PART II - APPLICATION DATA

      (Note: Part I deleted under the Privacy Act on Reading Room copy)

1.  Character of Discharge:  Under Other Than Honorable Conditions

2.  Date of discharge (or REFRAD):  030110

3.  Authority for separation:

      a.  Regulation:  Chapter 10, AR 635-200

      b.  Reason:  In Lieu of Trial by Court-Martial

4.  Prior review(s):  NONE



                         PART III - SERVICE HISTORY

                 SECTION A - Period of Service Under Review

1.    Service data:                              2.  Awards and
    decorations:
                                           ARCOM(4th Awd)     ASR
    a.  Period entered for:  Indef                 JSAM           OSR(4th
    Awd)
    b.  Entry date:  991029                        AAM
    c.  Age:  37 Years   DOB:  620226              GCMDL(6th Awd)


    d.  Educational level:  HS Grad                KCM


    e.  Aptitude area score:                       NCOPDRw/Num3
          GT:  105                               3.  Highest grade
achieved:
    f.  Length of Service:                         E7
          3 Year(s)  2 Month(s)  11 Day(s)


                                               4.  Performance evaluations:

                                                   See OMPF

                         PART III - SERVICE HISTORY
           SECTION A - Period of Service Under Review - Continued

5.  Periods of unauthorized absence:  NONE

    Status       Inclusive dates
      AWOL

      Mil conf

      Civil conf

      Other


6.  Nonjudicial punishment:  NONE

      Date  Offense(s)



7.  Court-Martial data:  NONE

      a.  SCM:
            Date   Offense(s)


      b.  SPCM:
            Date   Offense(s)


      c.  GCM:
            Date   Offense(s)


8.    Remarks:  NONE


                       SECTION B - Prior Service Data


Other discharge(s):

      Service    From  To    Type Discharge
      RA    820302    841105 Honorable
      RA    841106    881103 Honorable
      RA    881104    901120 Honorable
      RA         901121    991026       Honorable



                         PART IV - PREHEARING REVIEW

                       SECTION A-ANALYST’S ASSESSMENT
l.  Facts and Circumstances:

      a.  Evidence of record shows that on 30 December 2002, DA, Yongsan
Transition Center, Unit #15316, APO AP 96205, ORDERS 364-001 discharged the
applicant from the Regular Army, effective 10 January 2003.  The record
contains a properly constituted DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or
Discharge from Active Duty) which was authenticated by the applicant.  His
DD Form 214 indicates that he was discharged under the provisions of
Chapter 10, AR 635-200 by reason of for the good of the service-in lieu of
trial by court-martial, with a characterization of service of under other
than honorable conditions.  The specific facts and circumstances pertaining
to the applicant’s discharge are not contained in the available records.

      b.  On 10 January 2003, the applicant was discharged.  At the time of
discharge, the applicant had completed 3 years, 2 months, and 11 days of
active military service in the period under review and had a total of 20
years,
10 months and 9 days of active military service.

2.  Legal/Regulatory Basis for Separation Action:  Army Regulation 635-200
sets forth the basic authority for the separation of enlisted personnel.
Chapter l0 of that regulation provides, in pertinent part, that a member
who has committed an offense or offenses for which the authorized
punishment includes a punitive discharge may submit a request for a
discharge for the good of the service in lieu of trial by court-martial.
The requests may be submitted at any time after charges have been preferred
and must include the individual’s admission of guilt.  Army policy states
that although an honorable or general discharge is authorized, a discharge
UOHC is normally considered appropriate.



                      SECTION B-APPLICANT’S SUBMISSIONS


1.  Issue(s) of propriety and/or equity submitted by applicant or counsel.
    As stated on applicant’s DD Form 293.

2.  Exhibit(s) submitted:

      A-1:  DD Form 293, dated 030728, with three (3) enclosure(s).
      A-2:  Counsel Issues:  NONE
      B-l:  Other Documents: NONE


                   PART IV - PREHEARING REVIEW (CONTINUED)

              SECTION C - Medical and/or Legal Advisory Opinion


Referred to ( ) Medical Advisor      ( ) Legal Advisor



      a.  Medical prehearing comments (if applicable):


      b.  Legal prehearing comments (if applicable):











                         PART V - SUMMARY OF HEARING

                      SECTION A-Attendees and exhibits

1.  Review/hearing information:


      a. Type requested:
         ( X ) Records review             (   ) Hearing

      b. Type Held:
         ( X )Records review              (   ) Hearing
                                          (   ) Tender Offer

      c. Review/hearing location and date:  Washington, D.C. on 7 April
2004.

      d. Appearance by:
         Applicant                 (   ) Yes   ( X ) No
         Counsel                   (   ) Yes   ( X ) No

      e.  Applicant testified:     (   ) Yes   ( X ) No

      f.  Counsel presentation:    (   ) Yes   ( X ) No

      g.  Witness(es) testified:   (   ) Yes   ( X ) No

2.  Exhibit(s) submitted at hearing:
                        PART VI - ISSUES AND FINDINGS

1.  a.  Applicant's issue(s) of propriety and/or equity:

          ( X )  Same as those listed on DD Form 293 and Part IV, Section A
              of this case report and directive.
          (   )  Revised issue(s) furnished in writing by applicant as
              follows:
          (   )  Additional issue(s) identified during review/hearing as
              follows:

      b.  Request:  ( X ) Recharacterization     (   ) Change of Reason

2.  Finding(s), conclusion(s), and reason(s) for the Board's decision(s) on
issues of propriety and/or equity:

      a.  Propriety:   The applicant has not submitted an issue of
                   propriety and the ADRB has not otherwise relied upon an
                   issue of propriety to change the discharge.

      b.  Equity:      The parenthetical number(s) below correspond(s) to
                   the issue number(s) on the DD Form 293, or in Part VI,
                   Paragraph 1, above.

        (1)  The issue is rejected.  The applicant’s record is void of
facts and circumstances concerning the events that led to a discharge from
the Army.  The Board noted that the applicant’s record contains a properly
constituted DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active
Duty) which was authenticated by the applicant.  This document identifies
the reason and characterization of the discharge and the Board presumed
Government regularity in the discharge process.  The evidence of record
shows the applicant was discharged under the provisions of Chapter 10, AR
635-200, for the good of the service in lieu of trial by court-martial.  In
connection with such a discharge, the applicant was charged with the
commission of an offense punishable under the Uniform Code of Military
Justice (UCMJ) with a punitive discharge.  Procedurally, the applicant was
required to consult with defense counsel and to voluntarily, and in
writing, request separation from the Army in lieu of trial by court-
martial.  In doing so, the applicant admitted guilt to the stipulated, or
lesser-included offenses under the UCMJ.  In the absence of information to
the contrary, the Board was satisfied that all requirements of law and
regulation were met and the rights of the applicant were fully protected
throughout the separation process.  It also noted that the characterization
of service for this type of discharge is normally under other than
honorable conditions and that the applicant would have been aware of that
prior to requesting discharge.  Further, prior to voluntarily requesting
separation in lieu of trial by court-martial, the applicant would have been
notified that once his request for discharge was submitted, it could only
be withdrawn with the consent of the commander exercising general court-
martial authority, or without that commander’s consent, in the event trial
resulted in an acquittal or the sentence did not include a punitive
discharge.  The Board, being convinced that the reason for discharge and
the characterization of service were both proper and equitable, voted to
deny relief.

3.  Response(s) to item(s) not addressed as decisional issue(s):  NONE

                           PART VII - BOARD ACTION
                   SECTION A - Conclusions/Decisions/Vote

1.    Board conclusion(s):

      The discharge was:

      ( X ) Proper.
      (   ) Improper as to characterization.  Change characterization to
                                               .
      (   ) Improper as to reason.  Change reason to
                                   under                      .

      ( X ) Equitable.
      (   ) Inequitable as to characterization.  Change characterization to
                                         .
      (   ) Inequitable as to reason.  Change reason to
                                 
            under                                 .
      (   ) Both proper and equitable, but characterization/reason for
           separation cited was an administrative/clerical error and should
           be changed to                      under
                                   .

2.  Voting record:      Change   No Change
                  Reason       0         5
    Characterization       0         5

        The names and votes of the members of the Board are recorded in
Part IX of this document and can be obtained by writing to the address
below.  The request must contain the CASE NO. located in the upper right
corner of this document.

                  Department of the Army Review Boards Agency
                  ATTN:  Promulgation Team
                  1941 Jefferson Davis Highway, 2nd Floor
                  Arlington, VA  22202-4508



3.  Minority views:  NONE
                           PART VII - BOARD ACTION
                 SECTION B - Verification and Authentication

Case report reviewed and verified

                          
Ms. McKim-Spilker
Case Reviewing Official

                     PART VIII - DIRECTIVE/CERTIFICATION
                            SECTION A - DIRECTIVE

                                    NONE

                          SECTION B - CERTIFICATION

Approval Authority:


ROBERT L. HOUSE
Colonel, U.S. Army
President, Army Discharge
   Review Board

Official:




MARY E. SHAW
Lieutenant Colonel, U.S. Army
Chief, Secretary Recorder

EXHIBITS:
A - Application for review of discharge                  C - Other
B - Material submitted by applicant

INDEX RECORD:

AR Number:  2003094231                    INDEX NUMBERS:  A9217
Date of Review:  040407                                   A0143
Character of Service:  UD
Date of Discharge:  030110
Authority:  AR 635-200 C10
Reason:  A7000
Results of Board Action/
Vote/Affirmation:  NC 5-0 A













                           PART IX - VOTING RECORD

    Name                                   Reason          Characterization
                                           CHANGE   NC     HON  UHC   NC
UNCHAR

    1.      Mbr          X                 X       

    2.      Mbr          X                 X       

    3.      Mbr          X                 X       

    4.      Mbr          X                 X       

    5.      PO           X                 X