PART II - APPLICATION DATA
(Note: Part I deleted under the Privacy Act on Reading Room copy)
1. Character of Discharge: Under Other Than Honorable Conditions
2. Date of discharge (or REFRAD): 001129
3. Authority for separation:
a. Regulation: Chapter 10, AR 635-200
b. Reason: In Lieu of Trial by Court-Martial
4. Prior review(s): NONE
PART III - SERVICE HISTORY
SECTION A - Period of Service Under Review
1. Service data: 2. Awards and
decorations:
AAM
a. Period entered for: NIF GCMDL
b. Entry date: 890830 ASR
c. Age: 18 Years DOB: 710809
d. Educational level: HS Grad
e. Aptitude area score:
GT: 109 3. Highest grade
achieved:
f. Length of Service: E4
4 Years 3 Months 20 Days
4. Performance evaluations:
NONE
PART III - SERVICE HISTORY
SECTION A - Period of Service Under Review - Continued
5. Periods of unauthorized absence:
Status Inclusive dates
AWOL 930813-000616
Mil conf
Civil conf
Other
6. Nonjudicial punishment: NONE
Date Offense(s)
7. Court-Martial data: NONE
a. SCM:
Date Offense(s)
b. SPCM:
Date Offense(s)
c. GCM:
Date Offense(s)
8. Remarks: NONE
SECTION B - Prior Service Data
NONE
Other discharge(s):
Service From To Type Discharge
PART IV - PREHEARING REVIEW
SECTION A-ANALYST’S ASSESSMENT
l. Facts and Circumstances:
a. The specific facts and circumstances leading to the applicant’s
discharge are not in the available records. The record contains a properly
constituted DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active
Duty). His DD Form 214 indicates that he was AWOL from 13 August 1993 – 16
June 2000. On 28 July 2000, he was placed on excess leave. The record
indicates the applicant was discharged under the provisions of Chapter 10,
AR 635-200, in lieu of court-martial, with a characterization of service of
under other than honorable conditions. His DD Form 214 reflects a
separation code of KFS, and an RE Code of 4.
b. On 29 November 2000, the applicant was discharged. At the time
of discharge, the applicant had completed 4 years, 3 month, and 20 days of
active military service (which included 125 days of excess leave), and
accrued 6 years, 10 months, and 4 days of lost time in the period under
review.
c. On the contrary, the evidence provided by the applicant shows
that on 27 August 1993, he was released from active duty and transferred to
the USAR Control Group, St Louis, MO, by reason of expiration term of
service (ETS). The applicant provided supporting evidence showing that he
received his DD Form 214 for ETS, his ETS orders, and his approved DA Form
31 (Request and Authority for Leave) beginning on 29 July 1993. On 21
October 1994, the applicant requested transfer into a TPU of the Selected
Reserve. By official orders, on 8 January 1996 he was voluntarily released
from the USAR Control Group and assigned to the 257th TC Co, Las Vegas, NV.
On 1 November 1996, the applicant was reassigned back to the USAR Control
Group by reason of unsatisfactory participation.
2. Legal/Regulatory Basis for Separation Action: Army Regulation 635-200
sets forth the basic authority for the separation of enlisted personnel.
Chapter l0 of that regulation provides, in pertinent part, that a member
who has committed an offense or offenses for which the authorized
punishment includes a punitive discharge may submit a request for a
discharge for the good of the service in lieu of trial by court-martial.
The requests may be submitted at any time after charges have been preferred
and must include the individual’s admission of guilt. Army policy states
that although an honorable or general discharge is authorized, a discharge
under other than honorable conditions is normally considered appropriate.
SECTION B-APPLICANT’S SUBMISSIONS
1. Issue(s) of propriety and/or equity submitted by applicant or counsel.
As stated on applicant’s DD Form 293.
2. Exhibit(s) submitted:
A-1: DD Form 293, dated 031001, with 43 (forth-three) enclosures.
A-2: Counsel Issues: NONE
B-l: Other Documents: NONE
PART IV - PREHEARING REVIEW (CONTINUED)
SECTION C - Medical and/or Legal Advisory Opinion
Referred to ( ) Medical Advisor ( ) Legal Advisor
a. Medical prehearing comments (if applicable):
b. Legal prehearing comments (if applicable):
PART V - SUMMARY OF HEARING
SECTION A-Attendees and exhibits
1. Review/hearing information:
a. Type requested:
( X ) Records review ( ) Hearing
b. Type Held:
( X )Records review ( ) Hearing
( ) Tender Offer
c. Review/hearing location and date: Washington, DC on 21 July 2004.
d. Appearance by:
Applicant ( ) Yes ( X ) No
Counsel ( ) Yes ( X ) No
e. Applicant testified: ( ) Yes ( X ) No
f. Counsel presentation: ( ) Yes ( X ) No
g. Witness(es) testified: ( ) Yes ( X ) No
2. Exhibit(s) submitted at hearing:
PART VI - ISSUES AND FINDINGS
1. a. Applicant's issue(s) of propriety and/or equity:
( X ) Same as those listed on DD Form 293 and Part IV, Section A
of this case report and directive.
( ) Revised issue(s) furnished in writing by applicant as
follows:
( ) Additional issue(s) identified during review/hearing as
follows:
b. Request: ( X ) Recharacterization ( ) Change of Reason
2. Finding(s), conclusion(s), and reason(s) for the Board's decision(s) on
issues of propriety and/or equity:
a. Propriety: The parenthetical number(s) below correspond(s) to
the issue number(s) on the DD Form 293, or in Part VI,
Paragraph 1, above.
(1) The issue is rejected. The applicant’s record is void of the
specific facts and circumstances (i.e., the discharge packet) concerning
the events that led to a discharge from the Army. However, the applicant’s
record contains a properly constituted DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release
or Discharge from Active Duty), which identifies the reason and
characterization of the discharge and the Board presumed Government
regularity in the discharge process. The evidence of record shows the
applicant was discharged under the provisions of Chapter 10, AR 635-200,
for the good of the service in lieu of trial by court-martial. In
connection with such a discharge, the applicant was charged with the
commission of an offense punishable under the Uniform Code of Military
Justice (UCMJ) with a punitive discharge. Procedurally, the applicant was
required to consult with defense counsel and to voluntarily, and in
writing, request separation from the Army in lieu of trial by court-
martial. In doing so, the applicant admitted guilt to the stipulated or
lesser-included offenses under the UCMJ. Notwithstanding the documents and
allegations now provided by the applicant, the Board presumes that these
same documents and allegations were properly considered at the time that
his Chapter 10 separation was being adjudicated. In the absence of
information to the contrary, the Board was satisfied that all requirements
of law and regulation were met and the rights of the applicant were fully
protected throughout the separation process. It also noted that the
characterization of service for this type of discharge is normally under
other than honorable conditions and that the applicant would have been
aware of that prior to requesting discharge. The Board, being convinced
that the reason for discharge and the characterization of service were both
proper and equitable, voted to deny relief. See Paragraph 3, below.
b. Equity: The applicant has not submitted an issue of equity
and the ADRB has not otherwise relied upon an issue of
equity to change the discharge. The major factors upon
which the discharge was based are set forth in Parts III
and IV of this decisional document.
3. Response(s) to item(s) not addressed as decisional issue(s): Not
having all the facts and circumstances pertaining to the discharge under
review the Board presumed administrative regularity in the discharge
process. This Board is only empowered to adjudicate the characterization
of service and the narrative reason for separation. The Board recommends
that the applicant pursue his request for upgrade with the Army Board for
Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) using the DD Form 149 accompanying
this response.
PART VII - BOARD ACTION
SECTION A - Conclusions/Decisions/Vote
1. Board conclusion(s):
The discharge was:
( X ) Proper.
( ) Improper as to characterization. Change characterization to
.
( ) Improper as to reason. Change reason to
under .
( X ) Equitable.
( ) Inequitable as to characterization. Change characterization to
.
( ) Inequitable as to reason. Change reason to
under .
( ) Both proper and equitable, but characterization/reason for
separation cited was an administrative/clerical error and should
be changed to under
.
2. Voting record: Change No Change
Reason 2 3
Characterization 2 3
The names and votes of the members of the Board are recorded in
Part IX of this document and can be obtained by writing to the address
below. The request must contain the CASE NO. located in the upper right
corner of this document.
Department of the Army Review Boards Agency
ATTN: Promulgation Team
1941 Jefferson Davis Highway, 2nd Floor
Arlington, VA 22202-4508
3. Minority views: NONE
PART VII - BOARD ACTION
SECTION B - Verification and Authentication
Case report reviewed and verified
MR. RIVERA
Case Reviewing Official
PART VIII - DIRECTIVE/CERTIFICATION
SECTION A - DIRECTIVE
NONE
SECTION B - CERTIFICATION
Approval Authority:
ROBERT L. HOUSE
Colonel, U.S. Army
President, Army Discharge
Review Board
Official:
MARY E. SHAW
Lieutenant Colonel, U.S. Army
Chief, Secretary Recorder
EXHIBITS:
A - Application for review of discharge C - Other
B - Material submitted by applicant
INDEX RECORD:
AR Number: 2003097117 INDEX NUMBERS: A0143
Date of Review: 040721 A0113
Character of Service: UD A9235
Date of Discharge: 001129
Authority: AR 635-200 C10
Reason: A7100
Results of Board Action/
Vote/Affirmation: NC 3-2 A
PART IX - VOTING RECORD
Name Reason Characterization
CHANGE NC HON UHC NC
UNCHAR
1. Mbr X X
2. Mbr X X
3. Mbr X X
4. Mbr X X
5. PO X X
ARMY | DRB | CY2003 | 2003084444
Chapter l0 of that regulation provides, in pertinent part, that a member who has committed an offense or offenses for which the authorized punishment includes a punitive discharge may submit a request for a discharge for the good of the service in lieu of trial by court-martial. It also noted that the characterization of service for this type of discharge is normally under other than honorable conditions and that the applicant was aware of that prior to requesting discharge. PART VII -...
ARMY | DRB | CY2002 | 2002066868
It also noted that the characterization of service for this type of discharge is normally under other than honorable conditions and that the applicant was aware of that prior to requesting discharge. The Board, being convinced that the reason for discharge and the characterization of service were both proper and equitable, voted to deny relief. Lieutenant Colonel, U.S. Army Chief, Secretary Recorder EXHIBITS: A - Application for review of discharge C - Other B - Material submitted by...
ARMY | DRB | CY2000 | 2000047607
Chapter l0 of that regulation provides, in pertinent part, that a member who has committed an offense or offenses for which the authorized punishment includes a punitive discharge may submit a request for a discharge for the good of the service in lieu of trial by court-martial. PART VII - BOARD ACTIONSECTION B - Verification and Authentication Case report reviewed and verified MR. RON WILLIAMS Case Reviewing Official PART VIII - DIRECTIVE/CERTIFICATIONSECTION A - DIRECTIVE NONE SECTION B -...
ARMY | DRB | CY2001 | 2001058801
Prior review(s): NONE PART III - SERVICE HISTORY SECTION A - Period of Service Under Review 1. PART VII - BOARD ACTIONSECTION B - Verification and Authentication Case report reviewed and verified Ms. McKim-Spilker Case Reviewing Official PART VIII - DIRECTIVE/CERTIFICATIONSECTION A - DIRECTIVE NONE SECTION B - CERTIFICATION Approval Authority:GERARD W. SCHWARTZ Colonel, U.S. Army President, Army Discharge Review Board EXHIBITS: A - Application for review of discharge C - Other B - Material...
ARMY | DRB | CY2000 | 2000047907
On 20 August 1999, the applicant was discharged. PART VII - BOARD ACTIONSECTION B - Verification and Authentication Case report reviewed and verified MR. RIVERA Case Reviewing Official PART VIII - DIRECTIVE/CERTIFICATIONSECTION A - DIRECTIVE NONE SECTION B - CERTIFICATION Approval Authority:WILSON A. SHATZER Colonel, U.S. Army President, Army Discharge Review Board EXHIBITS: A - Application for review of discharge C - Other B - Material submitted by applicant
ARMY | DRB | CY2000 | 2000048476
Chapter l0 of that regulation provides, in pertinent part, that a member who has committed an offense or offenses for which the authorized punishment includes a punitive discharge may submit a request for a discharge for the good of the service in lieu of trial by court-martial. It also noted that the characterization of service for this type of discharge is normally under other than honorable conditions and that the applicant was aware of that prior to requesting discharge. AR Number:...
ARMY | DRB | CY2000 | 2000048489
A-2: Counsel Issues: NONE B-l: Other Documents: NONE C-1: DD Form 149, dated 001006. The Board, being convinced that the reason for discharge and the characterization of service were both proper and equitable, voted to deny relief.3. PART VII - BOARD ACTIONSECTION B - Verification and Authentication Case report reviewed and verified Ms. McKim-Spilker Case Reviewing Official PART VIII - DIRECTIVE/CERTIFICATIONSECTION A - DIRECTIVE NONE SECTION B - CERTIFICATION Approval Authority:WILSON A....
ARMY | DRB | CY2003 | AR2003091633
Remarks: NONE SECTION B - Prior Service Data NONE Other discharge(s): Service From To Type Discharge PART IV - PREHEARING REVIEW SECTION A-ANALYST’S ASSESSMENT l. Facts and Circumstances: a. Voting record: Change No Change Reason 0 5 Characterization 0 5 The names and votes of the members of the Board are recorded in Part IX of this document and can be obtained by writing to the address below. Minority views: NONE PART VII - BOARD ACTION SECTION B - Verification and Authentication Case...
ARMY | DRB | CY2003 | 2003086859
His DD Form 214 indicates that he was discharged under the provisions of Chapter 10, AR 635-200 by reason of for the good of the service-in lieu of trial by court-martial, with a characterization of service of under other than honorable conditions. The Board, being convinced that the reason for discharge and the characterization of service were both proper and equitable, voted to deny relief.3. PART VII - BOARD ACTIONSECTION B - Verification and Authentication Case report reviewed and...
ARMY | DRB | CY2003 | 2003092990
The applicant consulted with legal counsel, was advised of the impact of the discharge action, voluntarily waived consideration of his case by an administrative separation board contingent upon receiving a characterization of service no less favorable than a general, under honorable conditions, and did not submit a statement in his own behalf. PART VII - BOARD ACTIONSECTION B - Verification and Authentication Case report reviewed and verified MR. RIVERA Case Reviewing Official PART VIII -...