PART II - APPLICATION DATA

      (Note: Part I deleted under the Privacy Act on Reading Room copy)

1.  Character of Discharge:  Under Other Than Honorable Conditions

2.  Date of discharge (or REFRAD):  030526

3.  Authority for separation:

      a.  Regulation:  Chapter 10, AR 635-200

      b.  Reason:  In Lieu of Trial by Court-Martial

4.  Prior review(s):  NONE



                         PART III - SERVICE HISTORY

                 SECTION A - Period of Service Under Review

1.    Service data:                              2.  Awards and
    decorations:
                                           ARCOM(3rd Awd)
    a.  Period entered for:  5 Years               GCMDL(3rd Awd)
    b.  Entry date:  010313                        NDSM(2nd Awd)
    c.  Age:  30 Years   DOB:  710223              ASR


    d.  Educational level:  HS Grad                OSR


    e.  Aptitude area score:
          GT:  116                               3.  Highest grade
achieved:
    f.  Length of Service:                         E5
          2 Year(s)  2 Month(s)  13 Day(s)


                                               4.  Performance evaluations:

                                                   See OMPF

                         PART III - SERVICE HISTORY
           SECTION A - Period of Service Under Review - Continued

5.  Periods of unauthorized absence:  NONE

    Status       Inclusive dates
      AWOL

      Mil conf

      Civil conf

      Other


6.  Nonjudicial punishment:  NONE

      Date  Offense(s)



7.  Court-Martial data:  NONE

      a.  SCM:
            Date   Offense(s)


      b.  SPCM:
            Date   Offense(s)


      c.  GCM:
            Date   Offense(s)


8.    Remarks:  The official record contains a Report of Investigation (MPR
Case
                 00154-03); and, a summary of the applicant’s Article 32
Hearing
                 on (030403).

                       SECTION B - Prior Service Data


Other discharge(s):

      Service    From  To    Type Discharge
      RA    910917    970309 Honorable
      RA    970310    010312 Honorable




                         PART IV - PREHEARING REVIEW

                       SECTION A-ANALYST’S ASSESSMENT
l.  Facts and Circumstances:

      a.  The evidence of record shows that the applicant was charged with
assault and unlawful entry.  On 19 May 2003, the applicant consulted with
legal counsel and voluntarily requested, in writing, discharge under the
provisions of Chapter l0, AR 635-200 in lieu of trial by court-martial.  In
this request, the applicant would have admitted guilt to the offense, or a
lesser-included offense.  Further, the applicant would have indicated that
he understood that he could receive an under other than honorable
conditions discharge and that the discharge would have a significant effect
on eligibility for veteran’s benefits.  The applicant did not submit a
statement in his own behalf.  On 2 May 2003, DA, Kaiserslautern Transition
Center, CMR 429, 26th SG, APO AE, Orders 142-02 discharged the applicant
from the Regular Army, effective 26 May 2003.  The record contains a
properly constituted DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from
Active Duty) which was authenticated by the applicant.  His DD Form 214
indicates that he was discharged under the provisions of Chapter 10, AR 635-
200 by reason of for the good of the service-in lieu of trial by court-
martial, with a characterization of service of under other than honorable
conditions.  The applicant was reduced to the lowest enlisted rank.

      b.  On 26 May 2003, the applicant was discharged.  At the time of
discharge, the applicant had completed 2 years, 2 months, and 13 days of
active military service in the period under review and had a total of 11
years, 8 months and 10  days of active military service.

2.  Legal/Regulatory Basis for Separation Action:  Army Regulation 635-200
sets forth the basic authority for the separation of enlisted personnel.
Chapter l0 of that regulation provides, in pertinent part, that a member
who has committed an offense or offenses for which the authorized
punishment includes a punitive discharge may submit a request for a
discharge for the good of the service in lieu of trial by court-martial.
The requests may be submitted at any time after charges have been preferred
and must include the individual’s admission of guilt.  Army policy states
that although an honorable or general discharge is authorized, a discharge
UOHC is normally considered appropriate.


                      SECTION B-APPLICANT’S SUBMISSIONS


1.  Issue(s) of propriety and/or equity submitted by applicant or counsel.
    As stated on applicant’s DD Form 293.

2.  Exhibit(s) submitted:

      A-1:  DD Form 293, dated 030817, with three (3) enclosure(s).
      A-2:  Counsel Issues:  NONE
      B-l:  Other Documents: NONE


                   PART IV - PREHEARING REVIEW (CONTINUED)

              SECTION C - Medical and/or Legal Advisory Opinion


Referred to ( ) Medical Advisor      ( ) Legal Advisor



      a.  Medical prehearing comments (if applicable):


      b.  Legal prehearing comments (if applicable):











                         PART V - SUMMARY OF HEARING

                      SECTION A-Attendees and exhibits

1.  Review/hearing information:


      a. Type requested:
         ( X ) Records review             (   ) Hearing

      b. Type Held:
         ( X )Records review              (   ) Hearing
                                          (   ) Tender Offer

      c. Review/hearing location and date:  Washington, D.C. on 28 April
2004.

      d. Appearance by:
         Applicant                 (   ) Yes   ( X ) No
         Counsel                   (   ) Yes   ( X ) No

      e.  Applicant testified:     (   ) Yes   ( X ) No

      f.  Counsel presentation:    (   ) Yes   ( X ) No

      g.  Witness(es) testified:   (   ) Yes   ( X ) No

2.  Exhibit(s) submitted at hearing:
                        PART VI - ISSUES AND FINDINGS

1.  a.  Applicant's issue(s) of propriety and/or equity:

          ( X )  Same as those listed on DD Form 293 and Part IV, Section A
              of this case report and directive.
          (   )  Revised issue(s) furnished in writing by applicant as
              follows:
          (   )  Additional issue(s) identified during review/hearing as
              follows:

      b.  Request:  ( X ) Recharacterization     (   ) Change of Reason



2.  Finding(s), conclusion(s), and reason(s) for the Board's decision(s) on
issues of propriety and/or equity:

      a.  Propriety:   The applicant has not submitted an issue of
                   propriety and the ADRB has not otherwise relied upon an
                   issue of propriety to change the discharge.

      b.  Equity:      The parenthetical number(s) below correspond(s) to
                   the issue number(s) on the DD Form 293, or in Part VI,
                   Paragraph 1, above.

        (1-8)  The issues are rejected.  The Board carefully examined the
available records of service during the period of enlistment under review.
The Board noted that not all the facts and circumstances concerning the
events that led to a discharge from the Army are of record; however, the
applicant submitted a copy of his voluntary request for discharge in lieu
of trial by court-martial, as well as a copy of his Article 32 hearing and
the associated military police investigation report.  This evidence shows
that the applicant was discharged under the provisions of Chapter 10, AR
635-200, for the good of the service in lieu of trial by court-martial.  In
connection with such a discharge, the applicant was charged with the
commission of an offense punishable under the Uniform Code of Military
Justice (UCMJ) with a punitive discharge.  Procedurally, the applicant was
required to consult with defense counsel and to voluntarily, and in
writing, request separation from the Army in lieu of trial by court-
martial.  In doing so, the applicant admitted guilt to the stipulated, or
lesser-included offenses under the UCMJ.  In the absence of information to
the contrary, the Board was satisfied that all requirements of law and
regulation were met and the rights of the applicant were fully protected
throughout the separation process.  It also noted that the characterization
of service for this type of discharge is normally under other than
honorable conditions and that the applicant would have been aware of that
prior to requesting discharge.  The Board, being convinced that the reason
for discharge and the characterization of service were both proper and
equitable, voted to deny relief.

3.  Response(s) to item(s) not addressed as decisional issue(s):  NONE

                           PART VII - BOARD ACTION
                   SECTION A - Conclusions/Decisions/Vote

1.    Board conclusion(s):

      The discharge was:

      ( X ) Proper.
      (   ) Improper as to characterization.  Change characterization to
                                               .
      (   ) Improper as to reason.  Change reason to
                                   under                      .

      ( X ) Equitable.
      (   ) Inequitable as to characterization.  Change characterization to
                                         .
      (   ) Inequitable as to reason.  Change reason to
                                 
            under                                 .
      (   ) Both proper and equitable, but characterization/reason for
           separation cited was an administrative/clerical error and should
           be changed to                      under
                                   .

2.  Voting record:      Change   No Change
                  Reason       0         5
    Characterization       0         5

        The names and votes of the members of the Board are recorded in
Part IX of this document and can be obtained by writing to the address
below.  The request must contain the CASE NO. located in the upper right
corner of this document.

                  Department of the Army Review Boards Agency
                  ATTN:  Promulgation Team
                  1941 Jefferson Davis Highway, 2nd Floor
                  Arlington, VA  22202-4508



3.  Minority views:  NONE
                           PART VII - BOARD ACTION
                 SECTION B - Verification and Authentication

Case report reviewed and verified

                          
Ms. McKim-Spilker
Case Reviewing Official

                     PART VIII - DIRECTIVE/CERTIFICATION
                            SECTION A - DIRECTIVE

                                    NONE

                          SECTION B - CERTIFICATION

Approval Authority:


ROBERT L. HOUSE
Colonel, U.S. Army
President, Army Discharge
   Review Board

Official:




MARY E. SHAW
Lieutenant Colonel, U.S. Army
Chief, Secretary Recorder

EXHIBITS:
A - Application for review of discharge                  C - Other
B - Material submitted by applicant

INDEX RECORD:

AR Number:  2003094653                    INDEX NUMBERS:  A9217
Date of Review:  040428                                   A9235
Character of Service:  UD                                 A0100
Date of Discharge:  030526
Authority:  AR 635-200 C10
Reason:  A7000
Results of Board Action/
Vote/Affirmation:  NC 5-0 A













                           PART IX - VOTING RECORD

    Name                                   Reason          Characterization
                                           CHANGE   NC     HON  UHC   NC
UNCHAR

    1.      Mbr          X                 X       

    2.      Mbr          X                 X       

    3.      Mbr          X                 X       

    4.      Mbr          X                 X       

    5.      PO           X                 X