Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | DRB | CY2000 | 2000043219
Original file (2000043219.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved
PART II - APPLICATION DATA

(Note: Part I deleted under the Privacy Act on Reading Room copy)

1. Character of Discharge: General, Under Honorable Conditions

2. Date of discharge (or REFRAD): 951031

3. Authority for separation:

         a. Regulation: Chapter 14, AR 635-200

          b. Reason: Misconduct
4. Prior review(s): NONE


PART III - SERVICE HISTORY

SECTION A - Period of Service Under Review

 1.       Service data: 2. Awards and decorations:
                            GCMDL
a. Period entered for: 5 Years NDSM
b. Entry date: 901024 ASR
c. Age: 19 Years DOB: 710816 OSR
d. Educational level: HS Grad
e. Aptitude area score:
          GT: 112 3. Highest grade achieved:
f. Length of Service: E4
5 Year(s) 0 Month(s) 7 Day(s)

4. Performance evaluations:
NONE

PART III - SERVICE HISTORY
SECTION A - Period of Service Under Review - Continued

5. Periods of unauthorized absence: NONE

 Status Inclusive dates
         AWOL

         Mil conf

         Civil conf

         Other


6. Nonjudicial punishment:

         Date     Offense(s)
         931030 Derelict in the performance of his duties (931022)(summarized)
         940824 Disrespectful in language toward SGT (940714)

7. Court-Martial data:

         a. SCM:
                  Date Offense(s)
950810 Dereliction of duty by failing to stay awake while on guard
                  duty (950516); dereliction of duty by failing to secure
                  equipment while on guard duty (950516)
        
         b. SPCM:
                  Date Offense(s)

         c. GCM: 
                  Date Offense(s)


8.       Remarks: NONE
SECTION B - Prior Service Data

Other discharge(s):

          Service   From      To        Type Discharge
         ARNG 890906 900125 HD



PART IV - PREHEARING REVIEW

SECTION A-ANALYST’S ASSESSMENT
l. Facts and Circumstances:

         a. Evidence of record shows that on 29 August 1995, the unit commander notified the applicant of initiation of separation action under the provisions of Chapter l4, AR 635-200, by reason of misconduct—pattern of misconduct, with a general discharge. He was advised of his rights. The applicant acknowledged notification, consulted with legal counsel, was advised of the impact of the discharge action, waived consideration of his case by an administrative separation board and did not submit a statement in his own behalf. The unit commander subsequently recommended separation with a general discharge. The intermediate commander reviewed the proposed discharge action and recommended approval of the separation action with a general discharge. On 18 September 1995, the separation authority waived further rehabilitative efforts and directed that the applicant be discharged with a general discharge.

         b. On 31 October 1995, the applicant was discharged. At the time of discharge, the applicant had 5 years and 7 days service on his current enlistment.

         c. The unit commander recommended the applicant for separation from the Army because of a pattern of misconduct. This misconduct consisted of two Article 15’s for dereliction of duty and a summary court-martial for disrespectful behavior.

2. Legal/Regulatory Basis for Separation Action : Army Regulation 635-200 sets forth the basic authority for the separation of enlisted personnel. Chapter l4 establishes policy and prescribes procedures for separating members for misconduct. Specific categories include minor disciplinary infractions, a pattern of misconduct, commission of a serious offense, to include abuse of illegal drugs, convictions by civil authorities and desertion or absence without leave. Action will be taken to separate a member for misconduct when it is clearly established that rehabilitation is impractical or unlikely to succeed. Army policy states that an under other than honorable conditions discharge is normally considered appropriate, but a general discharge under honorable conditions or an honorable discharge may be granted.
SECTION B-APPLICANT’S SUBMISSIONS


 1. Issue(s) of propriety and/or equity submitted by applicant or counsel.
As stated on applicant’s DD Form 293.
2. Exhibit(s) submitted:

         A-1: DD Form 293, dated 000602, with one (1) enclosure(s).
         A-2: Counsel Issues: NONE
         B-l: Other Documents: NONE

PART IV - PREHEARING REVIEW (CONTINUED)



SECTION C - Medical and/or Legal Advisory Opinion


Referred to ( ) Medical Advisor ( ) Legal Advisor



 a. Medical prehearing comments (if applicable):

b. Legal prehearing comments (if applicable):
PART V - SUMMARY OF HEARING

SECTION A-Attendees and exhibits

1. Review/hearing information:

         a. Type requested:
         ( X ) Records review ( ) Hearing

         b. Type Held:
         ( X )Records review ( ) Hearing
         ( ) Tender Offer

         c. Review/hearing location and date: Washington, DC on 19 July 2000 .

         d. Appearance by:
         Applicant ( ) Yes ( X ) No
         Counsel ( ) Yes ( X ) No

          e. Applicant testified: ( ) Yes ( X ) No
        
         f. Counsel presentation: ( ) Yes ( X ) No
        
         g. Witness(es) testified: ( ) Yes ( X ) No
        
2. Exhibit(s) submitted at hearing:

PART VI - ISSUES AND FINDINGS

1. a. Applicant's issue(s) of propriety and/or equity:

          ( X )   Same as those listed on DD Form 293 and Part IV, Section A of this case report and directive.
         ( )     Revised issue(s) furnished in writing by applicant as follows:
         ( X )   Additional issue(s) identified during review/hearing as follows:
Board Issue: (2) The Discharge was improper.


         b. Request: ( X ) Recharacterization ( X ) Change of Reason


2. Finding(s), conclusion(s), and reason(s) for the Board's decision(s) on issues of propriety and/or equity:

          a. Propriety:    The parenthetical number(s) below correspond(s) to the issue number(s) on the DD Form 293, or in Part VI, Paragraph 1, above:

 (2) The issue is accepted. The Board carefully examined the applicant’s record of service during the period of enlistment under review. The Board noted that the applicant was discharged past his expiration of term of service. In view of the foregoing, the Board determined that the characterization of service and the reason for discharge were improper. Accordingly, the Board voted to upgrade the characterization of service to honorable and change the narrative reason for discharge to secretarial authority.

          b. Equity:       The parenthetical number(s) below correspond(s) to the issue number(s) on the DD Form 293, or in Part VI, Paragraph 1, above:
(1) The issue is rejected. Changing the narrative reason for discharge to expiration of term of service (ETS) is not within the purview of this Board. See response to issue (2), above.

3. Response(s) to item(s) not addressed as decisional issue(s): NONE
PART VII - BOARD ACTION
SECTION A - Conclusions/Decisions/Vote

1.       Board conclusion(s):

         The discharge was:

          ( )      Proper.
         ( X )    Improper as to characterization. Change characterization to Honorable .
         ( X )    Improper as to reason. Change reason to Secretarial Authority under Chapter 5, AR 635-200 .

         ( )      Equitable.
         ( )      Inequitable as to characterization. Change characterization to                                .
         ( )      Inequitable as to reason. Change reason to                       
                  under                                  .
         ( )      Both proper and equitable, but characterization/reason for separation cited was an administrative/clerical error and should be changed to                      under                          .
2. Voting record: Change No Change
         Reason 5 0
Characterization 5 0

         The names and votes of the members of the Board are recorded in Part IX of this document and can be obtained by writing to the address below. The request must contain the CASE NO. located in the upper right corner of this document.

Department of the Army Review Boards Agency
ATTN: Promulgation Team
1941 Jefferson Davis Highway, 2nd Floor
Arlington, VA 22202-4508



3. Minority views: NONE

PART VII - BOARD ACTION
SECTION B - Verification and Authentication

Case report reviewed and verified       

                                 
MS. WADE
Case Reviewing Official 

PART VIII - DIRECTIVE/CERTIFICATION
SECTION A - DIRECTIVE

 TO: ARBA Support Division-St Louis Date: 21 July 2000

The Army Discharge Review Board, established under the provisions of Section 30, Public Law 346, 78th Congress, 22 June 1944 and codified as Title 10, United States Code, Section 1553, in the case of the applicant named in Part I directs that the ARBA Support Division-St Louis issue a new DD Form 2l4 to the applicant which reflects the following directed change(s):
( X )   Change characterization of discharge to Honorable .
( X )   Change reason and authority for discharge to
        Secretarial Authority, Chapter 5, AR 635-200 .
 ( X )   Other (see remarks below).

Remarks: This action does not include a change to the RE code.
SECTION B - CERTIFICATION

 Approval Authority:


WILSON A. SHATZER
Colonel, U.S. Army
President, Army Discharge
Review Board

Official:




EARNEST C. SMITH, JR.
Lieutenant Colonel, U.S. Army
Chief, Secretary Recorder

EXHIBITS:
A - Application for review of discharge          C - Other
B - Material submitted by applicant

INDEX RECORD:

 AR Number: 2000043219 INDEX NUMBERS: A0154
Date of Review: 000719 A1200
Character of Service: GD A0100
Date of Discharge: 951031 A9311
Authority: AR 635-200 C14 A9411
Reason: A6700
Results of Board Action/
Vote/Affirmation: HD 5-0 A






PART IX - VOTING RECORD



 Name  Reason Characterization
 CHANGE NC HON UHC NC UNCHAR

1.      Mbr  X     X           

2.      Mbr  X     X           

3.      Mbr  X     X           

4.      Mbr  X     X           

5.      PO  X     X           





Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | DRB | CY2000 | 2000037791

    Original file (2000037791.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The Board, being convinced that the reason for discharge and the characterization of service were both proper and equitable, voted to deny relief. PART VII - BOARD ACTIONSECTION B - Verification and Authentication Case report reviewed and verified MRS. WADE Case Reviewing Official PART VIII - DIRECTIVE/CERTIFICATIONSECTION A - DIRECTIVE NONE SECTION B - CERTIFICATION Approval Authority:THOMAS J. ALLEN Colonel, U.S. Army President, Army Discharge Review Board EXHIBITS: A - Application for...

  • ARMY | DRB | CY2003 | AR2003097098

    Original file (AR2003097098.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    On 16 May 1995, the applicant was discharged. The Board, being convinced that the reason for discharge and the characterization of service were both proper and equitable, voted to deny relief. Minority views: NONE PART VII - BOARD ACTION SECTION B - Verification and Authentication Case report reviewed and verified MR. RIVERA Case Reviewing Official PART VIII - DIRECTIVE/CERTIFICATION SECTION A - DIRECTIVE NONE SECTION B - CERTIFICATION Approval Authority: ROBERT L. HOUSE Colonel, U.S....

  • ARMY | DRB | CY1997 | 199700275

    Original file (199700275.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Finding(s), conclusion(s), and reason(s) for the Board's decision(s) on issues of propriety and/or equity: EXHIBITS: A - Application for review of discharge C - Other B - Material submitted by applicant CASE NO: AD97-00275 PART IX - VOTING RECORD Name Reason Characterization CHANGENCHONUHCNCUNCHAR X X X X X X X X X X

  • ARMY | DRB | CY2002 | 2002077555

    Original file (2002077555.TXT) Auto-classification: Denied

    On 16 May 1995, the applicant was discharged. Applicant's issue(s) of propriety and/or equity: ( X ) Same as those listed on DD Form 293 and Part IV, Section A of this case report and directive. Minority views: NONE PART VII - BOARD ACTION SECTION B - Verification and Authentication Case report reviewed and verified MR. RON WILLIAMS Case Reviewing Official PART VIII - DIRECTIVE/CERTIFICATION SECTION A - DIRECTIVE NONE SECTION B - CERTIFICATION Approval Authority: SPURGEON A. MOORE Colonel,...

  • ARMY | DRB | CY1997 | 199700288

    Original file (199700288.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    960223: Applicant was discharged. The Board, being convinced that the reason for discharge and the characterization of service were both proper and equitable, voted to deny relief. CASE NO: AD97-00288 PART IX - VOTING RECORD Name Reason Characterization CHANGENCHONUHCNCUNCHAR 1.

  • ARMY | DRB | CY1997 | 199700149

    Original file (199700149.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Type of discharge (or characterization of service): GD 2. The Board, being convinced that the reason for discharge and the characterization of service were both proper and equitable, voted to deny relief. CASE NO: AD97-00149 PART IX - VOTING RECORD Name Reason Characterization CHANGENCHONUHCNCUNCHAR 1.

  • ARMY | DRB | CY1998 | 1998012172

    Original file (1998012172.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Prior review(s): NONE PART III - SERVICE HISTORY SECTION A - Period of Service Under Review 1. PART VII - BOARD ACTIONSECTION B - Verification and Authentication Case report reviewed and verified MR. ADRIANCE Case Reviewing Official PART VIII - DIRECTIVE/CERTIFICATIONSECTION A - DIRECTIVE NONE SECTION B - CERTIFICATION Approval Authority:THOMAS J. ALLEN Colonel, U.S. Army President, Army Discharge Review Board EXHIBITS: A - Application for review of discharge C - Other B - Material...

  • ARMY | DRB | CY1997 | 199700774

    Original file (199700774.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Summary of facts and circumstances concerning discharge: 950607: Unit commander notified the applicant of initiation of separation action under the provisions of Chapter 14, AR 635-200, for misconduct. The Board, being convinced that the reason for discharge and the characterization of service were both proper and equitable, voted to deny relief.3. Voting record: ChangeNo Change Reason 0 5 Characterization 0 5 The names and votes of the members of the Board are recorded in Part IX of this...

  • ARMY | DRB | CY1997 | 199701385

    Original file (199701385.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Type of discharge (or characterization of service): GD 2. EXHIBITS: A - Application for review of discharge C - Other B - Material submitted by applicant CASE NO: AD97-01385 PART IX - VOTING RECORD Name Reason Characterization CHANGENCHONUHCNCUNCHAR 1.

  • ARMY | DRB | CY2004 | AR20040000622

    Original file (AR20040000622.doc) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant consulted with legal counsel, was advised of the impact of the discharge action, and requested appearance before a board of officers. The Board noted that the unit commander used “Board Procedures” when notifying the applicant that she was initiating action to separate her under the provisions of Chapter 14, AR 635-200, by reason of misconduct. SECTION B - CERTIFICATION Approval Authority: ROBERT L. HOUSE Colonel, U.S. Army President, Army Discharge Review...