PART II - APPLICATION DATA
(Note: Part I deleted under the Privacy Act on Reading Room copy)
1. Character of Discharge: Bad Conduct
2. Date of discharge (or REFRAD): 980811
3. Authority for separation:
a. Regulation: Chapter 3, AR 635-200
b. Reason: Court-Martial, Other
4. Prior review(s): NONE
PART III - SERVICE HISTORY
SECTION A - Period of Service Under Review
1. Service data: 2. Awards and decorations:
ARCOM OSR (2)
a. Period entered for: 4 Years AAM (2ndAwd)
b. Entry date: 960724 GCMDL (2ndAwd)
c. Age: 31 Years DOB: 650701 NDSM
d. Educational level: HS Grad NCOPDR
e. Aptitude area score: ASR
GT: 120 3. Highest grade achieved:
f. Length of Service: E5
1 Year(s) 11 Month(s) 12 Day(s)
4. Performance evaluations:
See OMPF
PART III - SERVICE HISTORY
SECTION A - Period of Service Under Review - Continued
5. Periods of unauthorized absence:
Status Inclusive dates
AWOL 0
Mil conf 971125-971230;
Civil conf 0
Other 0
6. Nonjudicial punishment: NONE
Date Offense(s)
7. Court-Martial data:
a. SCM:
Date Offense(s)
b. SPCM:
Date Offense(s)
971125 Wrongfully used cocaine between (970710 and 970717), and wrongfully used cocaine again between (970826 and 970902).
c. GCM:
Date Offense(s)
8. Remarks: The applicant has an approved Bar to Reenlistment in file dated (970402).
SECTION B - Prior Service Data
Other discharge(s):
Service From To Type Discharge
RA 901023 960723 Honorable
PART IV - PREHEARING REVIEW
SECTION A-ANALYSTS ASSESSMENT
l. Facts and Circumstances:
a. Evidence of record shows that on 25 November 1997, the applicant was found guilty by a special court-martial of wrongfully using cocaine between (970710 and 970717) and wrongfully using cocaine again between (970826 and 970902). He was sentenced to be discharged with a Bad Conduct Discharge, confined for a period of 113 days, forfeiture of $600.00 pay per month for four months, and reduction to E1. On 22 December 1997, the sentence was approved. The record of trial was forwarded to The Judge Advocate General of The Army for review by the Court of Military Review. The United States Army Court of Military Review affirmed the approved findings of guilty and the sentence. On 14 July 1998, the sentence having been affirmed pursuant to Article 71© having been complied with, the sentence was ordered to be executed.
b. On 11 August 1998, the applicant was discharged. At the time of discharge, the applicant had completed 1 year, 11 months, and 12 days of active military service and accrued 36 days of lost time in the period under review and had a total of 7 years, 8 months and 11 days of active military service.
2. Legal/Regulatory Basis for Separation Action: Army Regulation 635-200 sets forth the basic authority for the separation of enlisted personnel. Chapter 3, Section IV, establishes policy and procedures for separating members with a dishonorable or bad conduct discharge; and provides that a soldier will be given a bad conduct discharge pursuant only to an approved sentence of a general or special court-martial; and that the appellate review must be completed and the affirmed sentence ordered duly executed.
SECTION B-APPLICANTS SUBMISSIONS
1. Issue(s) of propriety and/or equity submitted by applicant or counsel.
As stated on applicants DD Form 293.
2. Exhibit(s) submitted:
A-1: DD Form 293, dated 020107.
A-2: Counsel Issues: NONE
B-l: Other Documents: NONE
PART IV - PREHEARING REVIEW (CONTINUED)
SECTION C - Medical and/or Legal Advisory Opinion
Referred to ( ) Medical Advisor ( ) Legal Advisor
a. Medical prehearing comments (if applicable):
b. Legal prehearing comments (if applicable):
PART V - SUMMARY OF HEARING
SECTION A-Attendees and exhibits
1. Review/hearing information:
a. Type requested:
( X ) Records review ( ) Hearing
b. Type Held:
( X )Records review ( ) Hearing
( ) Tender Offer
c. Review/hearing location and date: Washington, DC on 20 February 2002.
d. Appearance by:
Applicant ( ) Yes ( X ) No
Counsel ( ) Yes ( X ) No
e. Applicant testified: ( ) Yes ( X ) No
f. Counsel presentation: ( ) Yes ( X ) No
g. Witness(es) testified: ( ) Yes ( X ) No
2. Exhibit(s) submitted at hearing:
PART VI - ISSUES AND FINDINGS
1. a. Applicant's issue(s) of propriety and/or equity:
( X ) Same as those listed on DD Form 293 and Part IV, Section A of this case report and directive.
( ) Revised issue(s) furnished in writing by applicant as follows:
( X ) Additional issue(s) identified during review/hearing as follows:
Board Issue: (2) Clemency is warranted.
b. Request: ( X ) Recharacterization ( ) Change of Reason
2. Finding(s), conclusion(s), and reason(s) for the Board's decision(s) on issues of propriety and/or equity:
a. Propriety: The applicant has not submitted an issue of propriety and the ADRB has not otherwise relied upon an issue of propriety to change the discharge.
b. Equity: The parenthetical number(s) below correspond(s) to the issue number(s) on the DD Form 293, or in Part VI, Paragraph 1, above.
(2) The issue is accepted. The Board carefully reviewed the applicants military record and found that clemency was warranted. Accordingly, the Board voted to upgrade the applicants characterization of service to general, under honorable conditions. A change in the reason for discharge is not authorized under Federal statute.
(1) See Paragraph 3, below.
3. Response(s) to item(s) not addressed as decisional issue(s):
Inasmuch as the Board voted to grant the full relief requested, response to the remaining issue is neither required nor rendered.
PART VII - BOARD ACTION
SECTION A - Conclusions/Decisions/Vote
1. Board conclusion(s):
The discharge was:
( X ) Proper.
( ) Improper as to characterization. Change characterization to .
( ) Improper as to reason. Change reason to under .
( ) Equitable.
( X ) Inequitable as to characterization. Change characterization to General, Under Honorable Conditions.
( ) Inequitable as to reason. Change reason to
under .
( ) Both proper and equitable, but characterization/reason for separation cited was an administrative/clerical error and should be changed to under .
2. Voting record: Change No Change
Reason 0 5
Characterization 4 1
The names and votes of the members of the Board are recorded in Part IX of this document and can be obtained by writing to the address below. The request must contain the CASE NO. located in the upper right corner of this document.
Department of the Army Review Boards Agency
ATTN: Promulgation Team
1941 Jefferson Davis Highway, 2nd Floor
Arlington, VA 22202-4508
3. Minority views: NONE
PART VII - BOARD ACTION
SECTION B - Verification and Authentication
Case report reviewed and verified
MR. RON WILLIAMS
Case Reviewing Official
PART VIII - DIRECTIVE/CERTIFICATION
SECTION A - DIRECTIVE
TO: ARBA Support Division-St Louis Date: 20 February 2002
The Army Discharge Review Board, established under the provisions of Section 30, Public Law 346, 78th Congress, 22 June 1944 and codified as Title 10, United States Code, Section 1553, in the case of the applicant named in Part I directs that the ARBA Support Division-St Louis issue a new DD Form 2l4 to the applicant which reflects the following directed change(s):
( X ) Change the characterization of discharge to General, Under Honorable Conditions.
SECTION B - CERTIFICATION
Approval Authority:
GERARD W. SCHWARTZ
Colonel, U.S. Army
President, Army Discharge
Review Board
Official:
EARNEST C. SMITH, JR.
Lieutenant Colonel, U.S. Army
Chief, Secretary Recorder
EXHIBITS:
A - Application for review of discharge C - Other
B - Material submitted by applicant
INDEX RECORD:
AR Number: 2002067265 INDEX NUMBERS: A9106
Date of Review: 020220 A9446
Character of Service: BCD A9218
Date of Discharge: 980811
Authority: AR 635-200 C3
Reason: A6800
Results of Board Action/
Vote/Affirmation: GD 4-1 A
PART IX - VOTING RECORD
Name Reason Characterization
CHANGE NC HON UHC NC UNCHAR
1. Mbr X X
2. Mbr X X
3. Mbr X X
4. Mbr X X
5. PO X X
ARMY | DRB | CY1999 | 1999026529
After consulting with legal counsel, he was advised of the impact of the discharge action, and voluntarily withdrew consideration of his case by an administrative separation board and his request for a conditional waiver. PART VII - BOARD ACTIONSECTION B - Verification and Authentication Case report reviewed and verified MRS. CAROLYN WADE Case Reviewing Official PART VIII - DIRECTIVE/CERTIFICATIONSECTION A - DIRECTIVE NONE SECTION B - CERTIFICATION Approval Authority:THOMAS J....
ARMY | DRB | CY2004 | AR2004104169
SECTION B - Prior Service Data NONE Other discharge(s): Service From To Type Discharge PART IV - PREHEARING REVIEW SECTION A-ANALYST’S ASSESSMENT l. Facts and Circumstances: a. Minority views: NONE PART VII - BOARD ACTION SECTION B - Verification and Authentication Case report reviewed and verified Ms. McKim-Spilker Case Reviewing Official PART VIII - DIRECTIVE/CERTIFICATION SECTION A - DIRECTIVE TO: ARBA Support Division-St Louis Date: 8 October 2004 The Army Discharge Review Board,...
ARMY | DRB | CY2003 | AR2003093350
Army policy states that an under other than honorable conditions discharge is normally considered appropriate, but a general discharge under honorable conditions or an honorable discharge may be granted. The Board, being convinced that the reason of discharge and the characterization of service were both proper and equitable, voted to deny relief. Minority views: NONE PART VII - BOARD ACTION SECTION B - Verification and Authentication Case report reviewed and verified Ms....
ARMY | DRB | CY2004 | AR2004106737
Accordingly, the Board voted to grant relief in the form of an upgrade of characterization of service to general, under honorable conditions. Voting record: Change No Change Reason 0 5 Characterization 4 1 The names and votes of the members of the Board are recorded in Part IX of this document and can be obtained by writing to the address below. Remarks: This action entails a restoration of grade to “SPC/E-4.” SECTION B - CERTIFICATION Approval Authority: ROBERT L. HOUSE Colonel, U.S....
ARMY | DRB | CY2004 | AR2004103391
Remarks: NONE SECTION B - Prior Service Data Other discharge(s): Service From To Type Discharge RA 920319 970930 Honorable PART IV - PREHEARING REVIEW SECTION A-ANALYST’S ASSESSMENT l. Facts and Circumstances: a. On 3 April 2000, the separation authority waived further rehabilitative efforts and directed that the applicant be discharged with a characterization of service of general, under honorable conditions. Remarks: This action entails a change to the reentry eligibility (RE) code to...
ARMY | DRB | CY2000 | 2000042412
The applicant acknowledged notification, consulted with legal counsel, was advised of the impact of the discharge action, waived consideration of his case by an administrative separation board, contingent upon receiving a characterization of service no less favorable than general, under honorable conditions, and did not submit a statement in his own behalf. The Board, being convinced that the reason for discharge and the characterization of service were both proper and equitable, voted to...
ARMY | DRB | CY2002 | 2002073011
Remarks: NONE SECTION B - Prior Service Data NONE Other discharge(s): Service From To Type Discharge PART IV - PREHEARING REVIEW SECTION A-ANALYSTS ASSESSMENT l. Facts and Circumstances: a. Minority views: NONE PART VII - BOARD ACTION SECTION B - Verification and Authentication Case report reviewed and verified Ms. McKim-Spilker Case Reviewing Official PART VIII - DIRECTIVE/CERTIFICATION SECTION A - DIRECTIVE TO: ARBA Support Division-St Louis Date: 23 May 2003 The Army Discharge Review...
ARMY | DRB | CY2002 | 2002078829
His DD Form 214 indicates that he was discharged under the provisions of Chapter 14, AR 635-200 by reason of misconduct, with a characterization of service of general, under honorable conditions (GD). Applicant's issue(s) of propriety and/or equity: ( X ) Same as those listed on DD Form 293 and Part IV, Section A of this case report and directive. Minority views: NONE PART VII - BOARD ACTION SECTION B - Verification and Authentication Case report reviewed and verified MR. RON WILLIAMS Case...
ARMY | DRB | CY2000 | 2000049940
Chapter l0 of that regulation provides, in pertinent part, that a member who has committed an offense or offenses for which the authorized punishment includes a punitive discharge may submit a request for a discharge for the good of the service in lieu of trial by court-martial. It also noted that the characterization of service for this type of discharge is normally under other than honorable conditions and that the applicant was aware of that prior to requesting discharge. AR Number:...
ARMY | DRB | CY2000 | 2000050049
On 11 May 1989, the separation authority approved the discharge with an under other than honorable conditions discharge. Chapter l0 of that regulation provides, in pertinent part, that a member who has committed an offense or offenses for which the authorized punishment includes a punitive discharge may submit a request for a discharge for the good of the service in lieu of trial by court-martial. The Board carefully examined the applicant’s record of service during the period of...