PART II - APPLICATION DATA

      (Note: Part I deleted under the Privacy Act on Reading Room copy)

1.  Character of Discharge:  Honorable

2.  Date of discharge (or REFRAD):  920909

3.  Authority for separation:

      a.  Regulation:  Chapter 13, AR 635-200

      b.  Reason:  Unsatisfactory Performance

4.  Prior review(s):  NONE



                         PART III - SERVICE HISTORY

                 SECTION A - Period of Service Under Review

1.    Service data:                              2.  Awards and
    decorations:
                                           NONE
    a.  Period entered for:  6 Years
    b.  Entry date:  911019
    c.  Age:  19 Years   DOB:  711130


    d.  Educational level:  HS Grad


    e.  Aptitude area score:
          GT:  126                               3.  Highest grade
achieved:
    f.  Length of Service:                         E3
          0 Year(s)  10 Month(s)  20 Day(s)


                                               4.  Performance evaluations:

                                                   NONE

                         PART III - SERVICE HISTORY
           SECTION A - Period of Service Under Review - Continued

5.  Periods of unauthorized absence:  NONE

    Status       Inclusive dates
      AWOL

      Mil conf

      Civil conf

      Other


6.  Nonjudicial punishment:

      Date  Offense(s)
      920309     Failed to repair – not in file;


7.  Court-Martial data:  NONE

      a.  SCM:
            Date   Offense(s)


      b.  SPCM:
            Date   Offense(s)


      c.  GCM:
            Date   Offense(s)


8.    Remarks:  Vacation of suspension on 920310 – violating restriction.


                       SECTION B - Prior Service Data


Other discharge(s):

      Service    From  To    Type Discharge
      ARNGUS     881222      900605     NA
      ADT   900607     900817     Uncharacterized
      ARNGUS     900817      911016     NA
           (Concurrent service)



                         PART IV - PREHEARING REVIEW

                       SECTION A-ANALYST’S ASSESSMENT
l.  Facts and Circumstances:

      a.  Evidence of record shows that on 20 July 1992, the unit commander
notified the applicant of initiation of separation action under the
provisions of Chapter l3, AR 635-200, by reason of unsatisfactory
performance, with an honorable discharge.  He was advised of his rights.
The applicant consulted with legal counsel, was advised of the impact of
the discharge action, and submitted a statement in his own behalf.  The
unit commander subsequently recommended separation from the service and
waiver of further rehabilitative efforts.  On 3 September 1992, the
separation authority waived further rehabilitative efforts and directed
that the applicant be discharged with a characterization of service of
honorable.

      b.  On 9 September 1992, the applicant was discharged.  At the time
of discharge, the applicant had completed 10 months and 20 days of active
military service in the period under review and had a total of 3 years, 8
months and
17 days of active military service.

      c.  The official record shows that the applicant accepted nonjudicial
punishment for failing to repair in March 1992.  In addition, the applicant
has an extensive counseling history, to include:  failing to follow
procedures and orders, failing to repair, malingering, violating
restriction; and, expressing a desire for discharge.

2.  Legal/Regulatory Basis for Separation Action:  Army Regulation 635-200
sets forth the basic authority for the separation of enlisted personnel.
Chapter 13 contains the policy and outlines the procedures for separating
individuals for unsatisfactory performance, to include separation for those
individuals who fail to maintain Army physical standards.  Initiation of
separation proceedings is required for individuals without medical
limitations who have two consecutive failures of the Army physical fitness
test or who are eliminated for cause from Noncommissioned Officer Education
System courses unless the responsible commander chooses to impose a bar to
reenlistment per AR 601-280.  Service of individuals separated because of
unsatisfactory performance will be characterized as honorable or under
honorable conditions as warranted by their military records.




                      SECTION B-APPLICANT’S SUBMISSIONS


1.  Issue(s) of propriety and/or equity submitted by applicant or counsel.
    As stated on applicant’s DD Form 293.

2.  Exhibit(s) submitted:

      A-1:  DD Form 293, dated 031110, with three (3) enclosure(s).
      A-2:  Counsel Issues:  NONE
      B-l:  Other Documents: NONE


                   PART IV - PREHEARING REVIEW (CONTINUED)

              SECTION C - Medical and/or Legal Advisory Opinion


Referred to ( ) Medical Advisor      ( ) Legal Advisor



      a.  Medical prehearing comments (if applicable):


      b.  Legal prehearing comments (if applicable):











                         PART V - SUMMARY OF HEARING

                      SECTION A-Attendees and exhibits

1.  Review/hearing information:


      a. Type requested:
         ( X ) Records review             (   ) Hearing

      b. Type Held:
         ( X )Records review              (   ) Hearing
                                          (   ) Tender Offer

      c. Review/hearing location and date:  Washington, D.C. on 28 July
2004.

      d. Appearance by:
         Applicant                 (   ) Yes   ( X ) No
         Counsel                   (   ) Yes   ( X ) No

      e.  Applicant testified:     (   ) Yes   ( X ) No

      f.  Counsel presentation:    (   ) Yes   ( X ) No

      g.  Witness(es) testified:   (   ) Yes   ( X ) No

2.  Exhibit(s) submitted at hearing:
                        PART VI - ISSUES AND FINDINGS

1.  a.  Applicant's issue(s) of propriety and/or equity:

          ( X )  Same as those listed on DD Form 293 and Part IV, Section A
              of this case report and directive.
          (   )  Revised issue(s) furnished in writing by applicant as
              follows:
          (   )  Additional issue(s) identified during review/hearing as
              follows:

      b.  Request:  (   ) Recharacterization     ( X ) Change of Reason

2.  Finding(s), conclusion(s), and reason(s) for the Board's decision(s) on
issues of propriety and/or equity:

      a.  Propriety:   The applicant has not submitted an issue of
                   propriety and the ADRB has not otherwise relied upon an
                   issue of propriety to change the discharge.

      b.  Equity:      The parenthetical number(s) below correspond(s) to
                   the issue number(s) on the DD Form 293, or in Part VI,
                   Paragraph 1, above.

        (1)  The issue is rejected.  The Board carefully examined the
applicant’s record of service during the period of enlistment under review.
 There was a full consideration of all faithful and honorable service as
well as the incidents of unsatisfactory performance.  The Board noted the
applicant’s contentions, however, the Board found a sufficient pattern of
unsatisfactory performance in his official record to warrant the separation
action under review.  The Board also noted that the applicant’s
unsatisfactory performance and associated counseling occurred prior to the
unfortunate incident concerning his wife.  Prior to this incident, the
applicant had an established pattern of unsatisfactory performance, to
include his numerous statements to his chain of command that he wanted a
discharge from the Army. The Board found no evidence of arbitrary or
capricious actions by the command.  The Board was satisfied that all
requirements of law and regulation were met and the rights of the applicant
were fully protected throughout the separation process.  Before initiating
action to separate the applicant, the command ensured the applicant was
appropriately counseled about the deficiencies that could lead to
separation.  The Board noted that the command made an assessment thereafter
of the applicant's potential for becoming a fully satisfactory soldier, and
the command appropriately determined the applicant did not demonstrate the
potential for further military service.  The Board, being convinced that
the reason for discharge was both proper and equitable, voted to deny
relief.

3.  Response(s) to item(s) not addressed as decisional issue(s):  NONE

                           PART VII - BOARD ACTION
                   SECTION A - Conclusions/Decisions/Vote

1.    Board conclusion(s):

      The discharge was:

      ( X ) Proper.
      (   ) Improper as to characterization.  Change characterization to
                                               .
      (   ) Improper as to reason.  Change reason to
                                   under                      .

      ( X ) Equitable.
      (   ) Inequitable as to characterization.  Change characterization to
                                         .
      (   ) Inequitable as to reason.  Change reason to
                                 
            under                                 .
      (   ) Both proper and equitable, but characterization/reason for
           separation cited was an administrative/clerical error and should
           be changed to                      under
                                   .

2.  Voting record:      Change   No Change
                  Reason       0         5
    Characterization       0         5

        The names and votes of the members of the Board are recorded in
Part IX of this document and can be obtained by writing to the address
below.  The request must contain the CASE NO. located in the upper right
corner of this document.

                  Department of the Army Review Boards Agency
                  ATTN:  Promulgation Team
                  1901 South Bell Street, 2nd Floor
                  Arlington, VA  22202-4508



3.  Minority views:  NONE
                           PART VII - BOARD ACTION
                 SECTION B - Verification and Authentication

Case report reviewed and verified

                          
Ms. McKim-Spilker
Case Reviewing Official

                     PART VIII - DIRECTIVE/CERTIFICATION
                            SECTION A - DIRECTIVE

                                    NONE

                          SECTION B - CERTIFICATION

Approval Authority:


ROBERT L. HOUSE
Colonel, U.S. Army
President, Army Discharge
   Review Board

Official:




MARY E. SHAW
Lieutenant Colonel, U.S. Army
Chief, Secretary Recorder

EXHIBITS:
A - Application for review of discharge                  C - Other
B - Material submitted by applicant

INDEX RECORD:

AR Number:  2003098788                    INDEX NUMBERS:  A9455
Date of Review:  040728                                   A9307
Character of Service:  HD                                 A0113
Date of Discharge:  920909
Authority:  AR 635-200 C13
Reason:  A4900
Results of Board Action/
Vote/Affirmation:  NC 5-0 A













                           PART IX - VOTING RECORD

    Name                                   Reason          Characterization
                                           CHANGE   NC     HON  UHC   NC
UNCHAR

    1.      Mbr          X                 X       

    2.      Mbr          X                 X       

    3.      Mbr          X                 X       

    4.      Mbr          X                 X       

    5.      PO           X                 X