PART IV - PREHEARING REVIEW (CONTINUED)
SECTION C - Medical and/or Legal Advisory Opinion
Referred to ( ) Medical Advisor ( ) Legal Advisor
a. Medical prehearing comments (if applicable):
b. Legal prehearing comments (if applicable):
PART V - SUMMARY OF HEARING
SECTION A-Attendees and exhibits
1. Review/hearing information:
a. Type requested:
( X ) Records review ( ) Hearing
b. Type Held:
( X )Records review ( ) Hearing
( ) Tender Offer
c. Review/hearing location and date: Washington, DC on 9 February
2005.
d. Appearance by:
Applicant ( ) Yes ( X ) No
Counsel ( ) Yes ( X ) No
e. Applicant testified: ( ) Yes ( X ) No
f. Counsel presentation: ( ) Yes ( X ) No
g. Witness(es) testified: ( ) Yes ( X ) No
2. Exhibit(s) submitted at hearing:
PART VI - ISSUES AND FINDINGS
1. a. Applicant's issue(s) of propriety and/or equity:
( X ) Same as those listed on DD Form 293 and Part IV, Section A
of this case report and directive.
( ) Revised issue(s) furnished in writing by applicant as
follows:
( ) Additional issue(s) identified during review/hearing as
follows:
b. Request: ( X ) Recharacterization ( X ) Change of Reason
2. Finding(s), conclusion(s), and reason(s) for the Board's decision(s) on
issues of propriety and/or equity:
a. Propriety: The parenthetical number(s) below correspond(s) to
the issue number(s) on the DD Form 293, or in Part VI,
Paragraph 1, above.
(1) The issue is rejected. The applicant’s record is void of the
specific facts and circumstances concerning the events that led to a
discharge from the Army. The Board noted the applicant’s contention;
however, the applicant has provided no independent corroborating evidence
in support of his contention. The applicant’s record contains a properly
constituted DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active
Duty), which was authenticated by the applicant’s signature. This document
identifies the narrative reason for separation and characterization of
service granted at his relief from initial active duty for training (IADT)
and the Board presumed Government regularity in the separation process.
The applicant’s DD Form 214 shows that the applicant was relieved from IADT
under the provisions of Chapter 5, Paragraph 5-11, AR 635-200, for failure
to meet procurement medical fitness standards with service uncharacterized.
In connection with such a separation, the proceedings of an Enlistment
Physical Standards Board (EPSBD) would have revealed that the applicant had
a medical condition that was disqualifying for enlistment and that it
existed prior to entry on active duty. Subsequently, competent medical
authority would have had to approve the findings of the EPSBD. The
applicant would have had to agree with the findings and the proposed action
for administrative separation from the Army. A soldier is in entry-level
status (ELS) for the first 180 days of continuous active duty. The purpose
of the entry-level status is to provide the soldier a probationary period.
Army Regulation 635-200 also provides, except in cases of serious
misconduct, that a soldier’s service will be uncharacterized when his
separation is initiated while the soldier is in entry level status.
Further, for soldiers in entry-level status, a general discharge is not
authorized. A fully honorable discharge may be granted only in cases which
are clearly warranted by unusual circumstances involving outstanding
personal conduct and/or performance of duty. The Board determined that no
such unusual circumstances were present in the applicant’s record and his
service did not warrant an honorable discharge. The Board was satisfied
that all requirements of law and regulation were met and that the rights of
the applicant were fully protected through the separation process. The
Board, being convinced that the reason for the discharge and the
characterization of service were both proper and equitable, voted to deny
relief.
b. Equity: The applicant has not submitted an issue of equity
and the ADRB has not otherwise relied upon an issue of
equity to change the discharge. The major factors upon
which the discharge was based are set forth in Parts III
and IV of this decisional document.
3. Response(s) to item(s) not addressed as decisional issue(s): NONE
PART VII - BOARD ACTION
SECTION A - Conclusions/Decisions/Vote
1. Board conclusion(s):
The discharge was:
( X ) Proper.
( ) Improper as to characterization. Change characterization to
.
( ) Improper as to reason. Change reason to
under .
( X ) Equitable.
( ) Inequitable as to characterization. Change characterization to
.
( ) Inequitable as to reason. Change reason to
under .
( ) Both proper and equitable, but characterization/reason for
separation cited was an administrative/clerical error and should
be changed to under
.
2. Voting record: Change No Change
Reason 0 5
Characterization 0 5
The names and votes of the members of the Board are recorded in
Part IX of this document and can be obtained by writing to the address
below. The request must contain the CASE NO. located in the upper right
corner of this document.
Department of the Army Review Boards Agency
ATTN: Promulgation Team
1901 South Bell Street, 2nd Floor
Arlington, VA 22202-4508
3. Minority views: NONE
PART VII - BOARD ACTION
SECTION B - Verification and Authentication
Case report reviewed and verified
MR. RIVERA
Case Reviewing Official
PART VIII - DIRECTIVE/CERTIFICATION
SECTION A - DIRECTIVE
NONE
SECTION B - CERTIFICATION
Approval Authority:
ROBERT L. HOUSE
Colonel, U.S. Army
President, Army Discharge
Review Board
Official:
MARY E. SHAW
Lieutenant Colonel, U.S. Army
Chief, Secretary Recorder
EXHIBITS:
A - Application for review of discharge C - Other
B - Material submitted by applicant
INDEX RECORD:
AR Number: 20040003335 INDEX NUMBERS: A0143
Date of Review: 050209 A0113
Character of Service: EL A9500
Date of Discharge: 900427
Authority: AR 635-200 C5
Reason: A2800
Results of Board Action/
Vote/Affirmation: NC 5-0 A
PART IX - VOTING RECORD
Name Reason Characterization
CHANGE NC HON UHC NC
UNCHAR
1. Mbr X X
2. Mbr X X
3. Mbr X X
4. Mbr X X
5. PO X X
ARMY | DRB | CY2001 | 2001058818
On 8 may 2001, the applicant was discharged. PART VII - BOARD ACTIONSECTION B - Verification and Authentication Case report reviewed and verified MR. RIVERA Case Reviewing Official PART VIII - DIRECTIVE/CERTIFICATIONSECTION A - DIRECTIVE NONE SECTION B - CERTIFICATION Approval Authority:GERARD W. SCHWARTZ Colonel, U.S. Army President, Army Discharge Review Board EXHIBITS: A - Application for review of discharge C - Other B - Material submitted by applicant
ARMY | DRB | CY1999 | AR1999023699
A-2: Counsel Issues: NONE B-l: Other Documents: NONE PART IV - PREHEARING REVIEW (CONTINUED) The Board being convinced that the reason for discharge and the characterization of service were both proper and equitable, voted to deny relief.3. PART VII - BOARD ACTIONSECTION B - Verification and Authentication Case report reviewed and verified MR. ADRIANCE Case Reviewing Official PART VIII - DIRECTIVE/CERTIFICATIONSECTION A - DIRECTIVE NONE SECTION B - CERTIFICATION Approval Authority:THOMAS...
ARMY | DRB | CY1999 | 1999016555
Prior review(s): NONE PART III - SERVICE HISTORY SECTION A - Period of Service Under Review 1. A-2: Counsel Issues: NONE B-l: Other Documents: NONE C-1: DD Form 149, dated 980718. AR Number: 1999016555 INDEX NUMBERS: A0102 Date of Review: 990427 A9218 Character of Service: EL A0113 Date of Discharge: 980626 Authority: AR 635-200 C5 Reason: A0400 Results of Board Action/ Vote/Affirmation: HD 5-0 A PART IX - VOTING RECORDName Reason Characterization CHANGENCHONUHCNCUNCHAR 1.
ARMY | DRB | CY2001 | 2001060708
On 26 October 1999, the applicant was discharged. PART VII - BOARD ACTIONSECTION B - Verification and Authentication Case report reviewed and verified MR. RIVERA Case Reviewing Official PART VIII - DIRECTIVE/CERTIFICATIONSECTION A - DIRECTIVE NONE SECTION B - CERTIFICATION Approval Authority:GERARD W. SCHWARTZ Colonel, U.S. Army President, Army Discharge Review Board EXHIBITS: A - Application for review of discharge C - Other B - Material submitted by applicant
ARMY | DRB | CY1999 | AR1999029380
On 8 May 1997, the applicant consulted with legal counsel, was advised of the impact of the discharge action, concurred with these proceedings and requested to be discharged from the US Army without delay and did not submit a statement on his behalf. The Board, being convinced that the characterization of service and the reason for discharge were both proper and equitable, voted to deny relief.3. PART VII - BOARD ACTIONSECTION B - Verification and Authentication Case report reviewed and...
ARMY | DRB | CY2004 | AR20040002276
The characterization of service for soldiers separated under this provision of regulation will normally be honorable, but will be uncharacterized if the soldier is in an entry-level status. This document identifies the reason and characterization of the discharge and the Board presumed Government regularity in the discharge process. Minority views: NONE PART VII - BOARD ACTION SECTION B - Verification and Authentication Case report reviewed and verified MR. RIVERA Case Reviewing...
ARMY | DRB | CY1999 | 1999029775
A-2: Counsel Issues: NONE B-l: Other Documents: NONE C-1: DD Form 149, dated 990328. The Board, being convinced that the characterization of service, and the reason for discharge were proper and equitable, voted to deny relief.3. PART VII - BOARD ACTIONSECTION B - Verification and Authentication Case report reviewed and verified MR. ADRIANCE Case Reviewing Official PART VIII - DIRECTIVE/CERTIFICATIONSECTION A - DIRECTIVE NONE SECTION B - CERTIFICATION Approval Authority:THOMAS J....
ARMY | DRB | CY2004 | AR20040002583
The characterization of service for soldiers separated under this provision of regulation will normally be honorable, but will be uncharacterized if the soldier is in an entry-level status. This document identifies the reason and characterization of the discharge and the Board presumed Government regularity in the discharge process. Minority views: NONE PART VII - BOARD ACTION SECTION B - Verification and Authentication Case report reviewed and verified MR. RIVERA Case Reviewing...
ARMY | DRB | CY2000 | 2000035103
Although the applicant’s record does not contain all the facts and circumstances concerning the events that led to his discharge from the Army, the Board noted that the applicant’s record does contain a properly constituted DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty) which was authenticated by the applicant’s signature. The Board being convinced that the reason for discharge and the characterization of service were both proper and equitable, voted to deny relief.3. ...
ARMY | DRB | CY2003 | 2003090463
PART VII - BOARD ACTIONSECTION B - Verification and Authentication Case report reviewed and verified Ms. McKim-Spilker Case Reviewing Official PART VIII - DIRECTIVE/CERTIFICATIONSECTION A - DIRECTIVE NONE SECTION B - CERTIFICATION Approval Authority:SPURGEON A. MOORE Colonel, U.S. Army President, Army Discharge Review Board EXHIBITS: A - Application for review of discharge C - Other B - Material submitted by applicant AR Number: 2003090463 INDEX NUMBERS: A0143 Date of Review: 031210...