PART II - APPLICATION DATA
(Note: Part I deleted under the Privacy Act on Reading Room copy)
1. Character of Discharge: Honorable
2. Date of discharge (or REFRAD): 910115
3. Authority for separation:
a. Regulation: Chapter 9, AR 635-200
b. Reason: Drug Abuse Rehabilitation Failure
4. Prior review(s): NONE
PART III - SERVICE HISTORY
SECTION A - Period of Service Under Review
1. Service data: 2. Awards and
decorations:
AAM
a. Period entered for: 3 Years GCMDL(3d Awd)
b. Entry date: 890228 ASR
c. Age: 26 Years DOB: 611001 NCOPDR
d. Educational level: HS Grad OSR
e. Aptitude area score:
GT: 107 3. Highest grade
achieved:
f. Length of Service: E5
1 Year(s) 10 Month(s) 17 Day(s)
4. Performance evaluations:
See OMPF
PART III - SERVICE HISTORY
SECTION A - Period of Service Under Review - Continued
5. Periods of unauthorized absence: NONE
Status Inclusive dates
AWOL
Mil conf
Civil conf
Other
6. Nonjudicial punishment: NONE
Date Offense(s)
7. Court-Martial data: NONE
a. SCM:
Date Offense(s)
b. SPCM:
Date Offense(s)
c. GCM:
Date Offense(s)
8. Remarks: NONE
SECTION B - Prior Service Data
Other discharge(s):
Service From To Type Discharge
RA 810120 841211 Honorable
RA 841212 890227 Honorable
PART IV - PREHEARING REVIEW
SECTION A-ANALYST’S ASSESSMENT
l. Facts and Circumstances:
a. Evidence of record shows that on 28 December 1990, the unit
commander in consultation with the Clinical Director/ADAPCP declared the
applicant a rehabilitation failure. On 3 October 1990, the unit commander
notified the applicant of initiation of separation action under the
provisions of Chapter 9, AR 635-200, by reason of alcohol/drug abuse
rehabilitation failure, with an honorable discharge. She was advised of
her rights. The applicant consulted with legal counsel, was advised of the
impact of the discharge action, waived her right to an appearance before an
administrative separation board, and did not submit a statement in her own
behalf. The unit commander subsequently recommended separation from the
service. On 9 January 1991, the separation authority directed that the
applicant be discharged with a characterization of service of honorable.
b. On 15 January 1991, the applicant was discharged. At the time of
discharge, the applicant had completed 1 year, 10 months, and 17 days of
active military service in the period under review and had a total of 9
years,
11 months and 26 days of active military service.
2. Legal/Regulatory Basis for Separation Action: Army Regulation 635-200
sets forth the basic authority for the separation of enlisted personnel.
Chapter 9 contains the authority and outlines the procedures for
discharging individuals because of alcohol or other drug abuse. A member
who has been referred to the Alcohol and Drug Abuse Prevention and Control
Program (ADAPCP) for alcohol/drug abuse may be separated because of
inability or refusal to participate in, cooperate in, or successfully
complete such a program if there is a lack of potential for continued Army
service and rehabilitation efforts are no longer practical. Army policy
states that an honorable or general discharge is authorized depending on
the applicant’s overall record of service. (However, an honorable
discharge is required if restricted use information is used in the
discharge process).
SECTION B-APPLICANT’S SUBMISSIONS
1. Issue(s) of propriety and/or equity submitted by applicant or counsel.
As stated on applicant’s DD Form 293.
2. Exhibit(s) submitted:
A-1: DD Form 293, dated 030603, with three (3) enclosure(s).
A-2: Counsel Issues: NONE
B-l: Other Documents: NONE
PART IV - PREHEARING REVIEW (CONTINUED)
SECTION C - Medical and/or Legal Advisory Opinion
Referred to ( ) Medical Advisor ( ) Legal Advisor
a. Medical prehearing comments (if applicable):
b. Legal prehearing comments (if applicable):
PART V - SUMMARY OF HEARING
SECTION A-Attendees and exhibits
1. Review/hearing information:
a. Type requested:
( X ) Records review ( ) Hearing
b. Type Held:
( X )Records review ( ) Hearing
( ) Tender Offer
c. Review/hearing location and date: Washington, D.C. on 4 February
2004.
d. Appearance by:
Applicant ( ) Yes ( X ) No
Counsel ( ) Yes ( X ) No
e. Applicant testified: ( ) Yes ( X ) No
f. Counsel presentation: ( ) Yes ( X ) No
g. Witness(es) testified: ( ) Yes ( X ) No
2. Exhibit(s) submitted at hearing:
PART VI - ISSUES AND FINDINGS
1. a. Applicant's issue(s) of propriety and/or equity:
( X ) Same as those listed on DD Form 293 and Part IV, Section A
of this case report and directive.
( ) Revised issue(s) furnished in writing by applicant as
follows:
( ) Additional issue(s) identified during review/hearing as
follows:
b. Request: ( ) Recharacterization ( X ) Change of Reason
2. Finding(s), conclusion(s), and reason(s) for the Board's decision(s) on
issues of propriety and/or equity:
a. Propriety: The applicant has not submitted an issue of
propriety and the ADRB has not otherwise relied upon an
issue of propriety to change the discharge.
b. Equity: The parenthetical number(s) below correspond(s) to
the issue number(s) on the DD Form 293, or in Part VI,
Paragraph 1, above.
(1) The issue is rejected. The Board carefully examined the
applicant’s record of service during the period of enlistment under review.
The evidence of record shows that the applicant was discharged under the
provisions of Chapter 9, AR 635-200, as a drug rehabilitation failure after
she tested positive for cocaine use while enrolled in a drug treatment
program. Her service was characterized as honorable. The Board
congratulates the applicant on her recovery and noted her current work as a
substance abuse counselor. However, these accomplishments do not provide a
basis upon which to change the reason for her discharge from the Army.
Individuals are assigned RE codes based on their service records or the
reason for discharge. The applicant was appropriately assigned an RE code
of 3. An RE Code of 3 indicates that the applicant requires a waiver prior
to being allowed to reenlist. If the applicant desires to reenlist, she
should contact the local recruiter to determine her eligibility to
reenlist. Those individuals can best advise a former service member as to
the needs of the Army at the time, and are required to process waivers of
RE codes. The Board, being convinced that the reason of discharge was both
proper and equitable, voted to deny relief.
3. Response(s) to item(s) not addressed as decisional issue(s): NONE
PART VII - BOARD ACTION
SECTION A - Conclusions/Decisions/Vote
1. Board conclusion(s):
The discharge was:
( X ) Proper.
( ) Improper as to characterization. Change characterization to
.
( ) Improper as to reason. Change reason to
under .
( X ) Equitable.
( ) Inequitable as to characterization. Change characterization to
.
( ) Inequitable as to reason. Change reason to
under .
( ) Both proper and equitable, but characterization/reason for
separation cited was an administrative/clerical error and should
be changed to under
.
2. Voting record: Change No Change
Reason 0 5
Characterization 0 5
The names and votes of the members of the Board are recorded in
Part IX of this document and can be obtained by writing to the address
below. The request must contain the CASE NO. located in the upper right
corner of this document.
Department of the Army Review Boards Agency
ATTN: Promulgation Team
1941 Jefferson Davis Highway, 2nd Floor
Arlington, VA 22202-4508
3. Minority views: NONE
PART VII - BOARD ACTION
SECTION B - Verification and Authentication
Case report reviewed and verified
Ms. McKim-Spilker
Case Reviewing Official
PART VIII - DIRECTIVE/CERTIFICATION
SECTION A - DIRECTIVE
NONE
SECTION B - CERTIFICATION
Approval Authority:
SPURGEON A. MOORE
Colonel, U.S. Army
President, Army Discharge
Review Board
Official:
MARY E. SHAW
Lieutenant Colonel, U.S. Army
Chief, Secretary Recorder
EXHIBITS:
A - Application for review of discharge C - Other
B - Material submitted by applicant
INDEX RECORD:
AR Number: 20030993007 INDEX NUMBERS: A0113
Date of Review: 040204 A9455
Character of Service: HD
Date of Discharge: 910115
Authority: AR 635-200 C9
Reason: A6900
Results of Board Action/
Vote/Affirmation: NC 5-0 A
PART IX - VOTING RECORD
Name Reason Characterization
CHANGE NC HON UHC NC
UNCHAR
1. Mbr X X
2. Mbr X X
3. Mbr X X
4. Mbr X X
5. PO X X
ARMY | DRB | CY2001 | 2001053790
A-2: Counsel Issues: NONE B-l: Other Documents: NONE C-1: DD Form 149, dated 010103. The Board, being convinced that the reason for discharge and the characterization of service were both proper and equitable, voted to deny relief.3. EXHIBITS: A - Application for review of discharge C - Other B - Material submitted by applicant
ARMY | DRB | CY2000 | 2000050184
Army policy states that an honorable or general discharge is authorized depending on the applicant’s overall record of service. EXHIBITS: A - Application for review of discharge C - Other B - Material submitted by applicant AR Number: 2000050184 INDEX NUMBERS: A9217 Date of Review: 010124 A9235 Character of Service: GD A0100 Date of Discharge: 880407 Authority: AR 635-200 C9 Reason: A6900 Results of Board Action/ Vote/Affirmation: NC 4-1 A Name Reason Characterization CHANGENCHONUHCNCUNCHAR 1.
ARMY | DRB | CY1999 | 1999034721
Applicant ( ) Yes ( X ) No Counsel ( ) Yes ( X ) No e. Applicant testified: ( ) Yes ( X ) Nof. The Board, being convinced that the reason for discharge and the characterization of service were both proper and equitable, voted to deny relief. PART VII - BOARD ACTIONSECTION B - Verification and Authentication Case report reviewed and verified MRS. WADE Case Reviewing Official PART VIII - DIRECTIVE/CERTIFICATIONSECTION A - DIRECTIVE NONE SECTION B - CERTIFICATION Approval Authority:THOMAS J....
ARMY | DRB | CY1998 | 1998012183
The applicant consulted with legal counsel, was advised of the impact of the discharge action, requested a hearing by a board of officers and did not submit a statement on his behalf. The Board determined that the reason for discharge was proper and equitable and voted not to change it.3. EXHIBITS: A - Application for review of discharge C - Other B - Material submitted by applicant
ARMY | DRB | CY2000 | 2000043703
The applicant consulted with legal counsel, was advised of the impact of the discharge action, voluntarily waived consideration of her case by an administrative separation board contingent upon her receiving a characterization of service no less favorable than a general discharge, and submitted a statement in her own behalf. Additionally, the Board noted that the appropriate authority approved the applicant’s discharge under the provisions of Chapter 9, AR 635-200, by reason of Alcohol...
ARMY | DRB | CY1999 | 1999025613
Army policy states that an honorable or general discharge is authorized depending on the applicant’s overall record of service. EXHIBITS: A - Application for review of discharge C - Other B - Material submitted by applicant AR Number: 1999025613 INDEX NUMBERS: A0154 Date of Review: 990621 A0100 Character of Service: GD A9319 Date of Discharge: 861015 A9309 Authority: AR 635-200 C9 A9221 Reason: A6900 Results of Board Action/ Vote/Affirmation: HD 5-0 A Name Reason Characterization...
ARMY | DRB | CY2000 | 2000040896
Army policy states that an honorable or general discharge is authorized depending on the applicant’s overall record of service. The Board determined that the characterization of service was inequitable because the applicant's generally acceptable personal conduct and performance of duty mitigated the discrediting entries in the service record. ( X ) Change the characterization of discharge to Honorable .
ARMY | DRB | CY2003 | 2003087746
Reason: Alcohol Rehabilitation Failure 4. PART VII - BOARD ACTIONSECTION B - Verification and Authentication Case report reviewed and verified Ms. McKim-Spilker Case Reviewing Official PART VIII - DIRECTIVE/CERTIFICATIONSECTION A - DIRECTIVE TO: ARBA Support Division-St Louis Date: 27 June 2003 The Army Discharge Review Board, established under the provisions of Section 30, Public Law 346, 78th Congress, 22 June 1944 and codified as Title 10, United States Code, Section 1553, in the case of...
ARMY | DRB | CY2003 | 2003084559
On 2 September 1999, the separation authority directed that the applicant be discharged with a characterization of service of general, under honorable conditions. The applicant has submitted a DD From 149 to the Army Board for Correction of Military Records and her records will be forwarded to that agency for processing. EXHIBITS: A - Application for review of discharge C - Other B - Material submitted by applicant
ARMY | DRB | CY2003 | AR2003095591
On 17 December 2002, the unit commander notified the applicant of initiation of separation action under the provisions of Chapter 9, AR 635-200, by reason of drug abuse rehabilitation failure, with a general, under honorable conditions discharge. Accordingly, the Board voted to change the characterization of service to fully honorable. SECTION B - CERTIFICATION Approval Authority: ROBERT L. HOUSE Colonel, U.S. Army President, Army Discharge Review Board Official: MARY E. SHAW Lieutenant...