Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | DRB | CY1997 | 199701393
Original file (199701393.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied
                                    CASE NO: AD97-01393
PART II - APPLICATION DATA
(Note: Part I deleted under the Privacy Act on Reading Room copy)

1. Type of discharge (or characterization of service): GD

2. Date of discharge (or REFRAD): 910618

3. Authority for separation:

         a. Regulation: Chapter 14, AR 635-200

         b. Reason: Misconduct-Patterns of Misconduct
4. Prior review(s): ( X ) NONE
PART III - SERVICE HISTORY
SECTION A - Period of Service Under Review

 1.       Service data: 2. Awards and decorations:
 Type
a. Period entered for: 4 Years NDSM
b. Entry date: 880615 AFEM
c. Age: 18 Years DOB: 690922 ASR
d. Educational level: HS Grad
e. Aptitude area scores:
         GT: 89                   3. Highest grade achieved:
f. Actual creditable service: 3 Years Grade
0 Months 4 Days E4

4. Performance evaluations:
( X ) NONE































OSA FORM 172 (REVISED) 1 MAY 94 PAGE 1

                                              CASE NO: AD97-01393

PART III - SERVICE HISTORY
SECTION A - Period of Service Under Review - Continued

 5. Periods of unauthorized absence: ( X ) NONE

 6. Nonjudicial punishment:
                  
         Date               Offense(s)
          900201            Maliciously communicate certain information concerning an                                            attempt being made or to be made to unlawfully destroy Fort                                 Sherman by means of an explosion, to wit: telling unit 40 that                              a bomb was on a HMMWV that would try to get through the Fort                                Sherman Gate, which was false information and which you then                                knew to be false (900127); wrongfully and willfully impersonate                                     a noncommissioned officer of the United States Army by                                       telephonically communicating with the Fort Sherman Gate and                                 claiming to be a SFC (900127). (summarized)
         910306            FTG (910115); disrespect in deportment toward a SGT (2                                       specifications) (910214); assault a SGT (910214); were derelict                                     in the performance of those duties in that you negligently                                           failed to prepare for guardmont (910207).


7. Court-Martial data: ( X ) NONE

         a. SCM:           ( X ) NONE
         Date              Offense(s)

        
         b. SPCM:                  ( X ) NONE
                  Date               Offense(s)


         c.       GCM:              ( X ) NONE
                  Date               Offense(s)


8.       Remarks: ( X ) NONE



SECTION B - Other Service Data
( X ) NONE





















OSA FORM 172 (REVISED) 1 MAY 94 PAGE 2

          CASE NO: AD97-01393
PART IV - PREHEARING REVIEW
SECTION A - Analyst's Assessment

1. Summary of facts and circumstances concerning discharge:
         910416:  Physical examination cleared applicant for separation.
          910418:  Mental status evaluation and physical examination cleared                                   applicant for separation.
          910524:  Unit commander notified the applicant of initiation of                              separation action under the provisions of Chapter 14, AR                                    635-200, for misconduct-pattern of misconduct. He was advised of                  his rights.
         910524:  Applicant acknowledged notification, consulted legal counsel, and                 submitted a statement in his own behalf.
         910528:  Unit commander recommended separation with a general discharge.
         910530:  Separation authority approved separation with a general discharge.
         910618:  Applicant was discharged.
2. Issue(s) of propriety and/or equity on DD Form 293 or incorporated by reference:
         See Attached DD Form 293

 3. Exhibit(s) submitted:

          A-1: DD Form 293, dated 970325.
         


PART IV - PREHEARING REVIEW
SECTION B - Medical and/or Legal Advisory Opinion
( X ) NONE
PART V - SUMMARY OF REVIEW HEARING

1. Review/Hearing information:

         a. Applicant testified: ( ) Yes ( X ) No

         b. Witness(es) testified: ( ) Yes ( X ) No
        

2. Exhibit(s) submitted at hearing: ( X ) NONE















OSA FORM 172 (REVISED) 1 MAY 94 PAGE 3

                                     CASE NO: AD97-01393
PART VI - ISSUES AND FINDINGS

1. a. Applicant's issue(s) of propriety and/or equity:
          ( X )   Same as those listed on DD Form 293 and Part IV, Section A, Paragraph 2.
         ( )     Revised issue(s) furnished in writing by applicant as follows:
         ( )     Additional issue(s) identified during review/hearing as follows:
        

b. Request: ( X ) Recharacterization ( ) Change of Reason


2. Finding(s), conclusion(s), and reason(s) for the Board's decision(s) on issues of propriety and/or equity:

          a. Propriety:    The applicant has not submitted an issue of propriety and the ADRB has not otherwise relied upon an issue of propriety to change the discharge.
         b. Equity:       The parenthetical number(s) below correspond(s) to the                     issue number(s) on the DD Form 293, or in Part VI,                                  Paragraph 1 above.

(1),(2) The issues are rejected. The applicant's discharge was appropriate because the quality of service determination at the time of discharge was inconsistent with the Army's standards for acceptable personal conduct and performance of duty by military personnel. By misconduct and poor duty performance the applicant diminished the quality of service below that meriting a fully honorable discharge. The applicant provided no independent corroborating evidence demonstrating that either the command's action was erroneous or the applicant’s service mitigated the misconduct or poor duty performance. The Board, being convinced that the reason for discharge and the characterization of service were both proper and equitable, voted to deny relief.

         3. Response to item(s) not addressed as decisional issue(s): ( X ) NA

























OSA FORM 172 (REVISED) 1 MAY 94 PAGE 4

                            CASE NO: AD97-01393
PART VII - BOARD ACTION
SECTION A - Conclusions/Decisions/Vote

1.       Board conclusion(s):

         The discharge was:

          ( X )    Proper.
         ( )      Improper as to characterization. Change characterization to                                      .
         ( )      Improper as to reason. Change reason to                         under                       .
         ( X )    Equitable.
         ( )      Inequitable as to characterization. Change characterization to                                .
         ( )      Inequitable as to reason. Change reason to                        
                  under                                  .
         ( )      Both proper and equitable, but characterization/reason for separation cited was an administrative/clerical error and should be changed to                      under                          .

2. Voting record: Change No Change
         Reason 0 5
Characterization 0 5

         The names and votes of the members of the Board are recorded in Part IX of this document and can be obtained by writing to the address below. The request must contain the CASE NO. located in the upper right corner of this document.

Department of the Army Review Boards Agency
ATTN: CPCD
1941 Jefferson Davis Highway, 2nd Floor
Arlington, VA 22202-4508

3. Minority views: ( X ) NA



























OSA FORM 172 (REVISED) 1 MAY 94 PAGE 5

                                     CASE NO: AD97-01393
PART VII - BOARD ACTION
SECTION B - Verification and Authentication

Case report reviewed and verified       


                                 
LTC WYRICK
Post Hearing Reviewer   


PART VIII - DIRECTIVE/CERTIFICATION
SECTION A - DIRECTIVE
(X) NONE
SECTION B - CERTIFICATION


Approval Authority:

EL CARTIO BARNES
Colonel, U.S. Army
President, Army Discharge
Review Board

Official:




SHERRY HILL SARGENT
Major, U.S. Army
Chief, Secretary Recorder

EXHIBITS:
A - Application for review of discharge  C - Other
B - Material submitted by applicant     

INDEX RECORD:

AD9701393 970605 GD 910618 AR635-200 C14 A6750 NC 5-0A
1 10 11 12 18 20 26 41 46 49 52

A9200 A0100 A9447
53 58 63















OSA FORM 172 (REVISED) 1 MAY 94 PAGE 6

                            CASE NO: AD97-01393
PART IX - VOTING RECORD

 Name  Reason Characterization
 CHANGE NC HON UHC NC UNCHAR

1. LTC WYRICK, JIMMY Mbr      X          X    

2. LTC PHILLIPS, JOHN Mbr      X          X    

3. LTC SMITH, LILLIAN Mbr      X          X    

4. COL ALLEN, THOMAS Mbr      X          X    

5. COL MATHEWS, WILLIAM PO      X          X    
































OSA FORM 172 (REVISED) 1 MAY 94 PAGE 7

Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | DRB | CY1997 | 199700588

    Original file (199700588.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Type of discharge (or characterization of service): GD2. OSA FORM 172 (REVISED) 1 MAY 94 PAGE 5 CASE NO: AD97-00588 PART VII - BOARD ACTIONSECTION B - Verification and Authentication Case report reviewed and verified MAJ WYRICK Post Hearing Reviewer PART VIII - DIRECTIVE/CERTIFICATIONSECTION A - DIRECTIVE (X) NONE SECTION B - CERTIFICATION EL CARTIO BARNES Colonel, U.S. Army President, Army Discharge Review Board CASE NO: AD97-00588 PART IX - VOTING RECORD Name Reason Characterization...

  • ARMY | DRB | CY1997 | 199701608

    Original file (199701608.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    CASE NO: AD97-01608 PART III - SERVICE HISTORYSECTION A - Period of Service Under Review - Continued 5. The Board, being convinced that the reason for discharge and the characterization of service were both proper and equitable, voted to deny relief.3. CASE NO: AD97-01608 PART IX - VOTING RECORD Name Reason Characterization CHANGENCHONUHCNCUNCHAR 1.

  • ARMY | DRB | CY1997 | 199700237

    Original file (199700237.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    CASE NO: AD97-00237 PART III - SERVICE HISTORYSECTION A - Period of Service Under Review - Continued 5. The Board, being convinced that the reason for discharge and the characterization of service were both proper and equitable, voted to deny relief. OSA FORM 172 (REVISED) 1 MAY 94 PAGE 5 CASE NO: AD97-00237 PART VII - BOARD ACTIONSECTION B - Verification and Authentication Case report reviewed and verified LTC SMITH Post Hearing Reviewer PART VIII - DIRECTIVE/CERTIFICATIONSECTION A -...

  • ARMY | DRB | CY1997 | 199701404

    Original file (199701404.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The Board examined the applicant's record of service during the period of enlistment under review. The Board, being convinced that the reason for discharge and the characterization of service were both proper and equitable, voted to deny relief.3. Voting record: ChangeNo Change Reason 0 5 Characterization 0 5 The names and votes of the members of the Board are recorded in Part IX of this document and can be obtained by writing to the address below.

  • ARMY | DRB | CY1997 | 199701649

    Original file (199701649.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Type of discharge (or characterization of service): GD2. 830303: Unit commander recommended applicant be separated from the Service. The Board, being convinced that the reason for discharge and the characterization of service were both proper and equitable, voted to deny relief.

  • ARMY | DRB | CY1997 | 199700258

    Original file (199700258.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Type of discharge (or characterization of service): HD2. CASE NO: AD97-00258 PART III - SERVICE HISTORYSECTION A - Period of Service Under Review - Continued 5. CASE NO: AD97-00258 PART IX - VOTING RECORD Name & Rank Reason Characterization CHANGENCHONUHCNCUNCHAR 1.

  • ARMY | DRB | CY1997 | 199700593

    Original file (199700593.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    Remarks: ( X ) NONE SECTION B - Other Service Data ( X ) NONEOSA FORM 172 (REVISED) 1 MAY 94 PAGE 2 Therefore, the Board voted to change the characterization of service to honorable. OSA FORM 172 (REVISED) 1 MAY 94 PAGE 6 CASE NO: AD97-00593 PART IX - VOTING RECORD Name Reason Characterization CHANGENCHONUHCNCUNCHAR 1.

  • ARMY | DRB | CY1997 | 199701644

    Original file (199701644.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    Type of discharge (or characterization of service): GD 2. PART VII - BOARD ACTIONSECTION B - Verification and Authentication Case report reviewed and verified COL MATHEWS Post Hearing Reviewer EXHIBITS: A - Application for review of discharge C - Other B - Material submitted by applicant

  • ARMY | DRB | CY1997 | 199700761

    Original file (199700761.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Finally, the Board considered the applicant's entire record of service for the period under review; it also noted that the characterization of service for this type of discharge is normally Under Other Than Honorable Conditions and that the applicant was aware of this prior to requesting discharge. The Board, being convinced that the reason for discharge and the characterization of service were both proper and equitable, voted to deny relief.3. CASE NO: AD97-00761 PART IX - VOTING RECORD...

  • ARMY | DRB | CY1997 | 199700764

    Original file (199700764.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Type of discharge (or characterization of service): GD 2. 910417: Applicant was discharged. PART VII - BOARD ACTIONSECTION B - Verification and Authentication Case report reviewed and verified COL MATHEWS Post Hearing Reviewer