PART II - APPLICATION DATA

      (Note: Part I deleted under the Privacy Act on Reading Room copy)

1.  Character of Discharge:  Honorable

2.  Date of discharge (or REFRAD):  020826

3.  Authority for separation:

      a.  Regulation:  Chapter 5, Paragraph 5-8, AR 635-200

      b.  Reason:  Parenthood

4.  Prior review(s):  NONE



                         PART III - SERVICE HISTORY

                 SECTION A - Period of Service Under Review

1.    Service data:                              2.  Awards and
    decorations:
                                           ARCOM
    a.  Period entered for:  3 Years               AAM
    b.  Entry date:  020605                        GCMDL
    c.  Age:  27 Years   DOB:  750414              NDSM


    d.  Educational level:  HS Grad                ASR


    e.  Aptitude area score:                       OSR
          GT:  95                                3.  Highest grade
achieved:
    f.  Length of Service:                         E4
          0 Year(s)  2 Month(s)  22 Day(s)


                                               4.  Performance evaluations:

                                                   NONE

                         PART III - SERVICE HISTORY
           SECTION A - Period of Service Under Review - Continued

5.  Periods of unauthorized absence:  NONE

    Status       Inclusive dates
      AWOL

      Mil conf

      Civil conf

      Other


6.  Nonjudicial punishment:  NONE

      Date  Offense(s)



7.  Court-Martial data:  NONE

      a.  SCM:
            Date   Offense(s)


      b.  SPCM:
            Date   Offense(s)


      c.  GCM:
            Date   Offense(s)


8.    Remarks:  NONE


                       SECTION B - Prior Service Data


Other discharge(s):

      Service    From  To    Type Discharge
      RA    970930    010203 Honorable
      USAR       010203    020604       Honorable



                         PART IV - PREHEARING REVIEW

                       SECTION A-ANALYST’S ASSESSMENT
l.  Facts and Circumstances:

      a.  Evidence of record shows that on 20 August 2002, DA, HQ, 101st
Airborne Division (Air Assault) and Fort Campbell, Fort Campbell, KY,
Orders 232-0017 released the applicant from active duty and transferred her
to the Individual Ready Reserve, effective 26 August 2002.  The record
contains a properly constituted DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or
Discharge from Active Duty) which was authenticated by the applicant.  Her
DD Form 214 indicates that she was discharged under the provisions of
Chapter 5-8, AR 635-200 by reason of parenthood, with a characterization of
service of honorable.  The specific facts and circumstances pertaining to
the applicant’s discharge are not contained in the available records.

      b.  On 26 August 2002, the applicant was discharged.  At the time of
discharge, the applicant had completed 2 months and 22 days of active
military service in the period under review and had a total of 4 years, 10
months and
26 days of total military service.

      c.  The evidence of record shows that the applicant had a prior
period of active duty from 30 September 1997 – 3 February 2001.  On 3
February 2002, she was released from active duty and transferred to the
Individual Ready Reserve with an honorable discharge.  On 30 March 2002,
she requested enlistment into the Regular Army.  On 15 May 2002, the
applicants RE code waiver request for pregnancy and asthma were approved.
On 5 June 2002, she enlisted in the Regular Army, and was released from
active duty after 2 months and 22 days service due to parenthood (current
enlistment being reviewed.)

2.  Legal/Regulatory Basis for Separation Action:  Army Regulation 635-200
provides the basic authority for the separation of enlisted personnel.
Paragraph 5-8 provides that a soldier may be separated when parental
obligations interfere with fulfillment of military responsibilities.
Specific reasons for separation because of parenthood include inability to
perform prescribed duties satisfactorily, repeated absenteeism, late for
work, inability to participate in field training exercises or perform
special duties such as CQ and Staff Duty NCO, and nonavailability for
worldwide assignment or deployment according to the needs of the Army.
Unless reason for separation requires a specific characterization, a
soldier being separated for the convenience of the government will be
awarded a character of service of honorable, under honorable conditions or
an uncharacterized description of service if in entry-level status.



                      SECTION B-APPLICANT’S SUBMISSIONS


1.  Issue(s) of propriety and/or equity submitted by applicant or counsel.
    As stated on applicant’s DD Form 293.

2.  Exhibit(s) submitted:

      A-1:  DD Form 293, dated 040504, with one (1) enclosure(s).
      A-2:  Counsel Issues:  NONE
      B-l:  Other Documents: NONE


                   PART IV - PREHEARING REVIEW (CONTINUED)

              SECTION C - Medical and/or Legal Advisory Opinion


Referred to ( ) Medical Advisor      ( ) Legal Advisor



      a.  Medical prehearing comments (if applicable):


      b.  Legal prehearing comments (if applicable):











                         PART V - SUMMARY OF HEARING


                      SECTION A-Attendees and exhibits


1.  Review/hearing information:


      a. Type requested:
         ( X ) Records review             (   ) Hearing

      b. Type Held:
         ( X )Records review              (   ) Hearing
                                          (   ) Tender Offer

      c. Review/hearing location and date:  Washington, D.C. on 5 January
2005.

      d. Appearance by:
         Applicant                 (   ) Yes   ( X ) No
         Counsel                   (   ) Yes   ( X ) No

      e.  Applicant testified:     (   ) Yes   ( X ) No

      f.  Counsel presentation:    (   ) Yes   ( X ) No

      g.  Witness(es) testified:   (   ) Yes   ( X ) No

2.  Exhibit(s) submitted at hearing:
                        PART VI - ISSUES AND FINDINGS

1.  a.  Applicant's issue(s) of propriety and/or equity:

          ( X )  Same as those listed on DD Form 293 and Part IV, Section A
              of this case report and directive.
          (   )  Revised issue(s) furnished in writing by applicant as
              follows:
          (   )  Additional issue(s) identified during review/hearing as
              follows:

      b.  Request:  ( X ) Recharacterization     (   ) Change of Reason

2.  Finding(s), conclusion(s), and reason(s) for the Board's decision(s) on
issues of propriety and/or equity:

      a.  Propriety:   The parenthetical number(s) below correspond(s) to
                   the issue number(s) on the DD Form 293, or in Part VI,
                   Paragraph 1, above.

        (1)  The issue is rejected.  The applicant’s record is void of
facts and circumstances concerning events that led to a discharge from the
Army.  The Board noted that the applicant’s record contains a properly
constituted DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active
Duty) which was authenticated by the applicant.  This document identifies
the reason and characterization of the discharge and the Board presumed
government regularity in the discharge process.  Individuals are assigned
RE codes based on their service records or the reason for separation.  The
applicant was appropriately assigned an RE code of 3 because she was
separated under the provisions of AR 635-200, Chapter 5-8, by reason of
parenthood.  An RE Code of 3 indicates that the applicant requires a waiver
prior to being allowed to reenlist.  This Board is not empowered to change
RE codes.  If the applicant desires to reenlist, she should contact a local
recruiter to determine her eligibility to reenlist.  Those individuals can
best advise a former service member as to the needs of the military
services at the time, and are required to process waivers of RE codes.  The
Board, being convinced that the reason for discharge and the
characterization of service were both proper and equitable, voted to deny
relief.

      b.  Equity:      The applicant has not submitted an issue of equity
                   and the ADRB has not otherwise relied upon an issue of
                   equity to change the discharge.  The major factors upon
                   which the discharge was based are set forth in Parts III
                   and IV of this decisional document.

3.  Response(s) to item(s) not addressed as decisional issue(s):  NONE

                           PART VII - BOARD ACTION
                   SECTION A - Conclusions/Decisions/Vote

1.    Board conclusion(s):

      The discharge was:

      ( X ) Proper.
      (   ) Improper as to characterization.  Change characterization to
                                               .
      (   ) Improper as to reason.  Change reason to
                                   under                      .

      ( X ) Equitable.
      (   ) Inequitable as to characterization.  Change characterization to
                                         .
      (   ) Inequitable as to reason.  Change reason to
                                 
            under                                 .
      (   ) Both proper and equitable, but characterization/reason for
           separation cited was an administrative/clerical error and should
           be changed to                      under
                                   .

2.  Voting record:      Change   No Change
                  Reason       0         5
    Characterization       0         5

        The names and votes of the members of the Board are recorded in
Part IX of this document and can be obtained by writing to the address
below.  The request must contain the CASE NO. located in the upper right
corner of this document.

                  Department of the Army Review Boards Agency
                  ATTN:  Promulgation Team
                  1901 South Bell Street, 2nd Floor
                  Arlington, VA  22202-4508



3.  Minority views:  NONE
                           PART VII - BOARD ACTION
                 SECTION B - Verification and Authentication

Case report reviewed and verified

                          
Ms. McKim-Spilker
Case Reviewing Official

                     PART VIII - DIRECTIVE/CERTIFICATION
                            SECTION A - DIRECTIVE

                                    NONE

                          SECTION B - CERTIFICATION

Approval Authority:


ROBERT L. HOUSE
Colonel, U.S. Army
President, Army Discharge
   Review Board

Official:




MARY E. SHAW
Lieutenant Colonel, U.S. Army
Chief, Secretary Recorder

EXHIBITS:
A - Application for review of discharge                  C - Other
B - Material submitted by applicant

INDEX RECORD:

AR Number:  20040000874                   INDEX NUMBERS:  A0143
Date of Review:  050105                                   A9217
Character of Service:  HD
Date of Discharge:  020826
Authority:  AR 635-200 C5
Reason:  A1500
Results of Board Action/
Vote/Affirmation:  NC 5-0 A













                           PART IX - VOTING RECORD

    Name                                   Reason          Characterization
                                           CHANGE   NC     HON  UHC   NC
UNCHAR

    1. LTC PROCTOR, ESMERALDA G.  Mbr          X                 X       

    2.      Mbr          X                 X       

    3.      Mbr          X                 X       

    4.      Mbr          X                 X       

    5.      PO           X                 X