PART II - APPLICATION DATA
(Note: Part I deleted under the Privacy Act on Reading Room copy)
1. Character of Discharge: Honorable
2. Date of discharge (or REFRAD): 960731
3. Authority for separation:
a. Regulation: Chapter 16-8, AR 635-200
b. Reason: Reduction in Force
4. Prior review(s): NONE
PART III - SERVICE HISTORY
SECTION A - Period of Service Under Review
1. Service data: 2. Awards and
decorations:
AAM(4th Awd) ASR
a. Period entered for: 5 Years ARCOM(3rd Awd) OSR
b. Entry date: 940927 GCMDL(3rd Awd) KLM(SA)
c. Age: 29 Years DOB: 650712 NDSM KLM(K)
d. Educational level: HS Grad SWASMw/1BSS
e. Aptitude area score: NCOPDRw/Num2
GT: 122 3. Highest grade
achieved:
f. Length of Service: E6
1 Year(s) 10 Month(s) 4 Day(s)
4. Performance evaluations:
See OMPF
PART III - SERVICE HISTORY
SECTION A - Period of Service Under Review - Continued
5. Periods of unauthorized absence: NONE
Status Inclusive dates
AWOL
Mil conf
Civil conf
Other
6. Nonjudicial punishment: NONE
Date Offense(s)
7. Court-Martial data: NONE
a. SCM:
Date Offense(s)
b. SPCM:
Date Offense(s)
c. GCM:
Date Offense(s)
8. Remarks: NONE
SECTION B - Prior Service Data
Other discharge(s):
Service From To Type Discharge
RA 830830 860625 Honorable
RA 860626 881122 Honorable
RA 881123 910903 Honorable
RA 910904 940926 Honorable
PART IV - PREHEARING REVIEW
SECTION A-ANALYST’S ASSESSMENT
l. Facts and Circumstances:
a. Evidence of record shows that on 8 September 1995, the CY95
Sergeant First Class/ANCOC Promotion/Selection Board, after a comprehensive
review of his Official Military Personnel File (OMPF), notified the
applicant that under the Department of the Army Qualitative Management
Program he was to be barred from reenlistment. On 16 October 1995, the
applicant appealed the DA imposed bar to reenlistment to the US Army
Enlisted Record and Evaluation Center (USAEREC). On 19 March 1996, the
applicant was notified that the DA Standby Advisory Board denied his
appeal. USAEREC directed that the applicant be discharged under the
provisions of Chapter 16, Paragraph 16-8, AR 635-200, by reason of
“Reduction in Force,” with a corresponding separation program designator of
“JCC,” and an RE code of “4.” The separation authority directed that the
applicant be discharged with a characterization of service of honorable.
The applicant was also entitled to half separation pay.
b. On 31 July 1996, the applicant was discharged. At the time of
discharge, the applicant had completed 1 year, 10 months, and 4 days of
active military service in the period under review and had a total of 12
years, 11 months and
1 day of active military service.
2. Legal/Regulatory Basis for Separation Action: Army Regulation 635-200
provides the basic authority for the separation of enlisted personnel.
Paragraph 16-8 of this regulation sets forth the requirements for early
separation of enlisted personnel due to reduction in force, strength
limitations, or budgetary constraints. Army policy states that the service
of personnel separated under this paragraph will be characterized as
honorable.
SECTION B-APPLICANT’S SUBMISSIONS
1. Issue(s) of propriety and/or equity submitted by applicant or counsel.
As stated on applicant’s DD Form 293.
2. Exhibit(s) submitted:
A-1: DD Form 293, dated 030530.
A-2: Counsel Issues: NONE
B-l: Other Documents: NONE
PART IV - PREHEARING REVIEW (CONTINUED)
SECTION C - Medical and/or Legal Advisory Opinion
Referred to ( ) Medical Advisor ( ) Legal Advisor
a. Medical prehearing comments (if applicable):
b. Legal prehearing comments (if applicable):
PART V - SUMMARY OF HEARING
SECTION A-Attendees and exhibits
1. Review/hearing information:
a. Type requested:
( X ) Records review ( ) Hearing
b. Type Held:
( X )Records review ( ) Hearing
( ) Tender Offer
c. Review/hearing location and date: Washington, D.C. on 11 February
2004.
d. Appearance by:
Applicant ( ) Yes ( X ) No
Counsel ( ) Yes ( X ) No
e. Applicant testified: ( ) Yes ( X ) No
f. Counsel presentation: ( ) Yes ( X ) No
g. Witness(es) testified: ( ) Yes ( X ) No
2. Exhibit(s) submitted at hearing:
PART VI - ISSUES AND FINDINGS
1. a. Applicant's issue(s) of propriety and/or equity:
( X ) Same as those listed on DD Form 293 and Part IV, Section A
of this case report and directive.
( ) Revised issue(s) furnished in writing by applicant as
follows:
( ) Additional issue(s) identified during review/hearing as
follows:
b. Request: ( ) Recharacterization ( X ) Change of Reason
2. Finding(s), conclusion(s), and reason(s) for the Board's decision(s) on
issues of propriety and/or equity:
a. Propriety: The applicant has not submitted an issue of
propriety and the ADRB has not otherwise relied upon an
issue of propriety to change the discharge.
b. Equity: The parenthetical number(s) below correspond(s) to
the issue number(s) on the DD Form 293, or in Part VI,
Paragraph 1, above.
(1) The issue is rejected. The Board carefully examined the
applicant’s record of service during the period of enlistment under review.
The evidence of record shows that the applicant was honorably discharged
under the provisions of Chapter 16, Paragraph 8, AR 635-200, by reason of
reduction in forces under the 1995 Department of the Army Qualitative
Management Program. The applicant was properly notified as to the reasons
of the DA imposed bar and was given the opportunity to appeal the bar prior
to his separation. The applicant’s appeal was denied, and the applicant
was involuntarily separated under the above-directed program. The
applicant requests that his separation program designator (SPD) be changed
to reflect that he was voluntarily discharged. However, the record clearly
shows that the applicant was involuntarily separated under the Army
Qualitative Management Program and, in accordance with his type of
discharge he was assigned the appropriate SPD code. Further, the applicant
was appropriately assigned an RE code of 4, which indicates that the
applicant was separated from his last period of service with a
disqualification which cannot be waived and he is ineligible for
reenlistment. The Board was satisfied that all requirements of law and
regulation were met and the rights of the applicant were fully protected
throughout the separation process. The Board being convinced that the
reason for discharge and the characterization of service were both proper
and equitable, voted to deny relief.
3. Response(s) to item(s) not addressed as decisional issue(s): NONE
PART VII - BOARD ACTION
SECTION A - Conclusions/Decisions/Vote
1. Board conclusion(s):
The discharge was:
( X ) Proper.
( ) Improper as to characterization. Change characterization to
.
( ) Improper as to reason. Change reason to
under .
( X ) Equitable.
( ) Inequitable as to characterization. Change characterization to
.
( ) Inequitable as to reason. Change reason to
under .
( ) Both proper and equitable, but characterization/reason for
separation cited was an administrative/clerical error and should
be changed to under
.
2. Voting record: Change No Change
Reason 0 5
Characterization 0 5
The names and votes of the members of the Board are recorded in
Part IX of this document and can be obtained by writing to the address
below. The request must contain the CASE NO. located in the upper right
corner of this document.
Department of the Army Review Boards Agency
ATTN: Promulgation Team
1941 Jefferson Davis Highway, 2nd Floor
Arlington, VA 22202-4508
3. Minority views: NONE
PART VII - BOARD ACTION
SECTION B - Verification and Authentication
Case report reviewed and verified
Ms. McKim-Spilker
Case Reviewing Official
PART VIII - DIRECTIVE/CERTIFICATION
SECTION A - DIRECTIVE
NONE
SECTION B - CERTIFICATION
Approval Authority:
SPURGEON A. MOORE
Colonel, U.S. Army
President, Army Discharge
Review Board
Official:
MARY E. SHAW
Lieutenant Colonel, U.S. Army
Chief, Secretary Recorder
EXHIBITS:
A - Application for review of discharge C - Other
B - Material submitted by applicant
INDEX RECORD:
AR Number: 2003091445 INDEX NUMBERS: A9455
Date of Review: 040211 A9217
Character of Service: HD A0113
Date of Discharge: 960731
Authority: AR 635-200 C16
Reason: A0500
Results of Board Action/
Vote/Affirmation: NC 5-0 A
PART IX - VOTING RECORD
Name Reason Characterization
CHANGE NC HON UHC NC
UNCHAR
1. Mbr X X
2. Mbr X X
3. Mbr X X
4. Mbr X X
5. PO X X
ARMY | DRB | CY2004 | AR20040000858
His DD Form 214 indicates that he was discharged under the provisions of Chapter 16-8, AR 635-200 by reason of reduction in authorized strength-qualitative early transition program, with a characterization of service of honorable. Applicant's issue(s) of propriety and/or equity: ( X ) Same as those listed on DD Form 293 and Part IV, Section A of this case report and directive. Minority views: NONE PART VII - BOARD ACTION SECTION B - Verification and Authentication Case report reviewed and...
ARMY | DRB | CY2000 | 2000039557
When discharged under this provision, Army policy states that the characterization of service will normally be under other than honorable conditions. The Board, being convinced that the reason for discharge and the characterization of service were both proper and equitable, voted to deny relief.3. AR Number: 2000039557 INDEX NUMBERS: A9217 Date of Review: 000515 A0100 Character of Service: GD A9201 Date of Discharge: 960731 A9203 Authority: AR 135-178 C7 Reason: A6750 Results of Board...
ARMY | DRB | CY2001 | 2001051861
of Crime Control and Public Safety, Office of the Adjutant General, State of North Carolina, Orders 178-6; revoked Orders 164-213; dated 19 July 1996 and directed that a new NGB Form 55a (Report of Separation and Record of Service) be issued under the provisions of Chapter 8-27f, NGR 600-200, Narrative reason (Not Within Reasonable Commuting Distance), RE-Code 1 with a characterization of service of honorable. From the evidence submitted by the applicant in support of her request, it...
ARMY | DRB | CY2003 | AR2003094277
Remarks: NONE SECTION B - Prior Service Data Other discharge(s): Service From To Type Discharge ARNGUS 881230 900627 Honorable RA 900628 991020 Honorable ARNGUS 991021 000713 Honorable USAR 000714 010130 Honorable USAR 010131 010710 Honorable PART IV - PREHEARING REVIEW SECTION A-ANALYST’S ASSESSMENT l. Facts and Circumstances: a. On 5 May 2003, the applicant was discharged. SECTION B - CERTIFICATION Approval Authority: SPURGEON A. MOORE Colonel, U.S. Army President, Army Discharge Review...
ARMY | DRB | CY2000 | 2000035806
The applicant consulted with legal counsel, was advised of the impact of the discharge action, and voluntarily waived consideration of his case by an administrative separation board contingent upon him receiving a characterization of service no less favorable than a general, under honorable conditions discharge and submitted a statement in his behalf. PART VII - BOARD ACTIONSECTION B - Verification and Authentication Case report reviewed and verified Ms. McKim-Spilker Case Reviewing...
ARMY | DRB | CY2003 | 2003090220
Her DD Form 214 indicates that she was discharged under the provisions of Chapter 10, AR 635-200 by reason of for the good of the service-in lieu of trial by court-martial, with a characterization of service of under other than honorable conditions. It also noted that the characterization of service for this type of discharge is normally under other than honorable conditions and that the applicant would have been aware of that prior to requesting discharge. PART VII - BOARD ACTIONSECTION B...
ARMY | DRB | CY2003 | 2003087592
After a thorough review of the applicant’s record and any issues submitted, the Board found no cause for clemency and therefore voted to deny relief.3. PART VII - BOARD ACTIONSECTION B - Verification and Authentication Case report reviewed and verified Ms. McKim-Spilker Case Reviewing Official PART VIII - DIRECTIVE/CERTIFICATIONSECTION A - DIRECTIVE NONE SECTION B - CERTIFICATION Approval Authority:SPURGEON A. MOORE Colonel, U.S. Army President, Army Discharge Review Board EXHIBITS: A -...
ARMY | DRB | CY2003 | AR2003093203
Remarks: NONE SECTION B - Prior Service Data NONE Other discharge(s): Service From To Type Discharge RA 880412 911218 Honorable RA 911219 980519 Honorable PART IV - PREHEARING REVIEW SECTION A-ANALYST’S ASSESSMENT l. Facts and Circumstances: a. The Board carefully examined the applicant’s record of service during the period of enlistment under review. SECTION B - CERTIFICATION Approval Authority: SPURGEON A. MOORE Colonel, U.S. Army President, Army Discharge Review Board Official: MARY E....
ARMY | DRB | CY2003 | AR2003094408
On 16 May 2003, the applicant was discharged. Change characterization to Honorable. SECTION B - CERTIFICATION Approval Authority: ROBERT L. HOUSE Colonel, U.S. Army President, Army Discharge Review Board Official: MARY E. SHAW Lieutenant Colonel, U.S. Army Chief, Secretary Recorder EXHIBITS: A - Application for review of discharge C - Other B - Material submitted by applicant INDEX RECORD: AR Number: 2003094408 INDEX NUMBERS: A9406 Date of Review: 040428 A9218 Character of Service: GD...
ARMY | DRB | CY1999 | 1999025854
Applicant's issue(s) of propriety and/or equity: ( X ) Same as those listed on DD Form 293 and Part IV, Section A of this case report and directive. Changing reentry (RE) codes is not within the purview of the Army Discharge Review Board. AR Number: 1999025854 INDEX NUMBERS: A9217 Date of Review: 990602 A9211 Character of Service: HD A9219 Date of Discharge: 920430 A9445 Authority: AR 635-200 C16 A0100 Reason: A2400 Results of Board Action/ Vote/Affirmation: NC 5-0 A Name Reason...