Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | DRB | CY2000 | 2000037994
Original file (2000037994.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied
PART II - APPLICATION DATA

(Note: Part I deleted under the Privacy Act on Reading Room copy)

1. Character of Discharge: Honorable

2. Date of discharge (or REFRAD): 960813

3. Authority for separation:

         a. Regulation: Chapter 16, AR 635-200

          b. Reason: Reduction in Force
4. Prior review(s): NONE


PART III - SERVICE HISTORY

SECTION A - Period of Service Under Review

 1.       Service data: 2. Awards and decorations:
                            ARCOM
a. Period entered for: 4 Years AAM(6)
b. Entry date: 940321 OSR(3)
c. Age: 27 Years DOB: 660421
d. Educational level: HS Grad
e. Aptitude area score:
          GT: 99 3. Highest grade achieved:
f. Length of Service: E5
2 Year(s) 4 Month(s) 23 Day(s)

4. Performance evaluations:
NONE

PART III - SERVICE HISTORY
SECTION A - Period of Service Under Review - Continued

5. Periods of unauthorized absence: NONE

 Status Inclusive dates
         AWOL

         Mil conf

         Civil conf

         Other


6. Nonjudicial punishment: NONE
         Date     Offense(s)
        


7. Court-Martial data: NONE
         a. SCM:
                  Date Offense(s)

        
         b. SPCM:
                  Date Offense(s)

         c. GCM: 
                  Date Offense(s)


8.       Remarks: NONE
SECTION B - Prior Service Data

Other discharge(s):

          Service   From      To        Type Discharge
         ARNGUS 860630 861125 Honorable
         RA 870630 910219 Honorable
         RA 910220 930620 Honorable
         RA 930621 940320 Honorable



PART IV - PREHEARING REVIEW

SECTION A-ANALYST’S ASSESSMENT
l. Facts and Circumstances:

          a. The evidence of record shows that on 16 April 1996, the Department of the Army imposed a bar to reenlistment under the Qualitative Management Program (QMP). On 29 April 1996, the unit commander notified the applicant of the Department of Army bar to reenlistment, explained the available options, and advised him of his rights. On 13 May 1996, the applicant acknowledged notification and that he understood the options available to him as a result of the bar to reenlistment and the Enlisted Qualitative Early Separation Program. He elected not to submit an appeal and acknowledged that he understood he would be discharged under the provisions of Paragraph 16-8, Chapter 16, Army Regulation 635-200, within 90 days. On 4 June 1996, Orders 156-0073, Department of the Army, United States Army Field Artillery School and Fort Sill, Oklahoma, discharged the applicant from the Regular Army, effective 13 August 1996.
         b. On 13 August 1996, the applicant was discharged. He was credited with
2 years, 4 months, and 23 days active service on the enlistment under review and
9 years, 1 month, and 14 days total time in service.

2. Legal/Regulatory Basis for Separation Action : Army Regulation 635-200 provides the basic authority for the separation of enlisted personnel. Paragraph 16-8 of this regulation sets forth the requirements for early separation of enlisted personnel due to reduction in force, strength limitations, or budgetary constraints. Army policy states that the service of personnel separated under this paragraph will be characterized as honorable.
SECTION B-APPLICANT’S SUBMISSIONS


 1. Issue(s) of propriety and/or equity submitted by applicant or counsel.
As stated on applicant’s DD Form 293.
2. Exhibit(s) submitted:

         A-1: DD Form 293, dated 000208.
         A-2: Counsel Issues: NONE
         B-l: Other Documents: NONE
         C-1: DD Form 149, dated 990629.

PART IV - PREHEARING REVIEW (CONTINUED)



SECTION C - Medical and/or Legal Advisory Opinion


Referred to ( ) Medical Advisor ( ) Legal Advisor



 a. Medical prehearing comments (if applicable):

b. Legal prehearing comments (if applicable):
PART V - SUMMARY OF HEARING

SECTION A-Attendees and exhibits

1. Review/hearing information:

         a. Type requested:
         ( X ) Records review ( ) Hearing

         b. Type Held:
         ( X )Records review ( ) Hearing
         ( ) Tender Offer

         c. Review/hearing location and date: Washington, DC on 15 March 2000

         d. Appearance by:
         Applicant ( ) Yes ( X ) No
         Counsel ( ) Yes ( X ) No

          e. Applicant testified: ( ) Yes ( X ) No
        
         f. Counsel presentation: ( ) Yes ( X ) No
        
         g. Witness(es) testified: ( ) Yes ( X ) No
        
2. Exhibit(s) submitted at hearing:

PART VI - ISSUES AND FINDINGS

1. a. Applicant's issue(s) of propriety and/or equity:

          ( X )   Same as those listed on DD Form 293 and Part IV, Section A of this case report and directive.
         ( )     Revised issue(s) furnished in writing by applicant as follows:
         ( )     Additional issue(s) identified during review/hearing as follows:
         b. Request: ( X ) Recharacterization ( ) Change of Reason


2. Finding(s), conclusion(s), and reason(s) for the Board's decision(s) on issues of propriety and/or equity:

          a. Propriety:    The applicant has not submitted an issue of propriety and the ADRB has not otherwise relied upon an issue of propriety to change the discharge.

          b. Equity:       The parenthetical number(s) below correspond(s) to the issue number(s) on the DD Form 293, or in Part VI, Paragraph 1, above:

 (1) The issue is rejected. The Board carefully examined the applicant’s record of service during the period of enlistment under review. The evidence of record does not support the applicant’s contention that his chain of command acted in an arbitrary and capricious manner in preparing his Noncommissioned Officer Enlisted Evaluation Report, and no evidence to support it has been submitted by the applicant. The Board was satisfied that all requirements of law and regulation were met and the rights of the applicant were fully protected throughout the separation process. The Board, being convinced that the reason for discharge and the characterization of service were both proper and equitable, voted to deny relief.
3. Response(s) to item(s) not addressed as decisional issue(s): NONE
PART VII - BOARD ACTION
SECTION A - Conclusions/Decisions/Vote

1.       Board conclusion(s):

         The discharge was:

          ( X )    Proper.
         ( )      Improper as to characterization. Change characterization to                                      .
         ( )      Improper as to reason. Change reason to                         under                       .

         ( X )    Equitable.
         ( )      Inequitable as to characterization. Change characterization to                                .
         ( )      Inequitable as to reason. Change reason to                       
                  under                                  .
         ( )      Both proper and equitable, but characterization/reason for separation cited was an administrative/clerical error and should be changed to                      under                          .
2. Voting record: Change No Change
         Reason 0 5
Characterization 0 5

         The names and votes of the members of the Board are recorded in Part IX of this document and can be obtained by writing to the address below. The request must contain the CASE NO. located in the upper right corner of this document.

Department of the Army Review Boards Agency
ATTN: Promulgation Team
1941 Jefferson Davis Highway, 2nd Floor
Arlington, VA 22202-4508



3. Minority views: NONE

PART VII - BOARD ACTION
SECTION B - Verification and Authentication

Case report reviewed and verified       

                                 
MRS. WADE
Case Reviewing Official 

PART VIII - DIRECTIVE/CERTIFICATION
SECTION A - DIRECTIVE
NONE
SECTION B - CERTIFICATION

Approval Authority:


THOMAS J. ALLEN
Colonel, U.S. Army
President, Army Discharge
Review Board

Official:




SUZANNE WALKER
Lieutenant Colonel, U.S. Army
Chief, Secretary Recorder

EXHIBITS:
A - Application for review of discharge          C - Other
B - Material submitted by applicant

INDEX RECORD:

 AR Number: 2000037994 INDEX NUMBERS: A9217
Date of Review: 000315 A0100
Character of Service: HD A9447
Date of Discharge: 960813
Authority: AR 635-200 C16
Reason: A9241
Results of Board Action/
Vote/Affirmation: NC 5-0 A













PART IX - VOTING RECORD



 Name  Reason Characterization
 CHANGE NC HON UHC NC UNCHAR

1.      Mbr      X          X    

2.      Mbr      X          X    

3.      Mbr      X          X    

4.      Mbr      X          X    

5.      PO      X          X    





Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | DRB | CY1997 | 199700304

    Original file (199700304.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The Board noted that the applicant was separated under the provisions of AR 635-200, Chapter 5, for a personality disorder. The Board, being convinced that the reason for discharge and the characterization of service were both proper and equitable, voted to deny relief.3. CASE NO: AD97-00304 PART IX - VOTING RECORD Name Reason Characterization CHANGENCHONUHCNCUNCHAR 1.

  • ARMY | DRB | CY2000 | 2000048388

    Original file (2000048388.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Chapter l0 of that regulation provides, in pertinent part, that a member who has committed an offense or offenses for which the authorized punishment includes a punitive discharge may submit a request for a discharge for the good of the service in lieu of trial by court-martial. It also noted that the characterization of service for this type of discharge is normally under other than honorable conditions and that the applicant was aware of that prior to requesting discharge. The Board,...

  • ARMY | DRB | CY2003 | AR2003091445

    Original file (AR2003091445.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    USAEREC directed that the applicant be discharged under the provisions of Chapter 16, Paragraph 16-8, AR 635-200, by reason of “Reduction in Force,” with a corresponding separation program designator of “JCC,” and an RE code of “4.” The separation authority directed that the applicant be discharged with a characterization of service of honorable. The Board being convinced that the reason for discharge and the characterization of service were both proper and equitable, voted to deny relief. ...

  • ARMY | DRB | CY1997 | 199700728

    Original file (199700728.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The Board examined the applicant's record of service during the period of enlistment under review. The Board, being convinced that the reason for discharge and the characterization of service were both proper and equitable, voted to deny relief. Voting record: ChangeNo Change Reason 0 5 Characterization 0 5 The names and votes of the members of the Board are recorded in Part IX of this document and can be obtained by writing to the address below.

  • ARMY | DRB | CY2001 | 2001058782

    Original file (2001058782.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The separation authority directed that the applicant be discharged with a characterization of service of honorable. EXHIBITS: A - Application for review of discharge C - Other B - Material submitted by applicant AR Number: 2001058782 INDEX NUMBERS: A0113 Date of Review: 010822 A9500 Character of Service: HD Date of Discharge: 960826 Authority: AR 635-200, C16-8 Reason: A0720 Results of Board Action/ Vote/Affirmation: NC 5-0 A Name Reason Characterization CHANGENCHONUHCNCUNCHAR 1.

  • ARMY | DRB | CY1999 | 1999025854

    Original file (1999025854.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Applicant's issue(s) of propriety and/or equity: ( X ) Same as those listed on DD Form 293 and Part IV, Section A of this case report and directive. Changing reentry (RE) codes is not within the purview of the Army Discharge Review Board. AR Number: 1999025854 INDEX NUMBERS: A9217 Date of Review: 990602 A9211 Character of Service: HD A9219 Date of Discharge: 920430 A9445 Authority: AR 635-200 C16 A0100 Reason: A2400 Results of Board Action/ Vote/Affirmation: NC 5-0 A Name Reason...

  • ARMY | DRB | CY2000 | 2000048088

    Original file (2000048088.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    On 4 November 1989, the applicant acknowledged notification, consulted legal counsel and stated that he would submit an appeal. EXHIBITS: A - Application for review of discharge C - Other B - Material submitted by applicant AR Number: 2000048088 INDEX NUMBERS: A0720 Date of Review: 001106 A0500 Character of Service: HD A9445 Date of Discharge: 900928 A0100 Authority: AR 635-200 C16 Reason: A0400 Results of Board Action/ Vote/Affirmation: NC 5-0 A Name Reason Characterization...

  • ARMY | DRB | CY2003 | 2003094167

    Original file (2003094167.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    Her DD Form 214 indicates that she was discharged under the provisions of Chapter 19, AR 635-200; qualitative management program by reason of non-retention on active duty with a characterization of service of honorable. On 21 September 2002, the applicant was discharged. PART VII - BOARD ACTIONSECTION B - Verification and Authentication Case report reviewed and verified Ms. McKim-Spilker Case Reviewing Official PART VIII - DIRECTIVE/CERTIFICATIONSECTION A - DIRECTIVE TO: ARBA Support...

  • ARMY | DRB | CY1999 | 1999021955

    Original file (1999021955.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The Board, being convinced that the reason for discharge and the characterization of service were both proper and equitable, voted to deny relief. PART VII - BOARD ACTIONSECTION B - Verification and Authentication Case report reviewed and verified MR. RIVERA Case Reviewing Official PART VIII - DIRECTIVE/CERTIFICATIONSECTION A - DIRECTIVE NONE SECTION B - CERTIFICATION Approval Authority:THOMAS J. ALLEN Colonel, U.S. Army President, Army Discharge Review Board EXHIBITS: A - Application for...

  • ARMY | DRB | CY2003 | AR2003099258

    Original file (AR2003099258.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    Remarks: NONE SECTION B - Prior Service Data NONE Other discharge(s): Service From To Type Discharge PART IV - PREHEARING REVIEW SECTION A-ANALYST’S ASSESSMENT l. Facts and Circumstances: a. Applicant's issue(s) of propriety and/or equity: ( X ) Same as those listed on DD Form 293 and Part IV, Section A of this case report and directive. Minority views: NONE PART VII - BOARD ACTION SECTION B - Verification and Authentication Case report reviewed and verified MR. RON WILLIAMS Case Reviewing...